Web Development · head to head
Flask vs Strikingly
Strikingly
Landing Page Builders
One-page website builder for small businesses and creators
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Flask requires manual configuration of many common features like authentication, ORM, and admin panels; Strikingly strikingly is optimized for single-page sites and is not well suited to building large, multi-section websites.
- They diverge on capability: Flask covers Lightweight framework, Strikingly covers Drag-and-drop editor.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Flask and Strikingly actually diverge.
| Attribute | Flask | Strikingly |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | free | freemium |
| Platforms | Linux, macOS, Windows, Cloud (any platform supporting Python) | web |
| Category | Web Development | Landing Page Builders |
| Founded | 2010 | 2012 |
Identical on both: starting price (Free), free tier (Yes), user rating (Not yet rated).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Flask
- Lightweight framework
- Jinja2 templating
- Werkzeug WSGI toolkit
- URL routing
- Request handling
- Session management
- Cookie handling
- Blueprint organization
Only in Strikingly
- Drag-and-drop editor
- Simple Store
- Blogging
- Forms and live chat
- Traffic analytics
- Social feed integration
- HTTPS/SSL
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Flask
- REST APIs and backend servicesnot Strikingly
- Small-to-medium web applications and prototypesnot Strikingly
- Microservicesnot Strikingly
- Server-rendered apps using Jinja templatingnot Strikingly
- Teaching and learning web developmentnot Strikingly
Strikingly
- Personal portfolio or resume sitenot Flask
- Single-product or small online storenot Flask
- Event or landing pagenot Flask
- Small business brochure sitenot Flask
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Flask
- Requires manual configuration of many common features like authentication, ORM, and admin panels
- No built-in admin interface or scaffolding tools
- Minimal built-in security features compared to full frameworks
Strikingly
- Strikingly is optimized for single-page sites and is not well suited to building large, multi-section websites.
- Transaction fees of 2-5% apply to store sales on lower-tier plans in addition to payment processor fees.
- Design customization is limited compared to code-based site builders, since sites are built from fixed templates.
- The free plan does not support a custom domain, limiting its use for professional or commercial sites.
Pricing, plan by plan
Flask
Free- Open SourceFree
- Micro web framework
- Flexible architecture
- Jinja2 templating
Strikingly
Free- Limited$8/month
- 2 sites
- 1 GB storage per site
- Up to 5 pages
- Pro$16/month
- 3 sites
- 20 GB storage per site
- Up to 100 pages
- VIP$49/month
- 5 sites
- 100 GB storage per site
- Up to 500 products
Which should you pick?
Choose Flask if
- You need lightweight framework.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Linux, macOS, Windows, Cloud (any platform supporting Python).
- You also want jinja2 templating.
Choose Strikingly if
- You need drag-and-drop editor.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on web.
- You also want simple store.
Questions people ask
- Is Flask or Strikingly better?
- Neither clearly leads. Flask starts at Free and Strikingly at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Flask or Strikingly?
- Flask starts at Free and Strikingly at Free.
- Does Flask or Strikingly run on more platforms?
- Flask runs on Linux, macOS, Windows, Cloud (any platform supporting Python). Strikingly runs on web.
- Can I use Flask for free?
- Both have a free tier, so you can try either at no cost before committing.
- What is Flask best used for?
- Flask is most often used for rest apis and backend services, small-to-medium web applications and prototypes, microservices, server-rendered apps using jinja templating. Of those, rest apis and backend services and small-to-medium web applications and prototypes are not what Strikingly is typically brought in for.
- What can Flask do that Strikingly cannot?
- Flask covers Lightweight framework, Jinja2 templating, Werkzeug WSGI toolkit, URL routing. Strikingly covers Drag-and-drop editor, Simple Store, Blogging, Forms and live chat.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Flask: Is Flask free to use?
Yes. Flask is open-source software released under the BSD-3-Clause License, available free for any use including commercial applications.
SourceStrikingly: Does Strikingly have a free plan?
Strikingly offers a free tier for getting started, with paid plans beginning at $8/month (billed yearly) adding a custom domain, more storage, and lower transaction fees on store sales.
SourceFlask: What are Flask's core dependencies?
Flask depends on three main libraries: Werkzeug (WSGI toolkit), Jinja (template engine), and Click (CLI toolkit).
SourceStrikingly: Does Strikingly charge transaction fees on store sales?
Yes. The Limited plan charges a 5% transaction fee, the Pro plan charges 2%, and the VIP plan removes the transaction fee entirely, in addition to any payment processor fees.
SourceFlask: Does Flask provide built-in database support?
No. Flask is a microframework that does not include built-in database support. Developers must choose and integrate their own database libraries, though Flask-SQLAlchemy is a popular community extension.
SourceStrikingly: What payment methods can I use to sell products?
Strikingly's built-in Simple Store supports accepting payments through PayPal and Stripe.
SourceFlask: What platforms does Flask support?
Flask is a microframework for Python that runs on any platform that supports Python, including Linux, macOS, Windows, and cloud platforms.
SourceFlask: Can Flask scale to large applications?
Yes. While designed to be lightweight and simple, Flask is designed with the ability to scale up to complex applications through blueprints, extensions, and modular architecture.
SourceFlask: Does Flask require a build step to run?
No. Flask does not require a build step. Applications can run directly with the Flask development server using 'flask run' from the command line.
SourceRelated pages
Other head to heads
- Flask vs Django
- Flask vs MySQL
- Flask vs Next.js
- Flask vs Laravel
- Flask vs npm
- Flask vs React
- Flask vs Vue.js
- Flask vs Carrd
- Flask vs Nginx
- Flask vs Node.js
- Flask vs v0 by Vercel
- Flask vs Apache HTTP Server
- Flask vs Astro
- Flask vs Bolt.new
- Flask vs .NET
- Flask vs Express.js
- Flask vs FastAPI
- Flask vs NestJS
- Strikingly vs Django
- Strikingly vs MySQL
- Strikingly vs Next.js
- Strikingly vs Laravel
- Strikingly vs npm
- Strikingly vs React
- Strikingly vs Vue.js
- Strikingly vs Carrd
- Strikingly vs Nginx
- Strikingly vs Node.js
- Strikingly vs v0 by Vercel
- Strikingly vs Apache HTTP Server
- Strikingly vs Astro
- Strikingly vs Bolt.new
- Strikingly vs .NET
- Strikingly vs Express.js
- Strikingly vs FastAPI
- Strikingly vs NestJS