Cybersecurity · head to head
IBM QRadar vs TunnelBear

IBM QRadar
Cybersecurity
Enterprise SIEM licensed by events per second, whose cloud business IBM sold to Palo Alto Networks in 2024.
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -
TunnelBear
Cybersecurity
Consumer VPN with a limited free tier and a bear-themed, beginner-friendly app
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Only TunnelBear has a free tier, so it costs nothing to try first.
- Each has a real cost: IBM QRadar iBM sold the QRadar SaaS business to Palo Alto Networks in 2024 and those customers are being moved to Cortex XSIAM, so anyone buying today is choosing an on-premises product whose vendor has publicly moved the cloud future to a competitor, and the support horizon becomes a contract negotiation rather than an assumption.; TunnelBear free plan's data cap is small compared to competitors offering more generous free allowances.
- They diverge on capability: IBM QRadar covers Offence model, TunnelBear covers Encrypted VPN tunnel.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 30 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which IBM QRadar and TunnelBear actually diverge.
| Attribute | IBM QRadar | TunnelBear |
|---|---|---|
| Starting price | On request | Free |
| Pricing model | subscription | freemium |
| Free tier | No | Yes |
| Platforms | Web, Api | windows, mac, linux, ios, android |
| Founded | 1911 | Unknown |
Identical on both: user rating (Not yet rated), category (Cybersecurity).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in IBM QRadar
- Offence model
- Network flow analysis
- Device Support Modules
- Ariel query language
- Rules and building blocks
- Deployment topology
- App Exchange
- Use Case Manager
Only in TunnelBear
- Encrypted VPN tunnel
- Server location switching
- GhostBear obfuscation
- Browser extensions
- Teams account management
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
IBM QRadar
- A regulated enterprise that must keep log data on premises or in a specific jurisdiction and cannot use a shared SaaS SIEMnot TunnelBear
- A SOC that wants log correlation and network flow analysis in one platform rather than buying an NDR product separatelynot TunnelBear
- An existing QRadar estate deciding whether to stay on premises or accept the migration path to a different vendor's platformnot TunnelBear
- Compliance-driven log retention and reporting where the audit requirement is specific about collection, retention and reportingnot TunnelBear
TunnelBear
- Casual browsing protection on public Wi-Finot IBM QRadar
- Occasional geo-unblocking with a light free allowancenot IBM QRadar
- Bypassing network-level VPN blocking via obfuscationnot IBM QRadar
- Managing VPN access for a small team with centralized billingnot IBM QRadar
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
IBM QRadar
- IBM sold the QRadar SaaS business to Palo Alto Networks in 2024 and those customers are being moved to Cortex XSIAM, so anyone buying today is choosing an on-premises product whose vendor has publicly moved the cloud future to a competitor, and the support horizon becomes a contract negotiation rather than an assumption.
- Licensing is by events per second and flows per minute, so every additional log source raises the cost directly and teams routinely exclude verbose sources such as DNS, proxy, endpoint and cloud audit logs to stay under the licence, which strips out exactly the data an investigation later needs.
- It needs a dedicated operator: rule tuning, parser work and offence triage are continuous jobs, and an organisation that deploys QRadar without at least one named engineer accumulates thousands of unreviewed offences and a false sense of coverage.
- A log source without a matching Device Support Module arrives unparsed, and writing a custom parser with regular expressions against an unfamiliar payload format is specialist work that can take days per source, which quietly determines which systems ever get monitored.
- On-premises capacity is planned across consoles, processors, collectors and data nodes, so outgrowing the sizing means procuring and racking more appliances rather than changing a subscription tier, and growth becomes a purchasing cycle measured in months.
TunnelBear
- Free plan's data cap is small compared to competitors offering more generous free allowances.
- Lacks advanced features like dedicated IP addresses or split-tunneling controls found in some rival VPNs.
- Server network is smaller than large competitors like NordVPN or ExpressVPN.
- No standalone router-level app, limiting whole-network protection options.
Pricing, plan by plan
IBM QRadar
On request- QRadar SIEMFree
- Event and flow processing
- Offense management
- Threat intelligence
- QRadar CloudFree
- Cloud-native deployment
- Elastic scaling
- Managed infrastructure
- QRadar SuiteFree
- SIEM + SOAR + XDR
- Unified analyst experience
- Federated search
TunnelBear
Free- FreeFree
- 2GB of data per month
- Access to VPN servers
- Unlimited devices
- Unlimited$9.99/month
- Unlimited monthly data
- All server locations
- Cheaper on annual/3-year billing
- Teams$undefined/month
- Unlimited data
- 5 connected devices per user
- Dedicated account manager
Which should you pick?
Choose IBM QRadar if
- You need offence model.
- You work on Web, Api.
- You also want network flow analysis.
Choose TunnelBear if
- You need encrypted vpn tunnel.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on windows, mac, linux, ios, android.
- You also want server location switching.
Questions people ask
- Is IBM QRadar or TunnelBear better?
- Neither clearly leads. IBM QRadar starts at On request and TunnelBear at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, IBM QRadar or TunnelBear?
- TunnelBear has a free tier; the other does not. Paid plans start at On request for IBM QRadar and Free for TunnelBear.
- Does IBM QRadar or TunnelBear run on more platforms?
- IBM QRadar runs on Web, Api. TunnelBear runs on windows, mac, linux, ios, android.
- Can I use TunnelBear for free?
- Yes. TunnelBear has a free tier, so you can try it without paying. IBM QRadar starts at On request.
- What is IBM QRadar best used for?
- IBM QRadar is most often used for a regulated enterprise that must keep log data on premises or in a specific jurisdiction and cannot use a shared saas siem, a soc that wants log correlation and network flow analysis in one platform rather than buying an ndr product separately, an existing qradar estate deciding whether to stay on premises or accept the migration path to a different vendor's platform, compliance-driven log retention and reporting where the audit requirement is specific about collection, retention and reporting. Of those, a regulated enterprise that must keep log data on premises or in a specific jurisdiction and cannot use a shared saas siem and a soc that wants log correlation and network flow analysis in one platform rather than buying an ndr product separately are not what TunnelBear is typically brought in for.
- What can IBM QRadar do that TunnelBear cannot?
- IBM QRadar covers Offence model, Network flow analysis, Device Support Modules, Ariel query language. TunnelBear covers Encrypted VPN tunnel, Server location switching, GhostBear obfuscation, Browser extensions.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
IBM QRadar: Who owns QRadar now?
It is split. IBM sold the QRadar SaaS assets to Palo Alto Networks in a deal announced in May 2024 and closed that September, and those customers are being migrated to Cortex XSIAM. IBM retains and supports the on-premises product.
IBM QRadar: Is QRadar being discontinued?
IBM has committed to continuing support for on-premises customers, including security updates, while offering migration assistance. The cloud product's future belongs to Palo Alto. If you are signing a multi-year term, get the support horizon written into the contract.
IBM QRadar: How is it licensed?
By events per second for logs and flows per minute for network data, with the software or appliance sized to that rate. Add-on modules in the suite are licensed separately.
IBM QRadar: What is an offence?
QRadar's term for a correlated case. Rules group related events and flows against a common indicator such as a host or user, so an analyst reviews one offence rather than the hundreds of events behind it.
IBM QRadar: Do I need a full-time engineer?
In practice yes for anything beyond a small deployment. Parser development, rule tuning and offence triage do not stop, and the most common failure mode is a well-installed QRadar that nobody has tuned since go-live.
Related pages
Other head to heads
- IBM QRadar vs Bitdefender Total Security
- IBM QRadar vs 1Password
- IBM QRadar vs Norton 360
- IBM QRadar vs LastPass
- IBM QRadar vs Microsoft Sentinel
- IBM QRadar vs Splunk Enterprise Security
- IBM QRadar vs CrowdStrike Falcon
- IBM QRadar vs LogRhythm SIEM
- IBM QRadar vs Recorded Future
- IBM QRadar vs SentinelOne Singularity
- IBM QRadar vs Proofpoint
- IBM QRadar vs Trend Micro Vision One
- IBM QRadar vs Arnica
- IBM QRadar vs Authelia
- IBM QRadar vs Authy
- IBM QRadar vs Baffle
- IBM QRadar vs Beyond Identity
- IBM QRadar vs BeyondTrust
- IBM QRadar vs Windscribe
- IBM QRadar vs Mullvad VPN
- IBM QRadar vs Private Internet Access
- IBM QRadar vs IVPN
- IBM QRadar vs Enpass
- IBM QRadar vs CyberGhost VPN
- IBM QRadar vs NordVPN
- IBM QRadar vs Surfshark
- IBM QRadar vs Avast One
- IBM QRadar vs ProtonVPN
- IBM QRadar vs Jamf Pro
- IBM QRadar vs Keeper Password Manager
- IBM QRadar vs Keygen
- IBM QRadar vs KnowBe4
- IBM QRadar vs Legit Security
- IBM QRadar vs ExpressVPN
- TunnelBear vs Bitdefender Total Security
- TunnelBear vs 1Password
- TunnelBear vs Norton 360
- TunnelBear vs LastPass
- TunnelBear vs Microsoft Sentinel
- TunnelBear vs Splunk Enterprise Security
- TunnelBear vs CrowdStrike Falcon
- TunnelBear vs LogRhythm SIEM
- TunnelBear vs Recorded Future
- TunnelBear vs SentinelOne Singularity
- TunnelBear vs Proofpoint
- TunnelBear vs Trend Micro Vision One
- TunnelBear vs Arnica
- TunnelBear vs Authelia
- TunnelBear vs Authy
- TunnelBear vs Baffle
- TunnelBear vs Beyond Identity
- TunnelBear vs BeyondTrust
- TunnelBear vs Windscribe
- TunnelBear vs Mullvad VPN
- TunnelBear vs Private Internet Access
- TunnelBear vs IVPN
- TunnelBear vs Enpass
- TunnelBear vs CyberGhost VPN
- TunnelBear vs NordVPN
- TunnelBear vs Surfshark
- TunnelBear vs Avast One
- TunnelBear vs ProtonVPN
- TunnelBear vs Jamf Pro
- TunnelBear vs Keeper Password Manager
- TunnelBear vs Keygen
- TunnelBear vs KnowBe4
- TunnelBear vs Legit Security
- TunnelBear vs ExpressVPN
