Logging · head to head
Grafana Loki vs Logstash
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Grafana Loki grafana Cloud Logs Pro plan includes only 30-day retention; retention beyond 30 days requires Enterprise plan with minimum $25,000 annual commitment; Logstash logstash's source is dual licensed: code outside the x-pack directory is Apache License 2.0, but code inside x-pack (which carries several of Logstash's monitoring and management features) is licensed under the Elastic License, not a fully open source license
- They diverge on capability: Grafana Loki covers Log aggregation, Logstash covers Data ingestion.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 30 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Grafana Loki and Logstash actually diverge.
| Attribute | Grafana Loki | Logstash |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | freemium | open-source |
| Platforms | Self-hosted (open source), Managed (Grafana Cloud Logs), Enterprise (self-managed with support) | Web, Api |
| Founded | 2014 | 2011 |
Identical on both: starting price (Free), free tier (Yes), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Logging).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Grafana Loki
- Log aggregation
- Label-based indexing
- LogQL language
- Cost-effective
Only in Logstash
- Data ingestion
- Event parsing
- Data transformation
- Multiple input sources
Both cover
- API
- Webhooks
- REST
- Web support
- Api support
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Grafana Loki
- Cost-sensitive organisations deploying Kubernetes and Prometheus ecosystemsnot Logstash
- Teams needing index-free log aggregation for high-volume environmentsnot Logstash
Logstash
- Log monitoringnot Grafana Loki
- Application performancenot Grafana Loki
- Security analyticsnot Grafana Loki
- Troubleshootingnot Grafana Loki
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Grafana Loki
- Grafana Cloud Logs Pro plan includes only 30-day retention; retention beyond 30 days requires Enterprise plan with minimum $25,000 annual commitment
- Open-source version requires self-hosting all infrastructure including storage and scaling
Logstash
- Logstash's source is dual licensed: code outside the x-pack directory is Apache License 2.0, but code inside x-pack (which carries several of Logstash's monitoring and management features) is licensed under the Elastic License, not a fully open source license
Pricing, plan by plan
Grafana Loki
FreeNo published plan breakdown. See the Grafana Loki review.
Logstash
Free- FreeFree
- Data ingestion
- Event parsing
- Data transformation
Which should you pick?
Choose Grafana Loki if
- You need log aggregation.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Self-hosted (open source), Managed (Grafana Cloud Logs), Enterprise (self-managed with support).
- You also want label-based indexing.
Choose Logstash if
- You need data ingestion.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Web, Api.
- You also want event parsing.
Questions people ask
- Is Grafana Loki or Logstash better?
- Neither clearly leads. Grafana Loki starts at Free and Logstash at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Grafana Loki or Logstash?
- Grafana Loki starts at Free and Logstash at Free.
- Does Grafana Loki or Logstash run on more platforms?
- Grafana Loki runs on Self-hosted (open source), Managed (Grafana Cloud Logs), Enterprise (self-managed with support). Logstash runs on Web, Api.
- Can I use Grafana Loki for free?
- Both have a free tier, so you can try either at no cost before committing.
- What is Grafana Loki best used for?
- Grafana Loki is most often used for cost-sensitive organisations deploying kubernetes and prometheus ecosystems, teams needing index-free log aggregation for high-volume environments. Of those, cost-sensitive organisations deploying kubernetes and prometheus ecosystems and teams needing index-free log aggregation for high-volume environments are not what Logstash is typically brought in for.
- What can Grafana Loki do that Logstash cannot?
- Grafana Loki covers Log aggregation, Label-based indexing, LogQL language, Cost-effective. Logstash covers Data ingestion, Event parsing, Data transformation, Multiple input sources. Both handle API, Webhooks, REST, Web support.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Grafana Loki: Is there a free tier for Grafana Cloud?
Yes, Grafana Cloud has a Free Forever plan at no cost with no registration required. The free tier is suitable for personal projects and early-stage startups.
SourceLogstash: How much does Logstash cost?
Logstash is free and open-source. The data processing pipeline is available to download at no charge and can be deployed without licensing costs or commercial restrictions.
SourceGrafana Loki: How long is data retained in Grafana's free plan?
The free tier retains metrics, logs, traces, and profiles for 14 days.
SourceGrafana Loki: What is the minimum cost for Grafana Enterprise?
Grafana Enterprise has a minimum annual commitment of 25,000 dollars.
SourceGrafana Loki: Do I need a credit card to use Grafana's free tier?
No, Grafana Cloud's Free Forever plan requires no credit card to get started.
SourceGrafana Loki: How is Grafana Cloud billed?
Grafana Cloud Pro starts at 19 dollars per month with usage-based charges on top. Billing is monthly based on your consumption. Grafana offers automatic volume discounts based on your spending.
SourceRelated pages
More on Grafana Loki
Other head to heads
- Grafana Loki vs Elastic Stack
- Grafana Loki vs New Relic
- Grafana Loki vs Datadog Logs
- Grafana Loki vs Coralogix
- Grafana Loki vs Axiom
- Grafana Loki vs Logz.io
- Grafana Loki vs InfluxDB
- Grafana Loki vs Better Stack
- Grafana Loki vs Graylog
- Grafana Loki vs Papertrail
- Grafana Loki vs Raygun
- Grafana Loki vs Retrace
- Grafana Loki vs Rollbar
- Grafana Loki vs Sematext
- Grafana Loki vs Elastic APM
- Grafana Loki vs New Relic Logs
- Grafana Loki vs ELK Stack
- Grafana Loki vs Filebeat
- Grafana Loki vs Fluentd
- Grafana Loki vs Traceloop
- Grafana Loki vs incident.io
- Grafana Loki vs Cronitor
- Grafana Loki vs FireHydrant
- Grafana Loki vs CloudWatch
- Grafana Loki vs Dynatrace
- Grafana Loki vs Airbrake
- Grafana Loki vs AppDynamics
- Grafana Loki vs Azure Monitor
- Grafana Loki vs Telegraf
- Logstash vs Elastic Stack
- Logstash vs New Relic
- Logstash vs Datadog Logs
- Logstash vs Coralogix
- Logstash vs Axiom
- Logstash vs Logz.io
- Logstash vs InfluxDB
- Logstash vs Better Stack
- Logstash vs Graylog
- Logstash vs Papertrail
- Logstash vs Raygun
- Logstash vs Retrace
- Logstash vs Rollbar
- Logstash vs Sematext
- Logstash vs Elastic APM
- Logstash vs New Relic Logs
- Logstash vs ELK Stack
- Logstash vs Filebeat
- Logstash vs Fluentd
- Logstash vs Traceloop
- Logstash vs incident.io
- Logstash vs Cronitor
- Logstash vs FireHydrant
- Logstash vs CloudWatch
- Logstash vs Dynatrace
- Logstash vs Airbrake
- Logstash vs AppDynamics
- Logstash vs Azure Monitor
- Logstash vs Telegraf


