Softwr

Project Management · head to head

LiquidPlanner vs Refact

LiquidPlanner logo

LiquidPlanner

Project Management

Predictive project management

From
On request
Free plan
No
Visit LiquidPlannerFull review
Refact logo

Refact

Developer Tools

Autonomous AI coding agent for development tasks

From
Free
Free plan
Yes
Visit RefactFull review

The short version

  • LiquidPlanner is a predictive project management solution; Refact is an autonomous AI coding agent.
  • Refact has a free plan, then $10/mo; LiquidPlanner starts at $15/mo.
  • Only LiquidPlanner lists predictive scheduling; only Refact lists autonomous agent workflows.
  • Where LiquidPlanner falls short: rebranded to Tempo Portfolio Manager; the pricing page shows no published figures, only an early access sign-up.
  • Where Refact falls short: requires configuration for optimal performance.
  • Prices and features on this page were last checked on 13 November 2026.

Where they differ

Only the attributes on which LiquidPlanner and Refact actually diverge.

Attributes where LiquidPlanner and Refact differ
AttributeLiquidPlannerRefact
Starting priceOn requestFree
Pricing modelSubscriptionFreemium with paid tiers
Free tierNoYes
PlatformsWebVS Code, Web
CategoryProject ManagementDeveloper Tools
Founded20062023

What each one covers

Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.

Only in LiquidPlanner

  • Predictive scheduling
  • Resource management
  • Time tracking
  • Analytics
  • Workload management
  • Jira
  • Salesforce
  • Slack

Only in Refact

  • Autonomous agent workflows
  • IDE chat
  • Real-time code completions
  • GitHub integration
  • Database integration
  • On-premise deployment
  • Multi-LLM support
  • 25+ language support

What people use each for

The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.

LiquidPlanner

  • Productivitynot Refact
  • Collaborationnot Refact
  • Task managementnot Refact
  • Organizationnot Refact

Refact

  • Autonomous code generation for development tasksnot LiquidPlanner
  • End-to-end bug fixes and refactoringnot LiquidPlanner
  • Multi-language software development accelerationnot LiquidPlanner
  • Enterprise development with data privacy requirementsnot LiquidPlanner

Where each one falls short

Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.

LiquidPlanner

  • Rebranded to Tempo Portfolio Manager; the pricing page shows no published figures, only an early access sign-up

Refact

  • Requires configuration for optimal performance
  • On-premise deployment adds operational complexity
  • Free tier limited by daily agent request quota
  • Coin system adds complexity to cost calculation

Pricing, plan by plan

LiquidPlanner

On request
  • Essentials$15/mo
    • Project management
    • Basic scheduling
  • Professional$25/mo
    • Predictive scheduling
    • Resource management
    • Analytics

Refact

Free
  • FreeFree
    • Limited daily agent usage
    • Unlimited completions
    • 2,000 coins for agent and chat
  • Pro$10/mo
    • 40 daily agent requests
    • 64k context window
    • 10,000 coins monthly
  • EnterpriseOn request
    • On-premise deployment
    • Custom coin allocation
    • Fine-tuning support

Which should you pick?

Choose LiquidPlanner if

  • You need predictive scheduling.
  • You also want resource management.
LiquidPlanner review

Choose Refact if

  • You need autonomous agent workflows.
  • You want to start without paying.
  • You work on VS Code, Web.
  • You also want ide chat.
Refact review

Questions people ask

Is LiquidPlanner or Refact better?
Neither clearly leads. LiquidPlanner starts at On request and Refact at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
Which is cheaper, LiquidPlanner or Refact?
Refact has a free tier; the other does not. Paid plans start at On request for LiquidPlanner and Free for Refact.
Does LiquidPlanner or Refact run on more platforms?
LiquidPlanner runs on Web. Refact runs on VS Code, Web.
Can I use Refact for free?
Yes. Refact has a free tier, so you can try it without paying. LiquidPlanner starts at On request.
What is LiquidPlanner best used for?
LiquidPlanner is most often used for productivity, collaboration, task management, organization. Of those, productivity and collaboration are not what Refact is typically brought in for.
What can LiquidPlanner do that Refact cannot?
LiquidPlanner covers Predictive scheduling, Resource management, Time tracking, Analytics. Refact covers Autonomous agent workflows, IDE chat, Real-time code completions, GitHub integration.

Answered from the vendors’ own pages

LiquidPlanner: How is Tempo timesheets pricing calculated for my organization?

Pricing is per-user per month and scales based on organization size. For 1-10 users: $1.00/user; 11-100 users: $5.21/user; 101-250 users: $3.66/user; scaling down to $0.25-$0.39/user for organizations with 5,000+ users.

Source
Refact: How many programming languages does Refact support?

Refact supports 25+ programming languages including Python, JavaScript, Go, Rust, Java, C++, and many others.

Source
LiquidPlanner: What license matching requirement exists for Tempo?

Your Tempo license size must match your Jira license size, with a user defined as anyone who can log into Jira.

Source
Refact: Can I deploy Refact on-premises?

Yes. Refact offers on-premise deployment options for organizations requiring complete data control and privacy.

Source
LiquidPlanner: Is there a free trial for Tempo timesheets?

Yes, Tempo offers a free trial available through the Atlassian Marketplace.

Source
Refact: What LLMs does Refact support?

Refact works with multiple LLMs including Claude, GPT-4, and open-source models, giving you flexibility in model selection.

Source
LiquidPlanner: What deployment options are available for Tempo?

Both Cloud and Data Center deployment options are offered, with annual billing available.

Source
Share

Related pages

More on LiquidPlanner

More on Refact

Keep looking

Other head to heads