Research · head to head
LabArchives vs Paperpile

LabArchives
Research
Electronic lab notebook with witnessing, version history and long-term institutional retention
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Only LabArchives has a free tier, so it costs nothing to try first.
- Each has a real cost: LabArchives the corporate rate is roughly 75 per cent above the academic rate for the same product, so a university spinout crossing into commercial status faces a step change in cost at exactly the point its budget is tightest.; Paperpile no monthly billing option; annual billing only
- Prices and features above were last checked on 31 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which LabArchives and Paperpile actually diverge.
| Attribute | LabArchives | Paperpile |
|---|---|---|
| Starting price | Free | $4.15/month |
| Pricing model | Per user per year | subscription |
| Free tier | Yes | No |
| Platforms | Web, iOS, Android | Web |
Identical on both: user rating (Not yet rated), category (Research).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in LabArchives
- Versioned entries
- Witnessing and signing
- Inventory
- Scheduler
- Education edition
- Single sign-on
- Structured data entry
- DOI and repository publishing
Only in Paperpile
Nothing recorded that LabArchives does not also cover.
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
LabArchives
- A university group that must keep research records after a PhD student leaves, rather than losing them with a laptopnot Paperpile
- A core facility that needs instrument booking and a shared record of who ran what and whennot Paperpile
- A small biotech building patent-defensible evidence of invention with witnessed, timestamped entriesnot Paperpile
- A teaching department running undergraduate laboratory courses where instructors need to see and grade notebook worknot Paperpile
Paperpile
- Organizing research papers and managing academic citationsnot LabArchives
- Creating citations in multiple styles and BibTeX for writingnot LabArchives
- Collaborating on research through shared reference librariesnot LabArchives
- Integrating citations into Google Docs and Microsoft Wordnot LabArchives
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
LabArchives
- The corporate rate is roughly 75 per cent above the academic rate for the same product, so a university spinout crossing into commercial status faces a step change in cost at exactly the point its budget is tightest.
- Inventory and Scheduler are separate per-user line items, so a lab that assumed one price per person for a working system ends up paying two or three.
- It is now a Dotmatics product inside a large scientific software portfolio, which puts roadmap priority with enterprise pharmaceutical buyers rather than with the academic labs that made it popular.
- The interface is functional rather than pleasant, and adoption typically fails not on features but on researchers quietly continuing to keep notes elsewhere; you need a mandate, not a rollout email.
- Instrument integration is thin compared with dedicated laboratory information management systems, so automated capture from analytical equipment usually still means manual upload or custom scripting.
Paperpile
- No monthly billing option; annual billing only
- Regular plan lacks full-text PDF search and annotations
- Safari and Firefox browser extensions currently in beta
- Chrome signup initially required
Pricing, plan by plan
LabArchives
Free- FreeFree
- Limited storage
- Core notebook and versioning
- Intended for evaluation and individual use
- Professional (Academic)$330/year
- Full ELN with witnessing and signing
- Academic rate per user per year
- Corporate rate is $575 per user per year
- ELN plus Inventory bundle$360/year
- Notebook plus sample and reagent inventory
- Academic rate; corporate rate is $675 per user per year
- Inventory standalone$99/year
- Sample tracking without the notebook
- Academic rate; corporate rate is $199 per user per year
Paperpile
$4.15/month- Regular$4.15/month
- Basic reference management
- PDF storage and citation generation
- Integrations with Word, Google Docs, and academic databases
- Expert$5.75/month
- All Regular features
- Full-text PDF search
- Notes and annotations
Which should you pick?
Choose LabArchives if
- You need versioned entries.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Web, iOS, Android.
- You also want witnessing and signing.
Choose Paperpile if
Nothing in the data separates Paperpile from LabArchives on the points above - pick on price and on how each one feels to use.
Questions people ask
- Is LabArchives or Paperpile better?
- Neither clearly leads. LabArchives starts at Free and Paperpile at $4.15/month, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, LabArchives or Paperpile?
- LabArchives has a free tier; the other does not. Paid plans start at Free for LabArchives and $4.15/month for Paperpile.
- Does LabArchives or Paperpile run on more platforms?
- LabArchives runs on Web, iOS, Android. Paperpile runs on Web.
- Can I use LabArchives for free?
- Yes. LabArchives has a free tier, so you can try it without paying. Paperpile starts at $4.15/month.
- What is LabArchives best used for?
- LabArchives is most often used for a university group that must keep research records after a phd student leaves, rather than losing them with a laptop, a core facility that needs instrument booking and a shared record of who ran what and when, a small biotech building patent-defensible evidence of invention with witnessed, timestamped entries, a teaching department running undergraduate laboratory courses where instructors need to see and grade notebook work. Of those, a university group that must keep research records after a phd student leaves, rather than losing them with a laptop and a core facility that needs instrument booking and a shared record of who ran what and when are not what Paperpile is typically brought in for.
- What can LabArchives do that Paperpile cannot?
- LabArchives covers Versioned entries, Witnessing and signing, Inventory, Scheduler.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
LabArchives: Does LabArchives satisfy patent evidence requirements?
Its versioning, timestamping and witnessed signatures are designed for that purpose, and it is widely accepted for it, but the legal weight depends on your institution's process being followed, not on the software alone.
Paperpile: How much does Paperpile cost?
Paperpile costs $4.15 per month for the Regular plan or $5.75 per month for the Expert plan, both billed annually.
SourceLabArchives: Who owns LabArchives?
Dotmatics. The product is branded LabArchives by Dotmatics and shares that company's corporate footprint.
Paperpile: Is there a free trial available for Paperpile?
Yes, Paperpile offers a 30-day free trial for both plans.
SourceLabArchives: Is there really a free tier?
Yes, with limited storage. It is suitable for trialling or a single researcher, not for a group that needs retention guarantees.
Paperpile: Does Paperpile offer academic or group discounts?
Yes, students, faculty, and researchers receive 50% off, and group discounts up to 20% off Expert plans are available when purchasing multiple seats.
SourceLabArchives: Can we export everything if we leave?
Yes, notebooks export in bulk, but exported archives lose much of the interactive structure, so treat the export as an archive rather than as a migration path into another ELN.
Paperpile: What billing options does Paperpile offer?
Paperpile accepts credit cards and PayPal, with additional payment options by location. Purchase orders are accepted for Enterprise customers.
SourceRelated pages
More on LabArchives
Other head to heads
- LabArchives vs Florence eBinders
- LabArchives vs Dotmatics
- LabArchives vs Labguru
- LabArchives vs Benchling
- LabArchives vs Sapio Sciences
- LabArchives vs LabVantage
- LabArchives vs Scispot
- LabArchives vs Wolfram Mathematica
- LabArchives vs Castor EDC
- LabArchives vs TetraScience
- LabArchives vs Valispace
- LabArchives vs Elicit
- LabArchives vs Thermo SampleManager LIMS
- LabArchives vs Zappi
- LabArchives vs Zotero
- LabArchives vs Mendeley
- LabArchives vs Obsidian
- LabArchives vs Roam Research
- LabArchives vs Schrodinger
- LabArchives vs LabWare
- LabArchives vs STARLIMS
- LabArchives vs Chemaxon
- Paperpile vs Florence eBinders
- Paperpile vs Dotmatics
- Paperpile vs Labguru
- Paperpile vs Benchling
- Paperpile vs Sapio Sciences
- Paperpile vs LabVantage
- Paperpile vs Scispot
- Paperpile vs Wolfram Mathematica
- Paperpile vs Castor EDC
- Paperpile vs TetraScience
- Paperpile vs Valispace
- Paperpile vs Elicit
- Paperpile vs Thermo SampleManager LIMS
- Paperpile vs Zappi
- Paperpile vs Zotero
- Paperpile vs Mendeley
- Paperpile vs Obsidian
- Paperpile vs Roam Research
- Paperpile vs Schrodinger
- Paperpile vs LabWare
- Paperpile vs STARLIMS
- Paperpile vs Chemaxon

