Developer Tools · head to head
Helix vs Very Good Security

Helix
Developer Tools
Post-modern modal text editor for the terminal, written in Rust
- From
- Free
- Free plan
- Yes

Very Good Security
Cybersecurity
Tokenisation proxy that keeps card and personal data out of your own systems and out of PCI scope
- From
- $1000/month
- Free plan
- No
The short version
- Only Helix has a free tier, so it costs nothing to try first.
- Each has a real cost: Helix no official GUI application yet, so it requires comfort with terminal workflows.; Very Good Security vGS sits in the live path of every request carrying sensitive data, so its latency and availability become yours, and an outage in the proxy is a payment outage no matter how healthy your own systems are.
- They diverge on capability: Helix covers Multiple Selections, Very Good Security covers Aliasing proxy.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 31 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Helix and Very Good Security actually diverge.
| Attribute | Helix | Very Good Security |
|---|---|---|
| Starting price | Free | $1000/month |
| Pricing model | open-source | Per month |
| Free tier | Yes | No |
| Platforms | linux, mac, windows | Web, API |
| Category | Developer Tools | Cybersecurity |
Identical on both: user rating (Not yet rated).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Helix
- Multiple Selections
- Tree-sitter Syntax Trees
- Built-in LSP Support
- Fuzzy File Finder
- Project-wide Search
Only in Very Good Security
- Aliasing proxy
- PCI scope reduction
- Network tokenisation
- Processor optionality
- Card issuing data
- Vault and access controls
- Data residency options
- Compliance artefacts
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Helix
- Editing code over SSH or in tmux sessionsnot Very Good Security
- Working with syntax-aware selection and navigationnot Very Good Security
- Getting IDE-like completion and diagnostics without plugin setupnot Very Good Security
- Lightweight, low-resource code editing on laptopsnot Very Good Security
Very Good Security
- A marketplace facing its first PCI DSS Level 1 assessment that wants to keep card data off its own estate rather than harden a dozen servicesnot Helix
- A merchant negotiating with a second acquirer that needs card credentials portable so the negotiation is real rather than theoreticalnot Helix
- A fintech collecting bank account and identity documents that wants sensitive fields absent from logs, backups and analytics warehouses by constructionnot Helix
- A card issuer that must display a full PAN in its own mobile app without the app or its backend touching cardholder datanot Helix
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Helix
- No official GUI application yet, so it requires comfort with terminal workflows.
- Plugin ecosystem is far smaller than Vim's or Neovim's, limiting customization.
- Keybindings differ from both Vim and Kakoune, adding a learning curve for users of either.
- Configuration is more limited than Neovim's Lua-based extensibility.
Very Good Security
- VGS sits in the live path of every request carrying sensitive data, so its latency and availability become yours, and an outage in the proxy is a payment outage no matter how healthy your own systems are.
- Token portability is the whole selling point yet leaving VGS means migrating tokens back out, a project the vendor has no incentive to streamline, so the lock-in you removed from your acquirer partly moves to VGS.
- Entry pricing at around one thousand US dollars a month is real money for a pre-revenue fintech, and it buys volume-limited throughput, so cost scales with exactly the growth that made you buy it.
- Scope reduction is not scope elimination: your QSA still assesses how you integrate, and teams regularly discover that a support tool or an internal admin screen pulled plaintext back in and dragged systems into scope again.
- Proxy-based interception constrains how you design request flows, and non-standard payloads, streaming uploads or binary formats often need custom routing rules that make debugging production issues noticeably harder.
Pricing, plan by plan
Helix
Free- FreeFree
- Full editor, no paid tiers
Very Good Security
$1000/month- Starter$1000/month
- Aliasing proxy
- Vault storage
- PCI scope reduction
- Growth$undefined/month
- Network tokenisation
- Multiple processors
- Data residency options
- Enterprise$undefined/year
- Custom vault architecture
- Dedicated support and SLA
- Contractual compliance coverage
Which should you pick?
Choose Helix if
- You need multiple selections.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on linux, mac, windows.
- You also want tree-sitter syntax trees.
Choose Very Good Security if
- You need aliasing proxy.
- You work on Web, API.
- You also want pci scope reduction.
Questions people ask
- Is Helix or Very Good Security better?
- Neither clearly leads. Helix starts at Free and Very Good Security at $1000/month, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Helix or Very Good Security?
- Helix has a free tier; the other does not. Paid plans start at Free for Helix and $1000/month for Very Good Security.
- Does Helix or Very Good Security run on more platforms?
- Helix runs on linux, mac, windows. Very Good Security runs on Web, API.
- Can I use Helix for free?
- Yes. Helix has a free tier, so you can try it without paying. Very Good Security starts at $1000/month.
- What is Helix best used for?
- Helix is most often used for editing code over ssh or in tmux sessions, working with syntax-aware selection and navigation, getting ide-like completion and diagnostics without plugin setup, lightweight, low-resource code editing on laptops. Of those, editing code over ssh or in tmux sessions and working with syntax-aware selection and navigation are not what Very Good Security is typically brought in for.
- What can Helix do that Very Good Security cannot?
- Helix covers Multiple Selections, Tree-sitter Syntax Trees, Built-in LSP Support, Fuzzy File Finder. Very Good Security covers Aliasing proxy, PCI scope reduction, Network tokenisation, Processor optionality.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Helix: Is Helix free to use?
Yes, Helix is free and open source, licensed under the Mozilla Public License 2.0 (MPL-2.0), with no paid tiers or subscriptions.
SourceVery Good Security: Does VGS make me PCI compliant?
No. It removes cardholder data from your systems so your assessment covers a far smaller boundary, but you still complete an assessment and your integration is part of it.
Helix: How do I install Helix?
Install via your operating system's package manager, or download pre-built binaries from GitHub Releases; the nightly version requires building from source.
SourceVery Good Security: Can I move to another processor without re-collecting cards?
Yes, that is a core reason people buy it. The vault reveals stored credentials to whichever processor you route to.
Helix: Does Helix support plugins?
Not yet. Helix currently has no plugin system, though the project intends to add one eventually; it instead ships with built-in LSP and tree-sitter support out of the box.
SourceVery Good Security: What does it cost?
Published entry pricing is about one thousand US dollars per month; growth and enterprise tiers are quoted.
Helix: How do I configure Helix?
Helix ships with sane modern defaults requiring much less config-file fiddling than Vim, though settings can still be customized in a config.toml file.
SourceVery Good Security: Is it only for card data?
No. The proxy handles any sensitive field, including bank details, national identifiers and documents, though payments is where the product is now focused.
Helix: Where can I get help or support?
Support is community-driven via GitHub for code and issues, the Matrix chat for discussion, and OpenCollective for funding ongoing development.
SourceRelated pages
More on Very Good Security
Other head to heads
- Helix vs Notepad++
- Helix vs GNU Emacs
- Helix vs Penpot
- Helix vs Ansible
- Helix vs Frappe
- Helix vs Restate
- Helix vs Visual Studio Code
- Helix vs Rust
- Helix vs Bazel
- Helix vs Eclipse IDE
- Helix vs Pants Build
- Helix vs Jitsu
- Helix vs Prettier
- Helix vs StackBlitz
- Helix vs Steampipe
- Helix vs Tilt
- Helix vs WarpBuild
- Helix vs Baffle
- Helix vs HashiCorp Vault
- Helix vs Feedzai
- Helix vs Securiti
- Helix vs Featurespace ARIC Risk Hub
- Helix vs Varonis Data Security Platform
- Helix vs LastPass
- Helix vs DataGrail
- Helix vs 1Password
- Helix vs Transcend
- Helix vs Doppler
- Helix vs Tuta
- Helix vs Delinea
- Helix vs Envysion
- Helix vs Frontegg
- Helix vs HashiCorp Boundary
- Very Good Security vs Notepad++
- Very Good Security vs GNU Emacs
- Very Good Security vs Penpot
- Very Good Security vs Ansible
- Very Good Security vs Frappe
- Very Good Security vs Restate
- Very Good Security vs Visual Studio Code
- Very Good Security vs Rust
- Very Good Security vs Bazel
- Very Good Security vs Eclipse IDE
- Very Good Security vs Pants Build
- Very Good Security vs Jitsu
- Very Good Security vs Prettier
- Very Good Security vs StackBlitz
- Very Good Security vs Steampipe
- Very Good Security vs Tilt
- Very Good Security vs WarpBuild
- Very Good Security vs Baffle
- Very Good Security vs HashiCorp Vault
- Very Good Security vs Feedzai
- Very Good Security vs Securiti
- Very Good Security vs Featurespace ARIC Risk Hub
- Very Good Security vs Varonis Data Security Platform
- Very Good Security vs LastPass
- Very Good Security vs DataGrail
- Very Good Security vs 1Password
- Very Good Security vs Transcend
- Very Good Security vs Doppler
- Very Good Security vs Tuta
- Very Good Security vs Delinea
- Very Good Security vs Envysion
- Very Good Security vs Frontegg
- Very Good Security vs HashiCorp Boundary
