Technology · head to head
Datadog vs Hetzner Cloud

Hetzner Cloud
Cloud & Infrastructure
Affordable cloud servers in Europe
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Only Hetzner Cloud has a free tier, so it costs nothing to try first.
- Each has a real cost: Datadog consumption-based pricing model makes costs hard to predict and can scale quickly; Hetzner Cloud cost-Optimized plans are shown as currently unavailable
- They diverge on capability: Datadog covers Infrastructure monitoring, Hetzner Cloud covers Cloud servers.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Datadog and Hetzner Cloud actually diverge.
| Attribute | Datadog | Hetzner Cloud |
|---|---|---|
| Starting price | $15/month | Free |
| Pricing model | Unknown | usage-based |
| Free tier | No | Yes |
| Platforms | Web, Linux, Windows, macOS | Web, Api, Cli |
| Category | Technology | Cloud & Infrastructure |
| Founded | 2010 | 1997 |
Identical on both: user rating (Not yet rated).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Datadog
- Infrastructure monitoring
- Application performance monitoring
- Log management
- Real user monitoring
- Synthetic monitoring
- Security monitoring
- Network monitoring
- Serverless monitoring
Only in Hetzner Cloud
- Cloud servers
- Block storage
- Object storage
- Load balancers
- Networks
- Firewalls
- Floating IPs
- Backups
Both cover
- Kubernetes
- Docker
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Datadog
- Infrastructure monitoringnot Hetzner Cloud
- Application performancenot Hetzner Cloud
- Security monitoringnot Hetzner Cloud
- Log analysisnot Hetzner Cloud
- Cloud monitoringnot Hetzner Cloud
Hetzner Cloud
- Low-cost virtual servers for development and testingnot Datadog
- European hosting with data held in Germany or Finlandnot Datadog
- Workloads with heavy egress, where included traffic mattersnot Datadog
- Self-hosting applications away from the hyperscalersnot Datadog
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Datadog
- Consumption-based pricing model makes costs hard to predict and can scale quickly
- Add-on modules significantly increase costs: custom metrics, indexed spans, extended retention
- No free tier for production monitoring
- High costs for organizations with large amounts of log data or high-cardinality metrics
Hetzner Cloud
- Cost-Optimized plans are shown as currently unavailable
- The shared-resource tiers are positioned for variable usage and development rather than sustained production workloads
- Regions are limited to Germany, Finland, the United States and Singapore, so latency to other markets is a real constraint
- The uptime guarantee is 99.9 percent, below what the large hyperscalers offer on comparable services
- Support is 24/7 by email, without a phone channel
Pricing, plan by plan
Datadog
$15/month- Infrastructure Monitoring$15/month
- Host monitoring
- Basic dashboards
- APM$31/month
- Application performance monitoring
- Trace collection
- Log Management$0.1/gb
- Log indexing
- Search and filter
Hetzner Cloud
Free- CX11$3.29/month
- 1 vCPU
- 1GB RAM
- 25GB SSD
- CX21$6.59/month
- 2 vCPU
- 4GB RAM
- 40GB SSD
Which should you pick?
Choose Datadog if
- You need infrastructure monitoring.
- You work on Web, Linux, Windows, macOS.
- You also want application performance monitoring.
Choose Hetzner Cloud if
- You need cloud servers.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Web, Api, Cli.
- You also want block storage.
Questions people ask
- Is Datadog or Hetzner Cloud better?
- Neither clearly leads. Datadog starts at $15/month and Hetzner Cloud at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Datadog or Hetzner Cloud?
- Hetzner Cloud has a free tier; the other does not. Paid plans start at $15/month for Datadog and Free for Hetzner Cloud.
- Does Datadog or Hetzner Cloud run on more platforms?
- Datadog runs on Web, Linux, Windows, macOS. Hetzner Cloud runs on Web, Api, Cli.
- Can I use Hetzner Cloud for free?
- Yes. Hetzner Cloud has a free tier, so you can try it without paying. Datadog starts at $15/month.
- What is Datadog best used for?
- Datadog is most often used for infrastructure monitoring, application performance, security monitoring, log analysis. Of those, infrastructure monitoring and application performance are not what Hetzner Cloud is typically brought in for.
- What can Datadog do that Hetzner Cloud cannot?
- Datadog covers Infrastructure monitoring, Application performance monitoring, Log management, Real user monitoring. Hetzner Cloud covers Cloud servers, Block storage, Object storage, Load balancers. Both handle Kubernetes, Docker.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Datadog: How is Datadog pricing structured?
Datadog uses consumption-based pricing tied to data volume ingested, hosts monitored, and products enabled. Infrastructure Monitoring starts at $15/host/month, APM at $31/host/month, and Log Management at $0.10/GB for indexed logs.
SourceDatadog: Does Datadog offer a free tier?
Datadog offers a free trial but not a permanent free tier for production monitoring. Pricing begins with paid plans only.
SourceDatadog: What integrations does Datadog support?
Datadog offers 1000+ built-in integrations including AWS, Kubernetes, Docker, Azure, GCP, and most major cloud platforms and services.
SourceDatadog: Can Datadog monitor Kubernetes clusters?
Yes. The Datadog Agent runs as a DaemonSet to provide real-time visibility into pods, nodes, deployments, and control-plane health across major Kubernetes distributions including EKS, AKS, GKE, OpenShift, and others.
SourceDatadog: How can I reduce Datadog costs?
Datadog bills based on indexed logs, custom metrics, and high-cardinality tags. Costs can be unpredictable and may run 2-3x estimates. Prepaying annually can secure 5-15% discounts.
SourceRelated pages
More on Hetzner Cloud
Other head to heads
- Datadog vs Asana
- Datadog vs ClickUp
- Datadog vs Figma
- Datadog vs Linear
- Datadog vs Monday.com
- Datadog vs Greenhouse
- Datadog vs Notion
- Datadog vs Amplitude
- Datadog vs PostHog
- Datadog vs PyCharm
- Datadog vs Sketch
- Datadog vs Docker
- Datadog vs Netlify
- Datadog vs Okta
- Datadog vs Aha!
- Datadog vs Coda
- Datadog vs Dashlane
- Datadog vs GitHub
- Datadog vs Grafana Cloud
- Datadog vs Neon
- Datadog vs DigitalOcean
- Datadog vs AWS (Amazon Web Services)
- Datadog vs Lambda (AWS Serverless)
- Datadog vs Deno Deploy
- Datadog vs Heroku
- Datadog vs Linode
- Datadog vs Packer
- Datadog vs Pulumi
- Datadog vs Render
- Datadog vs Upstash
- Datadog vs Vagrant
- Datadog vs Vultr
- Datadog vs Akamai
- Datadog vs Alibaba Cloud
- Datadog vs Chef
- Datadog vs Contabo
- Hetzner Cloud vs Asana
- Hetzner Cloud vs ClickUp
- Hetzner Cloud vs Figma
- Hetzner Cloud vs Linear
- Hetzner Cloud vs Monday.com
- Hetzner Cloud vs Greenhouse
- Hetzner Cloud vs Notion
- Hetzner Cloud vs Amplitude
- Hetzner Cloud vs PostHog
- Hetzner Cloud vs PyCharm
- Hetzner Cloud vs Sketch
- Hetzner Cloud vs Docker
- Hetzner Cloud vs Netlify
- Hetzner Cloud vs Okta
- Hetzner Cloud vs Aha!
- Hetzner Cloud vs Coda
- Hetzner Cloud vs Dashlane
- Hetzner Cloud vs GitHub
- Hetzner Cloud vs Grafana Cloud
- Hetzner Cloud vs Neon
- Hetzner Cloud vs DigitalOcean
- Hetzner Cloud vs AWS (Amazon Web Services)
- Hetzner Cloud vs Lambda (AWS Serverless)
- Hetzner Cloud vs Deno Deploy
- Hetzner Cloud vs Heroku
- Hetzner Cloud vs Linode
- Hetzner Cloud vs Packer
- Hetzner Cloud vs Pulumi
- Hetzner Cloud vs Render
- Hetzner Cloud vs Upstash
- Hetzner Cloud vs Vagrant
- Hetzner Cloud vs Vultr
- Hetzner Cloud vs Akamai
- Hetzner Cloud vs Alibaba Cloud
- Hetzner Cloud vs Chef
- Hetzner Cloud vs Contabo

