Cybersecurity · head to head
IVPN vs Signicat
IVPN
Cybersecurity
Privacy-focused VPN with anonymous account numbers instead of email signup
- From
- $6/month
- Rated
- -

Signicat
Cybersecurity
European digital identity hub connecting national eID schemes
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: IVPN has no free tier, unlike several consumer VPN competitors with limited free plans.; Signicat national eID scheme fees are passed through on top of Signicat's own charge, so a single-country business almost always pays less by integrating with the scheme directly.
- They diverge on capability: IVPN covers Anonymous account numbers, Signicat covers eID scheme brokering.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 1 September 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which IVPN and Signicat actually diverge.
Identical on both: free tier (No), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Cybersecurity).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in IVPN
- Anonymous account numbers
- Multi-hop connections
- Independent audits
- WireGuard and OpenVPN support
- AntiTracker
Only in Signicat
- eID scheme brokering
- Qualified electronic signatures
- Document verification
- AML screening
- Authentication
- Digital onboarding flows
- eIDAS compliance
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
IVPN
- Signing up for a VPN without providing an email addressnot Signicat
- Verifying a VPN's no-logs claims via independent auditsnot Signicat
- Layering multi-hop routing for higher-anonymity browsingnot Signicat
- Blocking trackers and ads via built-in AntiTrackernot Signicat
Signicat
- A lender expanding from Norway into Sweden, Denmark and the Netherlands without four separate eID integrationsnot IVPN
- An insurer needing eIDAS qualified signatures on policy documents that will hold up in a European courtnot IVPN
- A bank that wants customers to onboard with their existing national bank ID rather than photographing a passportnot IVPN
- A public sector body needing cross-border recognition of notified eID schemes under eIDASnot IVPN
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
IVPN
- Has no free tier, unlike several consumer VPN competitors with limited free plans.
- Standard plan's two-connection limit is lower than many rivals offering five or more devices.
- Smaller server network than large mainstream VPN providers, which can limit streaming unblocking.
- Pricing is higher than budget VPN competitors for comparable simultaneous-connection counts.
Signicat
- National eID scheme fees are passed through on top of Signicat's own charge, so a single-country business almost always pays less by integrating with the scheme directly.
- Value is concentrated in Northern and Western Europe, and coverage in Southern and Eastern Europe is thinner, so a pan-European rollout still hits gaps requiring document fallback.
- Pricing is per transaction and quoted, and because scheme rates vary by country the cost per onboarded customer differs materially between markets in ways that complicate unit economics.
- Each eID scheme connection typically carries its own setup fee and approval process, so adding a country is a project with a lead time rather than a configuration change.
- Availability is tied to the national schemes, meaning an outage at BankID or MitID stops your onboarding entirely and there is no vendor-side mitigation for it.
Pricing, plan by plan
IVPN
$6/month- Standard$6/month
- 2 simultaneous connections
- $60/year billed annually
- WireGuard and OpenVPN support
- Pro$10/month
- 7 simultaneous connections
- Multi-hop connections
- $100/year billed annually
Signicat
On request- Signicat Platform$undefined/year
- Priced per transaction with national scheme fees passed through
- Signature and verification products licensed separately
- Setup fee per eID scheme connected
Which should you pick?
Choose IVPN if
- You need anonymous account numbers.
- You work on windows, mac, linux, ios, android.
- You also want multi-hop connections.
Choose Signicat if
- You need eid scheme brokering.
- You work on Web, iOS, Android.
- You also want qualified electronic signatures.
Questions people ask
- Is IVPN or Signicat better?
- Neither clearly leads. IVPN starts at $6/month and Signicat at On request, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, IVPN or Signicat?
- IVPN starts at $6/month and Signicat at On request.
- Does IVPN or Signicat run on more platforms?
- IVPN runs on windows, mac, linux, ios, android. Signicat runs on Web, iOS, Android.
- What is IVPN best used for?
- IVPN is most often used for signing up for a vpn without providing an email address, verifying a vpn's no-logs claims via independent audits, layering multi-hop routing for higher-anonymity browsing, blocking trackers and ads via built-in antitracker. Of those, signing up for a vpn without providing an email address and verifying a vpn's no-logs claims via independent audits are not what Signicat is typically brought in for.
- What can IVPN do that Signicat cannot?
- IVPN covers Anonymous account numbers, Multi-hop connections, Independent audits, WireGuard and OpenVPN support. Signicat covers eID scheme brokering, Qualified electronic signatures, Document verification, AML screening.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Signicat: Is this an alternative to a document verification vendor?
Only where national eID exists. In markets with a mature bank ID scheme it is better; elsewhere you fall back to document checks, which Signicat also provides.
Signicat: Do we still pay the eID schemes?
Yes. Scheme fees are passed through in addition to Signicat charges. Ask for the split when comparing to a direct integration.
Signicat: Are signatures legally qualified?
Signicat supports eIDAS qualified electronic signatures, which carry the highest legal standing in the EU, as well as advanced signatures.
Related pages
Other head to heads
- IVPN vs Mullvad VPN
- IVPN vs Private Internet Access
- IVPN vs NordVPN
- IVPN vs TunnelBear
- IVPN vs ExpressVPN
- IVPN vs ProtonVPN
- IVPN vs Enpass
- IVPN vs Surfshark
- IVPN vs Avast One
- IVPN vs Windscribe
- IVPN vs Osano
- IVPN vs Wireshark
- IVPN vs WorkOS
- IVPN vs Zscaler Internet Access
- IVPN vs Milestone XProtect
- IVPN vs Proton Mail
- IVPN vs CyberGhost VPN
- IVPN vs Jumio
- IVPN vs Sumsub
- IVPN vs IDnow
- IVPN vs Trulioo
- IVPN vs Veriff
- IVPN vs iDenfy
- IVPN vs Yoti
- IVPN vs Shufti Pro
- IVPN vs Socure
- IVPN vs March Networks
- IVPN vs Featurespace ARIC Risk Hub
- IVPN vs Semperis
- IVPN vs MetricStream
- IVPN vs Microsoft Defender
- IVPN vs Mimecast
- IVPN vs Motorola Vigilant
- IVPN vs Nessus
- IVPN vs Microsoft Sentinel
- Signicat vs Mullvad VPN
- Signicat vs Private Internet Access
- Signicat vs NordVPN
- Signicat vs TunnelBear
- Signicat vs ExpressVPN
- Signicat vs ProtonVPN
- Signicat vs Enpass
- Signicat vs Surfshark
- Signicat vs Avast One
- Signicat vs Windscribe
- Signicat vs Osano
- Signicat vs Wireshark
- Signicat vs WorkOS
- Signicat vs Zscaler Internet Access
- Signicat vs Milestone XProtect
- Signicat vs Proton Mail
- Signicat vs CyberGhost VPN
- Signicat vs Jumio
- Signicat vs Sumsub
- Signicat vs IDnow
- Signicat vs Trulioo
- Signicat vs Veriff
- Signicat vs iDenfy
- Signicat vs Yoti
- Signicat vs Shufti Pro
- Signicat vs Socure
- Signicat vs March Networks
- Signicat vs Featurespace ARIC Risk Hub
- Signicat vs Semperis
- Signicat vs MetricStream
- Signicat vs Microsoft Defender
- Signicat vs Mimecast
- Signicat vs Motorola Vigilant
- Signicat vs Nessus
- Signicat vs Microsoft Sentinel
