Developer Tools · head to head
Soketi vs VMware Carbon Black

Soketi
Developer Tools
Self-hosted, Pusher-compatible WebSockets server with a stalled maintenance record
- From
- Free
- Free plan
- Yes
VMware Carbon Black
Cybersecurity
Cloud-delivered endpoint protection and EDR, now owned by Broadcom and positioned alongside Symantec.
- From
- On request
- Free plan
- No
The short version
- Only Soketi has a free tier, so it costs nothing to try first.
- Each has a real cost: Soketi maintenance has effectively stalled: the maintainer has said time is severely limited, releases are infrequent, and the community has been discussing whether the project is abandoned, which means security fixes may not arrive.; VMware Carbon Black broadcom's enterprise model concentrates direct sales and support on its largest accounts and moves everyone else to resellers, so a mid-size customer can lose named support contacts and face a substantially repriced renewal with limited notice.
- They diverge on capability: Soketi covers Pusher protocol compatibility, VMware Carbon Black covers Endpoint Standard.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 31 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Soketi and VMware Carbon Black actually diverge.
| Attribute | Soketi | VMware Carbon Black |
|---|---|---|
| Starting price | Free | On request |
| Pricing model | Open source, no licence fee | subscription |
| Free tier | Yes | No |
| Platforms | Linux, macOS, Windows | Desktop, Api |
| Category | Developer Tools | Cybersecurity |
| Founded | Unknown | 2002 |
Identical on both: user rating (Not yet rated).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Soketi
- Pusher protocol compatibility
- Presence and private channels
- Horizontal scaling
- App management backends
- Webhooks
- Prometheus metrics
Only in VMware Carbon Black
- Endpoint Standard
- Enterprise EDR
- Audit and Remediation
- Single sensor
- Live Response
- Workload protection
- Container security
- Watchlists and feeds
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Soketi
- A Laravel application that already uses Echo and wants to stop paying a hosted realtime providernot VMware Carbon Black
- Realtime notifications or presence indicators where data must not leave your own infrastructure for compliance reasonsnot VMware Carbon Black
- A local or CI environment that needs a Pusher-compatible server without hitting a paid accountnot VMware Carbon Black
- A high-connection-count application where hosted per-connection pricing has become the largest line in the infrastructure billnot VMware Carbon Black
VMware Carbon Black
- A SOC that wants unfiltered endpoint telemetry to hunt over rather than only vendor-generated alertsnot Soketi
- A vSphere estate that wants workload protection deployed through the hypervisor instead of installing an agent in every guestnot Soketi
- Replacing signature antivirus after an incident where the incumbent product had no record of what the attacker didnot Soketi
- An organisation already inside a Broadcom or Symantec enterprise agreement that can consolidate endpoint onto an existing contractnot Soketi
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Soketi
- Maintenance has effectively stalled: the maintainer has said time is severely limited, releases are infrequent, and the community has been discussing whether the project is abandoned, which means security fixes may not arrive.
- Dependency drift on Node and uWebSockets.js will eventually force you to fork or migrate, and that cost is unbudgeted at the point you adopt it.
- There is no commercial support to buy, so a production incident at three in the morning is entirely your problem with no escalation path.
- Scaling beyond a single node needs Redis and careful configuration, and getting presence channels correct across nodes is a genuine source of subtle bugs.
- It implements the Pusher protocol rather than tracking it, so any protocol feature Pusher adds later will not appear, and the compatibility guarantee slowly decays.
VMware Carbon Black
- Broadcom's enterprise model concentrates direct sales and support on its largest accounts and moves everyone else to resellers, so a mid-size customer can lose named support contacts and face a substantially repriced renewal with limited notice.
- Continuous EDR recording is retained for a defined window and longer retention is a paid tier, so the investigation you most need is often the one whose telemetry has already aged out, and that is discovered during the incident rather than before it.
- The product assumes an operator: watchlists, policy tuning and alert triage are ongoing work, and organisations without a dedicated analyst or an MDR contract typically leave policies in monitor mode and pay for telemetry that is never reviewed.
- The sensor operates in the same kernel and file-filter territory as other endpoint agents, so running it alongside an incumbent antivirus, DLP or backup agent commonly produces performance complaints and requires maintained exclusion lists on both sides.
- Linux sensor support is tied to specific distribution and kernel versions, so a routine operating system upgrade can leave hosts without a supported sensor until a matching build ships, and anything outside the supported list gets no coverage at all.
Pricing, plan by plan
Soketi
Free- SoketiFree
- MIT licensed
- Unlimited connections subject to your own hardware
- No vendor billing
VMware Carbon Black
On request- CB Endpoint StandardFree
- NGAV
- Behavioral EDR
- Device control
- CB Endpoint AdvancedFree
- All Standard features
- Threat hunting
- Audit and remediation
- CB Endpoint EnterpriseFree
- All Advanced features
- Advanced threat hunting
- Live response
Which should you pick?
Choose Soketi if
- You need pusher protocol compatibility.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Linux, macOS, Windows.
- You also want presence and private channels.
Choose VMware Carbon Black if
- You need endpoint standard.
- You work on Desktop, Api.
- You also want enterprise edr.
Questions people ask
- Is Soketi or VMware Carbon Black better?
- Neither clearly leads. Soketi starts at Free and VMware Carbon Black at On request, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Soketi or VMware Carbon Black?
- Soketi has a free tier; the other does not. Paid plans start at Free for Soketi and On request for VMware Carbon Black.
- Does Soketi or VMware Carbon Black run on more platforms?
- Soketi runs on Linux, macOS, Windows. VMware Carbon Black runs on Desktop, Api.
- Can I use Soketi for free?
- Yes. Soketi has a free tier, so you can try it without paying. VMware Carbon Black starts at On request.
- What is Soketi best used for?
- Soketi is most often used for a laravel application that already uses echo and wants to stop paying a hosted realtime provider, realtime notifications or presence indicators where data must not leave your own infrastructure for compliance reasons, a local or ci environment that needs a pusher-compatible server without hitting a paid account, a high-connection-count application where hosted per-connection pricing has become the largest line in the infrastructure bill. Of those, a laravel application that already uses echo and wants to stop paying a hosted realtime provider and realtime notifications or presence indicators where data must not leave your own infrastructure for compliance reasons are not what VMware Carbon Black is typically brought in for.
- What can Soketi do that VMware Carbon Black cannot?
- Soketi covers Pusher protocol compatibility, Presence and private channels, Horizontal scaling, App management backends. VMware Carbon Black covers Endpoint Standard, Enterprise EDR, Audit and Remediation, Single sensor.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Soketi: Is Soketi still maintained?
Barely. The maintainer has stated that available time is very limited and releases have been sparse; treat it as community-maintained.
VMware Carbon Black: Who owns Carbon Black now?
Broadcom. It acquired VMware in November 2023, and Carbon Black now sits in Broadcom's enterprise security business alongside Symantec. VMware branding is being phased out.
Soketi: Do I need to change my client code?
No. Pusher client SDKs and Laravel Echo work by changing the host, port and credentials.
VMware Carbon Black: Why do the docs use names I do not recognise?
The product has been renamed repeatedly. CB Defense is now Endpoint Standard, CB ThreatHunter is Enterprise EDR and CB LiveOps is Audit and Remediation. Older community answers and runbooks still use the previous names.
Soketi: What does it cost?
Nothing in licence fees. It is MIT licensed; you pay for the server it runs on.
VMware Carbon Black: Does it replace my existing antivirus?
Yes on supported Windows, macOS and Linux versions, and running it alongside another antivirus is not recommended because the two agents contend for the same hooks. Check your compliance requirements, as some auditors still ask for a named antivirus product.
Soketi: What are people moving to?
Laravel Reverb for Laravel applications, and Sockudo, a Rust reimplementation, for others.
VMware Carbon Black: Do I need a full-time analyst to run it?
To get value from Enterprise EDR, effectively yes. The prevention tier can run with part-time attention, but the hunting and recording capability is only worth its cost if somebody is querying it, which is why many customers buy it through an MDR provider.
VMware Carbon Black: How is it licensed?
Per endpoint, per year, with the capability tier determining the rate and workload and container protection priced separately. Extended EDR data retention is an additional line item.
Related pages
More on VMware Carbon Black
Other head to heads
- Soketi vs PartyKit
- Soketi vs Penpot
- Soketi vs Atlantis
- Soketi vs Coder
- Soketi vs Backstage
- Soketi vs Xlinesoft
- Soketi vs Bazel
- Soketi vs Eclipse IDE
- Soketi vs Pants Build
- Soketi vs Ansible
- Soketi vs Helix
- Soketi vs Jitsu
- Soketi vs Avo
- Soketi vs Azure DevOps
- Soketi vs Bitbucket
- Soketi vs Claude Code
- Soketi vs Cloud Native Buildpacks
- Soketi vs Bitdefender Total Security
- Soketi vs Norton 360
- Soketi vs 1Password
- Soketi vs LastPass
- Soketi vs Microsoft Defender for Endpoint
- Soketi vs Cybereason Defense Platform
- Soketi vs CrowdStrike Falcon
- Soketi vs SentinelOne
- Soketi vs Trend Micro Vision One
- Soketi vs Proofpoint
- Soketi vs Sophos Intercept X
- Soketi vs Descope
- Soketi vs Drata
- Soketi vs DTiQ
- Soketi vs ESET NOD32 Antivirus
- Soketi vs ExpressVPN
- Soketi vs Falco
- Soketi vs SentinelOne Singularity
- VMware Carbon Black vs PartyKit
- VMware Carbon Black vs Penpot
- VMware Carbon Black vs Atlantis
- VMware Carbon Black vs Coder
- VMware Carbon Black vs Backstage
- VMware Carbon Black vs Xlinesoft
- VMware Carbon Black vs Bazel
- VMware Carbon Black vs Eclipse IDE
- VMware Carbon Black vs Pants Build
- VMware Carbon Black vs Ansible
- VMware Carbon Black vs Helix
- VMware Carbon Black vs Jitsu
- VMware Carbon Black vs Avo
- VMware Carbon Black vs Azure DevOps
- VMware Carbon Black vs Bitbucket
- VMware Carbon Black vs Claude Code
- VMware Carbon Black vs Cloud Native Buildpacks
- VMware Carbon Black vs Bitdefender Total Security
- VMware Carbon Black vs Norton 360
- VMware Carbon Black vs 1Password
- VMware Carbon Black vs LastPass
- VMware Carbon Black vs Microsoft Defender for Endpoint
- VMware Carbon Black vs Cybereason Defense Platform
- VMware Carbon Black vs CrowdStrike Falcon
- VMware Carbon Black vs SentinelOne
- VMware Carbon Black vs Trend Micro Vision One
- VMware Carbon Black vs Proofpoint
- VMware Carbon Black vs Sophos Intercept X
- VMware Carbon Black vs Descope
- VMware Carbon Black vs Drata
- VMware Carbon Black vs DTiQ
- VMware Carbon Black vs ESET NOD32 Antivirus
- VMware Carbon Black vs ExpressVPN
- VMware Carbon Black vs Falco
- VMware Carbon Black vs SentinelOne Singularity
