Cloud · head to head
Infracost vs WSO2 API Manager

Infracost
Cloud
Cloud cost estimates in pull requests, with governance in the paid tier
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -

WSO2 API Manager
APIs
Complete API management platform for designing and managing APIs
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Infracost usage-based resources such as object storage, serverless functions and data transfer have no cost without monthly usage figures supplied by hand, and the documentation warns plainly that engineers otherwise read them as free.; WSO2 API Manager the free open source distribution does not include a subscription to the WSO2 Update service, so continuous improvements and security patches require a paid subscription
- They diverge on capability: Infracost covers Pull request cost diffs, WSO2 API Manager covers API Gateway.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 31 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Infracost and WSO2 API Manager actually diverge.
| Attribute | Infracost | WSO2 API Manager |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | Free open source tool, then per month by run volume | open-source |
| Platforms | Web, macOS, Linux, Windows, Docker | Java, Linux, Docker, Kubernetes |
| Category | Cloud | APIs |
| Founded | Unknown | 2005 |
Identical on both: starting price (Free), free tier (Yes), user rating (Not yet rated).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Infracost
- Pull request cost diffs
- Multi-format parsing
- Apache-2.0 CLI
- FinOps policies
- Automated remediation
- IDE integration
Only in WSO2 API Manager
- API Gateway
- API Designer
- Developer Portal
- LDAP
- Okta
- Keycloak
- Microservices
- Java support
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Infracost
- Teams that want an expensive infrastructure change questioned at review rather than discovered on an invoicenot WSO2 API Manager
- Platform groups enforcing tagging so cloud spend can be attributed to a team at allnot WSO2 API Manager
- Organisations adopting FinOps practice without buying a full cloud management platformnot WSO2 API Manager
- Engineers who want a cost figure in the editor while writing the Terraformnot WSO2 API Manager
WSO2 API Manager
- Publishing, securing and rate limiting APIs behind a gatewaynot Infracost
- Running an API developer portal with subscription key managementnot Infracost
- Self hosting an open source API management layer on premisesnot Infracost
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Infracost
- Usage-based resources such as object storage, serverless functions and data transfer have no cost without monthly usage figures supplied by hand, and the documentation warns plainly that engineers otherwise read them as free.
- Splitting production from non-production usage assumptions is not supported in the free usage file, which the docs attribute to a missing project filter, so that separation requires the paid product.
- The step from 250 to 1,000 dollars a month is large and the Cloud tier includes only ten admin seats, with developer seats charged at a figure that is not published, so the cost for a large organisation cannot be computed from the pricing page.
- Estimates are list price. Negotiated agreements, committed use discounts and reserved instance economics require SKU-level overrides available only on Enterprise, so the number in the pull request is not the number on the bill.
- The share of the product covered by the Apache-2.0 licence is shrinking. Checks, automated fixes, policies and agent integrations are all hosted-only, so the permissive licence increasingly protects the estimation engine rather than the product.
WSO2 API Manager
- The free open source distribution does not include a subscription to the WSO2 Update service, so continuous improvements and security patches require a paid subscription
- A commercial production licence is not part of the free download and comes only with a subscription
- No subscription price is published; Basic Support and Enterprise Support both require contacting sales for a quote
- 24x7x365 coverage requires Enterprise Support; the general query SLA is one business day
- A Customer Success Manager is a paid optional add on covering business hours only
- Consulting services and WSO2 Private Cloud hosting are quoted separately
Pricing, plan by plan
Infracost
Free- FreeFree
- 1,000 runs a month
- Terraform, CloudFormation and CDK estimates
- Community support
- Starter$250/month
- 10,000 runs a month
- Email support
- Cloud$1000/month
- Ten admin seats, developer seats charged separately
- FinOps policies and cost guardrails
- Dashboards and audit trails
- Enterprise$undefined/year
- SKU-level price overrides for negotiated rates
- Business unit reporting
- SSO with SAML group mapping
WSO2 API Manager
Free- CommunityFree
- Core API management
- Community support
- Commercial$undefined/monthly
- Enterprise features
- Technical support
- SLA
Which should you pick?
Choose Infracost if
- You need pull request cost diffs.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Web, macOS, Linux, Windows, Docker.
- You also want multi-format parsing.
Choose WSO2 API Manager if
- You need api gateway.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Java, Linux, Docker, Kubernetes.
- You also want api designer.
Questions people ask
- Is Infracost or WSO2 API Manager better?
- Neither clearly leads. Infracost starts at Free and WSO2 API Manager at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Infracost or WSO2 API Manager?
- Infracost starts at Free and WSO2 API Manager at Free.
- Does Infracost or WSO2 API Manager run on more platforms?
- Infracost runs on Web, macOS, Linux, Windows, Docker. WSO2 API Manager runs on Java, Linux, Docker, Kubernetes.
- Can I use Infracost for free?
- Both have a free tier, so you can try either at no cost before committing.
- What is Infracost best used for?
- Infracost is most often used for teams that want an expensive infrastructure change questioned at review rather than discovered on an invoice, platform groups enforcing tagging so cloud spend can be attributed to a team at all, organisations adopting finops practice without buying a full cloud management platform, engineers who want a cost figure in the editor while writing the terraform. Of those, teams that want an expensive infrastructure change questioned at review rather than discovered on an invoice and platform groups enforcing tagging so cloud spend can be attributed to a team at all are not what WSO2 API Manager is typically brought in for.
- What can Infracost do that WSO2 API Manager cannot?
- Infracost covers Pull request cost diffs, Multi-format parsing, Apache-2.0 CLI, FinOps policies. WSO2 API Manager covers API Gateway, API Designer, Developer Portal, LDAP.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Infracost: Is the open source version genuinely useful on its own?
Yes, for estimation. It parses your definitions and produces breakdowns and diffs locally. What it does not do is comment on pull requests, enforce policy or report across an organisation, all of which are hosted-only.
WSO2 API Manager: How is WSO2 API Manager priced?
WSO2 API Manager pricing is not published on their website. As an enterprise API management platform, pricing is custom-quoted based on deployment model and organizational requirements.
SourceInfracost: Will the estimate match my cloud bill?
No. It is list price. Committed use discounts, enterprise agreements and reserved instances need SKU-level overrides that sit in the Enterprise tier.
WSO2 API Manager: Does WSO2 API Manager offer different pricing for on-premises versus cloud deployments?
WSO2 API Manager supports multiple deployment options including on-premises and cloud, but pricing structures for different deployment models are not publicly disclosed.
SourceInfracost: Why do my S3 and Lambda resources show no cost?
Usage-based resources need monthly usage values supplied in a usage file or defined centrally. Without them they estimate at zero, which is the documented behaviour and the most common way the tool misleads.
WSO2 API Manager: What deployment flexibility does WSO2 API Manager provide?
WSO2 API Manager enables flexible deployment on-premises or in cloud environments, but specific pricing tiers for each deployment model require contacting WSO2 sales.
SourceInfracost: Has the licence ever changed?
No. The command line tool has been Apache 2.0 throughout, with no Business Source or AGPL episode, which is unusual in this category.
WSO2 API Manager: How would I request a WSO2 API Manager pricing quote?
Organizations can request pricing quotes by contacting WSO2 sales through their website. Custom quotes depend on API volume, deployment model, and feature requirements.
SourceInfracost: What is a run?
Not defined on the public pricing page, and the run allowance is what separates the free and Starter tiers, so establish the definition before choosing between them.
Related pages
More on WSO2 API Manager
Other head to heads
- Infracost vs Terragrunt
- Infracost vs Pulumi
- Infracost vs Packer
- Infracost vs Serverless Framework
- Infracost vs SST
- Infracost vs Coolify
- Infracost vs CapRover
- Infracost vs DeepInfra
- Infracost vs Linode
- Infracost vs VictoriaMetrics
- Infracost vs Contabo
- Infracost vs Chef
- Infracost vs Cilium
- Infracost vs Vagrant
- Infracost vs containerd
- Infracost vs TIBCO Mashery
- Infracost vs Appwrite
- Infracost vs Hasura
- Infracost vs PocketBase
- Infracost vs Sanity
- Infracost vs Apigee
- Infracost vs 3scale
- Infracost vs Akana
- Infracost vs Kong
- Infracost vs Boomi API Management
- Infracost vs Microsoft Azure API Management
- Infracost vs Spring Cloud Gateway
- Infracost vs Directus
- Infracost vs Dwolla
- Infracost vs Enable Banking
- Infracost vs Flybits
- Infracost vs i2c
- Infracost vs KeystoneJS
- WSO2 API Manager vs Terragrunt
- WSO2 API Manager vs Pulumi
- WSO2 API Manager vs Packer
- WSO2 API Manager vs Serverless Framework
- WSO2 API Manager vs SST
- WSO2 API Manager vs Coolify
- WSO2 API Manager vs CapRover
- WSO2 API Manager vs DeepInfra
- WSO2 API Manager vs Linode
- WSO2 API Manager vs VictoriaMetrics
- WSO2 API Manager vs Contabo
- WSO2 API Manager vs Chef
- WSO2 API Manager vs Cilium
- WSO2 API Manager vs Vagrant
- WSO2 API Manager vs containerd
- WSO2 API Manager vs TIBCO Mashery
- WSO2 API Manager vs Appwrite
- WSO2 API Manager vs Hasura
- WSO2 API Manager vs PocketBase
- WSO2 API Manager vs Sanity
- WSO2 API Manager vs Apigee
- WSO2 API Manager vs 3scale
- WSO2 API Manager vs Akana
- WSO2 API Manager vs Kong
- WSO2 API Manager vs Boomi API Management
- WSO2 API Manager vs Microsoft Azure API Management
- WSO2 API Manager vs Spring Cloud Gateway
- WSO2 API Manager vs Directus
- WSO2 API Manager vs Dwolla
- WSO2 API Manager vs Enable Banking
- WSO2 API Manager vs Flybits
- WSO2 API Manager vs i2c
- WSO2 API Manager vs KeystoneJS
