Developer Tools · head to head
Atlantis vs Tenable

Atlantis
Developer Tools
Runs Terraform plan and apply from pull request comments, self-hosted and free
- From
- Free
- Free plan
- Yes

Tenable
Cybersecurity
AI-powered exposure management platform for unified security visibility
- From
- $3500/year
- Free plan
- No
The short version
- Only Atlantis has a free tier, so it costs nothing to try first.
- Each has a real cost: Atlantis there is no company, no service level agreement and no paid support at any price, and the six maintainers are volunteers with day jobs, which some risk committees will not accept for a component holding production cloud credentials.; Tenable pricing starts at $3500/year for Tenable One VM, expensive for small organizations
- They diverge on capability: Atlantis covers Pull request plans, Tenable covers Unified attack surface mapping.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 31 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Atlantis and Tenable actually diverge.
Identical on both: user rating (Not yet rated).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Atlantis
- Pull request plans
- Comment driven apply
- Workspace locking
- Policy checking
- Multi-platform webhooks
- Custom workflows
Only in Tenable
- Unified attack surface mapping
- Exposure intelligence enrichment
- Tenable Hexa AI orchestration
- Cloud Exposure (CNAPP)
- OT Exposure
- Identity Exposure
- Vulnerability Management
- Attack Surface Management
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Atlantis
- Making Terraform review meaningful by putting the actual plan output in front of the approvernot Tenable
- Removing local applies and the credential sprawl that comes with every engineer holding production keysnot Tenable
- Getting pull request driven infrastructure without paying a per-user subscription for a hosted platformnot Tenable
- Enforcing Conftest policies as a blocking check before an apply can runnot Tenable
Tenable
- Comprehensive vulnerability scanning for enterprise networksnot Atlantis
- Cloud security monitoring and compliance for AWS, Azure, GCPnot Atlantis
- Identity and access management risk assessmentnot Atlantis
- Operational technology security for industrial systemsnot Atlantis
- Attack surface management for third-party risknot Atlantis
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Atlantis
- There is no company, no service level agreement and no paid support at any price, and the six maintainers are volunteers with day jobs, which some risk committees will not accept for a component holding production cloud credentials.
- The security surface is inherently sharp, because it is an internet-reachable webhook endpoint that executes applies with privileged credentials, gated by pull request comment authorisation that is coarse next to a real policy engine.
- It is stateful, holding a working directory and lock database on local disk, so high availability and horizontal scaling are awkward and you own upgrades, webhook plumbing, secret rotation and the host itself.
- It lacks the features that distinguish the commercial alternatives, with no native drift detection, no cost estimation, no managed state interface and no policy engine beyond the Conftest integration.
- Terragrunt and monorepo layouts are not first-class, requiring hand-written custom workflows and repository configuration that becomes a growing maintenance burden as the number of repositories increases.
Tenable
- Pricing starts at $3500/year for Tenable One VM, expensive for small organizations
- Many enterprise features require custom quote and sales engagement
- Cloud Exposure, OT Exposure, and other modules have no published pricing
- Multi-year contracts common, limiting flexibility
- Setup and configuration complexity for enterprise deployments
Pricing, plan by plan
Atlantis
Free- AtlantisFree
- Apache-2.0, no usage limits and no seat count
- No commercial edition and no paid support tier
- Community support through GitHub and the CNCF Slack channel
Tenable
$3500/year- Tenable One Vulnerability Management$3500/year
- Per 100 assets
- Multi-year discounts available
- Tenable One Web App Scanning$3578/year
- Per 5 FQDNs
- Annual subscription
- Nessus Professional$4790/year
- Vulnerability scanning
- Multi-year discounts available
- Optional advanced support: $400/year
- Nessus Expert$6790/year
- Advanced vulnerability scanning
- Multi-year discounts available
- Optional advanced support: $400/year
Which should you pick?
Choose Atlantis if
- You need pull request plans.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Linux, Docker, Kubernetes, Self-hosted.
- You also want comment driven apply.
Choose Tenable if
- You need unified attack surface mapping.
- You work on Cloud, Web.
- You also want exposure intelligence enrichment.
Questions people ask
- Is Atlantis or Tenable better?
- Neither clearly leads. Atlantis starts at Free and Tenable at $3500/year, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Atlantis or Tenable?
- Atlantis has a free tier; the other does not. Paid plans start at Free for Atlantis and $3500/year for Tenable.
- Does Atlantis or Tenable run on more platforms?
- Atlantis runs on Linux, Docker, Kubernetes, Self-hosted. Tenable runs on Cloud, Web.
- Can I use Atlantis for free?
- Yes. Atlantis has a free tier, so you can try it without paying. Tenable starts at $3500/year.
- What is Atlantis best used for?
- Atlantis is most often used for making terraform review meaningful by putting the actual plan output in front of the approver, removing local applies and the credential sprawl that comes with every engineer holding production keys, getting pull request driven infrastructure without paying a per-user subscription for a hosted platform, enforcing conftest policies as a blocking check before an apply can run. Of those, making terraform review meaningful by putting the actual plan output in front of the approver and removing local applies and the credential sprawl that comes with every engineer holding production keys are not what Tenable is typically brought in for.
- What can Atlantis do that Tenable cannot?
- Atlantis covers Pull request plans, Comment driven apply, Workspace locking, Policy checking. Tenable covers Unified attack surface mapping, Exposure intelligence enrichment, Tenable Hexa AI orchestration, Cloud Exposure (CNAPP).
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Atlantis: Is there a company behind Atlantis?
No. It runs as a series of LF Projects under the Linux Foundation and is maintained by volunteers. There is no vendor to buy support from and no service level agreement.
Tenable: How is Tenable One pricing structured?
Tenable One Vulnerability Management costs $3500/year per 100 assets. Web App Scanning is $3578/year per 5 FQDNs. Multi-year discounts are available.
SourceAtlantis: Is it a CNCF project?
No. It uses a channel in the CNCF Slack, which is often misread as membership, but the project sits under LF Projects rather than the CNCF.
Tenable: What is the difference between Nessus Professional and Nessus Expert?
Nessus Professional costs $4790/year and provides core vulnerability scanning. Nessus Expert costs $6790/year and offers advanced scanning capabilities.
SourceAtlantis: Does it work with OpenTofu?
Yes, there is a dedicated integration guide alongside Terraform, and it also has configuration for working with hosted Terraform backends.
Tenable: Are custom support and training available for Tenable?
Yes. Optional advanced support is available for $400/year. Training courses range from $275-$385/year.
SourceAtlantis: What does it not do that a paid platform does?
Drift detection, cost estimation, a managed state and run interface, and a real policy engine. Atlantis does pull request plan and apply well and stops there.
Related pages
Other head to heads
- Atlantis vs Spacelift
- Atlantis vs HCP Terraform
- Atlantis vs Harness
- Atlantis vs Jitsu
- Atlantis vs Visual Studio Code
- Atlantis vs Tilt
- Atlantis vs Soketi
- Atlantis vs Pants Build
- Atlantis vs Steampipe
- Atlantis vs Refact
- Atlantis vs Penpot
- Atlantis vs GNU Emacs
- Atlantis vs JFrog Artifactory
- Atlantis vs Namespace
- Atlantis vs Nix
- Atlantis vs Nixpacks
- Atlantis vs Octopus Deploy
- Atlantis vs Okteto
- Atlantis vs Netwrix
- Atlantis vs CrowdStrike Falcon
- Atlantis vs Qualys VMDR
- Atlantis vs Aikido
- Atlantis vs Arnica
- Atlantis vs Doppler
- Atlantis vs Chainguard
- Atlantis vs Recorded Future
- Atlantis vs Speakeasy
- Atlantis vs Sysdig
- Atlantis vs Endor Labs
- Atlantis vs Tanium
- Atlantis vs Enpass
- Atlantis vs Entrust Identity as a Service
- Atlantis vs Featurespace ARIC Risk Hub
- Atlantis vs Fortinet FortiGate
- Atlantis vs HID Global
- Atlantis vs IBM QRadar
- Tenable vs Spacelift
- Tenable vs HCP Terraform
- Tenable vs Harness
- Tenable vs Jitsu
- Tenable vs Visual Studio Code
- Tenable vs Tilt
- Tenable vs Soketi
- Tenable vs Pants Build
- Tenable vs Steampipe
- Tenable vs Refact
- Tenable vs Penpot
- Tenable vs GNU Emacs
- Tenable vs JFrog Artifactory
- Tenable vs Namespace
- Tenable vs Nix
- Tenable vs Nixpacks
- Tenable vs Octopus Deploy
- Tenable vs Okteto
- Tenable vs Netwrix
- Tenable vs CrowdStrike Falcon
- Tenable vs Qualys VMDR
- Tenable vs Aikido
- Tenable vs Arnica
- Tenable vs Doppler
- Tenable vs Chainguard
- Tenable vs Recorded Future
- Tenable vs Speakeasy
- Tenable vs Sysdig
- Tenable vs Endor Labs
- Tenable vs Tanium
- Tenable vs Enpass
- Tenable vs Entrust Identity as a Service
- Tenable vs Featurespace ARIC Risk Hub
- Tenable vs Fortinet FortiGate
- Tenable vs HID Global
- Tenable vs IBM QRadar
