Softwr

Software · head to head

Lark vs Pipefy

Lark logo

Lark

Software

The super app for team collaboration

From
Free
Rated
-
Full reviewWebsite
Pipefy logo

Pipefy

Software

Workflow and process management, simplified

From
On request
Rated
-
Full reviewWebsite

The short version

  • Only Lark has a free tier, so it costs nothing to try first.
  • Each has a real cost: Lark lark's own pricing page description states it offers a free starter pack, a Pro plan, and an Enterprise plan, and directs buyers to Contact us rather than publishing Pro/Enterprise figures on the rendered page.; Pipefy free Starter tier caps at 5 processes even with up to 10 users

Where they differ

Only the attributes on which Lark and Pipefy actually diverge.

Attributes where Lark and Pipefy differ
AttributeLarkPipefy
Starting priceFreeOn request
Pricing modelsubscriptionquote
Free tierYesNo
PlatformsWeb, Windows, Macos, Linux, Ios, AndroidWeb
Founded2019Unknown

Identical on both: user rating (Not yet rated), category (Unknown).

What each one covers

Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.

Only in Lark

  • Team messaging
  • Video conferencing
  • Collaborative docs
  • Cloud storage
  • Calendar
  • Jira
  • GitHub
  • Salesforce

Only in Pipefy

Nothing recorded that Lark does not also cover.

What people use each for

The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.

Lark

  • Team communicationnot Pipefy
  • Document collaborationnot Pipefy
  • Project managementnot Pipefy
  • Company intranetnot Pipefy

Pipefy

No use cases recorded yet. See the Pipefy review.

Where each one falls short

Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.

Lark

  • Lark's own pricing page description states it offers a free starter pack, a Pro plan, and an Enterprise plan, and directs buyers to Contact us rather than publishing Pro/Enterprise figures on the rendered page.

Pipefy

  • Free Starter tier caps at 5 processes even with up to 10 users
  • Business and Enterprise tiers publish no per-user price on the pricing page; both require contacting sales for a custom quote
  • Cancellations do not receive refunds even though the plan can be changed or stopped at any time

Pricing, plan by plan

Lark

Free
  • StarterFree
    • Up to 50 users
    • 100GB storage
    • Unlimited messaging
  • Pro$12/month
    • Unlimited users
    • 1TB storage per user
    • 24-hour meetings
  • Enterprise$20/month
    • SSO/SAML
    • eDiscovery
    • Custom retention

Pipefy

On request

No published plan breakdown. See the Pipefy review.

Which should you pick?

Choose Lark if

  • You need team messaging.
  • You want to start without paying.
  • You work on Web, Windows, Macos, Linux, Ios, Android.
  • You also want video conferencing.
Lark review

Choose Pipefy if

Nothing in the data separates Pipefy from Lark on the points above - pick on price and on how each one feels to use.

Pipefy review

Questions people ask

Is Lark or Pipefy better?
Neither clearly leads. Lark starts at Free and Pipefy at On request, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
Which is cheaper, Lark or Pipefy?
Lark has a free tier; the other does not. Paid plans start at Free for Lark and On request for Pipefy.
Does Lark or Pipefy run on more platforms?
Lark runs on Web, Windows, Macos, Linux, Ios, Android. Pipefy runs on Web.
Can I use Lark for free?
Yes. Lark has a free tier, so you can try it without paying. Pipefy starts at On request.
What is Lark best used for?
Lark is most often used for team communication, document collaboration, project management, company intranet. Of those, team communication and document collaboration are not what Pipefy is typically brought in for.
What can Lark do that Pipefy cannot?
Lark covers Team messaging, Video conferencing, Collaborative docs, Cloud storage.
ShareXLinkedInRedditWhatsAppEmail

Related pages

More on Lark

More on Pipefy

Keep looking

Other head to heads