Databases · head to head
DuckDB vs MariaDB

DuckDB
Databases
MIT-licensed analytical SQL database that runs inside your process, with no server, no dependencies and one writer at a time.
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -

MariaDB
Databases
The open source relational database for the enterprise
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: DuckDB a database file accepts one read-write process at a time; other processes must open it read-only and will not see subsequent writes, so DuckDB cannot be the shared database behind several services.; MariaDB jSON support using text fields rather than native binary type; lacks MySQL's JSON syntax and functions
- They diverge on capability: DuckDB covers In-process execution, MariaDB covers MySQL Compatibility.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 30 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which DuckDB and MariaDB actually diverge.
Identical on both: starting price (Free), free tier (Yes), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Databases).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in DuckDB
- In-process execution
- Vectorised columnar engine
- Direct file querying
- Zero dependencies
- Larger-than-memory queries
- MIT licence
- Postgres-flavoured SQL
- Extension ecosystem
Only in MariaDB
- MySQL Compatibility
- Aria Storage Engine
- ColumnStore
- Galera Cluster
- MaxScale
- Spider Engine
- Temporal Tables
- phpMyAdmin
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
DuckDB
- Transformation steps in a data pipeline that would otherwise need Spark, replaced by SQL over Parquet in a single processnot MariaDB
- Analytical queries embedded in an application or a dashboard where shipping a database server alongside it is not acceptablenot MariaDB
- Local exploration of files that are too large for a pandas dataframe but far too small to justify a warehousenot MariaDB
- Continuous integration and testing of analytical SQL, where a real engine can run in the test process without provisioning anythingnot MariaDB
MariaDB
- Transaction processingnot DuckDB
- Data storagenot DuckDB
- Application backendnot DuckDB
- Reportingnot DuckDB
- Data analyticsnot DuckDB
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
DuckDB
- A database file accepts one read-write process at a time; other processes must open it read-only and will not see subsequent writes, so DuckDB cannot be the shared database behind several services.
- There is no network protocol, authentication or user management, so exposing it to remote clients means writing and securing your own service around it.
- It is built for scans and aggregations, not for many small transactions, so a workload of high-frequency single-row inserts and updates performs badly compared with SQLite or Postgres.
- Storage files are backwards compatible but not forwards compatible, so a file written by a newer version cannot be read by an older one and every consumer of a shared file must be upgraded together.
- Query memory settings matter: some operations still need to hold significant state, so an under-configured memory limit turns a large join or a high-cardinality aggregation into a spill-heavy query or an out-of-memory failure rather than a slow success.
MariaDB
- JSON support using text fields rather than native binary type; lacks MySQL's JSON syntax and functions
- Galera Cluster maximum performance limited to the slowest node in cluster
- InnoDB tables limited to 1,017 columns and 64 secondary indexes
- Transaction size limits in Galera (128K rows and 2GB by default)
- Less strict SQL type checking than PostgreSQL; allows implicit conversions
Pricing, plan by plan
DuckDB
FreeNo published plan breakdown. See the DuckDB review.
MariaDB
FreeNo published plan breakdown. See the MariaDB review.
Which should you pick?
Choose DuckDB if
- You need in-process execution.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Linux, macOS, Windows, WebAssembly.
- You also want vectorised columnar engine.
Choose MariaDB if
- You need mysql compatibility.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Linux, Unix, Windows, macOS.
- You also want aria storage engine.
Questions people ask
- Is DuckDB or MariaDB better?
- Neither clearly leads. DuckDB starts at Free and MariaDB at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, DuckDB or MariaDB?
- DuckDB starts at Free and MariaDB at Free.
- Does DuckDB or MariaDB run on more platforms?
- DuckDB runs on Linux, macOS, Windows, WebAssembly. MariaDB runs on Linux, Unix, Windows, macOS.
- Can I use DuckDB for free?
- Both have a free tier, so you can try either at no cost before committing.
- What is DuckDB best used for?
- DuckDB is most often used for transformation steps in a data pipeline that would otherwise need spark, replaced by sql over parquet in a single process, analytical queries embedded in an application or a dashboard where shipping a database server alongside it is not acceptable, local exploration of files that are too large for a pandas dataframe but far too small to justify a warehouse, continuous integration and testing of analytical sql, where a real engine can run in the test process without provisioning anything. Of those, transformation steps in a data pipeline that would otherwise need spark, replaced by sql over parquet in a single process and analytical queries embedded in an application or a dashboard where shipping a database server alongside it is not acceptable are not what MariaDB is typically brought in for.
- What can DuckDB do that MariaDB cannot?
- DuckDB covers In-process execution, Vectorised columnar engine, Direct file querying, Zero dependencies. MariaDB covers MySQL Compatibility, Aria Storage Engine, ColumnStore, Galera Cluster.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
DuckDB: Can multiple applications share one DuckDB database?
Not for writing. One process holds the database read-write; others may attach read-only and will not see later writes. Shared multi-writer access needs a different database or a table format with a catalogue.
MariaDB: Is MariaDB completely free and open source?
Yes. MariaDB Server is licensed under GPLv2 and guaranteed to remain perpetually free and open source, independent of any commercial entities.
SourceDuckDB: Is it a replacement for a data warehouse?
For single-node analytical workloads up to a few hundred gigabytes it very often is. It is not a replacement when many concurrent users need a shared, governed, always-on service.
MariaDB: Is MariaDB backward compatible with MySQL?
Yes. MariaDB was designed as a drop-in replacement for MySQL. Every application, driver, and configuration that worked with MySQL works with MariaDB without code changes.
SourceDuckDB: Do I have to load data into it?
No. It queries Parquet, CSV, JSON and Arrow in place, including on object storage. Its own storage format is optional and mainly useful when you want indexes, constraints and faster repeated access.
MariaDB: What are the storage engine options in MariaDB?
MariaDB supports multiple storage engines including InnoDB (transactional, default), Aria (crash-safe, good for read-heavy workloads), and MyISAM. The Aria engine is faster than InnoDB for certain read-heavy queries and full table scans.
SourceDuckDB: What is MotherDuck's relationship to it?
MotherDuck is a separate company offering a managed and hybrid service built on the DuckDB engine. DuckDB itself remains MIT-licensed and independent of it, with the IP held by the DuckDB Foundation.
MariaDB: How much does MariaDB cost?
MariaDB Community Server is completely free to download and use. MariaDB offers paid enterprise support and managed cloud services for organizations needing professional support.
SourceDuckDB: Is it suitable for OLTP?
No. It is designed for analytical scans. For transactional workloads with frequent small writes, SQLite or Postgres is the right tool.
MariaDB: Does MariaDB support native JSON storage?
MariaDB stores JSON using text fields (the JSON type is an alias for LONGTEXT), not as a native binary type like MySQL does. JSON support exists but is less sophisticated than MySQL's JSON functions and syntax.
SourceMariaDB: What scaling options does MariaDB provide?
MariaDB supports both scaling up (more cores, memory, storage) and scaling out (read replication, Galera Cluster with multi-node replication). However, Galera Cluster performance cannot exceed the slowest node in the cluster.
SourceRelated pages
Other head to heads
- DuckDB vs SingleStore
- DuckDB vs SQLite
- DuckDB vs PostgreSQL
- DuckDB vs Cockroach Labs
- DuckDB vs Airtable
- DuckDB vs Amazon Aurora
- DuckDB vs ClickHouse
- DuckDB vs Apache Druid
- DuckDB vs Firebolt
- DuckDB vs OpenSearch
- DuckDB vs StarRocks
- DuckDB vs DataGrip
- DuckDB vs Estuary
- DuckDB vs Apache Pinot
- DuckDB vs Apache Pulsar
- DuckDB vs Cassandra
- DuckDB vs CouchDB
- DuckDB vs Microsoft SQL Server
- DuckDB vs Oracle Database
- DuckDB vs IBM Db2
- DuckDB vs Google Cloud SQL
- DuckDB vs Presto
- DuckDB vs Aiven
- DuckDB vs TiDB
- DuckDB vs Firestore
- DuckDB vs Memcached
- DuckDB vs MotherDuck
- DuckDB vs Neo4j
- DuckDB vs Qdrant
- DuckDB vs Valkey
- MariaDB vs SingleStore
- MariaDB vs SQLite
- MariaDB vs PostgreSQL
- MariaDB vs Cockroach Labs
- MariaDB vs Airtable
- MariaDB vs Amazon Aurora
- MariaDB vs ClickHouse
- MariaDB vs Apache Druid
- MariaDB vs Firebolt
- MariaDB vs OpenSearch
- MariaDB vs StarRocks
- MariaDB vs DataGrip
- MariaDB vs Estuary
- MariaDB vs Apache Pinot
- MariaDB vs Apache Pulsar
- MariaDB vs Cassandra
- MariaDB vs CouchDB
- MariaDB vs Microsoft SQL Server
- MariaDB vs Oracle Database
- MariaDB vs IBM Db2
- MariaDB vs Google Cloud SQL
- MariaDB vs Presto
- MariaDB vs Aiven
- MariaDB vs TiDB
- MariaDB vs Firestore
- MariaDB vs Memcached
- MariaDB vs MotherDuck
- MariaDB vs Neo4j
- MariaDB vs Qdrant
- MariaDB vs Valkey
