Manufacturing · head to head
Materialise Magics vs OpenSCAD

Materialise Magics
Manufacturing
Industrial build preparation and data repair for metal and polymer additive manufacturing
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Only OpenSCAD has a free tier, so it costs nothing to try first.
- Each has a real cost: Materialise Magics new seats and modules have been subscription only since 15 May 2024, so the perpetual purchase route is closed and existing perpetual holders are on a shrinking island.; OpenSCAD script-based workflow, not interactive design interface
- They diverge on capability: Materialise Magics covers Mesh repair, OpenSCAD covers Script-based modeling.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 31 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Materialise Magics and OpenSCAD actually diverge.
| Attribute | Materialise Magics | OpenSCAD |
|---|---|---|
| Starting price | On request | Free |
| Pricing model | quote | free |
| Free tier | No | Yes |
| Platforms | Windows | Windows, macOS, Linux, WebAssembly |
| Category | Manufacturing | CAD |
| Founded | Unknown | 2009 |
Identical on both: user rating (Not yet rated).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Materialise Magics
- Mesh repair
- Part orientation and nesting
- Support generation
- Build Processors
- Simulation module
- Structures module
- Reporting and traceability
Only in OpenSCAD
- Script-based modeling
- CSG operations
- 2D to 3D extrusion
- Parameterization
- STL export
- Preview
- 3D printers
- Slicers
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Materialise Magics
- A service bureau running several brands of metal printer that wants one preparation environment instead of five vendor slicersnot OpenSCAD
- Repairing badly formed STL or scan-derived meshes that a machine slicer will not acceptnot OpenSCAD
- Automating support generation on metal parts where manual support editing is the bottleneck in the processnot OpenSCAD
- Simulating and compensating for build distortion before committing an expensive metal buildnot OpenSCAD
OpenSCAD
- Parametric 3D design for manufacturing and 3D printingnot Materialise Magics
- Technical design with scripted control over geometrynot Materialise Magics
- Procedural model generationnot Materialise Magics
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Materialise Magics
- New seats and modules have been subscription only since 15 May 2024, so the perpetual purchase route is closed and existing perpetual holders are on a shrinking island.
- Build Processors are licensed separately per machine family, so adding a new printer brand adds a licence line as well as capital cost, and a mixed fleet multiplies the software bill.
- The modules that deliver the biggest labour saving, notably e-Stage automated support generation, are paid extras, so the base seat alone leaves you doing manual support work.
- Materialise publishes no prices anywhere, and quotes vary by region and reseller, so two similar bureaus can pay materially different amounts for the same configuration.
- It is Windows only and remains a desktop application, which sits awkwardly with the cloud direction of Materialise CO-AM and means preparation capacity is tied to specific workstations and licence seats.
OpenSCAD
- Script-based workflow, not interactive design interface
- Limited to constructive solid geometry and 2D extrusion modelling
- Not suitable for artistic 3D modelling or computer animation
- Complex build dependencies (Qt, CGAL, Boost)
Pricing, plan by plan
Materialise Magics
On request- Magics Essentials$undefined/year
- Mesh repair and editing
- Part orientation and platform placement
- Basic support generation
- Magics with modules$undefined/year
- Everything in Essentials
- e-Stage automated supports, Simulation, Structures priced individually
- Build Processors licensed per machine family
OpenSCAD
FreeNo published plan breakdown. See the OpenSCAD review.
Which should you pick?
Choose Materialise Magics if
- You need mesh repair.
- You work on Windows.
- You also want part orientation and nesting.
Choose OpenSCAD if
- You need script-based modeling.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Windows, macOS, Linux, WebAssembly.
- You also want csg operations.
Questions people ask
- Is Materialise Magics or OpenSCAD better?
- Neither clearly leads. Materialise Magics starts at On request and OpenSCAD at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Materialise Magics or OpenSCAD?
- OpenSCAD has a free tier; the other does not. Paid plans start at On request for Materialise Magics and Free for OpenSCAD.
- Does Materialise Magics or OpenSCAD run on more platforms?
- Materialise Magics runs on Windows. OpenSCAD runs on Windows, macOS, Linux, WebAssembly.
- Can I use OpenSCAD for free?
- Yes. OpenSCAD has a free tier, so you can try it without paying. Materialise Magics starts at On request.
- What is Materialise Magics best used for?
- Materialise Magics is most often used for a service bureau running several brands of metal printer that wants one preparation environment instead of five vendor slicers, repairing badly formed stl or scan-derived meshes that a machine slicer will not accept, automating support generation on metal parts where manual support editing is the bottleneck in the process, simulating and compensating for build distortion before committing an expensive metal build. Of those, a service bureau running several brands of metal printer that wants one preparation environment instead of five vendor slicers and repairing badly formed stl or scan-derived meshes that a machine slicer will not accept are not what OpenSCAD is typically brought in for.
- What can Materialise Magics do that OpenSCAD cannot?
- Materialise Magics covers Mesh repair, Part orientation and nesting, Support generation, Build Processors. OpenSCAD covers Script-based modeling, CSG operations, 2D to 3D extrusion, Parameterization.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Materialise Magics: Can I still buy a perpetual Magics licence?
No. Since 15 May 2024 Materialise sells new seats and new modules on subscription only. Existing perpetual licences continue to work but new capacity is subscription.
OpenSCAD: What is the cost of OpenSCAD?
OpenSCAD is free software with no licensing fees, subscriptions, or costs of any kind. The software is available as open-source with no restrictions on commercial or non-commercial use.
SourceMaterialise Magics: Do I need a separate Build Processor for each printer?
You need one per machine family, licensed separately from the Magics seat. Budget for it before you buy the printer.
Materialise Magics: Is Magics the same as CO-AM?
No. Magics is desktop build preparation. CO-AM is the Materialise cloud platform for AM workflow and production management, which absorbed the former Link3D product.
Materialise Magics: Does Magics slice?
It prepares and supports the build and hands off through a Build Processor, which produces the machine-ready file. The machine-specific processing lives in the Build Processor.
Related pages
More on Materialise Magics
Other head to heads
- Materialise Magics vs Autodesk Netfabb
- Materialise Magics vs Oqton
- Materialise Magics vs GrabCAD Print
- Materialise Magics vs Formlabs PreForm
- Materialise Magics vs Simplify3D
- Materialise Magics vs Markforged Eiger
- Materialise Magics vs SolidWorks
- Materialise Magics vs AVEVA System Platform
- Materialise Magics vs 3YOURMIND
- Materialise Magics vs Aras Innovator
- Materialise Magics vs Authentise
- Materialise Magics vs Dyndrite
- Materialise Magics vs QAD Redzone
- Materialise Magics vs Seeq
- Materialise Magics vs Sensemore
- Materialise Magics vs Siemens WinCC Unified
- Materialise Magics vs TrendMiner
- Materialise Magics vs FreeCAD
- Materialise Magics vs Ultimaker Cura
- Materialise Magics vs Enscape
- Materialise Magics vs V-Ray
- Materialise Magics vs KeyShot
- Materialise Magics vs PrusaSlicer
- Materialise Magics vs Bambu Studio
- Materialise Magics vs SolveSpace
- Materialise Magics vs CloudCompare
- Materialise Magics vs KiCad
- Materialise Magics vs Zoo
- Materialise Magics vs Mudbox
- Materialise Magics vs Octane Render
- Materialise Magics vs RealityScan
- Materialise Magics vs Solid Edge
- Materialise Magics vs Substance 3D Designer
- Materialise Magics vs Tinkercad
- OpenSCAD vs Autodesk Netfabb
- OpenSCAD vs Oqton
- OpenSCAD vs GrabCAD Print
- OpenSCAD vs Formlabs PreForm
- OpenSCAD vs Simplify3D
- OpenSCAD vs Markforged Eiger
- OpenSCAD vs SolidWorks
- OpenSCAD vs AVEVA System Platform
- OpenSCAD vs 3YOURMIND
- OpenSCAD vs Aras Innovator
- OpenSCAD vs Authentise
- OpenSCAD vs Dyndrite
- OpenSCAD vs QAD Redzone
- OpenSCAD vs Seeq
- OpenSCAD vs Sensemore
- OpenSCAD vs Siemens WinCC Unified
- OpenSCAD vs TrendMiner
- OpenSCAD vs FreeCAD
- OpenSCAD vs Ultimaker Cura
- OpenSCAD vs Enscape
- OpenSCAD vs V-Ray
- OpenSCAD vs KeyShot
- OpenSCAD vs PrusaSlicer
- OpenSCAD vs Bambu Studio
- OpenSCAD vs SolveSpace
- OpenSCAD vs CloudCompare
- OpenSCAD vs KiCad
- OpenSCAD vs Zoo
- OpenSCAD vs Mudbox
- OpenSCAD vs Octane Render
- OpenSCAD vs RealityScan
- OpenSCAD vs Solid Edge
- OpenSCAD vs Substance 3D Designer
- OpenSCAD vs Tinkercad

