Cybersecurity · head to head
Aikido vs IBM QRadar

Aikido
Cybersecurity
Unified security platform automating vulnerability detection and fixing across development
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -

IBM QRadar
Cybersecurity
Enterprise SIEM licensed by events per second, whose cloud business IBM sold to Palo Alto Networks in 2024.
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Only Aikido has a free tier, so it costs nothing to try first.
- Each has a real cost: Aikido free plan includes fair-usage limits on repos and container images; IBM QRadar iBM sold the QRadar SaaS business to Palo Alto Networks in 2024 and those customers are being moved to Cortex XSIAM, so anyone buying today is choosing an on-premises product whose vendor has publicly moved the cloud future to a competitor, and the support horizon becomes a contract negotiation rather than an assumption.
- They diverge on capability: Aikido covers Static Application Security Testing (SAST), IBM QRadar covers Offence model.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 30 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Aikido and IBM QRadar actually diverge.
| Attribute | Aikido | IBM QRadar |
|---|---|---|
| Starting price | Free | On request |
| Pricing model | Subscription with free tier | subscription |
| Free tier | Yes | No |
| Platforms | Web, CI/CD, IDE | Web, Api |
| Founded | 2022 | 1911 |
Identical on both: user rating (Not yet rated), category (Cybersecurity).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Aikido
- Static Application Security Testing (SAST)
- Software Composition Analysis (SCA)
- AutoFix
- Secrets detection
- Cloud Security Posture Management
- AI-powered penetration testing
- Device protection
- False positive reduction
Only in IBM QRadar
- Offence model
- Network flow analysis
- Device Support Modules
- Ariel query language
- Rules and building blocks
- Deployment topology
- App Exchange
- Use Case Manager
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Aikido
- Developer-friendly security integrated into PR workflowsnot IBM QRadar
- Automated vulnerability remediation with context-aware alertsnot IBM QRadar
- Consolidation of fragmented security tools across development lifecyclenot IBM QRadar
- Cloud infrastructure security posture monitoringnot IBM QRadar
- Supply chain attack prevention and malware detectionnot IBM QRadar
IBM QRadar
- A regulated enterprise that must keep log data on premises or in a specific jurisdiction and cannot use a shared SaaS SIEMnot Aikido
- A SOC that wants log correlation and network flow analysis in one platform rather than buying an NDR product separatelynot Aikido
- An existing QRadar estate deciding whether to stay on premises or accept the migration path to a different vendor's platformnot Aikido
- Compliance-driven log retention and reporting where the audit requirement is specific about collection, retention and reportingnot Aikido
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Aikido
- Free plan includes fair-usage limits on repos and container images
- Pricing increases significantly with user and repository scale
- Advanced features like penetration testing and VM scanning limited to higher tiers
- Device protection limited to Development environments only
- Requires multiple plan tiers for full platform coverage
IBM QRadar
- IBM sold the QRadar SaaS business to Palo Alto Networks in 2024 and those customers are being moved to Cortex XSIAM, so anyone buying today is choosing an on-premises product whose vendor has publicly moved the cloud future to a competitor, and the support horizon becomes a contract negotiation rather than an assumption.
- Licensing is by events per second and flows per minute, so every additional log source raises the cost directly and teams routinely exclude verbose sources such as DNS, proxy, endpoint and cloud audit logs to stay under the licence, which strips out exactly the data an investigation later needs.
- It needs a dedicated operator: rule tuning, parser work and offence triage are continuous jobs, and an organisation that deploys QRadar without at least one named engineer accumulates thousands of unreviewed offences and a false sense of coverage.
- A log source without a matching Device Support Module arrives unparsed, and writing a custom parser with regular expressions against an unfamiliar payload format is specialist work that can take days per source, which quietly determines which systems ever get monitored.
- On-premises capacity is planned across consoles, processors, collectors and data nodes, so outgrowing the sizing means procuring and racking more appliances rather than changing a subscription tier, and growth becomes a purchasing cycle measured in months.
Pricing, plan by plan
Aikido
Free- DeveloperFree
- Up to 2 users
- Dependency scanning (SCA)
- SAST and AI SAST
- Pro$600/month
- Up to 10 users
- All Basic features
- On-premise scanning
- Advanced$600/month
- Up to 10 users
- All Pro features
- Broker for internal apps
- Enterprise$null/custom
- Custom pricing for tailored modules
- Dedicated account management
- Custom SLAs
IBM QRadar
On request- QRadar SIEMFree
- Event and flow processing
- Offense management
- Threat intelligence
- QRadar CloudFree
- Cloud-native deployment
- Elastic scaling
- Managed infrastructure
- QRadar SuiteFree
- SIEM + SOAR + XDR
- Unified analyst experience
- Federated search
Which should you pick?
Choose Aikido if
- You need static application security testing (sast).
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Web, CI/CD, IDE.
- You also want software composition analysis (sca).
Choose IBM QRadar if
- You need offence model.
- You work on Web, Api.
- You also want network flow analysis.
Questions people ask
- Is Aikido or IBM QRadar better?
- Neither clearly leads. Aikido starts at Free and IBM QRadar at On request, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Aikido or IBM QRadar?
- Aikido has a free tier; the other does not. Paid plans start at Free for Aikido and On request for IBM QRadar.
- Does Aikido or IBM QRadar run on more platforms?
- Aikido runs on Web, CI/CD, IDE. IBM QRadar runs on Web, Api.
- Can I use Aikido for free?
- Yes. Aikido has a free tier, so you can try it without paying. IBM QRadar starts at On request.
- What is Aikido best used for?
- Aikido is most often used for developer-friendly security integrated into pr workflows, automated vulnerability remediation with context-aware alerts, consolidation of fragmented security tools across development lifecycle, cloud infrastructure security posture monitoring. Of those, developer-friendly security integrated into pr workflows and automated vulnerability remediation with context-aware alerts are not what IBM QRadar is typically brought in for.
- What can Aikido do that IBM QRadar cannot?
- Aikido covers Static Application Security Testing (SAST), Software Composition Analysis (SCA), AutoFix, Secrets detection. IBM QRadar covers Offence model, Network flow analysis, Device Support Modules, Ariel query language.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Aikido: What is included in Aikido's free Developer plan?
The free Developer plan includes up to 2 users with SAST, SCA, secrets detection, cloud scanning, and license risk detection. Fair-usage limits apply: 10 repos, 2 container images, 1 domain, and 1 cloud account.
SourceIBM QRadar: Who owns QRadar now?
It is split. IBM sold the QRadar SaaS assets to Palo Alto Networks in a deal announced in May 2024 and closed that September, and those customers are being migrated to Cortex XSIAM. IBM retains and supports the on-premises product.
Aikido: What is AutoFix and how does it work?
AutoFix is Aikido's automated vulnerability remediation feature that identifies vulnerabilities and suggests or applies specific code fixes automatically, reducing manual remediation effort.
SourceIBM QRadar: Is QRadar being discontinued?
IBM has committed to continuing support for on-premises customers, including security updates, while offering migration assistance. The cloud product's future belongs to Palo Alto. If you are signing a multi-year term, get the support horizon written into the contract.
Aikido: How many false positives does Aikido reduce?
Aikido reduces false positives by 99%, using AI-powered context awareness to filter noise and focus on vulnerabilities that present real business risk.
SourceIBM QRadar: How is it licensed?
By events per second for logs and flows per minute for network data, with the software or appliance sized to that rate. Add-on modules in the suite are licensed separately.
Aikido: What integrations does Aikido support?
Aikido integrates with Jira, Linear, Slack, Teams, GitHub, GitLab, and other popular development tools to fit into existing workflows.
SourceIBM QRadar: What is an offence?
QRadar's term for a correlated case. Rules group related events and flows against a common indicator such as a host or user, so an analyst reviews one offence rather than the hundreds of events behind it.
IBM QRadar: Do I need a full-time engineer?
In practice yes for anything beyond a small deployment. Parser development, rule tuning and offence triage do not stop, and the most common failure mode is a well-installed QRadar that nobody has tuned since go-live.
Related pages
Other head to heads
- Aikido vs Snyk
- Aikido vs Veracode
- Aikido vs Tenable
- Aikido vs Legit Security
- Aikido vs Palo Alto Networks Prisma Cloud
- Aikido vs Qualys VMDR
- Aikido vs Arnica
- Aikido vs Sysdig
- Aikido vs Akeyless
- Aikido vs Infisical
- Aikido vs Tanium
- Aikido vs Doppler
- Aikido vs Passbolt
- Aikido vs Ping Identity
- Aikido vs Proofpoint
- Aikido vs Rapid7 InsightVM
- Aikido vs Recorded Future
- Aikido vs Bitdefender Total Security
- Aikido vs 1Password
- Aikido vs Norton 360
- Aikido vs LastPass
- Aikido vs Microsoft Sentinel
- Aikido vs Splunk Enterprise Security
- Aikido vs CrowdStrike Falcon
- Aikido vs LogRhythm SIEM
- Aikido vs SentinelOne Singularity
- Aikido vs Trend Micro Vision One
- Aikido vs Authelia
- Aikido vs Authy
- Aikido vs Baffle
- Aikido vs Beyond Identity
- Aikido vs BeyondTrust
- IBM QRadar vs Snyk
- IBM QRadar vs Veracode
- IBM QRadar vs Tenable
- IBM QRadar vs Legit Security
- IBM QRadar vs Palo Alto Networks Prisma Cloud
- IBM QRadar vs Qualys VMDR
- IBM QRadar vs Arnica
- IBM QRadar vs Sysdig
- IBM QRadar vs Akeyless
- IBM QRadar vs Infisical
- IBM QRadar vs Tanium
- IBM QRadar vs Doppler
- IBM QRadar vs Passbolt
- IBM QRadar vs Ping Identity
- IBM QRadar vs Proofpoint
- IBM QRadar vs Rapid7 InsightVM
- IBM QRadar vs Recorded Future
- IBM QRadar vs Bitdefender Total Security
- IBM QRadar vs 1Password
- IBM QRadar vs Norton 360
- IBM QRadar vs LastPass
- IBM QRadar vs Microsoft Sentinel
- IBM QRadar vs Splunk Enterprise Security
- IBM QRadar vs CrowdStrike Falcon
- IBM QRadar vs LogRhythm SIEM
- IBM QRadar vs SentinelOne Singularity
- IBM QRadar vs Trend Micro Vision One
- IBM QRadar vs Authelia
- IBM QRadar vs Authy
- IBM QRadar vs Baffle
- IBM QRadar vs Beyond Identity
- IBM QRadar vs BeyondTrust
