ERP · head to head
Ivalua vs Metasfresh

Ivalua
ERP
Source-to-pay on one codebase and one data model, sold to large enterprises by module
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -

Metasfresh
ERP
Open-source ERP for mid-sized wholesale and manufacturing
- From
- €99/month
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Ivalua entry deployments are reported around 150,000 US dollars a year before implementation, which puts it entirely out of reach for mid-market procurement teams.; Metasfresh cloud hosting is charged separately from user licences at EUR 299 per month on monthly billing or EUR 249 per month on annual billing
- They diverge on capability: Ivalua covers Single data model, Metasfresh covers Supply chain.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 31 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Ivalua and Metasfresh actually diverge.
| Attribute | Ivalua | Metasfresh |
|---|---|---|
| Starting price | On request | €99/month |
| Pricing model | quote | subscription |
| Platforms | Web, iOS, Android | Self-hosted, Cloud, Web |
| Founded | Unknown | 2015 |
Identical on both: free tier (No), user rating (Not yet rated), category (ERP).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Ivalua
- Single data model
- Supplier risk and onboarding
- Contract lifecycle management
- Direct materials procurement
- Invoice matching and payment
- Configurable workflow engine
Only in Metasfresh
- Supply chain
- Inventory
- Manufacturing
- Purchasing
- Accounting
- Wholesale management
- Custom modules
- EDI systems
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Ivalua
- A manufacturer that needs direct materials sourcing tied to a bill of materials, not just indirect spendnot Metasfresh
- An enterprise whose last procurement programme failed because supplier master data could not be reconciled across modulesnot Metasfresh
- A regulated organisation needing third-party risk screening enforced before a supplier can receive a purchase ordernot Metasfresh
- Replacing separate sourcing, contract and invoice systems where each holds a different version of the supplier recordnot Metasfresh
Metasfresh
- Open source ERP for procurement, sales, warehouse and accountingnot Ivalua
- Hosting an ERP in a German data centre on a dedicated servernot Ivalua
- Self hosting an ERP where the source code must be inspectablenot Ivalua
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Ivalua
- Entry deployments are reported around 150,000 US dollars a year before implementation, which puts it entirely out of reach for mid-market procurement teams.
- Configurability requires an internal product owner and usually a systems integrator, so the total programme cost is a multiple of the licence and the failure modes are those of an ERP project.
- Module-based licensing means capability you assumed was included, such as contract lifecycle management or supplier risk, is frequently a separate line item discovered late in the negotiation.
- Supplier network pricing scales with active supplier count, so an organisation with a long tail of small suppliers pays for records that generate little spend.
- The user interface prioritises configurability over ease, and casual requisitioners across the business need more guidance than a consumer-style intake tool would require.
Metasfresh
- Cloud hosting is charged separately from user licences at EUR 299 per month on monthly billing or EUR 249 per month on annual billing
- The EUR 79 per user per month annual rate requires minimum user quantities that depend on company size; monthly billing costs EUR 99 per user per month
- The mandatory starter package covering setup, customisation, project management and training is priced individually on request
- Standard support is email only during business hours; a 24/7 SLA is a separate contract on request
- All published prices exclude VAT
- Projects larger than the L size starter package require an individual quote
Pricing, plan by plan
Ivalua
On request- Ivalua Source-to-Pay$undefined/year
- Module-based licensing rather than per seat
- User counts tiered by role category
- Supplier network pricing driven by active supplier count
Metasfresh
€99/month- Starter Package$null/custom
- Initial system setup
- Customization of windows and documents
- Project management
- User Fee$99/month
- Monthly billing
- Access to all developments
- Support and integration
- User Fee (annual)$79/month
- Annual billing minimum
- Access to all developments
- Support and integration
- Cloud Hosting$299/month
- Monthly billing
- Secure data transfer
- Real-time backup
Which should you pick?
Choose Ivalua if
- You need single data model.
- You work on Web, iOS, Android.
- You also want supplier risk and onboarding.
Choose Metasfresh if
- You need supply chain.
- You work on Self-hosted, Cloud, Web.
- You also want inventory.
Questions people ask
- Is Ivalua or Metasfresh better?
- Neither clearly leads. Ivalua starts at On request and Metasfresh at €99/month, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Ivalua or Metasfresh?
- Ivalua starts at On request and Metasfresh at €99/month.
- Does Ivalua or Metasfresh run on more platforms?
- Ivalua runs on Web, iOS, Android. Metasfresh runs on Self-hosted, Cloud, Web.
- What is Ivalua best used for?
- Ivalua is most often used for a manufacturer that needs direct materials sourcing tied to a bill of materials, not just indirect spend, an enterprise whose last procurement programme failed because supplier master data could not be reconciled across modules, a regulated organisation needing third-party risk screening enforced before a supplier can receive a purchase order, replacing separate sourcing, contract and invoice systems where each holds a different version of the supplier record. Of those, a manufacturer that needs direct materials sourcing tied to a bill of materials, not just indirect spend and an enterprise whose last procurement programme failed because supplier master data could not be reconciled across modules are not what Metasfresh is typically brought in for.
- What can Ivalua do that Metasfresh cannot?
- Ivalua covers Single data model, Supplier risk and onboarding, Contract lifecycle management, Direct materials procurement. Metasfresh covers Supply chain, Inventory, Manufacturing, Purchasing.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Ivalua: What does the single codebase actually buy me?
One supplier and contract record used across every module, so there is no synchronisation layer to reconcile and no data drift between sourcing and invoicing.
Metasfresh: What is metasfresh's monthly user fee?
metasfresh charges per-user monthly fees starting at 99 euros per user with monthly billing or 79 euros per user with annual billing (minimum user quantity required based on company size). This includes access to all ERP developments, support, integration, and custom configuration.
SourceIvalua: What does Ivalua cost?
It is not published. Third parties report entry deployments around 150,000 USD a year and full-platform deployments above 400,000, plus implementation.
Metasfresh: How much does metasfresh cloud hosting cost?
metasfresh Cloud Hosting costs 299 euros per month with monthly billing or 249 euros per month with annual billing. This includes secure data transfer, real-time backup, dedicated German server infrastructure, and comprehensive support.
SourceIvalua: Does it handle direct materials?
Yes, which distinguishes it from suites built primarily for indirect spend.
Metasfresh: Is there a one-time setup fee for metasfresh?
Yes, metasfresh includes a Starter Package with one-time costs for initial system setup, customization, project management, and multiplier training with online meeting room access. Exact pricing is available upon request based on company size and requirements.
SourceIvalua: Is Ivalua still independent?
Yes. It is one of the few large source-to-pay vendors not owned by a bigger enterprise software group.
Related pages
Other head to heads
- Ivalua vs GEP SMART
- Ivalua vs Levelpath
- Ivalua vs Jaggaer
- Ivalua vs Zycus
- Ivalua vs Axelor
- Ivalua vs IFS Cloud
- Ivalua vs Epicor
- Ivalua vs IQMS
- Ivalua vs Omnea
- Ivalua vs Cegid
- Ivalua vs Dolibarr
- Ivalua vs Tyler Enterprise ERP (Munis)
- Ivalua vs QAD Adaptive ERP
- Ivalua vs Sage X3
- Ivalua vs SYSPRO
- Ivalua vs ADempiere
- Ivalua vs Apache OFBiz
- Ivalua vs Aptean
- Ivalua vs DEAR Systems
- Ivalua vs iDempiere
- Ivalua vs Tryton
- Ivalua vs Fishbowl
- Ivalua vs Infor CloudSuite
- Ivalua vs MRPeasy
- Ivalua vs Visibility
- Ivalua vs Odoo
- Ivalua vs Cin7
- Ivalua vs Deltek
- Ivalua vs QAD
- Metasfresh vs GEP SMART
- Metasfresh vs Levelpath
- Metasfresh vs Jaggaer
- Metasfresh vs Zycus
- Metasfresh vs Axelor
- Metasfresh vs IFS Cloud
- Metasfresh vs Epicor
- Metasfresh vs IQMS
- Metasfresh vs Omnea
- Metasfresh vs Cegid
- Metasfresh vs Dolibarr
- Metasfresh vs Tyler Enterprise ERP (Munis)
- Metasfresh vs QAD Adaptive ERP
- Metasfresh vs Sage X3
- Metasfresh vs SYSPRO
- Metasfresh vs ADempiere
- Metasfresh vs Apache OFBiz
- Metasfresh vs Aptean
- Metasfresh vs DEAR Systems
- Metasfresh vs iDempiere
- Metasfresh vs Tryton
- Metasfresh vs Fishbowl
- Metasfresh vs Infor CloudSuite
- Metasfresh vs MRPeasy
- Metasfresh vs Visibility
- Metasfresh vs Odoo
- Metasfresh vs Cin7
- Metasfresh vs Deltek
- Metasfresh vs QAD
