Software · head to head
Datadog Logs vs Logstash

Datadog Logs
Software
Log Management and Analytics
- From
- $0.1/per GB ingested per month
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Only Logstash has a free tier, so it costs nothing to try first.
- Each has a real cost: Datadog Logs complex, multi-tiered pricing model based on ingestion, indexing, and storage; can become expensive at scale; Logstash logstash's source is dual licensed: code outside the x-pack directory is Apache License 2.0, but code inside x-pack (which carries several of Logstash's monitoring and management features) is licensed under the Elastic License, not a fully open source license
- They diverge on capability: Datadog Logs covers Log ingestion, Logstash covers Data ingestion.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Datadog Logs and Logstash actually diverge.
| Attribute | Datadog Logs | Logstash |
|---|---|---|
| Starting price | $0.1/per GB ingested per month | Free |
| Pricing model | usage-based | open-source |
| Free tier | No | Yes |
| Platforms | Cloud (AWS, Azure, Google Cloud, Oracle Cloud) | Web, Api |
| Founded | 2010 | 2011 |
Identical on both: user rating (Not yet rated), category (Unknown).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Datadog Logs
- Log ingestion
- Full-text search
- Custom dashboards
- Log-based metrics
Only in Logstash
- Data ingestion
- Event parsing
- Data transformation
- Multiple input sources
Both cover
- API
- Webhooks
- REST
- Web support
- Api support
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Datadog Logs
- Centralised log aggregation and analysisnot Logstash
- Multi-source log correlation with metrics and tracesnot Logstash
- Root cause analysis and troubleshootingnot Logstash
- Security monitoring and threat detectionnot Logstash
Logstash
- Log monitoringnot Datadog Logs
- Application performancenot Datadog Logs
- Security analyticsnot Datadog Logs
- Troubleshootingnot Datadog Logs
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Datadog Logs
- Complex, multi-tiered pricing model based on ingestion, indexing, and storage; can become expensive at scale
- Ingestion pricing of $0.10/GB can accumulate rapidly for high-volume logging environments
Logstash
- Logstash's source is dual licensed: code outside the x-pack directory is Apache License 2.0, but code inside x-pack (which carries several of Logstash's monitoring and management features) is licensed under the Elastic License, not a fully open source license
Pricing, plan by plan
Datadog Logs
$0.1/per GB ingested per monthNo published plan breakdown. See the Datadog Logs review.
Logstash
Free- FreeFree
- Data ingestion
- Event parsing
- Data transformation
Which should you pick?
Choose Datadog Logs if
- You need log ingestion.
- You work on Cloud (AWS, Azure, Google Cloud, Oracle Cloud).
- You also want full-text search.
Choose Logstash if
- You need data ingestion.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Web, Api.
- You also want event parsing.
Questions people ask
- Is Datadog Logs or Logstash better?
- Neither clearly leads. Datadog Logs starts at $0.1/per GB ingested per month and Logstash at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Datadog Logs or Logstash?
- Logstash has a free tier; the other does not. Paid plans start at $0.1/per GB ingested per month for Datadog Logs and Free for Logstash.
- Does Datadog Logs or Logstash run on more platforms?
- Datadog Logs runs on Cloud (AWS, Azure, Google Cloud, Oracle Cloud). Logstash runs on Web, Api.
- Can I use Logstash for free?
- Yes. Logstash has a free tier, so you can try it without paying. Datadog Logs starts at $0.1/per GB ingested per month.
- What is Datadog Logs best used for?
- Datadog Logs is most often used for centralised log aggregation and analysis, multi-source log correlation with metrics and traces, root cause analysis and troubleshooting, security monitoring and threat detection. Of those, centralised log aggregation and analysis and multi-source log correlation with metrics and traces are not what Logstash is typically brought in for.
- What can Datadog Logs do that Logstash cannot?
- Datadog Logs covers Log ingestion, Full-text search, Custom dashboards, Log-based metrics. Logstash covers Data ingestion, Event parsing, Data transformation, Multiple input sources. Both handle API, Webhooks, REST, Web support.
Related pages
More on Datadog Logs
Keep looking
Other head to heads
- Datadog Logs vs Elastic Stack
- Datadog Logs vs New Relic
- Datadog Logs vs Coralogix
- Datadog Logs vs Grafana Loki
- Datadog Logs vs CloudWatch
- Datadog Logs vs Dynatrace
- Datadog Logs vs InfluxDB
- Datadog Logs vs Airbrake
- Datadog Logs vs AppDynamics
- Datadog Logs vs Axiom
- Datadog Logs vs Azure Monitor
- Datadog Logs vs Better Stack
- Datadog Logs vs Bugsnag
- Datadog Logs vs Dynatrace Logs
- Datadog Logs vs Elastic
- Datadog Logs vs Elastic APM
- Datadog Logs vs Elasticsearch Service
- Datadog Logs vs ELK Stack
- Logstash vs Elastic Stack
- Logstash vs New Relic
- Logstash vs Coralogix
- Logstash vs Grafana Loki
- Logstash vs CloudWatch
- Logstash vs Dynatrace
- Logstash vs InfluxDB
- Logstash vs Airbrake
- Logstash vs AppDynamics
- Logstash vs Axiom
- Logstash vs Azure Monitor
- Logstash vs Better Stack
- Logstash vs Bugsnag
- Logstash vs Dynatrace Logs
- Logstash vs Elastic
- Logstash vs Elastic APM
- Logstash vs Elasticsearch Service
- Logstash vs ELK Stack

