Developer Tools · head to head
Jitsu vs Very Good Security

Jitsu
Developer Tools
Open source event pipeline that streams behavioural data to your own warehouse
- From
- Free
- Free plan
- Yes

Very Good Security
Cybersecurity
Tokenisation proxy that keeps card and personal data out of your own systems and out of PCI scope
- From
- $1000/month
- Free plan
- No
The short version
- Only Jitsu has a free tier, so it costs nothing to try first.
- Each has a real cost: Jitsu jitsu is a pipeline, not a customer data platform, so identity resolution, audience building and reverse ETL are absent and a marketing team expecting Segment parity will be disappointed.; Very Good Security vGS sits in the live path of every request carrying sensitive data, so its latency and availability become yours, and an outage in the proxy is a payment outage no matter how healthy your own systems are.
- They diverge on capability: Jitsu covers Event collection, Very Good Security covers Aliasing proxy.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 31 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Jitsu and Very Good Security actually diverge.
| Attribute | Jitsu | Very Good Security |
|---|---|---|
| Starting price | Free | $1000/month |
| Pricing model | Per month by event volume | Per month |
| Free tier | Yes | No |
| Platforms | Web, Linux, Docker, Kubernetes, iOS, Android | Web, API |
| Category | Developer Tools | Cybersecurity |
Identical on both: user rating (Not yet rated).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Jitsu
- Event collection
- Warehouse destinations
- Connector syncs
- Transformations
- Bundled ClickHouse
- Event debugger
- Self-hosting
- Custom domains
Only in Very Good Security
- Aliasing proxy
- PCI scope reduction
- Network tokenisation
- Processor optionality
- Card issuing data
- Vault and access controls
- Data residency options
- Compliance artefacts
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Jitsu
- A team paying five figures a year to a customer data platform when all it actually does is send events to Snowflakenot Very Good Security
- An engineering group that needs event collection running inside its own VPC for data residency or security review reasonsnot Very Good Security
- A product analytics setup that wants raw events in the warehouse as the source of truth rather than trapped in a vendor toolnot Very Good Security
- A startup that needs first-party event collection on its own domain to reduce loss from tracker blocking without paying CDP pricesnot Very Good Security
Very Good Security
- A marketplace facing its first PCI DSS Level 1 assessment that wants to keep card data off its own estate rather than harden a dozen servicesnot Jitsu
- A merchant negotiating with a second acquirer that needs card credentials portable so the negotiation is real rather than theoreticalnot Jitsu
- A fintech collecting bank account and identity documents that wants sensitive fields absent from logs, backups and analytics warehouses by constructionnot Jitsu
- A card issuer that must display a full PAN in its own mobile app without the app or its backend touching cardholder datanot Jitsu
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Jitsu
- Jitsu is a pipeline, not a customer data platform, so identity resolution, audience building and reverse ETL are absent and a marketing team expecting Segment parity will be disappointed.
- Connector sync frequency is deliberately tiered, with the free plan limited to manual runs and one daily sync, so anything approaching operational freshness requires the paid plan or self-hosting.
- Self-hosting means you own the reliability of a system that drops data silently when misconfigured, and event loss is uniquely hard to notice because nothing errors, the numbers are just quietly lower.
- The connector catalogue is far smaller than Fivetran or Airbyte, so if your requirement is pulling from many SaaS sources rather than pushing events, Jitsu is the wrong half of the problem.
- It is a small company with a small commercial team, so enterprise procurement processes around security review, contractual SLAs and support escalation take longer than with an incumbent vendor.
Very Good Security
- VGS sits in the live path of every request carrying sensitive data, so its latency and availability become yours, and an outage in the proxy is a payment outage no matter how healthy your own systems are.
- Token portability is the whole selling point yet leaving VGS means migrating tokens back out, a project the vendor has no incentive to streamline, so the lock-in you removed from your acquirer partly moves to VGS.
- Entry pricing at around one thousand US dollars a month is real money for a pre-revenue fintech, and it buys volume-limited throughput, so cost scales with exactly the growth that made you buy it.
- Scope reduction is not scope elimination: your QSA still assesses how you integrate, and teams regularly discover that a support tool or an internal admin screen pulled plaintext back in and dragged systems into scope again.
- Proxy-based interception constrains how you design request flows, and non-standard payloads, streaming uploads or binary formats often need custom routing rules that make debugging production issues noticeably harder.
Pricing, plan by plan
Jitsu
Free- Open SourceFree
- MIT licence
- Self-host on any cloud
- No usage limits
- Cloud FreeFree
- Unlimited captured events
- 200,000 active events per month
- Manual connector runs only
- Business$99/month
- 2,000,000 active events per month
- $40 per additional million events
- Hourly connector sync frequency
- Enterprise$undefined/year
- Custom event volume
- One minute sync frequency
- Unlimited active syncs
Very Good Security
$1000/month- Starter$1000/month
- Aliasing proxy
- Vault storage
- PCI scope reduction
- Growth$undefined/month
- Network tokenisation
- Multiple processors
- Data residency options
- Enterprise$undefined/year
- Custom vault architecture
- Dedicated support and SLA
- Contractual compliance coverage
Which should you pick?
Choose Jitsu if
- You need event collection.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Web, Linux, Docker, Kubernetes, iOS, Android.
- You also want warehouse destinations.
Choose Very Good Security if
- You need aliasing proxy.
- You work on Web, API.
- You also want pci scope reduction.
Questions people ask
- Is Jitsu or Very Good Security better?
- Neither clearly leads. Jitsu starts at Free and Very Good Security at $1000/month, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Jitsu or Very Good Security?
- Jitsu has a free tier; the other does not. Paid plans start at Free for Jitsu and $1000/month for Very Good Security.
- Does Jitsu or Very Good Security run on more platforms?
- Jitsu runs on Web, Linux, Docker, Kubernetes, iOS, Android. Very Good Security runs on Web, API.
- Can I use Jitsu for free?
- Yes. Jitsu has a free tier, so you can try it without paying. Very Good Security starts at $1000/month.
- What is Jitsu best used for?
- Jitsu is most often used for a team paying five figures a year to a customer data platform when all it actually does is send events to snowflake, an engineering group that needs event collection running inside its own vpc for data residency or security review reasons, a product analytics setup that wants raw events in the warehouse as the source of truth rather than trapped in a vendor tool, a startup that needs first-party event collection on its own domain to reduce loss from tracker blocking without paying cdp prices. Of those, a team paying five figures a year to a customer data platform when all it actually does is send events to snowflake and an engineering group that needs event collection running inside its own vpc for data residency or security review reasons are not what Very Good Security is typically brought in for.
- What can Jitsu do that Very Good Security cannot?
- Jitsu covers Event collection, Warehouse destinations, Connector syncs, Transformations. Very Good Security covers Aliasing proxy, PCI scope reduction, Network tokenisation, Processor optionality.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Jitsu: Is Jitsu the same as Jitsi?
No. Jitsu is an open source event data pipeline. Jitsi is an unrelated video conferencing project.
Very Good Security: Does VGS make me PCI compliant?
No. It removes cardholder data from your systems so your assessment covers a far smaller boundary, but you still complete an assessment and your integration is part of it.
Jitsu: Can I self-host for free?
Yes. The project is MIT licensed with no usage limits when self-hosted.
Very Good Security: Can I move to another processor without re-collecting cards?
Yes, that is a core reason people buy it. The vault reveals stored credentials to whichever processor you route to.
Jitsu: How does the cost compare with Segment?
The Business plan is 99 US dollars a month for two million active events, where a per-tracked-user CDP typically costs orders of magnitude more at comparable volume.
Very Good Security: What does it cost?
Published entry pricing is about one thousand US dollars per month; growth and enterprise tiers are quoted.
Jitsu: Does Jitsu do identity resolution?
No. It transports and transforms events; identity stitching and audiences are not part of the product.
Very Good Security: Is it only for card data?
No. The proxy handles any sensitive field, including bank details, national identifiers and documents, though payments is where the product is now focused.
Related pages
More on Very Good Security
Other head to heads
- Jitsu vs Atlantis
- Jitsu vs Tilt
- Jitsu vs Visual Studio Code
- Jitsu vs Penpot
- Jitsu vs Bazel
- Jitsu vs Eclipse IDE
- Jitsu vs Pants Build
- Jitsu vs Ansible
- Jitsu vs Helix
- Jitsu vs Notepad++
- Jitsu vs Steampipe
- Jitsu vs Backstage
- Jitsu vs Blacksmith
- Jitsu vs Coder
- Jitsu vs Garden
- Jitsu vs GitLab CI/CD
- Jitsu vs HCP Terraform
- Jitsu vs Baffle
- Jitsu vs HashiCorp Vault
- Jitsu vs Feedzai
- Jitsu vs Securiti
- Jitsu vs Featurespace ARIC Risk Hub
- Jitsu vs Varonis Data Security Platform
- Jitsu vs LastPass
- Jitsu vs DataGrail
- Jitsu vs 1Password
- Jitsu vs Transcend
- Jitsu vs Doppler
- Jitsu vs Tuta
- Jitsu vs Delinea
- Jitsu vs Envysion
- Jitsu vs Frontegg
- Jitsu vs HashiCorp Boundary
- Very Good Security vs Atlantis
- Very Good Security vs Tilt
- Very Good Security vs Visual Studio Code
- Very Good Security vs Penpot
- Very Good Security vs Bazel
- Very Good Security vs Eclipse IDE
- Very Good Security vs Pants Build
- Very Good Security vs Ansible
- Very Good Security vs Helix
- Very Good Security vs Notepad++
- Very Good Security vs Steampipe
- Very Good Security vs Backstage
- Very Good Security vs Blacksmith
- Very Good Security vs Coder
- Very Good Security vs Garden
- Very Good Security vs GitLab CI/CD
- Very Good Security vs HCP Terraform
- Very Good Security vs Baffle
- Very Good Security vs HashiCorp Vault
- Very Good Security vs Feedzai
- Very Good Security vs Securiti
- Very Good Security vs Featurespace ARIC Risk Hub
- Very Good Security vs Varonis Data Security Platform
- Very Good Security vs LastPass
- Very Good Security vs DataGrail
- Very Good Security vs 1Password
- Very Good Security vs Transcend
- Very Good Security vs Doppler
- Very Good Security vs Tuta
- Very Good Security vs Delinea
- Very Good Security vs Envysion
- Very Good Security vs Frontegg
- Very Good Security vs HashiCorp Boundary
