Developer Tools · head to head
Keycloak vs TunnelBear

Keycloak
Developer Tools
Open-source identity and access management server.
- From
- Free
- Free plan
- Yes
TunnelBear
Cybersecurity
Consumer VPN with a limited free tier and a bear-themed, beginner-friendly app
- From
- Free
- Free plan
- Yes
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Keycloak requires self-hosted deployment and operational expertise to install, configure and maintain; TunnelBear free plan's data cap is small compared to competitors offering more generous free allowances.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 29 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Keycloak and TunnelBear actually diverge.
| Attribute | Keycloak | TunnelBear |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | open-source | freemium |
| Platforms | Self-hosted, Docker, Kubernetes, Linux, Windows, API | windows, mac, linux, ios, android |
| Category | Developer Tools | Cybersecurity |
Identical on both: starting price (Free), free tier (Yes), user rating (Not yet rated).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Keycloak
Nothing recorded that TunnelBear does not also cover.
Only in TunnelBear
- Encrypted VPN tunnel
- Server location switching
- GhostBear obfuscation
- Browser extensions
- Teams account management
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Keycloak
- Organisations requiring self-hosted identity infrastructure for compliance or data residencynot TunnelBear
- Companies with existing LDAP/Active Directory systems needing federated authenticationnot TunnelBear
- Open-source projects and communities requiring free IAM without licensing costsnot TunnelBear
- Enterprises building custom identity workflows requiring fine-grained authorisationnot TunnelBear
- Teams with sufficient operational expertise to manage infrastructurenot TunnelBear
TunnelBear
- Casual browsing protection on public Wi-Finot Keycloak
- Occasional geo-unblocking with a light free allowancenot Keycloak
- Bypassing network-level VPN blocking via obfuscationnot Keycloak
- Managing VPN access for a small team with centralized billingnot Keycloak
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Keycloak
- Requires self-hosted deployment and operational expertise to install, configure and maintain
- No managed cloud option provided by Red Hat; organisations must operate infrastructure themselves or use third-party distributions
- Clustering and high-availability configurations require additional operational knowledge
- Community support only; commercial support requires third-party vendors or distributions
TunnelBear
- Free plan's data cap is small compared to competitors offering more generous free allowances.
- Lacks advanced features like dedicated IP addresses or split-tunneling controls found in some rival VPNs.
- Server network is smaller than large competitors like NordVPN or ExpressVPN.
- No standalone router-level app, limiting whole-network protection options.
Pricing, plan by plan
Keycloak
Free- Open-sourceFree
- Full platform functionality
- Self-hosted deployment
- Community support
TunnelBear
Free- FreeFree
- 2GB of data per month
- Access to VPN servers
- Unlimited devices
- Unlimited$9.99/month
- Unlimited monthly data
- All server locations
- Cheaper on annual/3-year billing
- Teams$undefined/month
- Unlimited data
- 5 connected devices per user
- Dedicated account manager
Which should you pick?
Choose Keycloak if
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Self-hosted, Docker, Kubernetes, Linux, Windows, API.
Choose TunnelBear if
- You need encrypted vpn tunnel.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on windows, mac, linux, ios, android.
- You also want server location switching.
Questions people ask
- Is Keycloak or TunnelBear better?
- Neither clearly leads. Keycloak starts at Free and TunnelBear at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Keycloak or TunnelBear?
- Keycloak starts at Free and TunnelBear at Free.
- Does Keycloak or TunnelBear run on more platforms?
- Keycloak runs on Self-hosted, Docker, Kubernetes, Linux, Windows, API. TunnelBear runs on windows, mac, linux, ios, android.
- Can I use Keycloak for free?
- Both have a free tier, so you can try either at no cost before committing.
- What is Keycloak best used for?
- Keycloak is most often used for organisations requiring self-hosted identity infrastructure for compliance or data residency, companies with existing ldap/active directory systems needing federated authentication, open-source projects and communities requiring free iam without licensing costs, enterprises building custom identity workflows requiring fine-grained authorisation. Of those, organisations requiring self-hosted identity infrastructure for compliance or data residency and companies with existing ldap/active directory systems needing federated authentication are not what TunnelBear is typically brought in for.
- What can Keycloak do that TunnelBear cannot?
- TunnelBear covers Encrypted VPN tunnel, Server location switching, GhostBear obfuscation, Browser extensions.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Keycloak: What protocols does Keycloak support?
Keycloak supports OpenID Connect, OAuth 2.0 and SAML 2.0 protocols for authentication and authorisation.
SourceKeycloak: Can Keycloak integrate with existing user directories?
Yes. Keycloak supports user federation with LDAP and Active Directory systems, allowing organisations to leverage existing user directories.
SourceKeycloak: Is Keycloak free?
Yes. Keycloak is fully open-source and free to deploy and use. No licensing fees are required.
SourceRelated pages
Other head to heads
- Keycloak vs Penpot
- Keycloak vs Soketi
- Keycloak vs Ansible
- Keycloak vs Atlantis
- Keycloak vs Vite
- Keycloak vs Depot
- Keycloak vs Pants Build
- Keycloak vs Buildkite
- Keycloak vs Coder
- Keycloak vs Jitsu
- Keycloak vs Bitbucket
- Keycloak vs Sweep
- Keycloak vs Azure DevOps
- Keycloak vs Backstage
- Keycloak vs Claude Code
- Keycloak vs Cloud Native Buildpacks
- Keycloak vs Cody
- Keycloak vs Windscribe
- Keycloak vs Mullvad VPN
- Keycloak vs Private Internet Access
- Keycloak vs IVPN
- Keycloak vs Enpass
- Keycloak vs CyberGhost VPN
- Keycloak vs NordVPN
- Keycloak vs Surfshark
- Keycloak vs Avast One
- Keycloak vs ProtonVPN
- Keycloak vs LastPass
- Keycloak vs Jamf Pro
- Keycloak vs Keeper Password Manager
- Keycloak vs Keygen
- Keycloak vs KnowBe4
- Keycloak vs Legit Security
- Keycloak vs LogRhythm SIEM
- Keycloak vs ExpressVPN
- TunnelBear vs Penpot
- TunnelBear vs Soketi
- TunnelBear vs Ansible
- TunnelBear vs Atlantis
- TunnelBear vs Vite
- TunnelBear vs Depot
- TunnelBear vs Pants Build
- TunnelBear vs Buildkite
- TunnelBear vs Coder
- TunnelBear vs Jitsu
- TunnelBear vs Bitbucket
- TunnelBear vs Sweep
- TunnelBear vs Azure DevOps
- TunnelBear vs Backstage
- TunnelBear vs Claude Code
- TunnelBear vs Cloud Native Buildpacks
- TunnelBear vs Cody
- TunnelBear vs Windscribe
- TunnelBear vs Mullvad VPN
- TunnelBear vs Private Internet Access
- TunnelBear vs IVPN
- TunnelBear vs Enpass
- TunnelBear vs CyberGhost VPN
- TunnelBear vs NordVPN
- TunnelBear vs Surfshark
- TunnelBear vs Avast One
- TunnelBear vs ProtonVPN
- TunnelBear vs LastPass
- TunnelBear vs Jamf Pro
- TunnelBear vs Keeper Password Manager
- TunnelBear vs Keygen
- TunnelBear vs KnowBe4
- TunnelBear vs Legit Security
- TunnelBear vs LogRhythm SIEM
- TunnelBear vs ExpressVPN
