Developer Tools · head to head
Keycloak vs Strikingly

Keycloak
Developer Tools
Open-source identity and access management server.
- From
- Free
- Free plan
- Yes

Strikingly
Web Development
One-page website builder for small businesses and creators
- From
- Free
- Free plan
- Yes
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Keycloak requires self-hosted deployment and operational expertise to install, configure and maintain; Strikingly strikingly is optimized for single-page sites and is not well suited to building large, multi-section websites.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 29 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Keycloak and Strikingly actually diverge.
| Attribute | Keycloak | Strikingly |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | open-source | freemium |
| Platforms | Self-hosted, Docker, Kubernetes, Linux, Windows, API | web |
| Category | Developer Tools | Web Development |
| Founded | Unknown | 2012 |
Identical on both: starting price (Free), free tier (Yes), user rating (Not yet rated).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Keycloak
Nothing recorded that Strikingly does not also cover.
Only in Strikingly
- Drag-and-drop editor
- Simple Store
- Blogging
- Forms and live chat
- Traffic analytics
- Social feed integration
- HTTPS/SSL
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Keycloak
- Organisations requiring self-hosted identity infrastructure for compliance or data residencynot Strikingly
- Companies with existing LDAP/Active Directory systems needing federated authenticationnot Strikingly
- Open-source projects and communities requiring free IAM without licensing costsnot Strikingly
- Enterprises building custom identity workflows requiring fine-grained authorisationnot Strikingly
- Teams with sufficient operational expertise to manage infrastructurenot Strikingly
Strikingly
- Personal portfolio or resume sitenot Keycloak
- Single-product or small online storenot Keycloak
- Event or landing pagenot Keycloak
- Small business brochure sitenot Keycloak
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Keycloak
- Requires self-hosted deployment and operational expertise to install, configure and maintain
- No managed cloud option provided by Red Hat; organisations must operate infrastructure themselves or use third-party distributions
- Clustering and high-availability configurations require additional operational knowledge
- Community support only; commercial support requires third-party vendors or distributions
Strikingly
- Strikingly is optimized for single-page sites and is not well suited to building large, multi-section websites.
- Transaction fees of 2-5% apply to store sales on lower-tier plans in addition to payment processor fees.
- Design customization is limited compared to code-based site builders, since sites are built from fixed templates.
- The free plan does not support a custom domain, limiting its use for professional or commercial sites.
Pricing, plan by plan
Keycloak
Free- Open-sourceFree
- Full platform functionality
- Self-hosted deployment
- Community support
Strikingly
Free- Limited$8/month
- 2 sites
- 1 GB storage per site
- Up to 5 pages
- Pro$16/month
- 3 sites
- 20 GB storage per site
- Up to 100 pages
- VIP$49/month
- 5 sites
- 100 GB storage per site
- Up to 500 products
Which should you pick?
Choose Keycloak if
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Self-hosted, Docker, Kubernetes, Linux, Windows, API.
Choose Strikingly if
- You need drag-and-drop editor.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on web.
- You also want simple store.
Questions people ask
- Is Keycloak or Strikingly better?
- Neither clearly leads. Keycloak starts at Free and Strikingly at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Keycloak or Strikingly?
- Keycloak starts at Free and Strikingly at Free.
- Does Keycloak or Strikingly run on more platforms?
- Keycloak runs on Self-hosted, Docker, Kubernetes, Linux, Windows, API. Strikingly runs on web.
- Can I use Keycloak for free?
- Both have a free tier, so you can try either at no cost before committing.
- What is Keycloak best used for?
- Keycloak is most often used for organisations requiring self-hosted identity infrastructure for compliance or data residency, companies with existing ldap/active directory systems needing federated authentication, open-source projects and communities requiring free iam without licensing costs, enterprises building custom identity workflows requiring fine-grained authorisation. Of those, organisations requiring self-hosted identity infrastructure for compliance or data residency and companies with existing ldap/active directory systems needing federated authentication are not what Strikingly is typically brought in for.
- What can Keycloak do that Strikingly cannot?
- Strikingly covers Drag-and-drop editor, Simple Store, Blogging, Forms and live chat.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Keycloak: What protocols does Keycloak support?
Keycloak supports OpenID Connect, OAuth 2.0 and SAML 2.0 protocols for authentication and authorisation.
SourceStrikingly: Does Strikingly have a free plan?
Strikingly offers a free tier for getting started, with paid plans beginning at $8/month (billed yearly) adding a custom domain, more storage, and lower transaction fees on store sales.
SourceKeycloak: Can Keycloak integrate with existing user directories?
Yes. Keycloak supports user federation with LDAP and Active Directory systems, allowing organisations to leverage existing user directories.
SourceStrikingly: Does Strikingly charge transaction fees on store sales?
Yes. The Limited plan charges a 5% transaction fee, the Pro plan charges 2%, and the VIP plan removes the transaction fee entirely, in addition to any payment processor fees.
SourceKeycloak: Is Keycloak free?
Yes. Keycloak is fully open-source and free to deploy and use. No licensing fees are required.
SourceStrikingly: What payment methods can I use to sell products?
Strikingly's built-in Simple Store supports accepting payments through PayPal and Stripe.
SourceRelated pages
Other head to heads
- Keycloak vs Penpot
- Keycloak vs Soketi
- Keycloak vs Ansible
- Keycloak vs Atlantis
- Keycloak vs Vite
- Keycloak vs Depot
- Keycloak vs Pants Build
- Keycloak vs Buildkite
- Keycloak vs Coder
- Keycloak vs Jitsu
- Keycloak vs Bitbucket
- Keycloak vs Sweep
- Keycloak vs Azure DevOps
- Keycloak vs Backstage
- Keycloak vs Claude Code
- Keycloak vs Cloud Native Buildpacks
- Keycloak vs Cody
- Keycloak vs Wix Studio
- Keycloak vs Carrd
- Keycloak vs Astro
- Keycloak vs Bootstrap
- Keycloak vs Qwik
- Keycloak vs Flask
- Keycloak vs Docusaurus
- Keycloak vs SolidStart
- Keycloak vs Bolt.new
- Keycloak vs Drupal
- Keycloak vs Lit
- Keycloak vs Apache HTTP Server
- Keycloak vs .NET
- Keycloak vs Express.js
- Keycloak vs FastAPI
- Keycloak vs Wix
- Strikingly vs Penpot
- Strikingly vs Soketi
- Strikingly vs Ansible
- Strikingly vs Atlantis
- Strikingly vs Vite
- Strikingly vs Depot
- Strikingly vs Pants Build
- Strikingly vs Buildkite
- Strikingly vs Coder
- Strikingly vs Jitsu
- Strikingly vs Bitbucket
- Strikingly vs Sweep
- Strikingly vs Azure DevOps
- Strikingly vs Backstage
- Strikingly vs Claude Code
- Strikingly vs Cloud Native Buildpacks
- Strikingly vs Cody
- Strikingly vs Wix Studio
- Strikingly vs Carrd
- Strikingly vs Astro
- Strikingly vs Bootstrap
- Strikingly vs Qwik
- Strikingly vs Flask
- Strikingly vs Docusaurus
- Strikingly vs SolidStart
- Strikingly vs Bolt.new
- Strikingly vs Drupal
- Strikingly vs Lit
- Strikingly vs Apache HTTP Server
- Strikingly vs .NET
- Strikingly vs Express.js
- Strikingly vs FastAPI
- Strikingly vs Wix
