Cybersecurity · head to head
CyberGhost VPN vs IBM QRadar
CyberGhost VPN
Cybersecurity
Consumer VPN operated from Romania and owned by Kape Technologies, with a no-logs claim audited by Deloitte.
- From
- $2.19/month
- Rated
- -

IBM QRadar
Cybersecurity
Enterprise SIEM licensed by events per second, whose cloud business IBM sold to Palo Alto Networks in 2024.
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: CyberGhost VPN kape Technologies, the parent, was formerly Crossrider, a browser extension platform whose technology was widely used to distribute adware, and Kape now also owns VPN review sites, so third-party rankings a buyer might use to verify the product can come from the same corporate group.; IBM QRadar iBM sold the QRadar SaaS business to Palo Alto Networks in 2024 and those customers are being moved to Cortex XSIAM, so anyone buying today is choosing an on-premises product whose vendor has publicly moved the cloud future to a competitor, and the support horizon becomes a contract negotiation rather than an assumption.
- They diverge on capability: CyberGhost VPN covers NoSpy servers, IBM QRadar covers Offence model.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 30 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which CyberGhost VPN and IBM QRadar actually diverge.
| Attribute | CyberGhost VPN | IBM QRadar |
|---|---|---|
| Starting price | $2.19/month | On request |
| Platforms | Web, Desktop, Mobile | Web, Api |
| Founded | 2011 | 1911 |
Identical on both: pricing model (subscription), free tier (No), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Cybersecurity).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in CyberGhost VPN
- NoSpy servers
- Audited no-logs policy
- WireGuard, OpenVPN and IKEv2
- Streaming-labelled servers
- Dedicated IP via token
- Kill switch
- Split tunnelling
- Smart Rules
Only in IBM QRadar
- Offence model
- Network flow analysis
- Device Support Modules
- Ariel query language
- Rules and building blocks
- Deployment topology
- App Exchange
- Use Case Manager
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
CyberGhost VPN
- A household that wants one subscription covering several devices for streaming and public Wi-Finot IBM QRadar
- A buyer who specifically wants a provider outside the Fourteen Eyes with a published third-party no-logs auditnot IBM QRadar
- Torrenting on a connection where the internet provider throttles or logs peer-to-peer trafficnot IBM QRadar
- Travellers needing to reach home-country services from abroad without configuring anything technicalnot IBM QRadar
IBM QRadar
- A regulated enterprise that must keep log data on premises or in a specific jurisdiction and cannot use a shared SaaS SIEMnot CyberGhost VPN
- A SOC that wants log correlation and network flow analysis in one platform rather than buying an NDR product separatelynot CyberGhost VPN
- An existing QRadar estate deciding whether to stay on premises or accept the migration path to a different vendor's platformnot CyberGhost VPN
- Compliance-driven log retention and reporting where the audit requirement is specific about collection, retention and reportingnot CyberGhost VPN
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
CyberGhost VPN
- Kape Technologies, the parent, was formerly Crossrider, a browser extension platform whose technology was widely used to distribute adware, and Kape now also owns VPN review sites, so third-party rankings a buyer might use to verify the product can come from the same corporate group.
- Pricing is structured so that the deep discount applies to the longest initial term and the standard rate applies at renewal, which means the figure used to make the decision is not the figure paid in year three unless the subscriber renegotiates or churns.
- The Deloitte engagement is point-in-time assurance over stated policy and server configuration, so it confirms things were as described when examined and says nothing about how the infrastructure behaves today or after an ownership change.
- Client capability differs sharply by platform: the Linux client is command-line only and lacks the kill switch and split tunnelling that the Windows client has, so a mixed-device household does not get the protection that reviews of the Windows app describe.
- Streaming-optimised server labels go stale because platforms block address ranges continually, and the practical support answer is to try a different server, which makes the labelled-server feature less dependable than the marketing implies.
IBM QRadar
- IBM sold the QRadar SaaS business to Palo Alto Networks in 2024 and those customers are being moved to Cortex XSIAM, so anyone buying today is choosing an on-premises product whose vendor has publicly moved the cloud future to a competitor, and the support horizon becomes a contract negotiation rather than an assumption.
- Licensing is by events per second and flows per minute, so every additional log source raises the cost directly and teams routinely exclude verbose sources such as DNS, proxy, endpoint and cloud audit logs to stay under the licence, which strips out exactly the data an investigation later needs.
- It needs a dedicated operator: rule tuning, parser work and offence triage are continuous jobs, and an organisation that deploys QRadar without at least one named engineer accumulates thousands of unreviewed offences and a false sense of coverage.
- A log source without a matching Device Support Module arrives unparsed, and writing a custom parser with regular expressions against an unfamiliar payload format is specialist work that can take days per source, which quietly determines which systems ever get monitored.
- On-premises capacity is planned across consoles, processors, collectors and data nodes, so outgrowing the sizing means procuring and racking more appliances rather than changing a subscription tier, and growth becomes a purchasing cycle measured in months.
Pricing, plan by plan
CyberGhost VPN
$2.19/month- 1 Month$12.99/month
- 7 devices
- 9000+ servers
- Unlimited bandwidth
- 2 Years + 2 Months$2.19/month
- All features
- Best value
- 45-day guarantee
- 6 Months$6.99/month
- All features
- 45-day guarantee
IBM QRadar
On request- QRadar SIEMFree
- Event and flow processing
- Offense management
- Threat intelligence
- QRadar CloudFree
- Cloud-native deployment
- Elastic scaling
- Managed infrastructure
- QRadar SuiteFree
- SIEM + SOAR + XDR
- Unified analyst experience
- Federated search
Which should you pick?
Choose CyberGhost VPN if
- You need nospy servers.
- You work on Web, Desktop, Mobile.
- You also want audited no-logs policy.
Choose IBM QRadar if
- You need offence model.
- You work on Web, Api.
- You also want network flow analysis.
Questions people ask
- Is CyberGhost VPN or IBM QRadar better?
- Neither clearly leads. CyberGhost VPN starts at $2.19/month and IBM QRadar at On request, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, CyberGhost VPN or IBM QRadar?
- CyberGhost VPN starts at $2.19/month and IBM QRadar at On request.
- Does CyberGhost VPN or IBM QRadar run on more platforms?
- CyberGhost VPN runs on Web, Desktop, Mobile. IBM QRadar runs on Web, Api.
- What is CyberGhost VPN best used for?
- CyberGhost VPN is most often used for a household that wants one subscription covering several devices for streaming and public wi-fi, a buyer who specifically wants a provider outside the fourteen eyes with a published third-party no-logs audit, torrenting on a connection where the internet provider throttles or logs peer-to-peer traffic, travellers needing to reach home-country services from abroad without configuring anything technical. Of those, a household that wants one subscription covering several devices for streaming and public wi-fi and a buyer who specifically wants a provider outside the fourteen eyes with a published third-party no-logs audit are not what IBM QRadar is typically brought in for.
- What can CyberGhost VPN do that IBM QRadar cannot?
- CyberGhost VPN covers NoSpy servers, Audited no-logs policy, WireGuard, OpenVPN and IKEv2, Streaming-labelled servers. IBM QRadar covers Offence model, Network flow analysis, Device Support Modules, Ariel query language.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
CyberGhost VPN: Who owns CyberGhost?
Kape Technologies, which acquired it in 2017. Kape was formerly called Crossrider and also owns ExpressVPN, Private Internet Access and Zenmate, plus the review sites vpnMentor and Wizcase.
IBM QRadar: Who owns QRadar now?
It is split. IBM sold the QRadar SaaS assets to Palo Alto Networks in a deal announced in May 2024 and closed that September, and those customers are being migrated to Cortex XSIAM. IBM retains and supports the on-premises product.
CyberGhost VPN: Has the no-logs claim been independently audited?
Yes. Deloitte has examined the no-logs policy and server configuration and published an assurance report. Note that this is a point-in-time engagement, not continuous monitoring.
IBM QRadar: Is QRadar being discontinued?
IBM has committed to continuing support for on-premises customers, including security updates, while offering migration assistance. The cloud product's future belongs to Palo Alto. If you are signing a multi-year term, get the support horizon written into the contract.
CyberGhost VPN: What jurisdiction is it under?
The service is operated from Romania, which has no mandatory communications data retention law in force and is not a member of the Five, Nine or Fourteen Eyes intelligence-sharing arrangements. Ownership sits with Kape, headquartered in the UK.
IBM QRadar: How is it licensed?
By events per second for logs and flows per minute for network data, with the software or appliance sized to that rate. Add-on modules in the suite are licensed separately.
CyberGhost VPN: Does it work with streaming services?
Often, using the servers labelled for each service, but this changes constantly as platforms block address ranges. Treat streaming access as a feature that may stop working on any given day rather than a guarantee.
IBM QRadar: What is an offence?
QRadar's term for a correlated case. Rules group related events and flows against a common indicator such as a host or user, so an analyst reviews one offence rather than the hundreds of events behind it.
CyberGhost VPN: Can I use it on Linux or a router?
There is a command-line Linux client with fewer features than the desktop apps, and router use requires manual OpenVPN configuration rather than an official app.
IBM QRadar: Do I need a full-time engineer?
In practice yes for anything beyond a small deployment. Parser development, rule tuning and offence triage do not stop, and the most common failure mode is a well-installed QRadar that nobody has tuned since go-live.
Related pages
More on CyberGhost VPN
Other head to heads
- CyberGhost VPN vs Surfshark
- CyberGhost VPN vs Norton 360
- CyberGhost VPN vs 1Password
- CyberGhost VPN vs Bitdefender Total Security
- CyberGhost VPN vs LastPass
- CyberGhost VPN vs NordVPN
- CyberGhost VPN vs Private Internet Access
- CyberGhost VPN vs TunnelBear
- CyberGhost VPN vs Mullvad VPN
- CyberGhost VPN vs Windscribe
- CyberGhost VPN vs Avast One
- CyberGhost VPN vs IVPN
- CyberGhost VPN vs Sigstore
- CyberGhost VPN vs Speakeasy
- CyberGhost VPN vs Sysdig
- CyberGhost VPN vs Tenable
- CyberGhost VPN vs Trend Micro Vision One
- CyberGhost VPN vs Microsoft Sentinel
- CyberGhost VPN vs Splunk Enterprise Security
- CyberGhost VPN vs CrowdStrike Falcon
- CyberGhost VPN vs LogRhythm SIEM
- CyberGhost VPN vs Recorded Future
- CyberGhost VPN vs SentinelOne Singularity
- CyberGhost VPN vs Proofpoint
- CyberGhost VPN vs Arnica
- CyberGhost VPN vs Authelia
- CyberGhost VPN vs Authy
- CyberGhost VPN vs Baffle
- CyberGhost VPN vs Beyond Identity
- CyberGhost VPN vs BeyondTrust
- IBM QRadar vs Surfshark
- IBM QRadar vs Norton 360
- IBM QRadar vs 1Password
- IBM QRadar vs Bitdefender Total Security
- IBM QRadar vs LastPass
- IBM QRadar vs NordVPN
- IBM QRadar vs Private Internet Access
- IBM QRadar vs TunnelBear
- IBM QRadar vs Mullvad VPN
- IBM QRadar vs Windscribe
- IBM QRadar vs Avast One
- IBM QRadar vs IVPN
- IBM QRadar vs Sigstore
- IBM QRadar vs Speakeasy
- IBM QRadar vs Sysdig
- IBM QRadar vs Tenable
- IBM QRadar vs Trend Micro Vision One
- IBM QRadar vs Microsoft Sentinel
- IBM QRadar vs Splunk Enterprise Security
- IBM QRadar vs CrowdStrike Falcon
- IBM QRadar vs LogRhythm SIEM
- IBM QRadar vs Recorded Future
- IBM QRadar vs SentinelOne Singularity
- IBM QRadar vs Proofpoint
- IBM QRadar vs Arnica
- IBM QRadar vs Authelia
- IBM QRadar vs Authy
- IBM QRadar vs Baffle
- IBM QRadar vs Beyond Identity
- IBM QRadar vs BeyondTrust
