Databases · head to head
Immuta vs MariaDB

Immuta
Databases
Attribute-based access control and masking applied inside Snowflake, Databricks and BigQuery
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -

MariaDB
Databases
The open source relational database for the enterprise
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Only MariaDB has a free tier, so it costs nothing to try first.
- Each has a real cost: Immuta contracts commonly start around one hundred to two hundred thousand US dollars a year for mid-market deployments and exceed five hundred thousand at enterprise scale, which excludes most data teams without a regulatory mandate.; MariaDB jSON support using text fields rather than native binary type; lacks MySQL's JSON syntax and functions
- They diverge on capability: Immuta covers Attribute-based policy, MariaDB covers MySQL Compatibility.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 31 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Immuta and MariaDB actually diverge.
Identical on both: user rating (Not yet rated), category (Databases).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Immuta
- Attribute-based policy
- Native enforcement
- Dynamic masking
- Row-level filtering
- Purpose-based access
- Sensitive data tagging
- Audit logging
- Multi-platform
Only in MariaDB
- MySQL Compatibility
- Aria Storage Engine
- ColumnStore
- Galera Cluster
- MaxScale
- Spider Engine
- Temporal Tables
- phpMyAdmin
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Immuta
- A bank whose Snowflake estate has grown to tens of thousands of roles that no one can review before an auditnot MariaDB
- A healthcare analytics team that must let researchers query patient data with identifiers masked unless a specific purpose is recordednot MariaDB
- A multinational applying different residency and access rules per jurisdiction to the same tables without duplicating datasetsnot MariaDB
- An organisation running both Snowflake and Databricks that wants one policy set rather than two divergent implementationsnot MariaDB
MariaDB
- Transaction processingnot Immuta
- Data storagenot Immuta
- Application backendnot Immuta
- Reportingnot Immuta
- Data analyticsnot Immuta
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Immuta
- Contracts commonly start around one hundred to two hundred thousand US dollars a year for mid-market deployments and exceed five hundred thousand at enterprise scale, which excludes most data teams without a regulatory mandate.
- Policy is only as good as the data classification underneath it, so an organisation with poorly tagged columns will spend months on classification before Immuta enforces anything useful.
- Native enforcement means capability varies by platform, and a feature available on Snowflake may be absent or behave differently on BigQuery, which undermines the promise of one policy set everywhere.
- Adding an access governance layer creates a new dependency in the path to data: a misconfigured policy silently returns fewer rows rather than erroring, and analysts can act on incomplete results without noticing.
- It governs cloud data platforms, so personal data in operational databases, files and SaaS applications sits outside its scope and needs separate controls, meaning Immuta is rarely the whole answer.
MariaDB
- JSON support using text fields rather than native binary type; lacks MySQL's JSON syntax and functions
- Galera Cluster maximum performance limited to the slowest node in cluster
- InnoDB tables limited to 1,017 columns and 64 secondary indexes
- Transaction size limits in Galera (128K rows and 2GB by default)
- Less strict SQL type checking than PostgreSQL; allows implicit conversions
Pricing, plan by plan
Immuta
On request- Immuta Platform$undefined/year
- Attribute-based policy authoring
- Native enforcement in supported data platforms
- Dynamic masking and row-level security
MariaDB
FreeNo published plan breakdown. See the MariaDB review.
Which should you pick?
Choose Immuta if
- You need attribute-based policy.
- You work on Web, API, Cloud.
- You also want native enforcement.
Choose MariaDB if
- You need mysql compatibility.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Linux, Unix, Windows, macOS.
- You also want aria storage engine.
Questions people ask
- Is Immuta or MariaDB better?
- Neither clearly leads. Immuta starts at On request and MariaDB at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Immuta or MariaDB?
- MariaDB has a free tier; the other does not. Paid plans start at On request for Immuta and Free for MariaDB.
- Does Immuta or MariaDB run on more platforms?
- Immuta runs on Web, API, Cloud. MariaDB runs on Linux, Unix, Windows, macOS.
- Can I use MariaDB for free?
- Yes. MariaDB has a free tier, so you can try it without paying. Immuta starts at On request.
- What is Immuta best used for?
- Immuta is most often used for a bank whose snowflake estate has grown to tens of thousands of roles that no one can review before an audit, a healthcare analytics team that must let researchers query patient data with identifiers masked unless a specific purpose is recorded, a multinational applying different residency and access rules per jurisdiction to the same tables without duplicating datasets, an organisation running both snowflake and databricks that wants one policy set rather than two divergent implementations. Of those, a bank whose snowflake estate has grown to tens of thousands of roles that no one can review before an audit and a healthcare analytics team that must let researchers query patient data with identifiers masked unless a specific purpose is recorded are not what MariaDB is typically brought in for.
- What can Immuta do that MariaDB cannot?
- Immuta covers Attribute-based policy, Native enforcement, Dynamic masking, Row-level filtering. MariaDB covers MySQL Compatibility, Aria Storage Engine, ColumnStore, Galera Cluster.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Immuta: Does Immuta sit in the query path?
No. It compiles policies into the data platform's own native controls, so queries run at normal speed through your existing tools.
MariaDB: Is MariaDB completely free and open source?
Yes. MariaDB Server is licensed under GPLv2 and guaranteed to remain perpetually free and open source, independent of any commercial entities.
SourceImmuta: What does it cost?
Not published. Market data suggests roughly 100,000 to 200,000 US dollars a year for mid-market deployments and considerably more at enterprise scale.
MariaDB: Is MariaDB backward compatible with MySQL?
Yes. MariaDB was designed as a drop-in replacement for MySQL. Every application, driver, and configuration that worked with MySQL works with MariaDB without code changes.
SourceImmuta: Is Immuta still independent?
Yes. It remains independently owned, unlike several competitors in data access governance that have been acquired.
MariaDB: What are the storage engine options in MariaDB?
MariaDB supports multiple storage engines including InnoDB (transactional, default), Aria (crash-safe, good for read-heavy workloads), and MyISAM. The Aria engine is faster than InnoDB for certain read-heavy queries and full table scans.
SourceImmuta: Does it work across more than one warehouse?
Yes, one policy set can target Snowflake, Databricks, BigQuery and Starburst, though enforcement capability varies by platform.
MariaDB: How much does MariaDB cost?
MariaDB Community Server is completely free to download and use. MariaDB offers paid enterprise support and managed cloud services for organizations needing professional support.
SourceMariaDB: Does MariaDB support native JSON storage?
MariaDB stores JSON using text fields (the JSON type is an alias for LONGTEXT), not as a native binary type like MySQL does. JSON support exists but is less sophisticated than MySQL's JSON functions and syntax.
SourceMariaDB: What scaling options does MariaDB provide?
MariaDB supports both scaling up (more cores, memory, storage) and scaling out (read replication, Galera Cluster with multi-node replication). However, Galera Cluster performance cannot exceed the slowest node in the cluster.
SourceRelated pages
Other head to heads
- Immuta vs Privacera
- Immuta vs BigQuery
- Immuta vs Teradata
- Immuta vs Dgraph
- Immuta vs Knack
- Immuta vs Elasticsearch
- Immuta vs Apache Druid
- Immuta vs DuckDB
- Immuta vs DynamoDB
- Immuta vs Oracle Database
- Immuta vs CosmosDB
- Immuta vs DataStax
- Immuta vs dbt
- Immuta vs EMQX
- Immuta vs FaunaDB
- Immuta vs Firebase Realtime Database
- Immuta vs Cassandra
- Immuta vs Amazon Redshift
- Immuta vs PostgreSQL
- Immuta vs Microsoft SQL Server
- Immuta vs SQLite
- Immuta vs Amazon Aurora
- Immuta vs IBM Db2
- Immuta vs Google Cloud SQL
- Immuta vs Presto
- Immuta vs Aiven
- Immuta vs OpenSearch
- Immuta vs TiDB
- Immuta vs Firestore
- Immuta vs Memcached
- Immuta vs MotherDuck
- Immuta vs Neo4j
- Immuta vs Qdrant
- Immuta vs Valkey
- MariaDB vs Privacera
- MariaDB vs BigQuery
- MariaDB vs Teradata
- MariaDB vs Dgraph
- MariaDB vs Knack
- MariaDB vs Elasticsearch
- MariaDB vs Apache Druid
- MariaDB vs DuckDB
- MariaDB vs DynamoDB
- MariaDB vs Oracle Database
- MariaDB vs CosmosDB
- MariaDB vs DataStax
- MariaDB vs dbt
- MariaDB vs EMQX
- MariaDB vs FaunaDB
- MariaDB vs Firebase Realtime Database
- MariaDB vs Cassandra
- MariaDB vs Amazon Redshift
- MariaDB vs PostgreSQL
- MariaDB vs Microsoft SQL Server
- MariaDB vs SQLite
- MariaDB vs Amazon Aurora
- MariaDB vs IBM Db2
- MariaDB vs Google Cloud SQL
- MariaDB vs Presto
- MariaDB vs Aiven
- MariaDB vs OpenSearch
- MariaDB vs TiDB
- MariaDB vs Firestore
- MariaDB vs Memcached
- MariaDB vs MotherDuck
- MariaDB vs Neo4j
- MariaDB vs Qdrant
- MariaDB vs Valkey
