Manufacturing · head to head
Hippo CMMS vs Simplify3D

Hippo CMMS
Manufacturing
Straightforward maintenance management, now part of Eptura
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -

Simplify3D
Manufacturing
Paid 3D printing slicer sold as a one-time licence in a market where rivals are free
- From
- $199/one-time
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Hippo CMMS no longer sold as a standalone product, so a new evaluation is really an Eptura evaluation with a different scope and price; Simplify3D every serious competitor is free, so the $199 has to be justified against Cura, PrusaSlicer, OrcaSlicer and Bambu Studio on support and consistency alone, not on capability.
- They diverge on capability: Hippo CMMS covers Interactive site maps, Simplify3D covers Process-based slicing.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 31 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Hippo CMMS and Simplify3D actually diverge.
| Attribute | Hippo CMMS | Simplify3D |
|---|---|---|
| Starting price | On request | $199/one-time |
| Pricing model | quote | One-time purchase |
| Platforms | Web, iOS, Android | Windows, macOS, Linux |
Identical on both: free tier (No), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Manufacturing).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Hippo CMMS
- Interactive site maps
- Work order management
- Preventive maintenance
- Equipment records
- Vendor management
- Mobile access
Only in Simplify3D
- Process-based slicing
- Support generation
- Layer preview
- Floating licences
- Offline licensing
- Wide printer profiles
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Hippo CMMS
- Facilities teams wanting a CMMS that a non-specialist can operatenot Simplify3D
- Sites where locating an asset on a floor plan is the natural way to find itnot Simplify3D
- Existing Hippo customers evaluating whether to stay within Epturanot Simplify3D
- Organisations wanting maintenance inside a broader workplace management suitenot Simplify3D
Simplify3D
- A print farm running machines from four manufacturers that wants one slicer and one set of profiles rather than fournot Hippo CMMS
- An engineering department on an air-gapped network that cannot use a slicer requiring online activationnot Hippo CMMS
- A team standardising support and infill settings across operators so prints are reproducible between shiftsnot Hippo CMMS
- A shop printing tall parts that need different settings at different heights in a single jobnot Hippo CMMS
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Hippo CMMS
- No longer sold as a standalone product, so a new evaluation is really an Eptura evaluation with a different scope and price
- Pricing is not published, which makes it hard to compare against MaintainX or Limble without a sales process
- The simplicity that was its selling point becomes a ceiling for organisations with complex asset hierarchies
- Reporting is basic against competitors that have invested heavily in analytics
- Product direction now follows Eptura workplace strategy rather than maintenance-specific needs
Simplify3D
- Every serious competitor is free, so the $199 has to be justified against Cura, PrusaSlicer, OrcaSlicer and Bambu Studio on support and consistency alone, not on capability.
- Major version upgrades are chargeable, so the perpetual licence covers a version rather than the product and the cost recurs every few years anyway.
- Development cadence is slower than the open source slicers, and features such as newer tree support algorithms and multi-material handling appear there first.
- Printer profiles for very new machines lag behind the manufacturer's own bundled slicer, so buyers of a brand new printer may get better results from the free tool that shipped with it.
- Standard licences require an internet connection to activate, and the offline option is a separate purchase negotiated with sales rather than a checkbox at checkout.
Pricing, plan by plan
Hippo CMMS
On request- Eptura Asset$undefined/month
- Work order management
- Preventive maintenance
- Asset records
Simplify3D
$199/one-time- Standard licence$199/one-time
- One user, perpetual for that version
- Internet activation required
- Two week money-back guarantee
- Floating licence$undefined/one-time
- Shared activation pool for teams
- Priced on request
- Volume discounts available
- Offline licence$undefined/one-time
- Activation without internet access
- For secure or air-gapped networks
- Priced on request
Which should you pick?
Choose Hippo CMMS if
- You need interactive site maps.
- You work on Web, iOS, Android.
- You also want work order management.
Choose Simplify3D if
- You need process-based slicing.
- You work on Windows, macOS, Linux.
- You also want support generation.
Questions people ask
- Is Hippo CMMS or Simplify3D better?
- Neither clearly leads. Hippo CMMS starts at On request and Simplify3D at $199/one-time, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Hippo CMMS or Simplify3D?
- Hippo CMMS starts at On request and Simplify3D at $199/one-time.
- Does Hippo CMMS or Simplify3D run on more platforms?
- Hippo CMMS runs on Web, iOS, Android. Simplify3D runs on Windows, macOS, Linux.
- What is Hippo CMMS best used for?
- Hippo CMMS is most often used for facilities teams wanting a cmms that a non-specialist can operate, sites where locating an asset on a floor plan is the natural way to find it, existing hippo customers evaluating whether to stay within eptura, organisations wanting maintenance inside a broader workplace management suite. Of those, facilities teams wanting a cmms that a non-specialist can operate and sites where locating an asset on a floor plan is the natural way to find it are not what Simplify3D is typically brought in for.
- What can Hippo CMMS do that Simplify3D cannot?
- Hippo CMMS covers Interactive site maps, Work order management, Preventive maintenance, Equipment records. Simplify3D covers Process-based slicing, Support generation, Layer preview, Floating licences.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Hippo CMMS: Is Hippo CMMS still available?
Not as a standalone purchase. It was acquired by Eptura and its capabilities are part of Eptura Asset. Existing customers are still served.
Simplify3D: Is Simplify3D a subscription?
No. It is a one-time purchase of $199 per user, but upgrades to future major versions cost extra.
Hippo CMMS: What was distinctive about it?
Interactive facility maps. Placing assets on a floor plan and raising work orders from the drawing is a genuinely different way to navigate a site, and it is why it retained users against slicker competitors.
Simplify3D: Why pay when PrusaSlicer and Cura are free?
For a mixed fleet you get one interface and one profile library across brands, plus a supplier to call. If you run one printer from one vendor, the free slicer is usually the better choice.
Hippo CMMS: What does it cost?
Not published. Eptura quotes, which is a change from Hippo, whose pricing was easier to establish.
Simplify3D: Can I install it on more than one computer?
A standard licence is per user with online activation. Teams needing shared or concurrent use buy floating licences, priced on request.
Hippo CMMS: Should a new buyer consider it?
Evaluate Eptura Asset on its own terms, against MaintainX and Limble. Choosing it because of Hippo reviews written before the acquisition is a mistake.
Simplify3D: Can I try it first?
There is a two week money-back guarantee rather than a free trial download.
Hippo CMMS: What happens to existing customers?
They continue to be supported within Eptura. The practical question is whether the broader workplace suite fits, since that is where the product roadmap now points.
Related pages
Other head to heads
- Hippo CMMS vs Maintenance Connection
- Hippo CMMS vs eMaint
- Hippo CMMS vs IBM Maximo Application Suite
- Hippo CMMS vs Rockwell FactoryTalk
- Hippo CMMS vs OpenBOM
- Hippo CMMS vs Propel
- Hippo CMMS vs ProShop ERP
- Hippo CMMS vs Fusion 360
- Hippo CMMS vs SolidWorks
- Hippo CMMS vs MachineMetrics
- Hippo CMMS vs LabVIEW
- Hippo CMMS vs AVEVA System Platform
- Hippo CMMS vs 3YOURMIND
- Hippo CMMS vs AMFG
- Hippo CMMS vs Aras Innovator
- Hippo CMMS vs Arena PLM
- Hippo CMMS vs Authentise
- Hippo CMMS vs Formlabs PreForm
- Hippo CMMS vs Markforged Eiger
- Hippo CMMS vs Autodesk Netfabb
- Hippo CMMS vs GrabCAD Print
- Hippo CMMS vs Materialise Magics
- Hippo CMMS vs Oqton
- Hippo CMMS vs Dyndrite
- Hippo CMMS vs Protolabs
- Hippo CMMS vs Fictiv
- Hippo CMMS vs Waites Sensor Technologies
- Hippo CMMS vs Xometry
- Hippo CMMS vs Yokogawa CENTUM VP
- Hippo CMMS vs KCF Technologies
- Simplify3D vs Maintenance Connection
- Simplify3D vs eMaint
- Simplify3D vs IBM Maximo Application Suite
- Simplify3D vs Rockwell FactoryTalk
- Simplify3D vs OpenBOM
- Simplify3D vs Propel
- Simplify3D vs ProShop ERP
- Simplify3D vs Fusion 360
- Simplify3D vs SolidWorks
- Simplify3D vs MachineMetrics
- Simplify3D vs LabVIEW
- Simplify3D vs AVEVA System Platform
- Simplify3D vs 3YOURMIND
- Simplify3D vs AMFG
- Simplify3D vs Aras Innovator
- Simplify3D vs Arena PLM
- Simplify3D vs Authentise
- Simplify3D vs Formlabs PreForm
- Simplify3D vs Markforged Eiger
- Simplify3D vs Autodesk Netfabb
- Simplify3D vs GrabCAD Print
- Simplify3D vs Materialise Magics
- Simplify3D vs Oqton
- Simplify3D vs Dyndrite
- Simplify3D vs Protolabs
- Simplify3D vs Fictiv
- Simplify3D vs Waites Sensor Technologies
- Simplify3D vs Xometry
- Simplify3D vs Yokogawa CENTUM VP
- Simplify3D vs KCF Technologies
