APIs · head to head
Kong Gateway vs Skyflow

Kong Gateway
APIs
Open-source and cloud API gateway for managing microservices traffic
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -

Skyflow
APIs
Data privacy vault that holds sensitive records outside your own systems
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Only Kong Gateway has a free tier, so it costs nothing to try first.
- Each has a real cost: Kong Gateway the free open-source gateway lacks the analytics, portals, and support of the paid Konnect tiers.; Skyflow reported contracts near 195,000 US dollars a year with a platform fee before usage put this out of reach of early stage companies, which are precisely the ones whose architecture is still cheap to change.
- They diverge on capability: Kong Gateway covers API request routing, Skyflow covers Tokenised storage.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 31 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Kong Gateway and Skyflow actually diverge.
| Attribute | Kong Gateway | Skyflow |
|---|---|---|
| Starting price | Free | On request |
| Pricing model | freemium | quote |
| Free tier | Yes | No |
| Platforms | web, linux, api | API, Web, Self-hosted |
| Founded | 2017 | Unknown |
Identical on both: user rating (Not yet rated), category (APIs).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Kong Gateway
- API request routing
- Plugin ecosystem
- Developer portals
- AI Gateway
- Analytics and observability
- SSO and audit logs
Only in Skyflow
- Tokenised storage
- Polymorphic encryption
- Field level access policies
- Data residency
- Secure functions
- PCI scope reduction
- Detokenisation gateway
- Audit trail
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Kong Gateway
- Routing and securing traffic across microservicesnot Skyflow
- Publishing internal or external developer portalsnot Skyflow
- Managing rate limits and authentication at the API edgenot Skyflow
- Gateway-level routing to multiple LLM providersnot Skyflow
Skyflow
- A fintech that wants card and bank account data out of its own infrastructure so its application servers leave PCI DSS assessment scopenot Kong Gateway
- A company entering India or the EU with data localisation obligations that would otherwise require standing up regional databases and operationsnot Kong Gateway
- A health technology business that needs protected health information isolated from the analytics stack while still supporting aggregate reportingnot Kong Gateway
- An engineering team that wants support agents to see masked identifiers and payment services to see real ones, enforced centrally rather than in every servicenot Kong Gateway
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Kong Gateway
- The free open-source gateway lacks the analytics, portals, and support of the paid Konnect tiers.
- Plus tier caps API requests at 1M/month before incurring per-million overage charges.
- Enterprise pricing is custom and not published, making budgeting harder without sales contact.
- Configuration and plugin management can require significant operational expertise to run at scale.
Skyflow
- Reported contracts near 195,000 US dollars a year with a platform fee before usage put this out of reach of early stage companies, which are precisely the ones whose architecture is still cheap to change.
- Every read of a protected field becomes a network call to a third party, so latency and an external availability dependency enter paths that were previously local database reads, and outage planning has to account for a vendor you do not control.
- Analytics and joins on vaulted data are constrained; work that was a simple SQL join now happens through secure functions or on tokens, and data teams routinely discover this after the engineering team has committed.
- Unwinding the vault later is a rewrite rather than a migration because tokens are threaded through every service, so the switching cost climbs steadily and the negotiating position at renewal weakens with each release.
- Scope reduction is an architectural claim your own assessor must accept, so the audit saving is real only if the implementation genuinely keeps sensitive values off your systems, and partial implementations that leave a cache or a log line in place deliver the cost without the benefit.
Pricing, plan by plan
Kong Gateway
Free- Free TrialFree
- 30-day enterprise functionality trial
- Unlimited gateways
- 30-day analytics retention
- Plus$undefined/month
- Up to 5 serverless, 2 hybrid, 2 dedicated cloud gateways
- 1M API requests/month included
- Up to 2 developer portals
- Enterprise$undefined/month
- Unlimited hybrid and dedicated cloud gateways
- Unlimited developer portals
- SSO and audit logs
Skyflow
On request- Skyflow Data Privacy Vault$undefined/year
- Platform fee plus usage by data subject count
- Priced additionally per data residency region
- PCI Level 1, SOC 2 Type 2, ISO 27001 and HIPAA coverage
Which should you pick?
Choose Kong Gateway if
- You need api request routing.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on web, linux, api.
- You also want plugin ecosystem.
Choose Skyflow if
- You need tokenised storage.
- You work on API, Web, Self-hosted.
- You also want polymorphic encryption.
Questions people ask
- Is Kong Gateway or Skyflow better?
- Neither clearly leads. Kong Gateway starts at Free and Skyflow at On request, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Kong Gateway or Skyflow?
- Kong Gateway has a free tier; the other does not. Paid plans start at Free for Kong Gateway and On request for Skyflow.
- Does Kong Gateway or Skyflow run on more platforms?
- Kong Gateway runs on web, linux, api. Skyflow runs on API, Web, Self-hosted.
- Can I use Kong Gateway for free?
- Yes. Kong Gateway has a free tier, so you can try it without paying. Skyflow starts at On request.
- What is Kong Gateway best used for?
- Kong Gateway is most often used for routing and securing traffic across microservices, publishing internal or external developer portals, managing rate limits and authentication at the api edge, gateway-level routing to multiple llm providers. Of those, routing and securing traffic across microservices and publishing internal or external developer portals are not what Skyflow is typically brought in for.
- What can Kong Gateway do that Skyflow cannot?
- Kong Gateway covers API request routing, Plugin ecosystem, Developer portals, AI Gateway. Skyflow covers Tokenised storage, Polymorphic encryption, Field level access policies, Data residency.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Kong Gateway: Is Kong Gateway free?
Kong's core gateway is open source and free to self-host. Kong Konnect, the managed cloud platform, offers a 30-day free trial before moving to paid Plus or custom Enterprise pricing.
SourceSkyflow: Does Skyflow really take my systems out of PCI scope?
It can, if card data never touches your infrastructure and the detokenisation happens at the boundary. Your QSA has to agree the design, so validate the architecture with your assessor before signing.
Kong Gateway: How is usage metered on the Plus plan?
The Plus plan includes 1M API requests per month, with additional usage billed at $200 per extra 1 million requests up to a 10M/month cap, plus per-gateway and per-LLM-model charges.
SourceSkyflow: What does it cost?
Nothing is published. Reported annual contracts sit around 195,000 US dollars, built from a platform fee plus usage by data subject count and additional charges per data residency region.
Kong Gateway: What support is included?
Plus includes email support with a 2-business-day SLA, while Enterprise adds dedicated success managers and professional services.
SourceSkyflow: How does it help with data localisation?
Records can be pinned to a specified region, so an Indian or EU residency requirement is met by the vault rather than by you running regional databases and operations teams.
Skyflow: Can I still run analytics on vaulted data?
Partly. Aggregates and comparisons are supported through polymorphic encryption and secure functions, but arbitrary joins against other datasets are harder than they were, and this is the most common late surprise.
Related pages
More on Kong Gateway
Other head to heads
- Kong Gateway vs Tyk
- Kong Gateway vs Moesif
- Kong Gateway vs Treblle
- Kong Gateway vs Convoy
- Kong Gateway vs Janus Gateway
- Kong Gateway vs Spring Cloud Gateway
- Kong Gateway vs Gravitee
- Kong Gateway vs Strapi
- Kong Gateway vs WSO2 API Manager
- Kong Gateway vs AWS API Gateway
- Kong Gateway vs GraphQL Apollo
- Kong Gateway vs Appwrite
- Kong Gateway vs Payload CMS
- Kong Gateway vs Portkey
- Kong Gateway vs Prisma
- Kong Gateway vs RapidAPI
- Kong Gateway vs REST Client VSCode
- Kong Gateway vs Rutter
- Kong Gateway vs Basis Theory
- Kong Gateway vs Paymentology
- Kong Gateway vs Akoya
- Kong Gateway vs Skaleet
- Kong Gateway vs Volt
- Kong Gateway vs Tink
- Kong Gateway vs Increase
- Kong Gateway vs Yodlee
- Kong Gateway vs Griffin
- Kong Gateway vs Trustly
- Kong Gateway vs Method Financial
- Kong Gateway vs MuleSoft Anypoint
- Kong Gateway vs LiteLLM
- Kong Gateway vs Neonomics
- Skyflow vs Tyk
- Skyflow vs Moesif
- Skyflow vs Treblle
- Skyflow vs Convoy
- Skyflow vs Janus Gateway
- Skyflow vs Spring Cloud Gateway
- Skyflow vs Gravitee
- Skyflow vs Strapi
- Skyflow vs WSO2 API Manager
- Skyflow vs AWS API Gateway
- Skyflow vs GraphQL Apollo
- Skyflow vs Appwrite
- Skyflow vs Payload CMS
- Skyflow vs Portkey
- Skyflow vs Prisma
- Skyflow vs RapidAPI
- Skyflow vs REST Client VSCode
- Skyflow vs Rutter
- Skyflow vs Basis Theory
- Skyflow vs Paymentology
- Skyflow vs Akoya
- Skyflow vs Skaleet
- Skyflow vs Volt
- Skyflow vs Tink
- Skyflow vs Increase
- Skyflow vs Yodlee
- Skyflow vs Griffin
- Skyflow vs Trustly
- Skyflow vs Method Financial
- Skyflow vs MuleSoft Anypoint
- Skyflow vs LiteLLM
- Skyflow vs Neonomics
