Testing · head to head
Insomnia vs Paw

Insomnia
Testing
REST and GraphQL API client for development and testing
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -

Paw
APIs
Full-featured REST client for macOS with powerful scripting and testing
- From
- $99/one-time
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Only Insomnia has a free tier, so it costs nothing to try first.
- Each has a real cost: Insomnia git Sync on the free tier covers up to 3 users only; Paw no specific pricing amounts published for subscription tiers
- They diverge on capability: Insomnia covers REST API Client, Paw covers REST Client.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 30 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Insomnia and Paw actually diverge.
Identical on both: user rating (Not yet rated).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Insomnia
- REST API Client
- GraphQL Support
- gRPC Support
- GitLab
- Windows support
- Linux support
- Web support
Only in Paw
- REST Client
- Scripting
- Dynamic Values
- Custom extensions
Both cover
- GitHub
- Slack
- MacOS support
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Insomnia
- Sending and debugging HTTP, GraphQL and gRPC requestsnot Paw
- Storing collections in Git rather than a vendor cloudnot Paw
- Mocking an API endpoint before it existsnot Paw
- Running collections in CI with the Inso CLInot Paw
- Environment management across staging and productionnot Paw
Paw
- API Developmentnot Insomnia
- API Gatewaynot Insomnia
- API Testingnot Insomnia
- API Documentationnot Insomnia
- Microservicesnot Insomnia
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Insomnia
- Git Sync on the free tier covers up to 3 users only
- Mock servers are capped at 1,000 requests a month on free, then $10 per 25,000
- Role-based access control requires Pro at $12 per user per month
- SSO, SCIM and vault integrations are Enterprise only at $45 per user per month
- Working without an account is limited to the local-only Scratch Pad
Paw
- No specific pricing amounts published for subscription tiers
- Individual and volume licensing requires direct contact
- Limited details on team subscription pricing
Pricing, plan by plan
Insomnia
Free- EssentialsFree
- unlimited Cloud/Local projects
- up to 3 users with Git Sync
- 1,000 mock server requests/month
- Pro$12/user/month
- unlimited users with Git Sync access
- unlimited organizations
- role-based access control
- Enterprise$45/user/month
- Kong Konnect integration
- SSO (SAML/OIDC)
- SCIM provisioning
Paw
$99/one-time- Standard$99/one-time
- Full REST client
- Advanced scripting
- Extensions
- Annual License$49/yearly
- All features
- Updates
- Priority support
Which should you pick?
Choose Insomnia if
- You need rest api client.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Windows, MacOS, Linux, Web.
- You also want graphql support.
Questions people ask
- Is Insomnia or Paw better?
- Neither clearly leads. Insomnia starts at Free and Paw at $99/one-time, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Insomnia or Paw?
- Insomnia has a free tier; the other does not. Paid plans start at Free for Insomnia and $99/one-time for Paw.
- Does Insomnia or Paw run on more platforms?
- Insomnia runs on Windows, MacOS, Linux, Web. Paw runs on MacOS.
- Can I use Insomnia for free?
- Yes. Insomnia has a free tier, so you can try it without paying. Paw starts at $99/one-time.
- What is Insomnia best used for?
- Insomnia is most often used for sending and debugging http, graphql and grpc requests, storing collections in git rather than a vendor cloud, mocking an api endpoint before it exists, running collections in ci with the inso cli. Of those, sending and debugging http, graphql and grpc requests and storing collections in git rather than a vendor cloud are not what Paw is typically brought in for.
- What can Insomnia do that Paw cannot?
- Insomnia covers REST API Client, GraphQL Support, gRPC Support, GitLab. Paw covers REST Client, Scripting, Dynamic Values, Custom extensions. Both handle GitHub, Slack, MacOS support.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Insomnia: How much does Insomnia cost?
Insomnia offers a free Essentials plan. Pro plans cost $12 per user per month with annual billing offering 17% savings. Enterprise plans cost $45 per user per month with support for up to 50 users self-serve; contact sales for larger teams.
SourcePaw: How much does RapidAPI for Mac (Paw) cost?
Paw offers a free tier for personal and professional use. Paid subscription plans are available on monthly and yearly billing, but specific pricing amounts are not disclosed and require direct contact with RapidAPI.
SourceInsomnia: Is there a free version of Insomnia?
Yes, the Essentials plan is free and includes unlimited Cloud and Local projects, Git Sync for up to 3 users, 1,000 mock server requests per month, Inso CLI, E2EE, custom linting, plugins, and AI features.
SourcePaw: Is there a free version of Paw?
Yes, RapidAPI for Mac (Paw) is free for both personal and professional use.
SourceInsomnia: What mock server request limits apply to Insomnia plans?
Essentials includes 1,000 mock server requests per month. Pro includes 10,000 requests per month. Enterprise includes unlimited mock server requests. Additional mock server requests beyond plan allowances cost $10 per 25,000 requests.
SourcePaw: What features are included in the free version of Paw?
The free tier includes HTTP client capabilities for API testing, API documentation, personal sync across devices, and support for Swagger, RAML, and API Blueprint formats.
SourcePaw: What additional features do Paw team subscriptions include?
Team subscription plans include all personal features plus collaborative tools, team project access, synchronized workflows with safe data merges, and real-time notifications and updates.
SourceRelated pages
Other head to heads
- Insomnia vs Playwright
- Insomnia vs GitHub Actions
- Insomnia vs BrowserStack
- Insomnia vs Cypress
- Insomnia vs CircleCI
- Insomnia vs BugHerd
- Insomnia vs Zephyr Scale
- Insomnia vs Testsigma
- Insomnia vs Kameleoon
- Insomnia vs Appium
- Insomnia vs Qase
- Insomnia vs Cucumber
- Insomnia vs Applitools
- Insomnia vs pytest
- Insomnia vs Vitest
- Insomnia vs Percy
- Insomnia vs Jest
- Insomnia vs Appwrite
- Insomnia vs Sanity
- Insomnia vs PocketBase
- Insomnia vs Apidog
- Insomnia vs Hasura
- Insomnia vs REST Client VSCode
- Insomnia vs Thunder Client
- Insomnia vs Hoppscotch
- Insomnia vs HTTPie
- Insomnia vs Griffin
- Insomnia vs KeystoneJS
- Insomnia vs Basis Theory
- Insomnia vs Astra
- Insomnia vs Asyncapi
- Insomnia vs AWS API Gateway
- Insomnia vs Microsoft Azure API Management
- Paw vs Playwright
- Paw vs GitHub Actions
- Paw vs BrowserStack
- Paw vs Cypress
- Paw vs CircleCI
- Paw vs BugHerd
- Paw vs Zephyr Scale
- Paw vs Testsigma
- Paw vs Kameleoon
- Paw vs Appium
- Paw vs Qase
- Paw vs Cucumber
- Paw vs Applitools
- Paw vs pytest
- Paw vs Vitest
- Paw vs Percy
- Paw vs Jest
- Paw vs Appwrite
- Paw vs Sanity
- Paw vs PocketBase
- Paw vs Apidog
- Paw vs Hasura
- Paw vs REST Client VSCode
- Paw vs Thunder Client
- Paw vs Hoppscotch
- Paw vs HTTPie
- Paw vs Griffin
- Paw vs KeystoneJS
- Paw vs Basis Theory
- Paw vs Astra
- Paw vs Asyncapi
- Paw vs AWS API Gateway
- Paw vs Microsoft Azure API Management
