Cloud · head to head
Infracost vs KeystoneJS

Infracost
Cloud
Cloud cost estimates in pull requests, with governance in the paid tier
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -

KeystoneJS
APIs
Powerful Node.js headless CMS framework and API platform
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Infracost usage-based resources such as object storage, serverless functions and data transfer have no cost without monthly usage figures supplied by hand, and the documentation warns plainly that engineers otherwise read them as free.; KeystoneJS database support is limited to PostgreSQL, MySQL and SQLite
- They diverge on capability: Infracost covers Pull request cost diffs, KeystoneJS covers REST API.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 31 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Infracost and KeystoneJS actually diverge.
| Attribute | Infracost | KeystoneJS |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | Free open source tool, then per month by run volume | open-source |
| Platforms | Web, macOS, Linux, Windows, Docker | Node.js, Self-hosted |
| Category | Cloud | APIs |
| Founded | Unknown | 2016 |
Identical on both: starting price (Free), free tier (Yes), user rating (Not yet rated).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Infracost
- Pull request cost diffs
- Multi-format parsing
- Apache-2.0 CLI
- FinOps policies
- Automated remediation
- IDE integration
Only in KeystoneJS
- REST API
- GraphQL API
- Admin interface
- Node.js
- Next.js
- React
- Databases
- Node.js support
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Infracost
- Teams that want an expensive infrastructure change questioned at review rather than discovered on an invoicenot KeystoneJS
- Platform groups enforcing tagging so cloud spend can be attributed to a team at allnot KeystoneJS
- Organisations adopting FinOps practice without buying a full cloud management platformnot KeystoneJS
- Engineers who want a cost figure in the editor while writing the Terraformnot KeystoneJS
KeystoneJS
- Headless CMS implementationnot Infracost
- Content management systemsnot Infracost
- Customizable API-driven applicationsnot Infracost
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Infracost
- Usage-based resources such as object storage, serverless functions and data transfer have no cost without monthly usage figures supplied by hand, and the documentation warns plainly that engineers otherwise read them as free.
- Splitting production from non-production usage assumptions is not supported in the free usage file, which the docs attribute to a missing project filter, so that separation requires the paid product.
- The step from 250 to 1,000 dollars a month is large and the Cloud tier includes only ten admin seats, with developer seats charged at a figure that is not published, so the cost for a large organisation cannot be computed from the pricing page.
- Estimates are list price. Negotiated agreements, committed use discounts and reserved instance economics require SKU-level overrides available only on Enterprise, so the number in the pull request is not the number on the bill.
- The share of the product covered by the Apache-2.0 licence is shrinking. Checks, automated fixes, policies and agent integrations are all hosted-only, so the permissive licence increasingly protects the estimation engine rather than the product.
KeystoneJS
- Database support is limited to PostgreSQL, MySQL and SQLite
- Keystone 5 is a separate legacy product documented on a different site and is not covered by the Keystone 6 docs
- Upgrading requires following a dedicated Migrate to 8.0.0 guide, so major versions are not drop-in
- Free support is a community Slack; enterprise-grade consulting and support is a separate paid engagement with Thinkmill and no published price
Pricing, plan by plan
Infracost
Free- FreeFree
- 1,000 runs a month
- Terraform, CloudFormation and CDK estimates
- Community support
- Starter$250/month
- 10,000 runs a month
- Email support
- Cloud$1000/month
- Ten admin seats, developer seats charged separately
- FinOps policies and cost guardrails
- Dashboards and audit trails
- Enterprise$undefined/year
- SKU-level price overrides for negotiated rates
- Business unit reporting
- SSO with SAML group mapping
KeystoneJS
Free- Open SourceFree
- Full KeystoneJS
- Community support
Which should you pick?
Choose Infracost if
- You need pull request cost diffs.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Web, macOS, Linux, Windows, Docker.
- You also want multi-format parsing.
Choose KeystoneJS if
- You need rest api.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Node.js, Self-hosted.
- You also want graphql api.
Questions people ask
- Is Infracost or KeystoneJS better?
- Neither clearly leads. Infracost starts at Free and KeystoneJS at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Infracost or KeystoneJS?
- Infracost starts at Free and KeystoneJS at Free.
- Does Infracost or KeystoneJS run on more platforms?
- Infracost runs on Web, macOS, Linux, Windows, Docker. KeystoneJS runs on Node.js, Self-hosted.
- Can I use Infracost for free?
- Both have a free tier, so you can try either at no cost before committing.
- What is Infracost best used for?
- Infracost is most often used for teams that want an expensive infrastructure change questioned at review rather than discovered on an invoice, platform groups enforcing tagging so cloud spend can be attributed to a team at all, organisations adopting finops practice without buying a full cloud management platform, engineers who want a cost figure in the editor while writing the terraform. Of those, teams that want an expensive infrastructure change questioned at review rather than discovered on an invoice and platform groups enforcing tagging so cloud spend can be attributed to a team at all are not what KeystoneJS is typically brought in for.
- What can Infracost do that KeystoneJS cannot?
- Infracost covers Pull request cost diffs, Multi-format parsing, Apache-2.0 CLI, FinOps policies. KeystoneJS covers REST API, GraphQL API, Admin interface, Node.js.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Infracost: Is the open source version genuinely useful on its own?
Yes, for estimation. It parses your definitions and produces breakdowns and diffs locally. What it does not do is comment on pull requests, enforce policy or report across an organisation, all of which are hosted-only.
KeystoneJS: Is KeystoneJS free?
Yes, KeystoneJS is free and open source with no licensing fees. Core platform has no lock-in and is contributed to by 250+ developers.
SourceInfracost: Will the estimate match my cloud bill?
No. It is list price. Committed use discounts, enterprise agreements and reserved instances need SKU-level overrides that sit in the Enterprise tier.
KeystoneJS: What are hosting costs for KeystoneJS?
KeystoneJS is self-hosted and deployment-agnostic. Hosting costs depend on your chosen deployment platform (Vercel, AWS, Heroku, etc.) and infrastructure, not KeystoneJS itself.
SourceInfracost: Why do my S3 and Lambda resources show no cost?
Usage-based resources need monthly usage values supplied in a usage file or defined centrally. Without them they estimate at zero, which is the documented behaviour and the most common way the tool misleads.
KeystoneJS: Does KeystoneJS offer paid support?
Enterprise support with tailored options is available from Thinkmill, the company behind KeystoneJS. Pricing details available upon request.
SourceInfracost: Has the licence ever changed?
No. The command line tool has been Apache 2.0 throughout, with no Business Source or AGPL episode, which is unusual in this category.
Infracost: What is a run?
Not defined on the public pricing page, and the run allowance is what separates the free and Starter tiers, so establish the definition before choosing between them.
Related pages
Other head to heads
- Infracost vs Terragrunt
- Infracost vs Pulumi
- Infracost vs Packer
- Infracost vs Serverless Framework
- Infracost vs SST
- Infracost vs Coolify
- Infracost vs CapRover
- Infracost vs DeepInfra
- Infracost vs Linode
- Infracost vs VictoriaMetrics
- Infracost vs Contabo
- Infracost vs Chef
- Infracost vs Cilium
- Infracost vs Vagrant
- Infracost vs containerd
- Infracost vs PocketBase
- Infracost vs Sanity
- Infracost vs Appwrite
- Infracost vs Hasura
- Infracost vs Strapi
- Infracost vs Parse Server
- Infracost vs Payload CMS
- Infracost vs Directus
- Infracost vs Kong
- Infracost vs Swagger/OpenAPI
- Infracost vs Gravitee
- Infracost vs Tyk
- Infracost vs Trustly
- Infracost vs Tuum
- Infracost vs Unit
- Infracost vs Vodeno
- Infracost vs Weavr
- Infracost vs Apollo GraphQL
- KeystoneJS vs Terragrunt
- KeystoneJS vs Pulumi
- KeystoneJS vs Packer
- KeystoneJS vs Serverless Framework
- KeystoneJS vs SST
- KeystoneJS vs Coolify
- KeystoneJS vs CapRover
- KeystoneJS vs DeepInfra
- KeystoneJS vs Linode
- KeystoneJS vs VictoriaMetrics
- KeystoneJS vs Contabo
- KeystoneJS vs Chef
- KeystoneJS vs Cilium
- KeystoneJS vs Vagrant
- KeystoneJS vs containerd
- KeystoneJS vs PocketBase
- KeystoneJS vs Sanity
- KeystoneJS vs Appwrite
- KeystoneJS vs Hasura
- KeystoneJS vs Strapi
- KeystoneJS vs Parse Server
- KeystoneJS vs Payload CMS
- KeystoneJS vs Directus
- KeystoneJS vs Kong
- KeystoneJS vs Swagger/OpenAPI
- KeystoneJS vs Gravitee
- KeystoneJS vs Tyk
- KeystoneJS vs Trustly
- KeystoneJS vs Tuum
- KeystoneJS vs Unit
- KeystoneJS vs Vodeno
- KeystoneJS vs Weavr
- KeystoneJS vs Apollo GraphQL
