Developer Tools · head to head
Prettier vs Very Good Security

Very Good Security
Cybersecurity
Tokenisation proxy that keeps card and personal data out of your own systems and out of PCI scope
- From
- $1000/month
- Free plan
- No
The short version
- Only Prettier has a free tier, so it costs nothing to try first.
- Each has a real cost: Prettier inflexible style rules that cannot be customized significantly, forcing teams to accept opinionated defaults; Very Good Security vGS sits in the live path of every request carrying sensitive data, so its latency and availability become yours, and an outage in the proxy is a payment outage no matter how healthy your own systems are.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 31 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Prettier and Very Good Security actually diverge.
| Attribute | Prettier | Very Good Security |
|---|---|---|
| Starting price | Free | $1000/month |
| Pricing model | free | Per month |
| Free tier | Yes | No |
| Platforms | CLI, Editor Plugins, Build Tools | Web, API |
| Category | Developer Tools | Cybersecurity |
| Founded | 2016 | Unknown |
Identical on both: user rating (Not yet rated).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Prettier
Nothing recorded that Very Good Security does not also cover.
Only in Very Good Security
- Aliasing proxy
- PCI scope reduction
- Network tokenisation
- Processor optionality
- Card issuing data
- Vault and access controls
- Data residency options
- Compliance artefacts
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Prettier
- Automatically formatting TypeScript files to project style standardsnot Very Good Security
- Enforcing consistent HTML indentation across component filesnot Very Good Security
- Removing style-related comments from pull request reviewsnot Very Good Security
- Formatting GraphQL queries with consistent indentationnot Very Good Security
Very Good Security
- A marketplace facing its first PCI DSS Level 1 assessment that wants to keep card data off its own estate rather than harden a dozen servicesnot Prettier
- A merchant negotiating with a second acquirer that needs card credentials portable so the negotiation is real rather than theoreticalnot Prettier
- A fintech collecting bank account and identity documents that wants sensitive fields absent from logs, backups and analytics warehouses by constructionnot Prettier
- A card issuer that must display a full PAN in its own mobile app without the app or its backend touching cardholder datanot Prettier
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Prettier
- Inflexible style rules that cannot be customized significantly, forcing teams to accept opinionated defaults
- Developers must format entire files rather than selective line ranges in some contexts
- Limited language support compared to some alternatives, though it covers major languages
Very Good Security
- VGS sits in the live path of every request carrying sensitive data, so its latency and availability become yours, and an outage in the proxy is a payment outage no matter how healthy your own systems are.
- Token portability is the whole selling point yet leaving VGS means migrating tokens back out, a project the vendor has no incentive to streamline, so the lock-in you removed from your acquirer partly moves to VGS.
- Entry pricing at around one thousand US dollars a month is real money for a pre-revenue fintech, and it buys volume-limited throughput, so cost scales with exactly the growth that made you buy it.
- Scope reduction is not scope elimination: your QSA still assesses how you integrate, and teams regularly discover that a support tool or an internal admin screen pulled plaintext back in and dragged systems into scope again.
- Proxy-based interception constrains how you design request flows, and non-standard payloads, streaming uploads or binary formats often need custom routing rules that make debugging production issues noticeably harder.
Pricing, plan by plan
Prettier
FreeNo published plan breakdown. See the Prettier review.
Very Good Security
$1000/month- Starter$1000/month
- Aliasing proxy
- Vault storage
- PCI scope reduction
- Growth$undefined/month
- Network tokenisation
- Multiple processors
- Data residency options
- Enterprise$undefined/year
- Custom vault architecture
- Dedicated support and SLA
- Contractual compliance coverage
Which should you pick?
Choose Prettier if
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on CLI, Editor Plugins, Build Tools.
Choose Very Good Security if
- You need aliasing proxy.
- You work on Web, API.
- You also want pci scope reduction.
Questions people ask
- Is Prettier or Very Good Security better?
- Neither clearly leads. Prettier starts at Free and Very Good Security at $1000/month, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Prettier or Very Good Security?
- Prettier has a free tier; the other does not. Paid plans start at Free for Prettier and $1000/month for Very Good Security.
- Does Prettier or Very Good Security run on more platforms?
- Prettier runs on CLI, Editor Plugins, Build Tools. Very Good Security runs on Web, API.
- Can I use Prettier for free?
- Yes. Prettier has a free tier, so you can try it without paying. Very Good Security starts at $1000/month.
- What is Prettier best used for?
- Prettier is most often used for automatically formatting typescript files to project style standards, enforcing consistent html indentation across component files, removing style-related comments from pull request reviews, formatting graphql queries with consistent indentation. Of those, automatically formatting typescript files to project style standards and enforcing consistent html indentation across component files are not what Very Good Security is typically brought in for.
- What can Prettier do that Very Good Security cannot?
- Very Good Security covers Aliasing proxy, PCI scope reduction, Network tokenisation, Processor optionality.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Prettier: Is Prettier free and open source?
Yes, Prettier is completely free and open source, available as an npm package with no licensing costs or subscriptions.
SourceVery Good Security: Does VGS make me PCI compliant?
No. It removes cardholder data from your systems so your assessment covers a far smaller boundary, but you still complete an assessment and your integration is part of it.
Prettier: Can Prettier be integrated with ESLint?
Yes, Prettier integrates with ESLint by disabling ESLint formatting rules via eslint-config-prettier, allowing both tools to work together with Prettier handling formatting and ESLint handling code quality.
SourceVery Good Security: Can I move to another processor without re-collecting cards?
Yes, that is a core reason people buy it. The vault reveals stored credentials to whichever processor you route to.
Prettier: Does Prettier support configuration customization?
Prettier is intentionally opinionated with limited configuration options to enforce consistency. You can create a .prettierrc file for basic customization, but Prettier does not support extensive rule customization like ESLint.
SourceVery Good Security: What does it cost?
Published entry pricing is about one thousand US dollars per month; growth and enterprise tiers are quoted.
Very Good Security: Is it only for card data?
No. The proxy handles any sensitive field, including bank details, national identifiers and documents, though payments is where the product is now focused.
Related pages
More on Very Good Security
Other head to heads
- Prettier vs ESLint
- Prettier vs Yarn
- Prettier vs Earthly
- Prettier vs Claude Code
- Prettier vs Deep Code
- Prettier vs Fig
- Prettier vs Visual Studio Code
- Prettier vs pnpm
- Prettier vs Turborepo
- Prettier vs GitHub Copilot
- Prettier vs Penpot
- Prettier vs Keycloak
- Prettier vs WarpBuild
- Prettier vs Webpack
- Prettier vs Avo
- Prettier vs Azure DevOps
- Prettier vs Backstage
- Prettier vs Bitbucket
- Prettier vs Baffle
- Prettier vs HashiCorp Vault
- Prettier vs Feedzai
- Prettier vs Securiti
- Prettier vs Featurespace ARIC Risk Hub
- Prettier vs Varonis Data Security Platform
- Prettier vs LastPass
- Prettier vs DataGrail
- Prettier vs 1Password
- Prettier vs Transcend
- Prettier vs Doppler
- Prettier vs Tuta
- Prettier vs Delinea
- Prettier vs Envysion
- Prettier vs Frontegg
- Prettier vs HashiCorp Boundary
- Very Good Security vs ESLint
- Very Good Security vs Yarn
- Very Good Security vs Earthly
- Very Good Security vs Claude Code
- Very Good Security vs Deep Code
- Very Good Security vs Fig
- Very Good Security vs Visual Studio Code
- Very Good Security vs pnpm
- Very Good Security vs Turborepo
- Very Good Security vs GitHub Copilot
- Very Good Security vs Penpot
- Very Good Security vs Keycloak
- Very Good Security vs WarpBuild
- Very Good Security vs Webpack
- Very Good Security vs Avo
- Very Good Security vs Azure DevOps
- Very Good Security vs Backstage
- Very Good Security vs Bitbucket
- Very Good Security vs Baffle
- Very Good Security vs HashiCorp Vault
- Very Good Security vs Feedzai
- Very Good Security vs Securiti
- Very Good Security vs Featurespace ARIC Risk Hub
- Very Good Security vs Varonis Data Security Platform
- Very Good Security vs LastPass
- Very Good Security vs DataGrail
- Very Good Security vs 1Password
- Very Good Security vs Transcend
- Very Good Security vs Doppler
- Very Good Security vs Tuta
- Very Good Security vs Delinea
- Very Good Security vs Envysion
- Very Good Security vs Frontegg
- Very Good Security vs HashiCorp Boundary

