Cloud · head to head
Infracost vs Janus Gateway

Infracost
Cloud
Cloud cost estimates in pull requests, with governance in the paid tier
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -

Janus Gateway
APIs
WebRTC gateway and media server for real-time communication
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Infracost usage-based resources such as object storage, serverless functions and data transfer have no cost without monthly usage figures supplied by hand, and the documentation warns plainly that engineers otherwise read them as free.; Janus Gateway no commercial pricing published; open-source project without official commercial offerings
- They diverge on capability: Infracost covers Pull request cost diffs, Janus Gateway covers WebRTC Gateway.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 31 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Infracost and Janus Gateway actually diverge.
| Attribute | Infracost | Janus Gateway |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | Free open source tool, then per month by run volume | open-source |
| Platforms | Web, macOS, Linux, Windows, Docker | Linux, MacOS, BSD |
| Category | Cloud | APIs |
| Founded | Unknown | 2010 |
Identical on both: starting price (Free), free tier (Yes), user rating (Not yet rated).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Infracost
- Pull request cost diffs
- Multi-format parsing
- Apache-2.0 CLI
- FinOps policies
- Automated remediation
- IDE integration
Only in Janus Gateway
- WebRTC Gateway
- Media Routing
- Video Conferencing
- RTP
- SRTP
- REST API
- Linux support
- MacOS support
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Infracost
- Teams that want an expensive infrastructure change questioned at review rather than discovered on an invoicenot Janus Gateway
- Platform groups enforcing tagging so cloud spend can be attributed to a team at allnot Janus Gateway
- Organisations adopting FinOps practice without buying a full cloud management platformnot Janus Gateway
- Engineers who want a cost figure in the editor while writing the Terraformnot Janus Gateway
Janus Gateway
- API Developmentnot Infracost
- API Gatewaynot Infracost
- API Testingnot Infracost
- API Documentationnot Infracost
- Microservicesnot Infracost
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Infracost
- Usage-based resources such as object storage, serverless functions and data transfer have no cost without monthly usage figures supplied by hand, and the documentation warns plainly that engineers otherwise read them as free.
- Splitting production from non-production usage assumptions is not supported in the free usage file, which the docs attribute to a missing project filter, so that separation requires the paid product.
- The step from 250 to 1,000 dollars a month is large and the Cloud tier includes only ten admin seats, with developer seats charged at a figure that is not published, so the cost for a large organisation cannot be computed from the pricing page.
- Estimates are list price. Negotiated agreements, committed use discounts and reserved instance economics require SKU-level overrides available only on Enterprise, so the number in the pull request is not the number on the bill.
- The share of the product covered by the Apache-2.0 licence is shrinking. Checks, automated fixes, policies and agent integrations are all hosted-only, so the permissive licence increasingly protects the estimation engine rather than the product.
Janus Gateway
- No commercial pricing published; open-source project without official commercial offerings
- Community-supported only; no vendor commercial support or SLA available
Pricing, plan by plan
Infracost
Free- FreeFree
- 1,000 runs a month
- Terraform, CloudFormation and CDK estimates
- Community support
- Starter$250/month
- 10,000 runs a month
- Email support
- Cloud$1000/month
- Ten admin seats, developer seats charged separately
- FinOps policies and cost guardrails
- Dashboards and audit trails
- Enterprise$undefined/year
- SKU-level price overrides for negotiated rates
- Business unit reporting
- SSO with SAML group mapping
Janus Gateway
Free- Open SourceFree
- Core WebRTC gateway
- Community support
Which should you pick?
Choose Infracost if
- You need pull request cost diffs.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Web, macOS, Linux, Windows, Docker.
- You also want multi-format parsing.
Choose Janus Gateway if
- You need webrtc gateway.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Linux, MacOS, BSD.
- You also want media routing.
Questions people ask
- Is Infracost or Janus Gateway better?
- Neither clearly leads. Infracost starts at Free and Janus Gateway at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Infracost or Janus Gateway?
- Infracost starts at Free and Janus Gateway at Free.
- Does Infracost or Janus Gateway run on more platforms?
- Infracost runs on Web, macOS, Linux, Windows, Docker. Janus Gateway runs on Linux, MacOS, BSD.
- Can I use Infracost for free?
- Both have a free tier, so you can try either at no cost before committing.
- What is Infracost best used for?
- Infracost is most often used for teams that want an expensive infrastructure change questioned at review rather than discovered on an invoice, platform groups enforcing tagging so cloud spend can be attributed to a team at all, organisations adopting finops practice without buying a full cloud management platform, engineers who want a cost figure in the editor while writing the terraform. Of those, teams that want an expensive infrastructure change questioned at review rather than discovered on an invoice and platform groups enforcing tagging so cloud spend can be attributed to a team at all are not what Janus Gateway is typically brought in for.
- What can Infracost do that Janus Gateway cannot?
- Infracost covers Pull request cost diffs, Multi-format parsing, Apache-2.0 CLI, FinOps policies. Janus Gateway covers WebRTC Gateway, Media Routing, Video Conferencing, RTP.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Infracost: Is the open source version genuinely useful on its own?
Yes, for estimation. It parses your definitions and produces breakdowns and diffs locally. What it does not do is comment on pull requests, enforce policy or report across an organisation, all of which are hosted-only.
Janus Gateway: How much does Janus Gateway cost?
Janus Gateway has no pricing model; it is a free open-source WebRTC server developed by Meetecho. The general-purpose server is available for download at no cost. There are no subscription tiers or commercial licensing fees.
SourceInfracost: Will the estimate match my cloud bill?
No. It is list price. Committed use discounts, enterprise agreements and reserved instances need SKU-level overrides that sit in the Enterprise tier.
Janus Gateway: Is Janus Gateway supported commercially?
Janus Gateway is community-supported open-source software with no official commercial support or SLA from the vendors. While Meetecho developed the project, users must rely on community documentation and forums for assistance.
SourceInfracost: Why do my S3 and Lambda resources show no cost?
Usage-based resources need monthly usage values supplied in a usage file or defined centrally. Without them they estimate at zero, which is the documented behaviour and the most common way the tool misleads.
Infracost: Has the licence ever changed?
No. The command line tool has been Apache 2.0 throughout, with no Business Source or AGPL episode, which is unusual in this category.
Infracost: What is a run?
Not defined on the public pricing page, and the run allowance is what separates the free and Starter tiers, so establish the definition before choosing between them.
Related pages
More on Janus Gateway
Other head to heads
- Infracost vs Terragrunt
- Infracost vs Pulumi
- Infracost vs Packer
- Infracost vs Serverless Framework
- Infracost vs SST
- Infracost vs Coolify
- Infracost vs CapRover
- Infracost vs DeepInfra
- Infracost vs Linode
- Infracost vs VictoriaMetrics
- Infracost vs Contabo
- Infracost vs Chef
- Infracost vs Cilium
- Infracost vs Vagrant
- Infracost vs containerd
- Infracost vs Hasura
- Infracost vs PocketBase
- Infracost vs Appwrite
- Infracost vs Sanity
- Infracost vs Kong Gateway
- Infracost vs Convoy
- Infracost vs Tyk
- Infracost vs Spring Cloud Gateway
- Infracost vs Gravitee
- Infracost vs Asyncapi
- Infracost vs Parse Server
- Infracost vs Fintech Farm
- Infracost vs Fintecture
- Infracost vs Formance
- Infracost vs GraphQL Apollo
- Infracost vs GraphQL Playground
- Infracost vs Kong
- Janus Gateway vs Terragrunt
- Janus Gateway vs Pulumi
- Janus Gateway vs Packer
- Janus Gateway vs Serverless Framework
- Janus Gateway vs SST
- Janus Gateway vs Coolify
- Janus Gateway vs CapRover
- Janus Gateway vs DeepInfra
- Janus Gateway vs Linode
- Janus Gateway vs VictoriaMetrics
- Janus Gateway vs Contabo
- Janus Gateway vs Chef
- Janus Gateway vs Cilium
- Janus Gateway vs Vagrant
- Janus Gateway vs containerd
- Janus Gateway vs Hasura
- Janus Gateway vs PocketBase
- Janus Gateway vs Appwrite
- Janus Gateway vs Sanity
- Janus Gateway vs Kong Gateway
- Janus Gateway vs Convoy
- Janus Gateway vs Tyk
- Janus Gateway vs Spring Cloud Gateway
- Janus Gateway vs Gravitee
- Janus Gateway vs Asyncapi
- Janus Gateway vs Parse Server
- Janus Gateway vs Fintech Farm
- Janus Gateway vs Fintecture
- Janus Gateway vs Formance
- Janus Gateway vs GraphQL Apollo
- Janus Gateway vs GraphQL Playground
- Janus Gateway vs Kong
