Web Development · head to head
Astro vs Strikingly

Astro
Web Development
Web framework for content-driven sites shipping minimal JavaScript by default
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -

Strikingly
Landing Page Builders
One-page website builder for small businesses and creators
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Astro limited to static site generation and server-side rendering; real-time applications requiring constant client-server communication are unsuitable; Strikingly strikingly is optimized for single-page sites and is not well suited to building large, multi-section websites.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Astro and Strikingly actually diverge.
| Attribute | Astro | Strikingly |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | open-source | freemium |
| Platforms | Web, Node.js, Cloudflare, Vercel, Netlify, AWS, Deno | web |
| Category | Web Development | Landing Page Builders |
| Founded | Unknown | 2012 |
Identical on both: starting price (Free), free tier (Yes), user rating (Not yet rated).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Astro
Nothing recorded that Strikingly does not also cover.
Only in Strikingly
- Drag-and-drop editor
- Simple Store
- Blogging
- Forms and live chat
- Traffic analytics
- Social feed integration
- HTTPS/SSL
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Astro
- Marketing websites and landing pages prioritising performance and SEOnot Strikingly
- Documentation and blog platforms with high page volumesnot Strikingly
- E-commerce storefronts where page speed affects conversion ratesnot Strikingly
- Portfolio and personal websites showcasing static content with minimal interactivitynot Strikingly
- Multi-language sites requiring efficient content management and translationnot Strikingly
- JAMstack projects integrating headless CMS platforms (Contentful, Sanity, Strapi)not Strikingly
Strikingly
- Personal portfolio or resume sitenot Astro
- Single-product or small online storenot Astro
- Event or landing pagenot Astro
- Small business brochure sitenot Astro
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Astro
- Limited to static site generation and server-side rendering; real-time applications requiring constant client-server communication are unsuitable
- Smaller ecosystem compared to Next.js; fewer third-party component libraries and integrations readily available
- Build time increases with large content volumes (1,000+ pages); incremental builds not yet as optimised as Gatsby or Next.js
- API routes and serverless functions are less mature than Next.js; complex backend integrations require additional tooling
Strikingly
- Strikingly is optimized for single-page sites and is not well suited to building large, multi-section websites.
- Transaction fees of 2-5% apply to store sales on lower-tier plans in addition to payment processor fees.
- Design customization is limited compared to code-based site builders, since sites are built from fixed templates.
- The free plan does not support a custom domain, limiting its use for professional or commercial sites.
Pricing, plan by plan
Astro
FreeNo published plan breakdown. See the Astro review.
Strikingly
Free- Limited$8/month
- 2 sites
- 1 GB storage per site
- Up to 5 pages
- Pro$16/month
- 3 sites
- 20 GB storage per site
- Up to 100 pages
- VIP$49/month
- 5 sites
- 100 GB storage per site
- Up to 500 products
Which should you pick?
Choose Astro if
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Web, Node.js, Cloudflare, Vercel, Netlify, AWS, Deno.
Choose Strikingly if
- You need drag-and-drop editor.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on web.
- You also want simple store.
Questions people ask
- Is Astro or Strikingly better?
- Neither clearly leads. Astro starts at Free and Strikingly at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Astro or Strikingly?
- Astro starts at Free and Strikingly at Free.
- Does Astro or Strikingly run on more platforms?
- Astro runs on Web, Node.js, Cloudflare, Vercel, Netlify, AWS, Deno. Strikingly runs on web.
- Can I use Astro for free?
- Both have a free tier, so you can try either at no cost before committing.
- What is Astro best used for?
- Astro is most often used for marketing websites and landing pages prioritising performance and seo, documentation and blog platforms with high page volumes, e-commerce storefronts where page speed affects conversion rates, portfolio and personal websites showcasing static content with minimal interactivity. Of those, marketing websites and landing pages prioritising performance and seo and documentation and blog platforms with high page volumes are not what Strikingly is typically brought in for.
- What can Astro do that Strikingly cannot?
- Strikingly covers Drag-and-drop editor, Simple Store, Blogging, Forms and live chat.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Astro: Is Astro free?
Yes. Astro is free and open-source under MIT licence. Deployment hosting (Vercel, Netlify, Cloudflare, AWS) may incur costs depending on usage.
SourceStrikingly: Does Strikingly have a free plan?
Strikingly offers a free tier for getting started, with paid plans beginning at $8/month (billed yearly) adding a custom domain, more storage, and lower transaction fees on store sales.
SourceAstro: Can I use React components in Astro?
Yes. Astro supports React, Vue, Svelte, Preact, and Solid components. Components are server-rendered by default; add client: directives to enable client-side interactivity only where needed.
SourceStrikingly: Does Strikingly charge transaction fees on store sales?
Yes. The Limited plan charges a 5% transaction fee, the Pro plan charges 2%, and the VIP plan removes the transaction fee entirely, in addition to any payment processor fees.
SourceAstro: How does Astro compare to Next.js for performance?
Astro achieves superior Core Web Vitals scores (66% pass rate vs Next.js 30%) by shipping minimal JavaScript. Next.js defaults to client-side rendering; Astro renders on the server by default.
SourceStrikingly: What payment methods can I use to sell products?
Strikingly's built-in Simple Store supports accepting payments through PayPal and Stripe.
SourceRelated pages
Other head to heads
- Astro vs Django
- Astro vs MySQL
- Astro vs Next.js
- Astro vs Flask
- Astro vs Laravel
- Astro vs npm
- Astro vs React
- Astro vs Vue.js
- Astro vs Carrd
- Astro vs Nginx
- Astro vs Node.js
- Astro vs v0 by Vercel
- Astro vs Apache HTTP Server
- Astro vs Bolt.new
- Astro vs .NET
- Astro vs Express.js
- Astro vs FastAPI
- Astro vs NestJS
- Strikingly vs Django
- Strikingly vs MySQL
- Strikingly vs Next.js
- Strikingly vs Flask
- Strikingly vs Laravel
- Strikingly vs npm
- Strikingly vs React
- Strikingly vs Vue.js
- Strikingly vs Carrd
- Strikingly vs Nginx
- Strikingly vs Node.js
- Strikingly vs v0 by Vercel
- Strikingly vs Apache HTTP Server
- Strikingly vs Bolt.new
- Strikingly vs .NET
- Strikingly vs Express.js
- Strikingly vs FastAPI
- Strikingly vs NestJS
