Softwr

Technology · head to head

Lovable vs Noloco

Lovable logo

Lovable

Technology

Build software by prompting

From
Free
Rated
-
Noloco logo

Noloco

No-Code

Client portals and internal tools built over data you already have

From
On request
Rated
-

The short version

  • Only Lovable has a free tier, so it costs nothing to try first.
  • Each has a real cost: Lovable credit-metered rather than unlimited: Free plan gets 5 build credits/day capped at 30/month, plus 20 cloud-hosting credits/month and 4 AI-feature credits/month; Noloco pricing follows user counts, and a client portal is by definition many low-activity users, so an agency with a few hundred client logins climbs the bands quickly for people who sign in twice a month.
  • They diverge on capability: Lovable covers Natural language programming, Noloco covers Row-level permissions.
  • Prices and features above were last checked on 30 August 2026.

Where they differ

Only the attributes on which Lovable and Noloco actually diverge.

Attributes where Lovable and Noloco differ
AttributeLovableNoloco
Starting priceFreeOn request
Pricing modelUnknownquote
Free tierYesNo
CategoryTechnologyNo-Code
Founded2023Unknown

Identical on both: platforms (Web), user rating (Not yet rated).

What each one covers

Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.

Only in Lovable

  • Natural language programming
  • Full application generation
  • Real-time development
  • AI pair programming
  • Multi-technology support
  • Automated testing
  • Deployment assistance
  • Code optimization

Only in Noloco

  • Row-level permissions
  • Multiple data sources
  • Client portals
  • Workflows
  • Forms and record detail pages
  • White labelling

What people use each for

The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.

Lovable

  • SaaS and business apps: subscription products, customer dashboards, admin panelsnot Noloco
  • Consumer community and content platformsnot Noloco
  • Marketplaces: booking tools and storefrontsnot Noloco
  • Internal tools: workflow tools and operational dashboardsnot Noloco
  • Marketing landing pages and campaign sitesnot Noloco

Noloco

  • Giving clients a branded portal onto their own records in an Airtable basenot Lovable
  • Replacing shared spreadsheets with a permissioned internal tool for an operations teamnot Lovable
  • A lightweight CRM over a PostgreSQL database that already existsnot Lovable
  • Partner or contractor dashboards where each party must see only its own jobs and documentsnot Lovable

Where each one falls short

Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.

Lovable

  • Credit-metered rather than unlimited: Free plan gets 5 build credits/day capped at 30/month, plus 20 cloud-hosting credits/month and 4 AI-feature credits/month
  • Credits expire: monthly plan credits expire after 2 months unused, annual-plan credits expire 1 month after the annual period ends, and all credits are non-refundable
  • Not open source; only the legacy precursor CLI gpt-engineer is open source (MIT), and that repo was archived read-only on 2026-04-22
  • Hosting is free only for smaller apps; significant traffic or size draws additional charges from the credit balance

Noloco

  • Pricing follows user counts, and a client portal is by definition many low-activity users, so an agency with a few hundred client logins climbs the bands quickly for people who sign in twice a month.
  • Limits are inherited from the data source. Airtable record ceilings, API rate limits and slow queries appear in the portal your customers use, and no setting inside Noloco can fix them.
  • Design control is deliberately narrow. You get a consistent application shell rather than a bespoke interface, which is fine for operations and a problem for anything marketing-led.
  • It is a small vendor competing directly with Airtable Interfaces and Softr, both far larger, so roadmap pace and long-term viability are legitimate procurement questions.
  • Output is responsive web only, with no native mobile application and no offline mode, so field staff on poor connections are not served by it.

Pricing, plan by plan

Lovable

Free

No published plan breakdown. See the Lovable review.

Noloco

On request
  • Noloco$undefined/year
    • Tiered plans differentiated by user counts, data sources and white labelling
    • Trial period rather than a permanent free plan
    • Higher tiers add custom domains, advanced permissions and priority support

Which should you pick?

Choose Lovable if

  • You need natural language programming.
  • You want to start without paying.
  • You also want full application generation.

Choose Noloco if

  • You need row-level permissions.
  • You also want multiple data sources.

Questions people ask

Is Lovable or Noloco better?
Neither clearly leads. Lovable starts at Free and Noloco at On request, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
Which is cheaper, Lovable or Noloco?
Lovable has a free tier; the other does not. Paid plans start at Free for Lovable and On request for Noloco.
Does Lovable or Noloco run on more platforms?
Both run on Web, so platform support will not decide this one for you.
Can I use Lovable for free?
Yes. Lovable has a free tier, so you can try it without paying. Noloco starts at On request.
What is Lovable best used for?
Lovable is most often used for saas and business apps: subscription products, customer dashboards, admin panels, consumer community and content platforms, marketplaces: booking tools and storefronts, internal tools: workflow tools and operational dashboards. Of those, saas and business apps: subscription products, customer dashboards, admin panels and consumer community and content platforms are not what Noloco is typically brought in for.
What can Lovable do that Noloco cannot?
Lovable covers Natural language programming, Full application generation, Real-time development, AI pair programming. Noloco covers Row-level permissions, Multiple data sources, Client portals, Workflows.

Answered from the vendors’ own pages

Lovable: What is included in Lovable's free plan?

The free plan includes 5 build credits per day (up to 30 per month), 20 Cloud credits per month, and 4 AI feature credits for trying features in apps. All plan members can access unlimited workspace members.

Source
Noloco: Do I need Airtable to use it?

No. Airtable is the most common source but PostgreSQL, MySQL, Google Sheets, HubSpot and built-in Noloco tables all work.

Lovable: How do credits work in Lovable's paid plans?

Lovable uses a credit-based model where costs depend on monthly credit allocation rather than per-seat pricing. Build tasks consume variable credits ranging from 0.50 to 1.70 credits depending on complexity, or 1 credit per message in Plan Mode.

Source
Noloco: Can external clients log in without paying for seats?

Client and internal users are counted differently, but they are still counted, so a portal with many client logins moves you up the plan bands. Check the current band definitions before committing to a per-client model.

Lovable: Do credits expire in Lovable?

Yes, credit expiration depends on the plan: monthly plan credits expire 2 months after issuance, annual plan credits expire 1 month after the annual period ends, and top-up credits expire 12 months from purchase. Daily grants expire daily with no rollover.

Source
Noloco: How is this different from Softr?

Both build portals over existing data. Noloco leans harder on permissions and multiple database sources; Softr leans on templates, speed to a first version and a bigger ecosystem.

Lovable: Are there additional costs for app hosting on Lovable?

Most small and new apps run free under included grants, but larger apps with significant traffic incur charges against the credit balance.

Source
Lovable: Does Lovable offer educational discounts?

Yes, a student discount is available with a valid university email.

Source
Share

Related pages

Other head to heads