Cybersecurity · head to head
Jamf Pro vs Resolver

Jamf Pro
Cybersecurity
Apple-only device management for Mac, iPhone, iPad and Apple TV, licensed per device by a public US vendor.
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -

Resolver
Cybersecurity
Risk, incident and investigations platform for corporate security and operational risk teams, owned by Kroll
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Jamf Pro it manages Apple hardware only, so any organisation with Windows or Android devices runs a second management platform and produces two sets of compliance evidence, and the two inventories disagree with each other more often than either vendor's documentation suggests.; Resolver kroll ownership since 2022 means the product is sold alongside risk consulting services, so buyers who want software with no services attach should expect that conversation and should price the licence separately in negotiation.
- They diverge on capability: Jamf Pro covers Automated Device Enrolment, Resolver covers Incident management.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 31 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Jamf Pro and Resolver actually diverge.
Identical on both: starting price (On request), pricing model (quote), free tier (No), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Cybersecurity).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Jamf Pro
- Automated Device Enrolment
- Configuration profiles
- Policies and scripts
- Smart groups
- Self Service
- Patch management
- Extension attributes
- Same-day OS support
Only in Resolver
- Incident management
- Investigations
- Enterprise risk management
- Internal audit
- Compliance and obligations
- Business continuity
- Risk Event Management
- Configurable dashboards
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Jamf Pro
- An Apple-heavy workforce where devices ship directly to users and must configure themselves on first boot with no IT touchnot Resolver
- Education deployments managing shared iPads across classes with per-user app assignmentnot Resolver
- Developer organisations where engineers have administrator rights on their own Macs and management has to be achieved by policy and script rather than lockdownnot Resolver
- Organisations needing compliance evidence for Apple devices that a general-purpose endpoint manager cannot produce at the required depthnot Resolver
Resolver
- A national retailer consolidating store incident reporting, loss prevention cases and investigations into one system with defensible evidence handlingnot Jamf Pro
- A bank that needs operational risk events captured against a risk and control register rather than in spreadsheets and emailnot Jamf Pro
- A university security operations centre running dispatch, case management and clery-style reporting from a single recordnot Jamf Pro
- An organisation that already retains Kroll for investigations and wants case intake and vendor handoff in the same platformnot Jamf Pro
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Jamf Pro
- It manages Apple hardware only, so any organisation with Windows or Android devices runs a second management platform and produces two sets of compliance evidence, and the two inventories disagree with each other more often than either vendor's documentation suggests.
- Licensing is per device per year with different rates for computers and mobile devices, so spare and shared hardware sitting in a cupboard continues to consume licences until somebody actively removes it from inventory, which is nobody's job by default.
- Apple's frameworks set the ceiling: if Apple does not expose a setting through MDM or declarative device management, Jamf cannot manage it either, so requests that are a single Group Policy object on Windows are answered with a scripted workaround or with nothing.
- Zero-touch deployment depends on devices being registered in Apple Business Manager, which generally means buying through Apple or an authorised reseller, so machines bought retail or inherited through an acquisition cannot be supervised without wiping and re-enrolling them.
- Getting value from it requires an Apple platform specialist who can write shell scripts, read configuration profiles and design smart group logic, and a generalist team without that skill uses a fraction of the product while paying the full per-device rate.
Resolver
- Kroll ownership since 2022 means the product is sold alongside risk consulting services, so buyers who want software with no services attach should expect that conversation and should price the licence separately in negotiation.
- Configuration flexibility comes at the cost of implementation time, with deployments commonly running several months and typically requiring vendor or partner services, so the first-year cost is well above the annual licence.
- Module-based pricing means the platform gets expensive quickly once you add audit, compliance and continuity to a security-led purchase, and modules bought later rarely carry the discount of the original deal.
- The IT and cyber compliance side is thinner than dedicated tools, so organisations chasing SOC 2 or ISO 27001 evidence automation will find it does not replace a Drata or Vanta.
- Reporting is capable but the drag and drop builder has a real learning curve, and organisations that do not train an internal administrator end up raising support tickets for changes that should be self-service.
Pricing, plan by plan
Jamf Pro
On requestNo published plan breakdown. See the Jamf Pro review.
Resolver
On request- Resolver Core$undefined/year
- Priced by modules selected and number of users
- Annual or multi-year enterprise agreement
- Implementation and configuration quoted separately
Which should you pick?
Choose Jamf Pro if
- You need automated device enrolment.
- You also want configuration profiles.
Choose Resolver if
- You need incident management.
- You work on Web, iOS, Android.
- You also want investigations.
Questions people ask
- Is Jamf Pro or Resolver better?
- Neither clearly leads. Jamf Pro starts at On request and Resolver at On request, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Jamf Pro or Resolver?
- Jamf Pro starts at On request and Resolver at On request.
- Does Jamf Pro or Resolver run on more platforms?
- Jamf Pro runs on Web. Resolver runs on Web, iOS, Android.
- What is Jamf Pro best used for?
- Jamf Pro is most often used for an apple-heavy workforce where devices ship directly to users and must configure themselves on first boot with no it touch, education deployments managing shared ipads across classes with per-user app assignment, developer organisations where engineers have administrator rights on their own macs and management has to be achieved by policy and script rather than lockdown, organisations needing compliance evidence for apple devices that a general-purpose endpoint manager cannot produce at the required depth. Of those, an apple-heavy workforce where devices ship directly to users and must configure themselves on first boot with no it touch and education deployments managing shared ipads across classes with per-user app assignment are not what Resolver is typically brought in for.
- What can Jamf Pro do that Resolver cannot?
- Jamf Pro covers Automated Device Enrolment, Configuration profiles, Policies and scripts, Smart groups. Resolver covers Incident management, Investigations, Enterprise risk management, Internal audit.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Jamf Pro: Does Jamf Pro include endpoint security?
No. Threat prevention, endpoint telemetry and compliance monitoring are Jamf Protect, a separate product and a separate licence. Jamf Connect for identity and password sync is also separate.
Resolver: Who owns Resolver?
Kroll, which acquired it in 2022. It is marketed as a Kroll business and sold alongside Kroll risk and investigations services.
Jamf Pro: Can it manage Windows or Android?
No. Jamf manages Apple platforms only. A mixed estate needs a second management platform, and that is a deliberate product decision rather than a gap they intend to close.
Resolver: What does Resolver cost?
Pricing is not published. It is quoted by module and user count on an annual or multi-year enterprise agreement, with implementation charged separately.
Jamf Pro: Do I need Apple Business Manager?
For zero-touch enrolment and volume app licensing, yes. You can enrol devices manually through a user-initiated flow without it, but you lose supervision, automatic enrolment and the ability to prevent a user removing management.
Resolver: Is Resolver a SOC 2 compliance tool?
No. It is a risk, incident and investigations platform. Automated evidence collection for security certifications is not its strength.
Jamf Pro: Can I host it myself?
Yes, Jamf Pro can be self-hosted, though Jamf Cloud is the default and receives new capabilities first. Self-hosting means you own the upgrade cadence, which matters because Apple's September releases set the timetable.
Resolver: How long does implementation take?
Months rather than weeks for a multi-module deployment, and most customers use vendor or partner services to configure it.
Jamf Pro: How does it compare to Microsoft Intune?
Intune manages Apple devices adequately and is often already paid for in an existing Microsoft agreement, which is the argument against Jamf. Jamf is deeper, supports new Apple releases faster, and has the local agent for scripting. Organisations with a few hundred Macs and a strong Apple culture generally choose Jamf; those with a handful of Macs in a Windows estate generally do not.
Related pages
Other head to heads
- Jamf Pro vs Bitdefender Total Security
- Jamf Pro vs 1Password
- Jamf Pro vs Norton 360
- Jamf Pro vs LastPass
- Jamf Pro vs Milestone XProtect
- Jamf Pro vs WireGuard
- Jamf Pro vs VIVOTEK VAST Security Station
- Jamf Pro vs Fenergo
- Jamf Pro vs Saviynt
- Jamf Pro vs Entrust Identity as a Service
- Jamf Pro vs IBM QRadar
- Jamf Pro vs Authelia
- Jamf Pro vs Authy
- Jamf Pro vs Baffle
- Jamf Pro vs Beyond Identity
- Jamf Pro vs BeyondTrust
- Jamf Pro vs Bitdefender VPN
- Jamf Pro vs LogicManager
- Jamf Pro vs Diligent
- Jamf Pro vs MetricStream
- Jamf Pro vs NICE Actimize
- Jamf Pro vs Omada Identity
- Jamf Pro vs Sardine
- Jamf Pro vs Silent Eight
- Jamf Pro vs Splunk Enterprise Security
- Jamf Pro vs Varonis Data Security Platform
- Jamf Pro vs OneTrust
- Jamf Pro vs Rhombus Systems
- Jamf Pro vs Trulioo
- Jamf Pro vs ESET NOD32 Antivirus
- Jamf Pro vs ExpressVPN
- Jamf Pro vs Falco
- Jamf Pro vs Google Authenticator
- Jamf Pro vs Grype
- Resolver vs Bitdefender Total Security
- Resolver vs 1Password
- Resolver vs Norton 360
- Resolver vs LastPass
- Resolver vs Milestone XProtect
- Resolver vs WireGuard
- Resolver vs VIVOTEK VAST Security Station
- Resolver vs Fenergo
- Resolver vs Saviynt
- Resolver vs Entrust Identity as a Service
- Resolver vs IBM QRadar
- Resolver vs Authelia
- Resolver vs Authy
- Resolver vs Baffle
- Resolver vs Beyond Identity
- Resolver vs BeyondTrust
- Resolver vs Bitdefender VPN
- Resolver vs LogicManager
- Resolver vs Diligent
- Resolver vs MetricStream
- Resolver vs NICE Actimize
- Resolver vs Omada Identity
- Resolver vs Sardine
- Resolver vs Silent Eight
- Resolver vs Splunk Enterprise Security
- Resolver vs Varonis Data Security Platform
- Resolver vs OneTrust
- Resolver vs Rhombus Systems
- Resolver vs Trulioo
- Resolver vs ESET NOD32 Antivirus
- Resolver vs ExpressVPN
- Resolver vs Falco
- Resolver vs Google Authenticator
- Resolver vs Grype
