Developer Tools · head to head
Spacelift vs Tenable

Spacelift
Developer Tools
Infrastructure-as-code orchestration for Terraform, OpenTofu, Pulumi and Kubernetes
- From
- Free
- Free plan
- Yes

Tenable
Cybersecurity
AI-powered exposure management platform for unified security visibility
- From
- $3500/year
- Free plan
- No
The short version
- Only Spacelift has a free tier, so it costs nothing to try first.
- Each has a real cost: Spacelift users are unlimited and private workers are metered, so deployment concurrency rather than headcount drives the bill, which inverts how most engineering budgets are built and is easy to under-forecast.; Tenable pricing starts at $3500/year for Tenable One VM, expensive for small organizations
- They diverge on capability: Spacelift covers Multi-tool orchestration, Tenable covers Unified attack surface mapping.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 31 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Spacelift and Tenable actually diverge.
Identical on both: user rating (Not yet rated).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Spacelift
- Multi-tool orchestration
- Policy as code
- Private workers
- Spaces
- Blueprints
- Drift detection
Only in Tenable
- Unified attack surface mapping
- Exposure intelligence enrichment
- Tenable Hexa AI orchestration
- Cloud Exposure (CNAPP)
- OT Exposure
- Identity Exposure
- Vulnerability Management
- Attack Surface Management
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Spacelift
- Platform teams running infrastructure changes through approval gates rather than through application CInot Tenable
- Organisations standardising Terraform and OpenTofu across many teams with policy enforcementnot Tenable
- Estates needing private runners so cloud credentials never leave the networknot Tenable
- Teams wanting drift detection and reconciliation rather than plan-time checks alonenot Tenable
Tenable
- Comprehensive vulnerability scanning for enterprise networksnot Spacelift
- Cloud security monitoring and compliance for AWS, Azure, GCPnot Spacelift
- Identity and access management risk assessmentnot Spacelift
- Operational technology security for industrial systemsnot Spacelift
- Attack surface management for third-party risknot Spacelift
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Spacelift
- Users are unlimited and private workers are metered, so deployment concurrency rather than headcount drives the bill, which inverts how most engineering budgets are built and is easy to under-forecast.
- There is no affordable paid entry point. The free tier stops at two users and the next tier is a five-figure commitment with nothing in between.
- Three of the five tiers are quote-only, so a shortlist cannot be costed without entering a sales process with each vendor on it.
- The self-hosted build lags the hosted one, has no public worker pool and lacks the Azure and Google Cloud integrations available in the SaaS product, with OIDC federation offered as the workaround.
- Stacks, Rego policies, Blueprints, Spaces and Spacelift-managed state are proprietary constructs, so leaving means rebuilding the orchestration layer rather than pointing it at a different runner.
Tenable
- Pricing starts at $3500/year for Tenable One VM, expensive for small organizations
- Many enterprise features require custom quote and sales engagement
- Cloud Exposure, OT Exposure, and other modules have no published pricing
- Multi-year contracts common, limiting flexibility
- Setup and configuration complexity for enterprise deployments
Pricing, plan by plan
Spacelift
Free- FreeFree
- Two users
- Public workers only
- No private workers
- Starter Plus$undefined/year
- Unlimited users
- Two public workers
- One to two private workers
- Business$undefined/year
- Unlimited users
- Three private workers
- Quoted
- Enterprise$undefined/year
- Unlimited users
- Five to thirty private workers
- Self-hosted option
Tenable
$3500/year- Tenable One Vulnerability Management$3500/year
- Per 100 assets
- Multi-year discounts available
- Tenable One Web App Scanning$3578/year
- Per 5 FQDNs
- Annual subscription
- Nessus Professional$4790/year
- Vulnerability scanning
- Multi-year discounts available
- Optional advanced support: $400/year
- Nessus Expert$6790/year
- Advanced vulnerability scanning
- Multi-year discounts available
- Optional advanced support: $400/year
Which should you pick?
Choose Spacelift if
- You need multi-tool orchestration.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Web, Self-hosted, Cloud.
- You also want policy as code.
Choose Tenable if
- You need unified attack surface mapping.
- You work on Cloud, Web.
- You also want exposure intelligence enrichment.
Questions people ask
- Is Spacelift or Tenable better?
- Neither clearly leads. Spacelift starts at Free and Tenable at $3500/year, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Spacelift or Tenable?
- Spacelift has a free tier; the other does not. Paid plans start at Free for Spacelift and $3500/year for Tenable.
- Does Spacelift or Tenable run on more platforms?
- Spacelift runs on Web, Self-hosted, Cloud. Tenable runs on Cloud, Web.
- Can I use Spacelift for free?
- Yes. Spacelift has a free tier, so you can try it without paying. Tenable starts at $3500/year.
- What is Spacelift best used for?
- Spacelift is most often used for platform teams running infrastructure changes through approval gates rather than through application ci, organisations standardising terraform and opentofu across many teams with policy enforcement, estates needing private runners so cloud credentials never leave the network, teams wanting drift detection and reconciliation rather than plan-time checks alone. Of those, platform teams running infrastructure changes through approval gates rather than through application ci and organisations standardising terraform and opentofu across many teams with policy enforcement are not what Tenable is typically brought in for.
- What can Spacelift do that Tenable cannot?
- Spacelift covers Multi-tool orchestration, Policy as code, Private workers, Spaces. Tenable covers Unified attack surface mapping, Exposure intelligence enrichment, Tenable Hexa AI orchestration, Cloud Exposure (CNAPP).
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Spacelift: How is Spacelift priced?
By tier and by private worker count rather than per user. Users are unlimited on every paid plan. The published figure on the pricing page carries no period label, and the FAQ describes the tier as an annual subscription, so confirm the period in writing.
Tenable: How is Tenable One pricing structured?
Tenable One Vulnerability Management costs $3500/year per 100 assets. Web App Scanning is $3578/year per 5 FQDNs. Multi-year discounts are available.
SourceSpacelift: Does it support OpenTofu?
Yes, and Spacelift sponsors the OpenTofu project, which is a substantive hedge for anyone avoiding Terraform under the Business Source Licence.
Tenable: What is the difference between Nessus Professional and Nessus Expert?
Nessus Professional costs $4790/year and provides core vulnerability scanning. Nessus Expert costs $6790/year and offers advanced scanning capabilities.
SourceSpacelift: Is there a self-hosted version?
Yes, described as carrying Enterprise functionality, but it is priced on request and lags the hosted product on cloud integrations.
Tenable: Are custom support and training available for Tenable?
Yes. Optional advanced support is available for $400/year. Training courses range from $275-$385/year.
SourceSpacelift: Why not just use the CI system we already have?
That is the real comparison. General purpose CI handles state, drift, approval gates and concurrency control for infrastructure poorly, and whether that is worth a five-figure floor depends on how much infrastructure change your organisation actually ships.
Spacelift: What happens to our pipelines if we leave?
They do not port. Rego policies, Blueprints, Spaces and managed state are Spacelift constructs and the orchestration has to be rebuilt elsewhere.
Related pages
Other head to heads
- Spacelift vs Atlantis
- Spacelift vs Earthly
- Spacelift vs Harness
- Spacelift vs Cortex
- Spacelift vs OpsLevel
- Spacelift vs Backstage
- Spacelift vs Okteto
- Spacelift vs Ona (formerly Gitpod)
- Spacelift vs HCP Terraform
- Spacelift vs Azure DevOps
- Spacelift vs ConfigCat
- Spacelift vs Frappe
- Spacelift vs Cloud Native Buildpacks
- Spacelift vs Cody
- Spacelift vs Dagger
- Spacelift vs Deep Code
- Spacelift vs Netwrix
- Spacelift vs CrowdStrike Falcon
- Spacelift vs Qualys VMDR
- Spacelift vs Aikido
- Spacelift vs Arnica
- Spacelift vs Doppler
- Spacelift vs Chainguard
- Spacelift vs Recorded Future
- Spacelift vs Speakeasy
- Spacelift vs Sysdig
- Spacelift vs Endor Labs
- Spacelift vs Tanium
- Spacelift vs Enpass
- Spacelift vs Entrust Identity as a Service
- Spacelift vs Featurespace ARIC Risk Hub
- Spacelift vs Fortinet FortiGate
- Spacelift vs HID Global
- Spacelift vs IBM QRadar
- Tenable vs Atlantis
- Tenable vs Earthly
- Tenable vs Harness
- Tenable vs Cortex
- Tenable vs OpsLevel
- Tenable vs Backstage
- Tenable vs Okteto
- Tenable vs Ona (formerly Gitpod)
- Tenable vs HCP Terraform
- Tenable vs Azure DevOps
- Tenable vs ConfigCat
- Tenable vs Frappe
- Tenable vs Cloud Native Buildpacks
- Tenable vs Cody
- Tenable vs Dagger
- Tenable vs Deep Code
- Tenable vs Netwrix
- Tenable vs CrowdStrike Falcon
- Tenable vs Qualys VMDR
- Tenable vs Aikido
- Tenable vs Arnica
- Tenable vs Doppler
- Tenable vs Chainguard
- Tenable vs Recorded Future
- Tenable vs Speakeasy
- Tenable vs Sysdig
- Tenable vs Endor Labs
- Tenable vs Tanium
- Tenable vs Enpass
- Tenable vs Entrust Identity as a Service
- Tenable vs Featurespace ARIC Risk Hub
- Tenable vs Fortinet FortiGate
- Tenable vs HID Global
- Tenable vs IBM QRadar
