Cybersecurity · head to head
IBM QRadar vs Surfshark

IBM QRadar
Cybersecurity
Enterprise SIEM licensed by events per second, whose cloud business IBM sold to Palo Alto Networks in 2024.
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: IBM QRadar iBM sold the QRadar SaaS business to Palo Alto Networks in 2024 and those customers are being moved to Cortex XSIAM, so anyone buying today is choosing an on-premises product whose vendor has publicly moved the cloud future to a competitor, and the support horizon becomes a contract negotiation rather than an assumption.; Surfshark smaller server network (4,500+ servers) compared to larger competitors like NordVPN
- They diverge on capability: IBM QRadar covers Offence model, Surfshark covers Unlimited devices.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 30 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which IBM QRadar and Surfshark actually diverge.
| Attribute | IBM QRadar | Surfshark |
|---|---|---|
| Starting price | On request | $1.78/month |
| Pricing model | subscription | Unknown |
| Platforms | Web, Api | Windows, macOS, iOS, Android, Linux |
| Founded | 1911 | 2018 |
Identical on both: free tier (No), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Cybersecurity).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in IBM QRadar
- Offence model
- Network flow analysis
- Device Support Modules
- Ariel query language
- Rules and building blocks
- Deployment topology
- App Exchange
- Use Case Manager
Only in Surfshark
- Unlimited devices
- CleanWeb ad blocker
- MultiHop
- Camouflage Mode
- NoBorders mode
- Kill Switch
- Bypasser split tunneling
- Rotating IP
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
IBM QRadar
- A regulated enterprise that must keep log data on premises or in a specific jurisdiction and cannot use a shared SaaS SIEMnot Surfshark
- A SOC that wants log correlation and network flow analysis in one platform rather than buying an NDR product separatelynot Surfshark
- An existing QRadar estate deciding whether to stay on premises or accept the migration path to a different vendor's platformnot Surfshark
- Compliance-driven log retention and reporting where the audit requirement is specific about collection, retention and reportingnot Surfshark
Surfshark
- Vpnnot IBM QRadar
- Privacynot IBM QRadar
- Security Suitenot IBM QRadar
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
IBM QRadar
- IBM sold the QRadar SaaS business to Palo Alto Networks in 2024 and those customers are being moved to Cortex XSIAM, so anyone buying today is choosing an on-premises product whose vendor has publicly moved the cloud future to a competitor, and the support horizon becomes a contract negotiation rather than an assumption.
- Licensing is by events per second and flows per minute, so every additional log source raises the cost directly and teams routinely exclude verbose sources such as DNS, proxy, endpoint and cloud audit logs to stay under the licence, which strips out exactly the data an investigation later needs.
- It needs a dedicated operator: rule tuning, parser work and offence triage are continuous jobs, and an organisation that deploys QRadar without at least one named engineer accumulates thousands of unreviewed offences and a false sense of coverage.
- A log source without a matching Device Support Module arrives unparsed, and writing a custom parser with regular expressions against an unfamiliar payload format is specialist work that can take days per source, which quietly determines which systems ever get monitored.
- On-premises capacity is planned across consoles, processors, collectors and data nodes, so outgrowing the sizing means procuring and racking more appliances rather than changing a subscription tier, and growth becomes a purchasing cycle measured in months.
Surfshark
- Smaller server network (4,500+ servers) compared to larger competitors like NordVPN
- Lower brand recognition compared to established VPN providers
- Limited customer service availability in some time zones
Pricing, plan by plan
IBM QRadar
On request- QRadar SIEMFree
- Event and flow processing
- Offense management
- Threat intelligence
- QRadar CloudFree
- Cloud-native deployment
- Elastic scaling
- Managed infrastructure
- QRadar SuiteFree
- SIEM + SOAR + XDR
- Unified analyst experience
- Federated search
Surfshark
$1.78/month- Starter$1.78/month
- Unlimited simultaneous connections
- 4,500+ servers
- Basic VPN
- One$3.59/month
- VPN
- Antivirus
- Personal data leak alert
- One+$4/month
- All One features
- Incogi included
Which should you pick?
Choose IBM QRadar if
- You need offence model.
- You work on Web, Api.
- You also want network flow analysis.
Choose Surfshark if
- You need unlimited devices.
- You work on Windows, macOS, iOS, Android, Linux.
- You also want cleanweb ad blocker.
Questions people ask
- Is IBM QRadar or Surfshark better?
- Neither clearly leads. IBM QRadar starts at On request and Surfshark at $1.78/month, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, IBM QRadar or Surfshark?
- IBM QRadar starts at On request and Surfshark at $1.78/month.
- Does IBM QRadar or Surfshark run on more platforms?
- IBM QRadar runs on Web, Api. Surfshark runs on Windows, macOS, iOS, Android, Linux.
- What is IBM QRadar best used for?
- IBM QRadar is most often used for a regulated enterprise that must keep log data on premises or in a specific jurisdiction and cannot use a shared saas siem, a soc that wants log correlation and network flow analysis in one platform rather than buying an ndr product separately, an existing qradar estate deciding whether to stay on premises or accept the migration path to a different vendor's platform, compliance-driven log retention and reporting where the audit requirement is specific about collection, retention and reporting. Of those, a regulated enterprise that must keep log data on premises or in a specific jurisdiction and cannot use a shared saas siem and a soc that wants log correlation and network flow analysis in one platform rather than buying an ndr product separately are not what Surfshark is typically brought in for.
- What can IBM QRadar do that Surfshark cannot?
- IBM QRadar covers Offence model, Network flow analysis, Device Support Modules, Ariel query language. Surfshark covers Unlimited devices, CleanWeb ad blocker, MultiHop, Camouflage Mode.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
IBM QRadar: Who owns QRadar now?
It is split. IBM sold the QRadar SaaS assets to Palo Alto Networks in a deal announced in May 2024 and closed that September, and those customers are being migrated to Cortex XSIAM. IBM retains and supports the on-premises product.
Surfshark: Does Surfshark maintain a no-logs policy?
Yes. Surfshark does not log browsing history, visited IP addresses, bandwidth usage, or network traffic. This policy was independently verified by Deloitte in 2025.
SourceIBM QRadar: Is QRadar being discontinued?
IBM has committed to continuing support for on-premises customers, including security updates, while offering migration assistance. The cloud product's future belongs to Palo Alto. If you are signing a multi-year term, get the support horizon written into the contract.
Surfshark: How many simultaneous device connections does Surfshark allow?
Surfshark allows unlimited simultaneous connections on all subscription plans, enabling protection of every device in a household with a single subscription.
SourceIBM QRadar: How is it licensed?
By events per second for logs and flows per minute for network data, with the software or appliance sized to that rate. Add-on modules in the suite are licensed separately.
IBM QRadar: What is an offence?
QRadar's term for a correlated case. Rules group related events and flows against a common indicator such as a host or user, so an analyst reviews one offence rather than the hundreds of events behind it.
IBM QRadar: Do I need a full-time engineer?
In practice yes for anything beyond a small deployment. Parser development, rule tuning and offence triage do not stop, and the most common failure mode is a well-installed QRadar that nobody has tuned since go-live.
Related pages
Other head to heads
- IBM QRadar vs Bitdefender Total Security
- IBM QRadar vs 1Password
- IBM QRadar vs Norton 360
- IBM QRadar vs LastPass
- IBM QRadar vs Microsoft Sentinel
- IBM QRadar vs Splunk Enterprise Security
- IBM QRadar vs CrowdStrike Falcon
- IBM QRadar vs LogRhythm SIEM
- IBM QRadar vs Recorded Future
- IBM QRadar vs SentinelOne Singularity
- IBM QRadar vs Proofpoint
- IBM QRadar vs Trend Micro Vision One
- IBM QRadar vs Arnica
- IBM QRadar vs Authelia
- IBM QRadar vs Authy
- IBM QRadar vs Baffle
- IBM QRadar vs Beyond Identity
- IBM QRadar vs BeyondTrust
- IBM QRadar vs CyberGhost VPN
- IBM QRadar vs ProtonVPN
- IBM QRadar vs NordVPN
- IBM QRadar vs Avast One
- IBM QRadar vs McAfee Total Protection
- IBM QRadar vs IVPN
- IBM QRadar vs Mullvad VPN
- IBM QRadar vs Windscribe
- IBM QRadar vs TunnelBear
- IBM QRadar vs Private Internet Access
- IBM QRadar vs iDenfy
- IBM QRadar vs IDnow
- IBM QRadar vs Jumio
- IBM QRadar vs Kaspersky Total Security
- IBM QRadar vs LogicManager
- IBM QRadar vs ExpressVPN
- Surfshark vs Bitdefender Total Security
- Surfshark vs 1Password
- Surfshark vs Norton 360
- Surfshark vs LastPass
- Surfshark vs Microsoft Sentinel
- Surfshark vs Splunk Enterprise Security
- Surfshark vs CrowdStrike Falcon
- Surfshark vs LogRhythm SIEM
- Surfshark vs Recorded Future
- Surfshark vs SentinelOne Singularity
- Surfshark vs Proofpoint
- Surfshark vs Trend Micro Vision One
- Surfshark vs Arnica
- Surfshark vs Authelia
- Surfshark vs Authy
- Surfshark vs Baffle
- Surfshark vs Beyond Identity
- Surfshark vs BeyondTrust
- Surfshark vs CyberGhost VPN
- Surfshark vs ProtonVPN
- Surfshark vs NordVPN
- Surfshark vs Avast One
- Surfshark vs McAfee Total Protection
- Surfshark vs IVPN
- Surfshark vs Mullvad VPN
- Surfshark vs Windscribe
- Surfshark vs TunnelBear
- Surfshark vs Private Internet Access
- Surfshark vs iDenfy
- Surfshark vs IDnow
- Surfshark vs Jumio
- Surfshark vs Kaspersky Total Security
- Surfshark vs LogicManager
- Surfshark vs ExpressVPN

