Developer Tools · head to head
Keycloak vs Surfshark

Keycloak
Developer Tools
Open-source identity and access management server.
- From
- Free
- Free plan
- Yes
The short version
- Only Keycloak has a free tier, so it costs nothing to try first.
- Each has a real cost: Keycloak requires self-hosted deployment and operational expertise to install, configure and maintain; Surfshark smaller server network (4,500+ servers) compared to larger competitors like NordVPN
- Prices and features above were last checked on 30 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Keycloak and Surfshark actually diverge.
Identical on both: user rating (Not yet rated).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Keycloak
Nothing recorded that Surfshark does not also cover.
Only in Surfshark
- Unlimited devices
- CleanWeb ad blocker
- MultiHop
- Camouflage Mode
- NoBorders mode
- Kill Switch
- Bypasser split tunneling
- Rotating IP
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Keycloak
- Organisations requiring self-hosted identity infrastructure for compliance or data residencynot Surfshark
- Companies with existing LDAP/Active Directory systems needing federated authenticationnot Surfshark
- Open-source projects and communities requiring free IAM without licensing costsnot Surfshark
- Enterprises building custom identity workflows requiring fine-grained authorisationnot Surfshark
- Teams with sufficient operational expertise to manage infrastructurenot Surfshark
Surfshark
- Vpnnot Keycloak
- Privacynot Keycloak
- Security Suitenot Keycloak
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Keycloak
- Requires self-hosted deployment and operational expertise to install, configure and maintain
- No managed cloud option provided by Red Hat; organisations must operate infrastructure themselves or use third-party distributions
- Clustering and high-availability configurations require additional operational knowledge
- Community support only; commercial support requires third-party vendors or distributions
Surfshark
- Smaller server network (4,500+ servers) compared to larger competitors like NordVPN
- Lower brand recognition compared to established VPN providers
- Limited customer service availability in some time zones
Pricing, plan by plan
Keycloak
Free- Open-sourceFree
- Full platform functionality
- Self-hosted deployment
- Community support
Surfshark
$1.78/month- Starter$1.78/month
- Unlimited simultaneous connections
- 4,500+ servers
- Basic VPN
- One$3.59/month
- VPN
- Antivirus
- Personal data leak alert
- One+$4/month
- All One features
- Incogi included
Which should you pick?
Choose Keycloak if
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Self-hosted, Docker, Kubernetes, Linux, Windows, API.
Choose Surfshark if
- You need unlimited devices.
- You work on Windows, macOS, iOS, Android, Linux.
- You also want cleanweb ad blocker.
Questions people ask
- Is Keycloak or Surfshark better?
- Neither clearly leads. Keycloak starts at Free and Surfshark at $1.78/month, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Keycloak or Surfshark?
- Keycloak has a free tier; the other does not. Paid plans start at Free for Keycloak and $1.78/month for Surfshark.
- Does Keycloak or Surfshark run on more platforms?
- Keycloak runs on Self-hosted, Docker, Kubernetes, Linux, Windows, API. Surfshark runs on Windows, macOS, iOS, Android, Linux.
- Can I use Keycloak for free?
- Yes. Keycloak has a free tier, so you can try it without paying. Surfshark starts at $1.78/month.
- What is Keycloak best used for?
- Keycloak is most often used for organisations requiring self-hosted identity infrastructure for compliance or data residency, companies with existing ldap/active directory systems needing federated authentication, open-source projects and communities requiring free iam without licensing costs, enterprises building custom identity workflows requiring fine-grained authorisation. Of those, organisations requiring self-hosted identity infrastructure for compliance or data residency and companies with existing ldap/active directory systems needing federated authentication are not what Surfshark is typically brought in for.
- What can Keycloak do that Surfshark cannot?
- Surfshark covers Unlimited devices, CleanWeb ad blocker, MultiHop, Camouflage Mode.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Keycloak: What protocols does Keycloak support?
Keycloak supports OpenID Connect, OAuth 2.0 and SAML 2.0 protocols for authentication and authorisation.
SourceSurfshark: Does Surfshark maintain a no-logs policy?
Yes. Surfshark does not log browsing history, visited IP addresses, bandwidth usage, or network traffic. This policy was independently verified by Deloitte in 2025.
SourceKeycloak: Can Keycloak integrate with existing user directories?
Yes. Keycloak supports user federation with LDAP and Active Directory systems, allowing organisations to leverage existing user directories.
SourceSurfshark: How many simultaneous device connections does Surfshark allow?
Surfshark allows unlimited simultaneous connections on all subscription plans, enabling protection of every device in a household with a single subscription.
SourceKeycloak: Is Keycloak free?
Yes. Keycloak is fully open-source and free to deploy and use. No licensing fees are required.
SourceRelated pages
Other head to heads
- Keycloak vs Penpot
- Keycloak vs Soketi
- Keycloak vs Ansible
- Keycloak vs Atlantis
- Keycloak vs Vite
- Keycloak vs Depot
- Keycloak vs Pants Build
- Keycloak vs Buildkite
- Keycloak vs Coder
- Keycloak vs Jitsu
- Keycloak vs Bitbucket
- Keycloak vs Sweep
- Keycloak vs Azure DevOps
- Keycloak vs Backstage
- Keycloak vs Claude Code
- Keycloak vs Cloud Native Buildpacks
- Keycloak vs Cody
- Keycloak vs CyberGhost VPN
- Keycloak vs ProtonVPN
- Keycloak vs NordVPN
- Keycloak vs Avast One
- Keycloak vs McAfee Total Protection
- Keycloak vs Norton 360
- Keycloak vs IVPN
- Keycloak vs Mullvad VPN
- Keycloak vs Windscribe
- Keycloak vs TunnelBear
- Keycloak vs Private Internet Access
- Keycloak vs CrowdStrike Falcon
- Keycloak vs iDenfy
- Keycloak vs IDnow
- Keycloak vs Jumio
- Keycloak vs Kaspersky Total Security
- Keycloak vs LogicManager
- Keycloak vs ExpressVPN
- Surfshark vs Penpot
- Surfshark vs Soketi
- Surfshark vs Ansible
- Surfshark vs Atlantis
- Surfshark vs Vite
- Surfshark vs Depot
- Surfshark vs Pants Build
- Surfshark vs Buildkite
- Surfshark vs Coder
- Surfshark vs Jitsu
- Surfshark vs Bitbucket
- Surfshark vs Sweep
- Surfshark vs Azure DevOps
- Surfshark vs Backstage
- Surfshark vs Claude Code
- Surfshark vs Cloud Native Buildpacks
- Surfshark vs Cody
- Surfshark vs CyberGhost VPN
- Surfshark vs ProtonVPN
- Surfshark vs NordVPN
- Surfshark vs Avast One
- Surfshark vs McAfee Total Protection
- Surfshark vs Norton 360
- Surfshark vs IVPN
- Surfshark vs Mullvad VPN
- Surfshark vs Windscribe
- Surfshark vs TunnelBear
- Surfshark vs Private Internet Access
- Surfshark vs CrowdStrike Falcon
- Surfshark vs iDenfy
- Surfshark vs IDnow
- Surfshark vs Jumio
- Surfshark vs Kaspersky Total Security
- Surfshark vs LogicManager
- Surfshark vs ExpressVPN

