Manufacturing · head to head
Materialise Magics vs PrusaSlicer

Materialise Magics
Manufacturing
Industrial build preparation and data repair for metal and polymer additive manufacturing
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Only PrusaSlicer has a free tier, so it costs nothing to try first.
- Each has a real cost: Materialise Magics new seats and modules have been subscription only since 15 May 2024, so the perpetual purchase route is closed and existing perpetual holders are on a shrinking island.; PrusaSlicer limited to slicing workflow only; no interactive 3D design capabilities
- They diverge on capability: Materialise Magics covers Mesh repair, PrusaSlicer covers Automatic supports.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 31 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Materialise Magics and PrusaSlicer actually diverge.
| Attribute | Materialise Magics | PrusaSlicer |
|---|---|---|
| Starting price | On request | Free |
| Pricing model | quote | free |
| Free tier | No | Yes |
| Platforms | Windows | Windows, macOS, Linux |
| Category | Manufacturing | CAD |
| Founded | Unknown | 2012 |
Identical on both: user rating (Not yet rated).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Materialise Magics
- Mesh repair
- Part orientation and nesting
- Support generation
- Build Processors
- Simulation module
- Structures module
- Reporting and traceability
Only in PrusaSlicer
- Automatic supports
- Multi-material
- Variable layer height
- Custom G-code
- Paint-on supports
- Ironing
- Prusa printers
- Most FDM printers
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Materialise Magics
- A service bureau running several brands of metal printer that wants one preparation environment instead of five vendor slicersnot PrusaSlicer
- Repairing badly formed STL or scan-derived meshes that a machine slicer will not acceptnot PrusaSlicer
- Automating support generation on metal parts where manual support editing is the bottleneck in the processnot PrusaSlicer
- Simulating and compensating for build distortion before committing an expensive metal buildnot PrusaSlicer
PrusaSlicer
- Preparation of STL models for 3D printingnot Materialise Magics
- Multi-material printing preparationnot Materialise Magics
- G-code generation and customisation via macrosnot Materialise Magics
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Materialise Magics
- New seats and modules have been subscription only since 15 May 2024, so the perpetual purchase route is closed and existing perpetual holders are on a shrinking island.
- Build Processors are licensed separately per machine family, so adding a new printer brand adds a licence line as well as capital cost, and a mixed fleet multiplies the software bill.
- The modules that deliver the biggest labour saving, notably e-Stage automated support generation, are paid extras, so the base seat alone leaves you doing manual support work.
- Materialise publishes no prices anywhere, and quotes vary by region and reseller, so two similar bureaus can pay materially different amounts for the same configuration.
- It is Windows only and remains a desktop application, which sits awkwardly with the cloud direction of Materialise CO-AM and means preparation capacity is tied to specific workstations and licence seats.
PrusaSlicer
- Limited to slicing workflow only; no interactive 3D design capabilities
- Designed for RepRap-based printers; compatibility with other printer architectures varies
Pricing, plan by plan
Materialise Magics
On request- Magics Essentials$undefined/year
- Mesh repair and editing
- Part orientation and platform placement
- Basic support generation
- Magics with modules$undefined/year
- Everything in Essentials
- e-Stage automated supports, Simulation, Structures priced individually
- Build Processors licensed per machine family
PrusaSlicer
FreeNo published plan breakdown. See the PrusaSlicer review.
Which should you pick?
Choose Materialise Magics if
- You need mesh repair.
- You work on Windows.
- You also want part orientation and nesting.
Choose PrusaSlicer if
- You need automatic supports.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Windows, macOS, Linux.
- You also want multi-material.
Questions people ask
- Is Materialise Magics or PrusaSlicer better?
- Neither clearly leads. Materialise Magics starts at On request and PrusaSlicer at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Materialise Magics or PrusaSlicer?
- PrusaSlicer has a free tier; the other does not. Paid plans start at On request for Materialise Magics and Free for PrusaSlicer.
- Does Materialise Magics or PrusaSlicer run on more platforms?
- Materialise Magics runs on Windows. PrusaSlicer runs on Windows, macOS, Linux.
- Can I use PrusaSlicer for free?
- Yes. PrusaSlicer has a free tier, so you can try it without paying. Materialise Magics starts at On request.
- What is Materialise Magics best used for?
- Materialise Magics is most often used for a service bureau running several brands of metal printer that wants one preparation environment instead of five vendor slicers, repairing badly formed stl or scan-derived meshes that a machine slicer will not accept, automating support generation on metal parts where manual support editing is the bottleneck in the process, simulating and compensating for build distortion before committing an expensive metal build. Of those, a service bureau running several brands of metal printer that wants one preparation environment instead of five vendor slicers and repairing badly formed stl or scan-derived meshes that a machine slicer will not accept are not what PrusaSlicer is typically brought in for.
- What can Materialise Magics do that PrusaSlicer cannot?
- Materialise Magics covers Mesh repair, Part orientation and nesting, Support generation, Build Processors. PrusaSlicer covers Automatic supports, Multi-material, Variable layer height, Custom G-code.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Materialise Magics: Can I still buy a perpetual Magics licence?
No. Since 15 May 2024 Materialise sells new seats and new modules on subscription only. Existing perpetual licences continue to work but new capacity is subscription.
PrusaSlicer: How much does PrusaSlicer cost?
PrusaSlicer is completely free and open-source software developed by Prusa Research.
SourceMaterialise Magics: Do I need a separate Build Processor for each printer?
You need one per machine family, licensed separately from the Magics seat. Budget for it before you buy the printer.
Materialise Magics: Is Magics the same as CO-AM?
No. Magics is desktop build preparation. CO-AM is the Materialise cloud platform for AM workflow and production management, which absorbed the former Link3D product.
Materialise Magics: Does Magics slice?
It prepares and supports the build and hands off through a Build Processor, which produces the machine-ready file. The machine-specific processing lives in the Build Processor.
Related pages
More on Materialise Magics
More on PrusaSlicer
Other head to heads
- Materialise Magics vs Autodesk Netfabb
- Materialise Magics vs Oqton
- Materialise Magics vs GrabCAD Print
- Materialise Magics vs Formlabs PreForm
- Materialise Magics vs Simplify3D
- Materialise Magics vs Markforged Eiger
- Materialise Magics vs SolidWorks
- Materialise Magics vs AVEVA System Platform
- Materialise Magics vs 3YOURMIND
- Materialise Magics vs Aras Innovator
- Materialise Magics vs Authentise
- Materialise Magics vs Dyndrite
- Materialise Magics vs QAD Redzone
- Materialise Magics vs Seeq
- Materialise Magics vs Sensemore
- Materialise Magics vs Siemens WinCC Unified
- Materialise Magics vs TrendMiner
- Materialise Magics vs Ultimaker Cura
- Materialise Magics vs Bambu Studio
- Materialise Magics vs FreeCAD
- Materialise Magics vs Enscape
- Materialise Magics vs V-Ray
- Materialise Magics vs KeyShot
- Materialise Magics vs OpenSCAD
- Materialise Magics vs SolveSpace
- Materialise Magics vs KiCad
- Materialise Magics vs Siemens NX
- Materialise Magics vs Arnold
- Materialise Magics vs BricsCAD
- Materialise Magics vs Mari
- Materialise Magics vs IronCAD
- Materialise Magics vs Redshift
- Materialise Magics vs MicroSurvey CAD
- Materialise Magics vs Modo
- PrusaSlicer vs Autodesk Netfabb
- PrusaSlicer vs Oqton
- PrusaSlicer vs GrabCAD Print
- PrusaSlicer vs Formlabs PreForm
- PrusaSlicer vs Simplify3D
- PrusaSlicer vs Markforged Eiger
- PrusaSlicer vs SolidWorks
- PrusaSlicer vs AVEVA System Platform
- PrusaSlicer vs 3YOURMIND
- PrusaSlicer vs Aras Innovator
- PrusaSlicer vs Authentise
- PrusaSlicer vs Dyndrite
- PrusaSlicer vs QAD Redzone
- PrusaSlicer vs Seeq
- PrusaSlicer vs Sensemore
- PrusaSlicer vs Siemens WinCC Unified
- PrusaSlicer vs TrendMiner
- PrusaSlicer vs Ultimaker Cura
- PrusaSlicer vs Bambu Studio
- PrusaSlicer vs FreeCAD
- PrusaSlicer vs Enscape
- PrusaSlicer vs V-Ray
- PrusaSlicer vs KeyShot
- PrusaSlicer vs OpenSCAD
- PrusaSlicer vs SolveSpace
- PrusaSlicer vs KiCad
- PrusaSlicer vs Siemens NX
- PrusaSlicer vs Arnold
- PrusaSlicer vs BricsCAD
- PrusaSlicer vs Mari
- PrusaSlicer vs IronCAD
- PrusaSlicer vs Redshift
- PrusaSlicer vs MicroSurvey CAD
- PrusaSlicer vs Modo

