Developer Tools · head to head
Jitsu vs Reportz

Jitsu
Developer Tools
Open source event pipeline that streams behavioural data to your own warehouse
- From
- Free
- Free plan
- Yes

Reportz
Business Intelligence
Per-dashboard marketing reporting at under ten dollars a client
- From
- $9.9/month
- Free plan
- No
The short version
- Jitsu is an MIT-licensed alternative to Segment.
- Jitsu has a free plan, then $99/mo; Reportz starts at $9.9/mo.
- Only Jitsu lists event collection; only Reportz lists per-dashboard pricing.
- Where Reportz falls short: there is no data modelling, SQL or warehouse layer, so cross-source analysis is limited to what the widget set already supports.
- Prices and features on this page were last checked on 31 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Jitsu and Reportz actually diverge.
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Jitsu
- Event collection
- Warehouse destinations
- Connector syncs
- Transformations
- Bundled ClickHouse
- Event debugger
- Self-hosting
- Custom domains
Only in Reportz
- Per-dashboard pricing
- Unlimited users
- Public share links
- White labelling
- Template library
- Scheduled reports
- Custom KPI widgets
- Client management
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Jitsu
- A team paying five figures a year to a customer data platform when all it actually does is send events to Snowflakenot Reportz
- An engineering group that needs event collection running inside its own VPC for data residency or security review reasonsnot Reportz
- A product analytics setup that wants raw events in the warehouse as the source of truth rather than trapped in a vendor toolnot Reportz
- A startup that needs first-party event collection on its own domain to reduce loss from tracker blocking without paying CDP pricesnot Reportz
Reportz
- A five-person SEO agency reporting to twenty five clients that cannot justify several hundred dollars a month for reporting softwarenot Jitsu
- A freelancer who needs one white-labelled dashboard per client and nothing elsenot Jitsu
- An agency giving clients a live link instead of a monthly PDF, without buying client seatsnot Jitsu
- A marketing team wanting a cheap always-on KPI screen fed from ad and analytics platformsnot Jitsu
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Jitsu
- Jitsu is a pipeline, not a customer data platform, so identity resolution, audience building and reverse ETL are absent and a marketing team expecting Segment parity will be disappointed
- Connector sync frequency is deliberately tiered, with the free plan limited to manual runs and one daily sync, so anything approaching operational freshness requires the paid plan or self-hosting
- Self-hosting means you own the reliability of a system that drops data silently when misconfigured, and event loss is uniquely hard to notice because nothing errors, the numbers are just quietly lower
- The connector catalogue is far smaller than Fivetran or Airbyte, so if your requirement is pulling from many SaaS sources rather than pushing events, Jitsu is the wrong half of the problem
- It is a small company with a small commercial team, so enterprise procurement processes around security review, contractual SLAs and support escalation take longer than with an incumbent vendor
Reportz
- The connector library is smaller than the established agency reporting tools, and if a platform you report on is missing there is no practical route to getting it added
- Four Dots is a small agency-owned business rather than a funded software company, so API breakages and platform changes can take longer to fix than at larger vendors
- There is no data modelling, SQL or warehouse layer, so cross-source analysis is limited to what the widget set already supports
- Per-dashboard billing means an agency that builds several views per client loses the headline price advantage quickly
- Documentation and support are thin compared with larger competitors, and complex setups often need direct email support rather than self-service answers
Pricing, plan by plan
Jitsu
Free- Open SourceFree
- MIT licence
- Self-host on any cloud
- No usage limits
- Cloud FreeFree
- Unlimited captured events
- 200,000 active events per month
- Manual connector runs only
- Business$99/mo
- 2,000,000 active events per month
- $40 per additional million events
- Hourly connector sync frequency
- EnterpriseOn request
- Custom event volume
- One minute sync frequency
- Unlimited active syncs
Reportz
$9.9/month- Consultant$9.9/mo
- Priced per dashboard
- Unlimited users
- Unlimited data sources
- Agency$99/mo
- Around ten dashboards at the same per-dashboard rate
- Unlimited users
- Custom domain
- Enterprise$742.5/mo
- 75 dashboards
- Volume rate
- Unlimited users
Which should you pick?
Choose Jitsu if
- You need event collection.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Web, Linux, Self-hosted, iOS, Android.
- You also want warehouse destinations.
Questions people ask
- Is Jitsu or Reportz better?
- Neither clearly leads. Jitsu starts at Free and Reportz at $9.9/month, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Jitsu or Reportz?
- Jitsu has a free tier; the other does not. Paid plans start at Free for Jitsu and $9.9/month for Reportz.
- Does Jitsu or Reportz run on more platforms?
- Jitsu runs on Web, Linux, Self-hosted, iOS, Android. Reportz runs on Web.
- Can I use Jitsu for free?
- Yes. Jitsu has a free tier, so you can try it without paying. Reportz starts at $9.9/month.
- What is Jitsu best used for?
- Jitsu is most often used for a team paying five figures a year to a customer data platform when all it actually does is send events to snowflake, an engineering group that needs event collection running inside its own vpc for data residency or security review reasons, a product analytics setup that wants raw events in the warehouse as the source of truth rather than trapped in a vendor tool, a startup that needs first-party event collection on its own domain to reduce loss from tracker blocking without paying cdp prices. Of those, a team paying five figures a year to a customer data platform when all it actually does is send events to snowflake and an engineering group that needs event collection running inside its own vpc for data residency or security review reasons are not what Reportz is typically brought in for.
- What can Jitsu do that Reportz cannot?
- Jitsu covers Event collection, Warehouse destinations, Connector syncs, Transformations. Reportz covers Per-dashboard pricing, Unlimited users, Public share links, White labelling.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Jitsu: Is Jitsu the same as Jitsi?
No. Jitsu is an open source event data pipeline. Jitsi is an unrelated video conferencing project.
Reportz: What does Reportz cost?
9.90 US dollars per dashboard per month, with unlimited users and data sources on every tier.
Jitsu: Can I self-host for free?
Yes. The project is MIT licensed with no usage limits when self-hosted.
Reportz: Is there a free plan?
No, but there is a fifteen day trial with no card required.
Jitsu: How does the cost compare with Segment?
The Business plan is 99 US dollars a month for two million active events, where a per-tracked-user CDP typically costs orders of magnitude more at comparable volume.
Reportz: Who is behind it?
Four Dots, a digital marketing agency in Belgrade that built the tool for its own client reporting.
Jitsu: Does Jitsu do identity resolution?
No. It transports and transforms events; identity stitching and audiences are not part of the product.
Reportz: Can clients view without a login?
Yes, dashboards can be shared as a public link under your own domain.
Related pages
Other head to heads
- Jitsu vs Atlantis
- Jitsu vs Visual Studio Code
- Jitsu vs Steampipe
- Jitsu vs Tilt
- Jitsu vs Frappe
- Jitsu vs Kubernetes
- Jitsu vs GNU Emacs
- Jitsu vs Penpot
- Jitsu vs Bazel
- Jitsu vs Eclipse IDE
- Jitsu vs GitHub
- Jitsu vs Pants Build
- Jitsu vs Turborepo
- Jitsu vs Yarn
- Jitsu vs Argo CD
- Jitsu vs Blacksmith
- Jitsu vs CLion
- Jitsu vs Coder
- Jitsu vs Databox
- Jitsu vs Klipfolio
- Jitsu vs DashThis
- Jitsu vs Luzmo
- Jitsu vs Cyfe
- Jitsu vs Hex
- Jitsu vs Deepnote
- Jitsu vs Grow
- Jitsu vs Dundas BI
- Jitsu vs Rill Data
- Jitsu vs Fabi
- Jitsu vs Stripe Dashboard
- Jitsu vs Oracle Analytics Cloud
- Jitsu vs Periscope Data
- Jitsu vs Zoho Analytics
- Jitsu vs Baremetrics
- Jitsu vs Board International
- Jitsu vs Cabin
- Reportz vs Atlantis
- Reportz vs Visual Studio Code
- Reportz vs Steampipe
- Reportz vs Tilt
- Reportz vs Frappe
- Reportz vs Kubernetes
- Reportz vs GNU Emacs
- Reportz vs Penpot
- Reportz vs Bazel
- Reportz vs Eclipse IDE
- Reportz vs GitHub
- Reportz vs Pants Build
- Reportz vs Turborepo
- Reportz vs Yarn
- Reportz vs Argo CD
- Reportz vs Blacksmith
- Reportz vs CLion
- Reportz vs Coder
- Reportz vs Databox
- Reportz vs Klipfolio
- Reportz vs DashThis
- Reportz vs Luzmo
- Reportz vs Cyfe
- Reportz vs Hex
- Reportz vs Deepnote
- Reportz vs Grow
- Reportz vs Dundas BI
- Reportz vs Rill Data
- Reportz vs Fabi
- Reportz vs Stripe Dashboard
- Reportz vs Oracle Analytics Cloud
- Reportz vs Periscope Data
- Reportz vs Zoho Analytics
- Reportz vs Baremetrics
- Reportz vs Board International
- Reportz vs Cabin
