Databases · head to head
Memcached vs NocoDB

NocoDB
Spreadsheets
Open-source no-code database platform with REST and GraphQL APIs
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Memcached no persistence at all: restart a node and its cache is gone, which every design must assume; NocoDB the free cloud tier is capped at 3 editor seats, 1,000 records and 1 GB of storage
- They diverge on capability: Memcached covers In-memory key-value cache, NocoDB covers REST API.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 1 September 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Memcached and NocoDB actually diverge.
Identical on both: starting price (Free), free tier (Yes), user rating (Not yet rated).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Memcached
- In-memory key-value cache
- Multithreaded
- Client-side sharding
- Predictable memory use
Only in NocoDB
- REST API
- GraphQL API
- No-code database
- Multiple SQL databases
- Webhooks
- Automation
- Cloud support
- Self-hosted support
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Memcached
- Caching expensive database query results to cut loadnot NocoDB
- Session storage where losing sessions on restart is acceptablenot NocoDB
- Fronting an API whose responses are costly and change slowlynot NocoDB
NocoDB
- Self-hosting an open source alternative to a spreadsheet databasenot Memcached
- Putting a spreadsheet interface over an existing Postgres or MySQL databasenot Memcached
- Building internal tools on structured data with an APInot Memcached
- Team bases with per-field and per-table permissions on the paid tiersnot Memcached
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Memcached
- No persistence at all: restart a node and its cache is gone, which every design must assume
- No replication or failover, so losing a node loses that share of the cache
- Only simple key-value, with none of the lists, sorted sets or streams Redis offers
- Values are capped at 1MB by default, which surprises teams caching large documents
NocoDB
- The free cloud tier is capped at 3 editor seats, 1,000 records and 1 GB of storage
- Records are the metering unit on cloud, so Plus covers 50K and Business 300K rather than scaling by seat alone
- Row-level security, audit log retention and team hierarchy require the Scale tier
- SCIM provisioning and air-gapped deployment are Enterprise only
- The self-hosted Community edition is unlimited on records and seats but does without workflows, scripts and dashboards, which start at the paid self-hosted tiers
Pricing, plan by plan
Memcached
Free- MemcachedFree
- Full functionality
- Self-hosted
- No usage limits
NocoDB
Free- Free (Cloud)Free
- 3 editor seats
- 10 commenter seats
- 1 GB storage
- Plus$12/month
- Unlimited seats
- 50,000 records
- 20 GB storage
- Business$24/month
- Unlimited seats
- 300,000 records
- 100 GB storage
- Scale$45/month
- Minimum 3 seats required
- 1,000,000 records
- 150 GB storage
Which should you pick?
Choose Memcached if
- You need in-memory key-value cache.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Linux, macOS, Windows, Docker, Self-hosted.
- You also want multithreaded.
Choose NocoDB if
- You need rest api.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Cloud, Self-hosted, Docker.
- You also want graphql api.
Questions people ask
- Is Memcached or NocoDB better?
- Neither clearly leads. Memcached starts at Free and NocoDB at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Memcached or NocoDB?
- Memcached starts at Free and NocoDB at Free.
- Does Memcached or NocoDB run on more platforms?
- Memcached runs on Linux, macOS, Windows, Docker, Self-hosted. NocoDB runs on Cloud, Self-hosted, Docker.
- Can I use Memcached for free?
- Both have a free tier, so you can try either at no cost before committing.
- What is Memcached best used for?
- Memcached is most often used for caching expensive database query results to cut load, session storage where losing sessions on restart is acceptable, fronting an api whose responses are costly and change slowly. Of those, caching expensive database query results to cut load and session storage where losing sessions on restart is acceptable are not what NocoDB is typically brought in for.
- What can Memcached do that NocoDB cannot?
- Memcached covers In-memory key-value cache, Multithreaded, Client-side sharding, Predictable memory use. NocoDB covers REST API, GraphQL API, No-code database, Multiple SQL databases.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Memcached: Is Memcached free?
Yes, open source with no licence fee.
NocoDB: Is NocoDB free?
Yes, NocoDB offers a free cloud plan with 3 editor seats, 1,000 records, 1 GB storage, and 1,000 API calls per month. A free self-hosted Community edition with unlimited records and seats is also available.
SourceMemcached: Memcached or Redis?
Memcached is a pure cache: simpler, multithreaded and very predictable. Redis adds persistence, replication and rich data structures, which is why it is the default choice unless you specifically want a cache and nothing more.
NocoDB: How much does NocoDB Plus cost?
NocoDB Plus costs $12 per seat per month (billed annually) or $15 per seat per month (monthly). For unlimited seats, it costs $108/month annually or $180/month monthly. Plus includes 50,000 records, 20 GB storage, and 100,000 API calls per month.
SourceMemcached: Does Memcached persist data?
No. Everything is in memory and lost on restart, by design.
NocoDB: What is the difference between NocoDB Plus and Business plans?
Plus ($12/seat annual) includes 50,000 records and 100,000 API calls per month. Business ($24/seat annual) includes 300,000 records, 1,000,000 API calls per month, external database connections, SAML SSO, and table/field permissions.
SourceNocoDB: Can I self-host NocoDB for free?
Yes, NocoDB's Community edition is free for self-hosting. It includes unlimited records, storage, and seats, with all core features including webhooks and 6 view types.
SourceRelated pages
Other head to heads
- Memcached vs Dragonfly
- Memcached vs Valkey
- Memcached vs Readyset
- Memcached vs PostgreSQL
- Memcached vs DuckDB
- Memcached vs DynamoDB
- Memcached vs NATS
- Memcached vs Apache Pulsar
- Memcached vs Presto
- Memcached vs Timeplus
- Memcached vs RabbitMQ
- Memcached vs EMQX
- Memcached vs FaunaDB
- Memcached vs Firebase Realtime Database
- Memcached vs MotherDuck
- Memcached vs Neo4j
- Memcached vs Apache Kafka
- Memcached vs Firestore
- Memcached vs APITable
- Memcached vs Teable
- Memcached vs Looker
- Memcached vs SeaTable
- Memcached vs Tableau
- Memcached vs Metabase
- Memcached vs Redash
- Memcached vs Mathesar
- Memcached vs Baserow
- Memcached vs Budibase
- Memcached vs Fibery
- Memcached vs Apache Superset
- Memcached vs Coefficient
- Memcached vs Cube Software
- Memcached vs Quadratic
- Memcached vs Rowy
- NocoDB vs Dragonfly
- NocoDB vs Valkey
- NocoDB vs Readyset
- NocoDB vs PostgreSQL
- NocoDB vs DuckDB
- NocoDB vs DynamoDB
- NocoDB vs NATS
- NocoDB vs Apache Pulsar
- NocoDB vs Presto
- NocoDB vs Timeplus
- NocoDB vs RabbitMQ
- NocoDB vs EMQX
- NocoDB vs FaunaDB
- NocoDB vs Firebase Realtime Database
- NocoDB vs MotherDuck
- NocoDB vs Neo4j
- NocoDB vs Apache Kafka
- NocoDB vs Firestore
- NocoDB vs APITable
- NocoDB vs Teable
- NocoDB vs Looker
- NocoDB vs SeaTable
- NocoDB vs Tableau
- NocoDB vs Metabase
- NocoDB vs Redash
- NocoDB vs Mathesar
- NocoDB vs Baserow
- NocoDB vs Budibase
- NocoDB vs Fibery
- NocoDB vs Apache Superset
- NocoDB vs Coefficient
- NocoDB vs Cube Software
- NocoDB vs Quadratic
- NocoDB vs Rowy
