Developer Tools · head to head
Keycloak vs VMware Carbon Black

Keycloak
Developer Tools
Open-source identity and access management server.
- From
- Free
- Free plan
- Yes
VMware Carbon Black
Cybersecurity
Cloud-delivered endpoint protection and EDR, now owned by Broadcom and positioned alongside Symantec.
- From
- On request
- Free plan
- No
The short version
- Only Keycloak has a free tier, so it costs nothing to try first.
- Each has a real cost: Keycloak requires self-hosted deployment and operational expertise to install, configure and maintain; VMware Carbon Black broadcom's enterprise model concentrates direct sales and support on its largest accounts and moves everyone else to resellers, so a mid-size customer can lose named support contacts and face a substantially repriced renewal with limited notice.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 30 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Keycloak and VMware Carbon Black actually diverge.
| Attribute | Keycloak | VMware Carbon Black |
|---|---|---|
| Starting price | Free | On request |
| Pricing model | open-source | subscription |
| Free tier | Yes | No |
| Platforms | Self-hosted, Docker, Kubernetes, Linux, Windows, API | Desktop, Api |
| Category | Developer Tools | Cybersecurity |
| Founded | Unknown | 2002 |
Identical on both: user rating (Not yet rated).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Keycloak
Nothing recorded that VMware Carbon Black does not also cover.
Only in VMware Carbon Black
- Endpoint Standard
- Enterprise EDR
- Audit and Remediation
- Single sensor
- Live Response
- Workload protection
- Container security
- Watchlists and feeds
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Keycloak
- Organisations requiring self-hosted identity infrastructure for compliance or data residencynot VMware Carbon Black
- Companies with existing LDAP/Active Directory systems needing federated authenticationnot VMware Carbon Black
- Open-source projects and communities requiring free IAM without licensing costsnot VMware Carbon Black
- Enterprises building custom identity workflows requiring fine-grained authorisationnot VMware Carbon Black
- Teams with sufficient operational expertise to manage infrastructurenot VMware Carbon Black
VMware Carbon Black
- A SOC that wants unfiltered endpoint telemetry to hunt over rather than only vendor-generated alertsnot Keycloak
- A vSphere estate that wants workload protection deployed through the hypervisor instead of installing an agent in every guestnot Keycloak
- Replacing signature antivirus after an incident where the incumbent product had no record of what the attacker didnot Keycloak
- An organisation already inside a Broadcom or Symantec enterprise agreement that can consolidate endpoint onto an existing contractnot Keycloak
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Keycloak
- Requires self-hosted deployment and operational expertise to install, configure and maintain
- No managed cloud option provided by Red Hat; organisations must operate infrastructure themselves or use third-party distributions
- Clustering and high-availability configurations require additional operational knowledge
- Community support only; commercial support requires third-party vendors or distributions
VMware Carbon Black
- Broadcom's enterprise model concentrates direct sales and support on its largest accounts and moves everyone else to resellers, so a mid-size customer can lose named support contacts and face a substantially repriced renewal with limited notice.
- Continuous EDR recording is retained for a defined window and longer retention is a paid tier, so the investigation you most need is often the one whose telemetry has already aged out, and that is discovered during the incident rather than before it.
- The product assumes an operator: watchlists, policy tuning and alert triage are ongoing work, and organisations without a dedicated analyst or an MDR contract typically leave policies in monitor mode and pay for telemetry that is never reviewed.
- The sensor operates in the same kernel and file-filter territory as other endpoint agents, so running it alongside an incumbent antivirus, DLP or backup agent commonly produces performance complaints and requires maintained exclusion lists on both sides.
- Linux sensor support is tied to specific distribution and kernel versions, so a routine operating system upgrade can leave hosts without a supported sensor until a matching build ships, and anything outside the supported list gets no coverage at all.
Pricing, plan by plan
Keycloak
Free- Open-sourceFree
- Full platform functionality
- Self-hosted deployment
- Community support
VMware Carbon Black
On request- CB Endpoint StandardFree
- NGAV
- Behavioral EDR
- Device control
- CB Endpoint AdvancedFree
- All Standard features
- Threat hunting
- Audit and remediation
- CB Endpoint EnterpriseFree
- All Advanced features
- Advanced threat hunting
- Live response
Which should you pick?
Choose Keycloak if
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Self-hosted, Docker, Kubernetes, Linux, Windows, API.
Choose VMware Carbon Black if
- You need endpoint standard.
- You work on Desktop, Api.
- You also want enterprise edr.
Questions people ask
- Is Keycloak or VMware Carbon Black better?
- Neither clearly leads. Keycloak starts at Free and VMware Carbon Black at On request, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Keycloak or VMware Carbon Black?
- Keycloak has a free tier; the other does not. Paid plans start at Free for Keycloak and On request for VMware Carbon Black.
- Does Keycloak or VMware Carbon Black run on more platforms?
- Keycloak runs on Self-hosted, Docker, Kubernetes, Linux, Windows, API. VMware Carbon Black runs on Desktop, Api.
- Can I use Keycloak for free?
- Yes. Keycloak has a free tier, so you can try it without paying. VMware Carbon Black starts at On request.
- What is Keycloak best used for?
- Keycloak is most often used for organisations requiring self-hosted identity infrastructure for compliance or data residency, companies with existing ldap/active directory systems needing federated authentication, open-source projects and communities requiring free iam without licensing costs, enterprises building custom identity workflows requiring fine-grained authorisation. Of those, organisations requiring self-hosted identity infrastructure for compliance or data residency and companies with existing ldap/active directory systems needing federated authentication are not what VMware Carbon Black is typically brought in for.
- What can Keycloak do that VMware Carbon Black cannot?
- VMware Carbon Black covers Endpoint Standard, Enterprise EDR, Audit and Remediation, Single sensor.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Keycloak: What protocols does Keycloak support?
Keycloak supports OpenID Connect, OAuth 2.0 and SAML 2.0 protocols for authentication and authorisation.
SourceVMware Carbon Black: Who owns Carbon Black now?
Broadcom. It acquired VMware in November 2023, and Carbon Black now sits in Broadcom's enterprise security business alongside Symantec. VMware branding is being phased out.
Keycloak: Can Keycloak integrate with existing user directories?
Yes. Keycloak supports user federation with LDAP and Active Directory systems, allowing organisations to leverage existing user directories.
SourceVMware Carbon Black: Why do the docs use names I do not recognise?
The product has been renamed repeatedly. CB Defense is now Endpoint Standard, CB ThreatHunter is Enterprise EDR and CB LiveOps is Audit and Remediation. Older community answers and runbooks still use the previous names.
Keycloak: Is Keycloak free?
Yes. Keycloak is fully open-source and free to deploy and use. No licensing fees are required.
SourceVMware Carbon Black: Does it replace my existing antivirus?
Yes on supported Windows, macOS and Linux versions, and running it alongside another antivirus is not recommended because the two agents contend for the same hooks. Check your compliance requirements, as some auditors still ask for a named antivirus product.
VMware Carbon Black: Do I need a full-time analyst to run it?
To get value from Enterprise EDR, effectively yes. The prevention tier can run with part-time attention, but the hunting and recording capability is only worth its cost if somebody is querying it, which is why many customers buy it through an MDR provider.
VMware Carbon Black: How is it licensed?
Per endpoint, per year, with the capability tier determining the rate and workload and container protection priced separately. Extended EDR data retention is an additional line item.
Related pages
More on VMware Carbon Black
Other head to heads
- Keycloak vs Penpot
- Keycloak vs Soketi
- Keycloak vs Ansible
- Keycloak vs Atlantis
- Keycloak vs Vite
- Keycloak vs Depot
- Keycloak vs Pants Build
- Keycloak vs Buildkite
- Keycloak vs Coder
- Keycloak vs Jitsu
- Keycloak vs Bitbucket
- Keycloak vs Sweep
- Keycloak vs Azure DevOps
- Keycloak vs Backstage
- Keycloak vs Claude Code
- Keycloak vs Cloud Native Buildpacks
- Keycloak vs Cody
- Keycloak vs Bitdefender Total Security
- Keycloak vs Norton 360
- Keycloak vs 1Password
- Keycloak vs LastPass
- Keycloak vs Microsoft Defender for Endpoint
- Keycloak vs Cybereason Defense Platform
- Keycloak vs CrowdStrike Falcon
- Keycloak vs SentinelOne
- Keycloak vs Trend Micro Vision One
- Keycloak vs Proofpoint
- Keycloak vs Sophos Intercept X
- Keycloak vs Descope
- Keycloak vs Drata
- Keycloak vs DTiQ
- Keycloak vs ESET NOD32 Antivirus
- Keycloak vs ExpressVPN
- Keycloak vs Falco
- Keycloak vs SentinelOne Singularity
- VMware Carbon Black vs Penpot
- VMware Carbon Black vs Soketi
- VMware Carbon Black vs Ansible
- VMware Carbon Black vs Atlantis
- VMware Carbon Black vs Vite
- VMware Carbon Black vs Depot
- VMware Carbon Black vs Pants Build
- VMware Carbon Black vs Buildkite
- VMware Carbon Black vs Coder
- VMware Carbon Black vs Jitsu
- VMware Carbon Black vs Bitbucket
- VMware Carbon Black vs Sweep
- VMware Carbon Black vs Azure DevOps
- VMware Carbon Black vs Backstage
- VMware Carbon Black vs Claude Code
- VMware Carbon Black vs Cloud Native Buildpacks
- VMware Carbon Black vs Cody
- VMware Carbon Black vs Bitdefender Total Security
- VMware Carbon Black vs Norton 360
- VMware Carbon Black vs 1Password
- VMware Carbon Black vs LastPass
- VMware Carbon Black vs Microsoft Defender for Endpoint
- VMware Carbon Black vs Cybereason Defense Platform
- VMware Carbon Black vs CrowdStrike Falcon
- VMware Carbon Black vs SentinelOne
- VMware Carbon Black vs Trend Micro Vision One
- VMware Carbon Black vs Proofpoint
- VMware Carbon Black vs Sophos Intercept X
- VMware Carbon Black vs Descope
- VMware Carbon Black vs Drata
- VMware Carbon Black vs DTiQ
- VMware Carbon Black vs ESET NOD32 Antivirus
- VMware Carbon Black vs ExpressVPN
- VMware Carbon Black vs Falco
- VMware Carbon Black vs SentinelOne Singularity
