Manufacturing · head to head
Hippo CMMS vs Petasense

Hippo CMMS
Manufacturing
Straightforward maintenance management, now part of Eptura
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -

Petasense
Manufacturing
Wireless vibration and asset reliability monitoring, now owned by AssetWatch
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Hippo CMMS no longer sold as a standalone product, so a new evaluation is really an Eptura evaluation with a different scope and price; Petasense petasense is now owned by AssetWatch, whose business is monitoring delivered as a managed service, so a buyer wanting self-service software should get the delivery model written into the contract rather than assume it.
- They diverge on capability: Hippo CMMS covers Interactive site maps, Petasense covers Vibration Mote.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 1 September 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Hippo CMMS and Petasense actually diverge.
| Attribute | Hippo CMMS | Petasense |
|---|---|---|
| Platforms | Web, iOS, Android | Web, Cloud, iOS, Android |
Identical on both: starting price (On request), pricing model (quote), free tier (No), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Manufacturing).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Hippo CMMS
- Interactive site maps
- Work order management
- Preventive maintenance
- Equipment records
- Vendor management
- Mobile access
Only in Petasense
- Vibration Mote
- Transmitter range
- ARO cloud
- VFD-specific monitoring
- Reliability workflow
- Mixed wired and wireless
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Hippo CMMS
- Facilities teams wanting a CMMS that a non-specialist can operatenot Petasense
- Sites where locating an asset on a floor plan is the natural way to find itnot Petasense
- Existing Hippo customers evaluating whether to stay within Epturanot Petasense
- Organisations wanting maintenance inside a broader workplace management suitenot Petasense
Petasense
- A reliability team wanting continuous vibration data on assets currently covered by a quarterly walkaround routenot Hippo CMMS
- A plant with variable frequency drive assets where generic vibration analytics produce too many false alarmsnot Hippo CMMS
- Mixing battery sensors on accessible pumps with wired sensors on the handful of assets that would stop productionnot Hippo CMMS
- A manufacturer with no in-house vibration analyst that wants the analysis delivered as a service rather than as a dashboardnot Hippo CMMS
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Hippo CMMS
- No longer sold as a standalone product, so a new evaluation is really an Eptura evaluation with a different scope and price
- Pricing is not published, which makes it hard to compare against MaintainX or Limble without a sales process
- The simplicity that was its selling point becomes a ceiling for organisations with complex asset hierarchies
- Reporting is basic against competitors that have invested heavily in analytics
- Product direction now follows Eptura workplace strategy rather than maintenance-specific needs
Petasense
- Petasense is now owned by AssetWatch, whose business is monitoring delivered as a managed service, so a buyer wanting self-service software should get the delivery model written into the contract rather than assume it.
- Hardware is required per measurement point and gateways are required per area, so the up-front capital for a plant-wide deployment is substantial and separate from the subscription.
- Per-asset subscription pricing scales linearly, which makes full coverage of a large population of low-value motors uneconomic compared with route-based monitoring.
- Nothing is published on sensor cost, subscription rate, gateway requirements or contract length, so a total cost of ownership figure requires a full sales engagement before you can compare it against anything.
- Battery-powered wireless sensors trade measurement richness for battery life, so the sampling rate and resolution are lower than a wired analyser would give, which limits diagnosis of high-frequency bearing defects on critical machines.
Pricing, plan by plan
Hippo CMMS
On request- Eptura Asset$undefined/month
- Work order management
- Preventive maintenance
- Asset records
Petasense
On request- Petasense ARO$undefined/year
- Subscription priced per monitored asset
- Vibration Mote or Transmitter hardware required per measurement point
- Gateway hardware required for wireless deployments
Which should you pick?
Choose Hippo CMMS if
- You need interactive site maps.
- You work on Web, iOS, Android.
- You also want work order management.
Choose Petasense if
- You need vibration mote.
- You work on Web, Cloud, iOS, Android.
- You also want transmitter range.
Questions people ask
- Is Hippo CMMS or Petasense better?
- Neither clearly leads. Hippo CMMS starts at On request and Petasense at On request, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Hippo CMMS or Petasense?
- Hippo CMMS starts at On request and Petasense at On request.
- Does Hippo CMMS or Petasense run on more platforms?
- Hippo CMMS runs on Web, iOS, Android. Petasense runs on Web, Cloud, iOS, Android.
- What is Hippo CMMS best used for?
- Hippo CMMS is most often used for facilities teams wanting a cmms that a non-specialist can operate, sites where locating an asset on a floor plan is the natural way to find it, existing hippo customers evaluating whether to stay within eptura, organisations wanting maintenance inside a broader workplace management suite. Of those, facilities teams wanting a cmms that a non-specialist can operate and sites where locating an asset on a floor plan is the natural way to find it are not what Petasense is typically brought in for.
- What can Hippo CMMS do that Petasense cannot?
- Hippo CMMS covers Interactive site maps, Work order management, Preventive maintenance, Equipment records. Petasense covers Vibration Mote, Transmitter range, ARO cloud, VFD-specific monitoring.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Hippo CMMS: Is Hippo CMMS still available?
Not as a standalone purchase. It was acquired by Eptura and its capabilities are part of Eptura Asset. Existing customers are still served.
Petasense: Is Petasense still a separate product?
Yes. It trades under its own name with its own product line, but the owner since January 2024 is AssetWatch.
Hippo CMMS: What was distinctive about it?
Interactive facility maps. Placing assets on a floor plan and raising work orders from the drawing is a genuinely different way to navigate a site, and it is why it retained users against slicker competitors.
Petasense: Do I have to buy Petasense hardware?
Yes. The platform is built around its own Motes and Transmitters; it is not a bring-your-own-sensor analytics product.
Hippo CMMS: What does it cost?
Not published. Eptura quotes, which is a change from Hippo, whose pricing was easier to establish.
Petasense: Can I get monitoring as a service?
Yes, through parent AssetWatch, whose model is condition monitoring engineers reviewing your data. Clarify which model your quote covers.
Hippo CMMS: Should a new buyer consider it?
Evaluate Eptura Asset on its own terms, against MaintainX and Limble. Choosing it because of Hippo reviews written before the acquisition is a mistake.
Petasense: How is it priced?
Per monitored asset on subscription, plus sensors and gateways. Nothing is published.
Hippo CMMS: What happens to existing customers?
They continue to be supported within Eptura. The practical question is whether the broader workplace suite fits, since that is where the product roadmap now points.
Related pages
Other head to heads
- Hippo CMMS vs Maintenance Connection
- Hippo CMMS vs eMaint
- Hippo CMMS vs IBM Maximo Application Suite
- Hippo CMMS vs Rockwell FactoryTalk
- Hippo CMMS vs OpenBOM
- Hippo CMMS vs Propel
- Hippo CMMS vs ProShop ERP
- Hippo CMMS vs Fusion 360
- Hippo CMMS vs SolidWorks
- Hippo CMMS vs MachineMetrics
- Hippo CMMS vs LabVIEW
- Hippo CMMS vs AVEVA System Platform
- Hippo CMMS vs 3YOURMIND
- Hippo CMMS vs AMFG
- Hippo CMMS vs Aras Innovator
- Hippo CMMS vs Arena PLM
- Hippo CMMS vs Authentise
- Hippo CMMS vs Nanoprecise Sci Corp
- Hippo CMMS vs Samotics
- Hippo CMMS vs SKF Enlight Centre
- Hippo CMMS vs MOVUS
- Hippo CMMS vs Augury
- Hippo CMMS vs KCF Technologies
- Hippo CMMS vs Erbessd Instruments
- Hippo CMMS vs Waites Sensor Technologies
- Hippo CMMS vs Sensemore
- Hippo CMMS vs Poseidon Systems
- Hippo CMMS vs PROGNOST Systems
- Hippo CMMS vs Markforged Eiger
- Hippo CMMS vs Materialise Magics
- Hippo CMMS vs Oden Technologies
- Petasense vs Maintenance Connection
- Petasense vs eMaint
- Petasense vs IBM Maximo Application Suite
- Petasense vs Rockwell FactoryTalk
- Petasense vs OpenBOM
- Petasense vs Propel
- Petasense vs ProShop ERP
- Petasense vs Fusion 360
- Petasense vs SolidWorks
- Petasense vs MachineMetrics
- Petasense vs LabVIEW
- Petasense vs AVEVA System Platform
- Petasense vs 3YOURMIND
- Petasense vs AMFG
- Petasense vs Aras Innovator
- Petasense vs Arena PLM
- Petasense vs Authentise
- Petasense vs Nanoprecise Sci Corp
- Petasense vs Samotics
- Petasense vs SKF Enlight Centre
- Petasense vs MOVUS
- Petasense vs Augury
- Petasense vs KCF Technologies
- Petasense vs Erbessd Instruments
- Petasense vs Waites Sensor Technologies
- Petasense vs Sensemore
- Petasense vs Poseidon Systems
- Petasense vs PROGNOST Systems
- Petasense vs Markforged Eiger
- Petasense vs Materialise Magics
- Petasense vs Oden Technologies
