Design · head to head
InVision vs Octopus Deploy

Octopus Deploy
Developer Tools
Continuous delivery and runbook automation for releases
- From
- Free
- Free plan
- Yes
The short version
- InVision is a digital product design platform.
- Free plans on both; paid from $25/mo and $2080/yr.
- Where InVision falls short: service discontinued as of end of 2024; no longer available or supported.
- Where Octopus Deploy falls short: free tier caps at 10 projects, 10 tenants, 10 machines, 10 users, 5 concurrent tasks and 1 space.
- Prices and features on this page were last checked on 13 November 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which InVision and Octopus Deploy actually diverge.
| Attribute | InVision | Octopus Deploy |
|---|---|---|
| Platforms | Web, macOS, Windows, iOS, Android | Web |
| Category | Design | Developer Tools |
Identical on both: starting price (Free), free tier (Yes).
Not yet recorded: pricing model for InVision, founded for Octopus Deploy.
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in InVision
- Interactive prototypes
- Design collaboration
- Freehand whiteboarding
- Design system manager
- Inspect mode
- Comments & feedback
- Version control
- User testing
Only in Octopus Deploy
Nothing recorded that InVision does not also cover.
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
InVision
- Prototype creationnot Octopus Deploy
- Design feedbacknot Octopus Deploy
- Whiteboarding sessionsnot Octopus Deploy
- Design handoffnot Octopus Deploy
- User testingnot Octopus Deploy
Octopus Deploy
- Automating software deployments across development, testing, productionnot InVision
- Automating emergency tasks like website failover and incident responsenot InVision
- Managing multi-tenant deployments without duplicating configurationnot InVision
- Tracking DORA metrics and enforcing deployment approval gatesnot InVision
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
InVision
- Service discontinued as of end of 2024; no longer available or supported
- Workflow required constant switching between design software (Sketch/Photoshop) and InVision for prototyping, creating inefficiency
- Performance issues and glitches reported, especially with larger projects
- Limited development capabilities; required additional hosting and developer support for deployment
- Could not export working web or mobile applications without additional development
Octopus Deploy
- Free tier caps at 10 projects, 10 tenants, 10 machines, 10 users, 5 concurrent tasks and 1 space
- Annual billing is the only option for both Octopus Cloud and Octopus Server; there is no monthly plan
- Professional cloud tier is $4,330 per year and Enterprise cloud is $24,600 per year, with tenants and machines sold as add-ons beyond the free allotment
Pricing, plan by plan
InVision
FreeNo published plan breakdown. See the InVision review.
Octopus Deploy
Free- FreeFree
- 10 projects
- 10 tenants
- 10 machines
- Professional (Cloud)$4,330/yr
- Up to 100 projects
- Unlimited spaces and users
- Tenants and machines available as add-ons
- Professional (Server)$2,080/yr
- Up to 100 projects
- Unlimited spaces and users
- Tenants and machines available as add-ons
- Enterprise (Cloud)$24,600/yr
- 100+ projects supported
- Unlimited spaces and users
- 20 concurrent tasks
Which should you pick?
Choose InVision if
- You need interactive prototypes.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Web, macOS, Windows, iOS, Android.
- You also want design collaboration.
Questions people ask
- Is InVision or Octopus Deploy better?
- Neither clearly leads. InVision starts at Free and Octopus Deploy at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, InVision or Octopus Deploy?
- InVision starts at Free and Octopus Deploy at Free.
- Does InVision or Octopus Deploy run on more platforms?
- InVision runs on Web, macOS, Windows, iOS, Android. Octopus Deploy runs on Web.
- Can I use InVision for free?
- Both have a free tier, so you can try either at no cost before committing.
- What is InVision best used for?
- InVision is most often used for prototype creation, design feedback, whiteboarding sessions, design handoff. Of those, prototype creation and design feedback are not what Octopus Deploy is typically brought in for.
- What can InVision do that Octopus Deploy cannot?
- InVision covers Interactive prototypes, Design collaboration, Freehand whiteboarding, Design system manager.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
InVision: Is InVision still active and supported in 2026?
No. InVision announced discontinuation of all services by end of 2024. The platform is no longer available or supported.
SourceOctopus Deploy: How much does Octopus Deploy cost?
Octopus Deploy offers a free tier at $0/year with limits on projects (10), users (10), and tenants (10). Professional plans start at $2,080/year for self-hosted or $4,330/year for cloud hosting.
SourceInVision: What were InVision's core features?
InVision allowed designers to transform designs into interactive prototypes and mockups for web and mobile. It supported Craft Player for Sketch, Craft Sync for Photoshop, and preview mode in Studio, enabling design-to-prototype workflows.
SourceOctopus Deploy: What does the free Octopus Deploy tier include?
The free tier includes 10 projects, 10 tenants, 10 machines, 10 users, 5 concurrent tasks, 1TB file storage, 100GB database storage, and community support only.
SourceInVision: What were InVision's pricing plans?
InVision offered Free ($0), Starter ($25/month), Professional ($99/month), and Team plans. Annual billing provided a 10% discount. Free plan included basic prototyping; paid plans added collaboration and file access.
SourceOctopus Deploy: Can I try Octopus Deploy for free before purchasing?
Yes, a free tier is available with unlimited duration but capped usage, plus a 30-day free trial with full Enterprise features is offered to evaluate the platform.
SourceInVision: Why did InVision fail in the market?
InVision's market position was disrupted by Figma, which unified design, prototyping, and collaboration in a single web-based platform. InVision required switching between design software and prototyping, creating friction and reducing competitiveness.
SourceOctopus Deploy: What are the Enterprise pricing differences between Cloud and Server hosting?
Enterprise Cloud hosting costs $24,600/year and includes 20 concurrent tasks and 24/7 support. Enterprise Server self-hosted costs $15,600/year with flexible concurrent task configuration and 24/7 support.
SourceInVision: What integrations did InVision support?
InVision integrated with design tools like Sketch and Photoshop, and supported sharing and collaboration workflows. The platform did not support deployment or direct development integration.
SourceRelated pages
More on Octopus Deploy
Other head to heads
- InVision vs Figma
- InVision vs Adobe XD
- InVision vs Sketch
- InVision vs Proto.io
- InVision vs Framer
- InVision vs Maze
- InVision vs Marvel
- InVision vs ProtoPie
- InVision vs Origami Studio
- InVision vs Principle
- InVision vs Axure RP
- InVision vs Procreate
- InVision vs Inkscape
- InVision vs Krita
- InVision vs Linearity Curve
- InVision vs CorelDRAW Graphics Suite
- InVision vs Spline
- InVision vs Xara Designer Pro+
- InVision vs Harness
- InVision vs HCP Terraform
- InVision vs Kubernetes
- InVision vs Earthly
- InVision vs Moonrepo
- InVision vs Ansible
- InVision vs Argo CD
- InVision vs Garden
- InVision vs GitLab CI/CD
- InVision vs LaunchDarkly
- InVision vs Ona (formerly Gitpod)
- InVision vs GNAT Pro
- InVision vs Cody
- InVision vs ConfigCat
- InVision vs Cortex
- InVision vs Dagger
- InVision vs Deep Code
- InVision vs Deno
- Octopus Deploy vs Figma
- Octopus Deploy vs Adobe XD
- Octopus Deploy vs Sketch
- Octopus Deploy vs Proto.io
- Octopus Deploy vs Framer
- Octopus Deploy vs Maze
- Octopus Deploy vs Marvel
- Octopus Deploy vs ProtoPie
- Octopus Deploy vs Origami Studio
- Octopus Deploy vs Principle
- Octopus Deploy vs Axure RP
- Octopus Deploy vs Procreate
- Octopus Deploy vs Inkscape
- Octopus Deploy vs Krita
- Octopus Deploy vs Linearity Curve
- Octopus Deploy vs CorelDRAW Graphics Suite
- Octopus Deploy vs Spline
- Octopus Deploy vs Xara Designer Pro+
- Octopus Deploy vs Harness
- Octopus Deploy vs HCP Terraform
- Octopus Deploy vs Kubernetes
- Octopus Deploy vs Earthly
- Octopus Deploy vs Moonrepo
- Octopus Deploy vs Ansible
- Octopus Deploy vs Argo CD
- Octopus Deploy vs Garden
- Octopus Deploy vs GitLab CI/CD
- Octopus Deploy vs LaunchDarkly
- Octopus Deploy vs Ona (formerly Gitpod)
- Octopus Deploy vs GNAT Pro
- Octopus Deploy vs Cody
- Octopus Deploy vs ConfigCat
- Octopus Deploy vs Cortex
- Octopus Deploy vs Dagger
- Octopus Deploy vs Deep Code
- Octopus Deploy vs Deno

