Cybersecurity · head to head
Enpass vs IBM QRadar

Enpass
Cybersecurity
Offline-first password manager that stores your vault locally instead of the cloud
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -

IBM QRadar
Cybersecurity
Enterprise SIEM licensed by events per second, whose cloud business IBM sold to Palo Alto Networks in 2024.
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Only Enpass has a free tier, so it costs nothing to try first.
- Each has a real cost: Enpass no built-in cloud sync of its own, so users must configure a third-party storage provider for multi-device sync.; IBM QRadar iBM sold the QRadar SaaS business to Palo Alto Networks in 2024 and those customers are being moved to Cortex XSIAM, so anyone buying today is choosing an on-premises product whose vendor has publicly moved the cloud future to a competitor, and the support horizon becomes a contract negotiation rather than an assumption.
- They diverge on capability: Enpass covers Offline vaults, IBM QRadar covers Offence model.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 30 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Enpass and IBM QRadar actually diverge.
| Attribute | Enpass | IBM QRadar |
|---|---|---|
| Starting price | Free | On request |
| Pricing model | freemium | subscription |
| Free tier | Yes | No |
| Platforms | web, ios, android, windows, mac, linux | Web, Api |
| Founded | Unknown | 1911 |
Identical on both: user rating (Not yet rated), category (Cybersecurity).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Enpass
- Offline vaults
- Bring-your-own-cloud sync
- Autofill and password generator
- Password audit
- Business admin console
- Cross-platform apps
Only in IBM QRadar
- Offence model
- Network flow analysis
- Device Support Modules
- Ariel query language
- Rules and building blocks
- Deployment topology
- App Exchange
- Use Case Manager
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Enpass
- Storing passwords without trusting a vendor's cloudnot IBM QRadar
- Syncing a vault via personal cloud storagenot IBM QRadar
- Managing a household's shared loginsnot IBM QRadar
- Provisioning team vaults with SSO-adjacent admin controlsnot IBM QRadar
IBM QRadar
- A regulated enterprise that must keep log data on premises or in a specific jurisdiction and cannot use a shared SaaS SIEMnot Enpass
- A SOC that wants log correlation and network flow analysis in one platform rather than buying an NDR product separatelynot Enpass
- An existing QRadar estate deciding whether to stay on premises or accept the migration path to a different vendor's platformnot Enpass
- Compliance-driven log retention and reporting where the audit requirement is specific about collection, retention and reportingnot Enpass
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Enpass
- No built-in cloud sync of its own, so users must configure a third-party storage provider for multi-device sync.
- Mobile Lite tier caps vaults at 25 items, pushing active mobile users toward a paid plan quickly.
- Lacks dark web monitoring and breach alerting found in some competing password managers.
- Team/business plan lacks a native SSO login option comparable to enterprise-grade competitors.
IBM QRadar
- IBM sold the QRadar SaaS business to Palo Alto Networks in 2024 and those customers are being moved to Cortex XSIAM, so anyone buying today is choosing an on-premises product whose vendor has publicly moved the cloud future to a competitor, and the support horizon becomes a contract negotiation rather than an assumption.
- Licensing is by events per second and flows per minute, so every additional log source raises the cost directly and teams routinely exclude verbose sources such as DNS, proxy, endpoint and cloud audit logs to stay under the licence, which strips out exactly the data an investigation later needs.
- It needs a dedicated operator: rule tuning, parser work and offence triage are continuous jobs, and an organisation that deploys QRadar without at least one named engineer accumulates thousands of unreviewed offences and a false sense of coverage.
- A log source without a matching Device Support Module arrives unparsed, and writing a custom parser with regular expressions against an unfamiliar payload format is specialist work that can take days per source, which quietly determines which systems ever get monitored.
- On-premises capacity is planned across consoles, processors, collectors and data nodes, so outgrowing the sizing means procuring and racking more appliances rather than changing a subscription tier, and growth becomes a purchasing cycle measured in months.
Pricing, plan by plan
Enpass
Free- LiteFree
- Up to 25 items on mobile
- Unlimited items on desktop trial
- No cloud sync
- Individual$1.99/month
- Unlimited items
- Cloud sync via own storage provider
- Unlimited devices
- Family$2.99/month
- Up to 6 members
- Shared vaults
- Unlimited devices per member
- Business$1.99/month
- Per-user pricing billed yearly
- Admin console
- Microsoft 365 / Google Workspace integration
IBM QRadar
On request- QRadar SIEMFree
- Event and flow processing
- Offense management
- Threat intelligence
- QRadar CloudFree
- Cloud-native deployment
- Elastic scaling
- Managed infrastructure
- QRadar SuiteFree
- SIEM + SOAR + XDR
- Unified analyst experience
- Federated search
Which should you pick?
Choose Enpass if
- You need offline vaults.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on web, ios, android, windows, mac, linux.
- You also want bring-your-own-cloud sync.
Choose IBM QRadar if
- You need offence model.
- You work on Web, Api.
- You also want network flow analysis.
Questions people ask
- Is Enpass or IBM QRadar better?
- Neither clearly leads. Enpass starts at Free and IBM QRadar at On request, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Enpass or IBM QRadar?
- Enpass has a free tier; the other does not. Paid plans start at Free for Enpass and On request for IBM QRadar.
- Does Enpass or IBM QRadar run on more platforms?
- Enpass runs on web, ios, android, windows, mac, linux. IBM QRadar runs on Web, Api.
- Can I use Enpass for free?
- Yes. Enpass has a free tier, so you can try it without paying. IBM QRadar starts at On request.
- What is Enpass best used for?
- Enpass is most often used for storing passwords without trusting a vendor's cloud, syncing a vault via personal cloud storage, managing a household's shared logins, provisioning team vaults with sso-adjacent admin controls. Of those, storing passwords without trusting a vendor's cloud and syncing a vault via personal cloud storage are not what IBM QRadar is typically brought in for.
- What can Enpass do that IBM QRadar cannot?
- Enpass covers Offline vaults, Bring-your-own-cloud sync, Autofill and password generator, Password audit. IBM QRadar covers Offence model, Network flow analysis, Device Support Modules, Ariel query language.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
IBM QRadar: Who owns QRadar now?
It is split. IBM sold the QRadar SaaS assets to Palo Alto Networks in a deal announced in May 2024 and closed that September, and those customers are being migrated to Cortex XSIAM. IBM retains and supports the on-premises product.
IBM QRadar: Is QRadar being discontinued?
IBM has committed to continuing support for on-premises customers, including security updates, while offering migration assistance. The cloud product's future belongs to Palo Alto. If you are signing a multi-year term, get the support horizon written into the contract.
IBM QRadar: How is it licensed?
By events per second for logs and flows per minute for network data, with the software or appliance sized to that rate. Add-on modules in the suite are licensed separately.
IBM QRadar: What is an offence?
QRadar's term for a correlated case. Rules group related events and flows against a common indicator such as a host or user, so an analyst reviews one offence rather than the hundreds of events behind it.
IBM QRadar: Do I need a full-time engineer?
In practice yes for anything beyond a small deployment. Parser development, rule tuning and offence triage do not stop, and the most common failure mode is a well-installed QRadar that nobody has tuned since go-live.
Related pages
Other head to heads
- Enpass vs 1Password
- Enpass vs Bitwarden
- Enpass vs Sticky Password
- Enpass vs LastPass
- Enpass vs TunnelBear
- Enpass vs IVPN
- Enpass vs Passbolt
- Enpass vs Mullvad VPN
- Enpass vs Private Internet Access
- Enpass vs Norton 360
- Enpass vs HashiCorp Vault
- Enpass vs BigID
- Enpass vs CyberGhost VPN
- Enpass vs Dahua Technology
- Enpass vs Descope
- Enpass vs Drata
- Enpass vs DTiQ
- Enpass vs ESET NOD32 Antivirus
- Enpass vs Bitdefender Total Security
- Enpass vs Microsoft Sentinel
- Enpass vs Splunk Enterprise Security
- Enpass vs CrowdStrike Falcon
- Enpass vs LogRhythm SIEM
- Enpass vs Recorded Future
- Enpass vs SentinelOne Singularity
- Enpass vs Proofpoint
- Enpass vs Trend Micro Vision One
- Enpass vs Arnica
- Enpass vs Authelia
- Enpass vs Authy
- Enpass vs Baffle
- Enpass vs Beyond Identity
- Enpass vs BeyondTrust
- IBM QRadar vs 1Password
- IBM QRadar vs Bitwarden
- IBM QRadar vs Sticky Password
- IBM QRadar vs LastPass
- IBM QRadar vs TunnelBear
- IBM QRadar vs IVPN
- IBM QRadar vs Passbolt
- IBM QRadar vs Mullvad VPN
- IBM QRadar vs Private Internet Access
- IBM QRadar vs Norton 360
- IBM QRadar vs HashiCorp Vault
- IBM QRadar vs BigID
- IBM QRadar vs CyberGhost VPN
- IBM QRadar vs Dahua Technology
- IBM QRadar vs Descope
- IBM QRadar vs Drata
- IBM QRadar vs DTiQ
- IBM QRadar vs ESET NOD32 Antivirus
- IBM QRadar vs Bitdefender Total Security
- IBM QRadar vs Microsoft Sentinel
- IBM QRadar vs Splunk Enterprise Security
- IBM QRadar vs CrowdStrike Falcon
- IBM QRadar vs LogRhythm SIEM
- IBM QRadar vs Recorded Future
- IBM QRadar vs SentinelOne Singularity
- IBM QRadar vs Proofpoint
- IBM QRadar vs Trend Micro Vision One
- IBM QRadar vs Arnica
- IBM QRadar vs Authelia
- IBM QRadar vs Authy
- IBM QRadar vs Baffle
- IBM QRadar vs Beyond Identity
- IBM QRadar vs BeyondTrust
