APIs · head to head
Portkey vs Skyflow

Portkey
APIs
Observe, govern, and secure every AI interaction across your enterprise
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -

Skyflow
APIs
Data privacy vault that holds sensitive records outside your own systems
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Portkey the free Developer tier records only 10,000 logs per month with 3 day log retention; the $49 per month Production tier raises that to 100,000 logs with $9 per additional 100,000 requests, as of August 2026.; Skyflow reported contracts near 195,000 US dollars a year with a platform fee before usage put this out of reach of early stage companies, which are precisely the ones whose architecture is still cheap to change.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 31 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Portkey and Skyflow actually diverge.
Identical on both: starting price (On request), free tier (No), user rating (Not yet rated), category (APIs).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Portkey
Nothing recorded that Skyflow does not also cover.
Only in Skyflow
- Tokenised storage
- Polymorphic encryption
- Field level access policies
- Data residency
- Secure functions
- PCI scope reduction
- Detokenisation gateway
- Audit trail
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Portkey
- Accessing 1,600+ language models through unified API gatewaynot Skyflow
- Monitoring and observing LLM behavior in production environmentsnot Skyflow
- Managing costs and setting budget limits for AI spendingnot Skyflow
- Implementing guardrails and PII redaction for secure AI interactionsnot Skyflow
Skyflow
- A fintech that wants card and bank account data out of its own infrastructure so its application servers leave PCI DSS assessment scopenot Portkey
- A company entering India or the EU with data localisation obligations that would otherwise require standing up regional databases and operationsnot Portkey
- A health technology business that needs protected health information isolated from the analytics stack while still supporting aggregate reportingnot Portkey
- An engineering team that wants support agents to see masked identifiers and payment services to see real ones, enforced centrally rather than in every servicenot Portkey
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Portkey
- The free Developer tier records only 10,000 logs per month with 3 day log retention; the $49 per month Production tier raises that to 100,000 logs with $9 per additional 100,000 requests, as of August 2026.
Skyflow
- Reported contracts near 195,000 US dollars a year with a platform fee before usage put this out of reach of early stage companies, which are precisely the ones whose architecture is still cheap to change.
- Every read of a protected field becomes a network call to a third party, so latency and an external availability dependency enter paths that were previously local database reads, and outage planning has to account for a vendor you do not control.
- Analytics and joins on vaulted data are constrained; work that was a simple SQL join now happens through secure functions or on tokens, and data teams routinely discover this after the engineering team has committed.
- Unwinding the vault later is a rewrite rather than a migration because tokens are threaded through every service, so the switching cost climbs steadily and the negotiating position at renewal weakens with each release.
- Scope reduction is an architectural claim your own assessor must accept, so the audit saving is real only if the implementation genuinely keeps sensitive values off your systems, and partial implementations that leave a cache or a log line in place deliver the cost without the benefit.
Pricing, plan by plan
Portkey
On requestNo published plan breakdown. See the Portkey review.
Skyflow
On request- Skyflow Data Privacy Vault$undefined/year
- Platform fee plus usage by data subject count
- Priced additionally per data residency region
- PCI Level 1, SOC 2 Type 2, ISO 27001 and HIPAA coverage
Which should you pick?
Choose Portkey if
Nothing in the data separates Portkey from Skyflow on the points above - pick on price and on how each one feels to use.
Choose Skyflow if
- You need tokenised storage.
- You work on API, Web, Self-hosted.
- You also want polymorphic encryption.
Questions people ask
- Is Portkey or Skyflow better?
- Neither clearly leads. Portkey starts at On request and Skyflow at On request, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Portkey or Skyflow?
- Portkey starts at On request and Skyflow at On request.
- Does Portkey or Skyflow run on more platforms?
- Portkey runs on Web. Skyflow runs on API, Web, Self-hosted.
- What is Portkey best used for?
- Portkey is most often used for accessing 1,600+ language models through unified api gateway, monitoring and observing llm behavior in production environments, managing costs and setting budget limits for ai spending, implementing guardrails and pii redaction for secure ai interactions. Of those, accessing 1,600+ language models through unified api gateway and monitoring and observing llm behavior in production environments are not what Skyflow is typically brought in for.
- What can Portkey do that Skyflow cannot?
- Skyflow covers Tokenised storage, Polymorphic encryption, Field level access policies, Data residency.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Portkey: What happens if I exceed my Portkey plan's request limit?
Production tier ($49/month) charges $9 per additional 100,000 requests beyond the included 100,000. Enterprise customers have custom limits determined through their service agreement. Source: https://portkey.ai/pricing
SourceSkyflow: Does Skyflow really take my systems out of PCI scope?
It can, if card data never touches your infrastructure and the detokenisation happens at the boundary. Your QSA has to agree the design, so validate the architecture with your assessor before signing.
Portkey: Can I self-host Portkey to avoid per-request billing?
Yes. Portkey offers an Open Source self-hosted version with unlimited requests at no cost, including universal API, routing, guardrails, and load balancing features. Source: https://portkey.ai/pricing
SourceSkyflow: What does it cost?
Nothing is published. Reported annual contracts sit around 195,000 US dollars, built from a platform fee plus usage by data subject count and additional charges per data residency region.
Portkey: How long does Portkey retain my logs and metrics?
Free Developer tier retains logs 3 days and metrics 30 days. Production tier retains logs 30 days and metrics 90 days. Enterprise tier offers custom retention periods. Source: https://portkey.ai/pricing
SourceSkyflow: How does it help with data localisation?
Records can be pinned to a specified region, so an Indian or EU residency requirement is met by the vault rather than by you running regional databases and operations teams.
Portkey: What compliance features are included in the Enterprise plan?
Enterprise tier includes SOC2 Type 2 certification, GDPR compliance, HIPAA compliance, VPC hosting, SSO, advanced guardrails, and dedicated support. Custom pricing required. Source: https://portkey.ai/pricing
SourceSkyflow: Can I still run analytics on vaulted data?
Partly. Aggregates and comparisons are supported through polymorphic encryption and secure functions, but arbitrary joins against other datasets are harder than they were, and this is the most common late surprise.
Related pages
Other head to heads
- Portkey vs Appwrite
- Portkey vs Hasura
- Portkey vs PocketBase
- Portkey vs Sanity
- Portkey vs Tink
- Portkey vs Apigee
- Portkey vs Treblle
- Portkey vs Apollo GraphQL
- Portkey vs Kong
- Portkey vs Volt
- Portkey vs WSO2 API Manager
- Portkey vs 3scale
- Portkey vs Treasury Prime
- Portkey vs Yapily
- Portkey vs 10x Banking
- Portkey vs Brite Payments
- Portkey vs Bruno
- Portkey vs Bud Financial
- Portkey vs Basis Theory
- Portkey vs Paymentology
- Portkey vs Akoya
- Portkey vs Skaleet
- Portkey vs Increase
- Portkey vs Yodlee
- Portkey vs Griffin
- Portkey vs Trustly
- Portkey vs Method Financial
- Portkey vs MuleSoft Anypoint
- Portkey vs LiteLLM
- Portkey vs Neonomics
- Portkey vs Payload CMS
- Skyflow vs Appwrite
- Skyflow vs Hasura
- Skyflow vs PocketBase
- Skyflow vs Sanity
- Skyflow vs Tink
- Skyflow vs Apigee
- Skyflow vs Treblle
- Skyflow vs Apollo GraphQL
- Skyflow vs Kong
- Skyflow vs Volt
- Skyflow vs WSO2 API Manager
- Skyflow vs 3scale
- Skyflow vs Treasury Prime
- Skyflow vs Yapily
- Skyflow vs 10x Banking
- Skyflow vs Brite Payments
- Skyflow vs Bruno
- Skyflow vs Bud Financial
- Skyflow vs Basis Theory
- Skyflow vs Paymentology
- Skyflow vs Akoya
- Skyflow vs Skaleet
- Skyflow vs Increase
- Skyflow vs Yodlee
- Skyflow vs Griffin
- Skyflow vs Trustly
- Skyflow vs Method Financial
- Skyflow vs MuleSoft Anypoint
- Skyflow vs LiteLLM
- Skyflow vs Neonomics
- Skyflow vs Payload CMS
