Recruitment · head to head
Checkr vs JobAdder

Checkr
Recruitment
Background check platform priced per report, with third-party court fees passed through separately
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -

JobAdder
Recruitment
Recruitment platform for staffing agencies and in-house teams, majority owned by the SEEK job board group
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Checkr advertised per-report prices exclude court and database access fees, so the real cost per candidate varies by jurisdiction and is higher than the sticker in many counties; JobAdder there is no native pay and bill chain, so contract staffing agencies must buy and integrate a separate timesheet and invoicing system and reconcile two sources of placement data.
- They diverge on capability: Checkr covers Package pricing, JobAdder covers Job posting.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 1 September 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Checkr and JobAdder actually diverge.
Identical on both: starting price (On request), free tier (No), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Recruitment).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Checkr
- Package pricing
- API and dashboard
- Adjudication tools
- Continuous checks
- Candidate portal
Only in JobAdder
- Job posting
- Candidate management
- Client and contact CRM
- Placement tracking
- Interview scheduling
- Workflow automation
- Mobile apps
- Marketplace integrations
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Checkr
- A company running high-volume hourly or gig hiring that needs API-driven checks integrated into an existing ATSnot JobAdder
- A startup or mid-size employer wanting self-service ordering through a dashboard without a dedicated screening account managernot JobAdder
- An employer that needs continuous rescreening for driving-related roles rather than a one-time check at hirenot JobAdder
- A company budgeting screening costs that needs to model court fee variance across the states it hires innot JobAdder
JobAdder
- An Australian or New Zealand agency that lives on SEEK applications and wants the shortest path from board to pipelinenot Checkr
- A recruitment firm that wants consultants productive in days rather than running a multi-month implementationnot Checkr
- An in-house team in APAC that needs agency-grade candidate search without enterprise ATS costnot Checkr
- A consultancy whose recruiters work from client sites and need genuine mobile workflownot Checkr
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Checkr
- Advertised per-report prices exclude court and database access fees, so the real cost per candidate varies by jurisdiction and is higher than the sticker in many counties
- Turnaround time depends on how fast individual courts process requests, which Checkr does not control and which can stretch well past the advertised average in rural or backlogged counties
- Add-on checks such as MVR, drug screening and education verification are priced separately, so a full pre-employment package can cost significantly more than the base package price suggests
- Enterprise-scale volume requires a custom Enterprise contract rather than the published per-report rates, so large employers cannot rely on the public pricing page to budget
- Compliance obligations under the FCRA and state ban-the-box laws remain the employer's responsibility even though Checkr provides tooling, so legal review is still needed rather than assumed away by the platform
- Candidate disputes and re-adjudication can add days to a hiring timeline, which matters for roles filled under time pressure
JobAdder
- There is no native pay and bill chain, so contract staffing agencies must buy and integrate a separate timesheet and invoicing system and reconcile two sources of placement data.
- The product is strongest inside the SEEK footprint, and buyers in North America or continental Europe get weaker board coverage while paying the same per user rate.
- Analytics beyond standard activity and placement reporting require an add-on, which turns a competitive headline price into a higher effective one for data-driven agencies.
- Pricing is per user per month by quote with annual commitment, so agencies with fluctuating consultant headcount carry licences through quiet quarters.
- Support and product hours run on Australian time, meaning European and American customers frequently wait overnight for a response to anything the documentation does not answer.
Pricing, plan by plan
Checkr
On request- Basic$29.99/report
- SSN trace
- Sex offender registry
- Global watchlist
- Essential$59.99/report
- Everything in Basic
- Identity verification
- Unlimited county criminal search
- Complete$94.99/report
- Everything in Essential
- Unlimited state criminal search
- Federal criminal search
JobAdder
On request- JobAdder$undefined/year
- Priced per user per month on annual terms
- Agency and in-house configurations
- Job board posting included, board fees separate
Which should you pick?
Choose Checkr if
- You need package pricing.
- You work on Web, API.
- You also want api and dashboard.
Choose JobAdder if
- You need job posting.
- You work on Web, iOS, Android.
- You also want candidate management.
Questions people ask
- Is Checkr or JobAdder better?
- Neither clearly leads. Checkr starts at On request and JobAdder at On request, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Checkr or JobAdder?
- Checkr starts at On request and JobAdder at On request.
- Does Checkr or JobAdder run on more platforms?
- Checkr runs on Web, API. JobAdder runs on Web, iOS, Android.
- What is Checkr best used for?
- Checkr is most often used for a company running high-volume hourly or gig hiring that needs api-driven checks integrated into an existing ats, a startup or mid-size employer wanting self-service ordering through a dashboard without a dedicated screening account manager, an employer that needs continuous rescreening for driving-related roles rather than a one-time check at hire, a company budgeting screening costs that needs to model court fee variance across the states it hires in. Of those, a company running high-volume hourly or gig hiring that needs api-driven checks integrated into an existing ats and a startup or mid-size employer wanting self-service ordering through a dashboard without a dedicated screening account manager are not what JobAdder is typically brought in for.
- What can Checkr do that JobAdder cannot?
- Checkr covers Package pricing, API and dashboard, Adjudication tools, Continuous checks. JobAdder covers Job posting, Candidate management, Client and contact CRM, Placement tracking.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Checkr: Does the per-report price include court fees?
No. Checkr states that standard third-party court and database access fees are passed through at cost on top of the package price, and these vary by jurisdiction.
JobAdder: Who owns JobAdder?
SEEK, the Australasian job board operator, has held a majority stake since 2016, which is why the SEEK integration is deeper than a normal partnership.
Checkr: Can Checkr be used without an ATS integration?
Yes, checks can be ordered manually through the Checkr dashboard as well as programmatically through the API.
JobAdder: Does it handle contractor timesheets and invoicing?
Not natively. It integrates with dedicated pay and bill systems such as Astute Payroll, which adds a second vendor and contract.
Checkr: Is pricing different for enterprise volume?
Yes, high-volume employers negotiate an Enterprise contract rather than paying the published per-report rates.
JobAdder: Is it suitable outside Australia?
Yes, and it has a real UK customer base, but board coverage and support hours are calibrated to APAC.
JobAdder: How long is implementation?
Days to a few weeks for most agencies, which is its main advantage over the heavier agency platforms.
Related pages
Other head to heads
- Checkr vs Gem
- Checkr vs Glassdoor
- Checkr vs SeekOut
- Checkr vs hireEZ
- Checkr vs Codility
- Checkr vs HackerRank
- Checkr vs Indeed
- Checkr vs Findem
- Checkr vs Fetcher
- Checkr vs Karat
- Checkr vs Recruitee
- Checkr vs ZipRecruiter
- Checkr vs SAP SuccessFactors
- Checkr vs BrightHire
- Checkr vs Bullhorn
- Checkr vs Comeet
- Checkr vs Workable
- Checkr vs SmartRecruiters
- Checkr vs JazzHR
- Checkr vs Manatal
- Checkr vs Occupop
- Checkr vs Teamtailor
- Checkr vs Metaview
- Checkr vs JobScore
- Checkr vs Jobvite
- JobAdder vs Gem
- JobAdder vs Glassdoor
- JobAdder vs SeekOut
- JobAdder vs hireEZ
- JobAdder vs Codility
- JobAdder vs HackerRank
- JobAdder vs Indeed
- JobAdder vs Findem
- JobAdder vs Fetcher
- JobAdder vs Karat
- JobAdder vs Recruitee
- JobAdder vs ZipRecruiter
- JobAdder vs SAP SuccessFactors
- JobAdder vs BrightHire
- JobAdder vs Bullhorn
- JobAdder vs Comeet
- JobAdder vs Workable
- JobAdder vs SmartRecruiters
- JobAdder vs JazzHR
- JobAdder vs Manatal
- JobAdder vs Occupop
- JobAdder vs Teamtailor
- JobAdder vs Metaview
- JobAdder vs JobScore
- JobAdder vs Jobvite
