Design · head to head
InVision vs Womp

Womp
Design
Browser 3D modelling built on blended implicit surfaces for non-specialists
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: InVision service discontinued as of end of 2024; no longer available or supported; Womp everything runs through the browser graphics stack, so an older laptop with integrated graphics hits frame rate and render limits fast and there is no local rendering fallback.
- They diverge on capability: InVision covers Interactive prototypes, Womp covers Implicit surface modelling.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 31 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which InVision and Womp actually diverge.
Identical on both: starting price (Free), free tier (Yes), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Design).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in InVision
- Interactive prototypes
- Design collaboration
- Freehand whiteboarding
- Design system manager
- Inspect mode
- Comments & feedback
- Version control
- User testing
Only in Womp
- Implicit surface modelling
- Browser rendering
- Material library
- Scene sharing
- Export
- Templates
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
InVision
- Prototype creationnot Womp
- Design feedbacknot Womp
- Whiteboarding sessionsnot Womp
- Design handoffnot Womp
- User testingnot Womp
Womp
- Producing 3D product or icon visuals in a design team with no 3D specialistnot InVision
- Making a set of consistent 3D illustrations for a website or campaign in a daynot InVision
- Prototyping a form quickly for discussion before it is remodelled properly in CADnot InVision
- Teaching 3D concepts without installing software on managed machinesnot InVision
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
InVision
- Service discontinued as of end of 2024; no longer available or supported
- Workflow required constant switching between design software (Sketch/Photoshop) and InVision for prototyping, creating inefficiency
- Performance issues and glitches reported, especially with larger projects
- Limited development capabilities; required additional hosting and developer support for deployment
- Could not export working web or mobile applications without additional development
Womp
- Everything runs through the browser graphics stack, so an older laptop with integrated graphics hits frame rate and render limits fast and there is no local rendering fallback.
- Implicit modelling gives no control over the exported mesh, so the output topology is unsuitable for rigging, animation or subdivision work downstream.
- Nothing is dimensionally accurate, so a form designed here has to be remodelled in CAD before it can be manufactured.
- Scenes live in the vendor account, so if the service changes or closes, the only copies you hold are whatever you exported in advance.
- The material and lighting set is deliberately simplified, which caps art direction and makes the output visually recognisable as having come from Womp.
Pricing, plan by plan
InVision
FreeNo published plan breakdown. See the InVision review.
Womp
Free- Free$undefined/month
- Public scenes
- Limited render resolution
- Limited storage
- Pro$undefined/month
- Private scenes
- Higher render resolution
- Mesh export and larger storage
Which should you pick?
Choose InVision if
- You need interactive prototypes.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Web, Macos, Windows, Ios, Android.
- You also want design collaboration.
Choose Womp if
- You need implicit surface modelling.
- You want to start without paying.
- You also want browser rendering.
Questions people ask
- Is InVision or Womp better?
- Neither clearly leads. InVision starts at Free and Womp at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, InVision or Womp?
- InVision starts at Free and Womp at Free.
- Does InVision or Womp run on more platforms?
- InVision runs on Web, Macos, Windows, Ios, Android. Womp runs on Web.
- Can I use InVision for free?
- Both have a free tier, so you can try either at no cost before committing.
- What is InVision best used for?
- InVision is most often used for prototype creation, design feedback, whiteboarding sessions, design handoff. Of those, prototype creation and design feedback are not what Womp is typically brought in for.
- What can InVision do that Womp cannot?
- InVision covers Interactive prototypes, Design collaboration, Freehand whiteboarding, Design system manager. Womp covers Implicit surface modelling, Browser rendering, Material library, Scene sharing.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
InVision: Is InVision still active and supported in 2026?
No. InVision announced discontinuation of all services by end of 2024. The platform is no longer available or supported.
SourceWomp: Do I need to know 3D to use it?
No. That is the point of the modelling approach; there is no topology, edge flow or subdivision to understand.
InVision: What were InVision's core features?
InVision allowed designers to transform designs into interactive prototypes and mockups for web and mobile. It supported Craft Player for Sketch, Craft Sync for Photoshop, and preview mode in Studio, enabling design-to-prototype workflows.
SourceWomp: Can I use the meshes in Blender or a game engine?
You can export them, but the topology comes from tessellating an implicit surface, so it is not suitable for rigging, animation or subdivision without a retopology pass.
InVision: What were InVision's pricing plans?
InVision offered Free ($0), Starter ($25/month), Professional ($99/month), and Team plans. Annual billing provided a 10% discount. Free plan included basic prototyping; paid plans added collaboration and file access.
SourceWomp: Is it accurate enough for manufacturing?
No. It is a visual tool. Anything to be made needs remodelling in CAD.
InVision: Why did InVision fail in the market?
InVision's market position was disrupted by Figma, which unified design, prototyping, and collaboration in a single web-based platform. InVision required switching between design software and prototyping, creating friction and reducing competitiveness.
SourceInVision: What integrations did InVision support?
InVision integrated with design tools like Sketch and Photoshop, and supported sharing and collaboration workflows. The platform did not support deployment or direct development integration.
SourceRelated pages
Other head to heads
- InVision vs Proto.io
- InVision vs Adobe XD
- InVision vs Framer
- InVision vs Marvel
- InVision vs Origami Studio
- InVision vs ProtoPie
- InVision vs Principle
- InVision vs Axure RP
- InVision vs Procreate
- InVision vs Krita
- InVision vs Webflow
- InVision vs Canva
- InVision vs Magnific
- InVision vs Subframe
- InVision vs Vectr
- InVision vs Spline
- InVision vs Photopea
- InVision vs LottieFiles
- InVision vs Gravit Designer
- InVision vs Linearity Curve
- InVision vs Xara Designer Pro+
- InVision vs Playground AI
- InVision vs Procreate Dreams
- InVision vs Rebelle
- InVision vs Rive
- InVision vs Balsamiq Wireframes
- Womp vs Proto.io
- Womp vs Adobe XD
- Womp vs Framer
- Womp vs Marvel
- Womp vs Origami Studio
- Womp vs ProtoPie
- Womp vs Principle
- Womp vs Axure RP
- Womp vs Procreate
- Womp vs Krita
- Womp vs Webflow
- Womp vs Canva
- Womp vs Magnific
- Womp vs Subframe
- Womp vs Vectr
- Womp vs Spline
- Womp vs Photopea
- Womp vs LottieFiles
- Womp vs Gravit Designer
- Womp vs Linearity Curve
- Womp vs Xara Designer Pro+
- Womp vs Playground AI
- Womp vs Procreate Dreams
- Womp vs Rebelle
- Womp vs Rive
- Womp vs Balsamiq Wireframes

