Cloud · head to head
containerd vs Janus Gateway

containerd
Cloud
Industry-standard container runtime, and the engine inside Docker
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -

Janus Gateway
APIs
WebRTC gateway and media server for real-time communication
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: containerd not a developer-facing tool: there is no build command and the CLI is deliberately minimal, so it needs companions like nerdctl or Buildah; Janus Gateway no commercial pricing published; open-source project without official commercial offerings
- They diverge on capability: containerd covers Full container lifecycle, Janus Gateway covers WebRTC Gateway.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 30 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which containerd and Janus Gateway actually diverge.
| Attribute | containerd | Janus Gateway |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | Open source, no licence fee | open-source |
| Platforms | Linux, Windows | Linux, MacOS, BSD |
| Category | Cloud | APIs |
| Founded | Unknown | 2010 |
Identical on both: starting price (Free), free tier (Yes), user rating (Not yet rated).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in containerd
- Full container lifecycle
- CRI support
- OCI compliant
- Snapshotter plugins
- Namespaces
- Stable API
Only in Janus Gateway
- WebRTC Gateway
- Media Routing
- Video Conferencing
- RTP
- SRTP
- REST API
- Linux support
- MacOS support
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
containerd
- Running the container runtime under a Kubernetes cluster after the Docker shim removalnot Janus Gateway
- Building a platform or PaaS that needs to execute containersnot Janus Gateway
- Reducing the moving parts on nodes that only ever run Kubernetes workloadsnot Janus Gateway
- Embedding container execution inside another productnot Janus Gateway
Janus Gateway
- API Developmentnot containerd
- API Gatewaynot containerd
- API Testingnot containerd
- API Documentationnot containerd
- Microservicesnot containerd
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
containerd
- Not a developer-facing tool: there is no build command and the CLI is deliberately minimal, so it needs companions like nerdctl or Buildah
- Debugging is lower-level than Docker, and error messages assume knowledge of the runtime internals
- Documentation is aimed at platform engineers, so newcomers usually find Docker or Podman material more useful
- No image building at all — that is out of scope by design
Janus Gateway
- No commercial pricing published; open-source project without official commercial offerings
- Community-supported only; no vendor commercial support or SLA available
Pricing, plan by plan
containerd
Free- containerdFree
- Full functionality
- No usage limits
- Community support
Janus Gateway
Free- Open SourceFree
- Core WebRTC gateway
- Community support
Which should you pick?
Choose containerd if
- You need full container lifecycle.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Linux, Windows.
- You also want cri support.
Choose Janus Gateway if
- You need webrtc gateway.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Linux, MacOS, BSD.
- You also want media routing.
Questions people ask
- Is containerd or Janus Gateway better?
- Neither clearly leads. containerd starts at Free and Janus Gateway at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, containerd or Janus Gateway?
- containerd starts at Free and Janus Gateway at Free.
- Does containerd or Janus Gateway run on more platforms?
- containerd runs on Linux, Windows. Janus Gateway runs on Linux, MacOS, BSD.
- Can I use containerd for free?
- Both have a free tier, so you can try either at no cost before committing.
- What is containerd best used for?
- containerd is most often used for running the container runtime under a kubernetes cluster after the docker shim removal, building a platform or paas that needs to execute containers, reducing the moving parts on nodes that only ever run kubernetes workloads, embedding container execution inside another product. Of those, running the container runtime under a kubernetes cluster after the docker shim removal and building a platform or paas that needs to execute containers are not what Janus Gateway is typically brought in for.
- What can containerd do that Janus Gateway cannot?
- containerd covers Full container lifecycle, CRI support, OCI compliant, Snapshotter plugins. Janus Gateway covers WebRTC Gateway, Media Routing, Video Conferencing, RTP.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
containerd: Is containerd free?
Yes. It is an open-source CNCF graduated project with no licence fee.
Janus Gateway: How much does Janus Gateway cost?
Janus Gateway has no pricing model; it is a free open-source WebRTC server developed by Meetecho. The general-purpose server is available for download at no cost. There are no subscription tiers or commercial licensing fees.
Sourcecontainerd: Do I need containerd if I use Docker?
You already have it. Docker uses containerd underneath to run containers; it is not an alternative you install separately.
Janus Gateway: Is Janus Gateway supported commercially?
Janus Gateway is community-supported open-source software with no official commercial support or SLA from the vendors. While Meetecho developed the project, users must rely on community documentation and forums for assistance.
Sourcecontainerd: Why did Kubernetes drop Docker for containerd?
Kubernetes talks to runtimes through the Container Runtime Interface. Docker did not speak CRI natively and needed a shim, so Kubernetes removed the shim and talks to containerd directly, which Docker was already using anyway.
containerd: Can containerd build images?
No. Image building is deliberately out of scope. Tools such as Buildah, BuildKit or Docker handle that.
Related pages
More on Janus Gateway
Other head to heads
- containerd vs Podman
- containerd vs K3s
- containerd vs Crossplane
- containerd vs OpenEBS
- containerd vs DigitalOcean
- containerd vs Portworx
- containerd vs Northflank
- containerd vs Microsoft Azure
- containerd vs Qovery
- containerd vs AWS (Amazon Web Services)
- containerd vs Vultr
- containerd vs Akamai
- containerd vs Alibaba Cloud
- containerd vs CapRover
- containerd vs Chef
- containerd vs Buildah
- containerd vs Skopeo
- containerd vs Hasura
- containerd vs PocketBase
- containerd vs Appwrite
- containerd vs Sanity
- containerd vs Kong Gateway
- containerd vs Convoy
- containerd vs Tyk
- containerd vs Spring Cloud Gateway
- containerd vs Gravitee
- containerd vs Asyncapi
- containerd vs Parse Server
- containerd vs Fintech Farm
- containerd vs Fintecture
- containerd vs Formance
- containerd vs GraphQL Apollo
- containerd vs GraphQL Playground
- containerd vs Kong
- Janus Gateway vs Podman
- Janus Gateway vs K3s
- Janus Gateway vs Crossplane
- Janus Gateway vs OpenEBS
- Janus Gateway vs DigitalOcean
- Janus Gateway vs Portworx
- Janus Gateway vs Northflank
- Janus Gateway vs Microsoft Azure
- Janus Gateway vs Qovery
- Janus Gateway vs AWS (Amazon Web Services)
- Janus Gateway vs Vultr
- Janus Gateway vs Akamai
- Janus Gateway vs Alibaba Cloud
- Janus Gateway vs CapRover
- Janus Gateway vs Chef
- Janus Gateway vs Buildah
- Janus Gateway vs Skopeo
- Janus Gateway vs Hasura
- Janus Gateway vs PocketBase
- Janus Gateway vs Appwrite
- Janus Gateway vs Sanity
- Janus Gateway vs Kong Gateway
- Janus Gateway vs Convoy
- Janus Gateway vs Tyk
- Janus Gateway vs Spring Cloud Gateway
- Janus Gateway vs Gravitee
- Janus Gateway vs Asyncapi
- Janus Gateway vs Parse Server
- Janus Gateway vs Fintech Farm
- Janus Gateway vs Fintecture
- Janus Gateway vs Formance
- Janus Gateway vs GraphQL Apollo
- Janus Gateway vs GraphQL Playground
- Janus Gateway vs Kong
