Energy · head to head
AVEVA PI System vs Helioscope

AVEVA PI System
Energy
Industrial data infrastructure for real-time insights
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: AVEVA PI System pricing is not published and comes through an account representative; Helioscope licences are single user, so each designer needs their own
- They diverge on capability: AVEVA PI System covers Real-time data collection, Helioscope covers PV system design.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 30 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which AVEVA PI System and Helioscope actually diverge.
| Attribute | AVEVA PI System | Helioscope |
|---|---|---|
| Starting price | On request | $159/month |
| Pricing model | one-time | subscription |
| Platforms | Desktop, Web, Mobile, Api | Web, Api |
| Founded | 1967 | 2012 |
Identical on both: free tier (No), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Energy).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in AVEVA PI System
- Real-time data collection
- Time-series data storage
- Asset framework
- Visualization
- Analytics
- Event management
- Notifications
- Data integration
Only in Helioscope
- PV system design
- 3D shade modeling
- Performance simulation
- Single-line diagrams
- BOM generation
- Proposal templates
- Component database
- Financial modeling
Both cover
- SOC2
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
AVEVA PI System
- Industrial data collection and storage for oil, gas, and chemical processingnot Helioscope
- Real-time operational data visualization and HMI dashboardsnot Helioscope
- Supply chain and asset performance monitoring across sitesnot Helioscope
- Compliance and audit trail management for regulated industriesnot Helioscope
- Integration with SCADA systems and manufacturing executionnot Helioscope
Helioscope
- Solar project design and modelingnot AVEVA PI System
- Rooftop, carport, and ground-mount solar system planningnot AVEVA PI System
- Financial analysis and sales proposal generation for solar installationsnot AVEVA PI System
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
AVEVA PI System
- Pricing is not published and comes through an account representative
- The vendor is moving to a subscription commercial model, so perpetual licence expectations no longer hold
- Made up of several separately named components, including PI Server, PI Vision, Edge Data Store and the adapters and connectors needed per data source
Helioscope
- Licences are single user, so each designer needs their own
- Projects are capped at 10 a month on both Basic and Pro
- System size is capped by plan, at 1.25 MW DC on Basic and 5 MW on Pro, so a larger array forces an upgrade regardless of project count
- Trackers, LIDAR modelling and API access sit on the higher tiers
- Enterprise is priced per project with no published figure
Pricing, plan by plan
AVEVA PI System
On request- Data Archive$undefined/license
- Time-series data storage
- High-speed data collection
- Data compression
- Operations$undefined/license
- PI Vision dashboards
- AF analytics
- Event frames
- Enterprise$undefined/license
- PI Integrator
- Cloud connectivity
- Advanced analytics
Helioscope
$159/month- Basic$159/month
- 1 user per license
- 10 projects per month (120 per year)
- 15% discount for annual billing ($1,620/year)
- Pro$259/month
- 1 user per license
- 10 projects per month (120 per year)
- 15% discount for annual billing ($2,640/year)
- Enterprise$null/month
- Unlimited users
- Unlimited projects
- Custom pricing
Which should you pick?
Choose AVEVA PI System if
- You need real-time data collection.
- You work on Desktop, Web, Mobile, Api.
- You also want time-series data storage.
Choose Helioscope if
- You need pv system design.
- You work on Web, Api.
- You also want 3d shade modeling.
Questions people ask
- Is AVEVA PI System or Helioscope better?
- Neither clearly leads. AVEVA PI System starts at On request and Helioscope at $159/month, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, AVEVA PI System or Helioscope?
- AVEVA PI System starts at On request and Helioscope at $159/month.
- Does AVEVA PI System or Helioscope run on more platforms?
- AVEVA PI System runs on Desktop, Web, Mobile, Api. Helioscope runs on Web, Api.
- What is AVEVA PI System best used for?
- AVEVA PI System is most often used for industrial data collection and storage for oil, gas, and chemical processing, real-time operational data visualization and hmi dashboards, supply chain and asset performance monitoring across sites, compliance and audit trail management for regulated industries. Of those, industrial data collection and storage for oil, gas, and chemical processing and real-time operational data visualization and hmi dashboards are not what Helioscope is typically brought in for.
- What can AVEVA PI System do that Helioscope cannot?
- AVEVA PI System covers Real-time data collection, Time-series data storage, Asset framework, Visualization. Helioscope covers PV system design, 3D shade modeling, Performance simulation, Single-line diagrams. Both handle SOC2.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
AVEVA PI System: What is AVEVA PI System pricing?
AVEVA does not list PI System pricing on its website. AVEVA markets industrial software through enterprise sales channels with custom quotes.
SourceHelioscope: What is the starting price for HelioScope?
HelioScope Basic plan costs $159 per month per license with annual billing at $1,620/year (15% discount). The Pro plan is $259/month or $2,640/year. Each license covers 1 user. Source: https://helioscope.aurorasolar.com/pricing
SourceAVEVA PI System: Does AVEVA offer a Flex Subscription Program?
AVEVA mentions Flex Subscription Program on its site for flexible product access, but pricing and terms are not published publicly.
SourceHelioscope: How many projects can I design monthly with HelioScope Basic and Pro?
Both Basic and Pro plans include 10 projects per month, equaling 120 projects per year. The project allocation is the same across both tiers; the difference is in design capability (1.25 MW for Basic vs. 5 MW for Pro). Source: https://helioscope.aurorasolar.com/pricing
SourceAVEVA PI System: Is AVEVA PI System available in the cloud?
AVEVA offers cloud options for its products, but per-seat or usage-based pricing for cloud deployments is not disclosed on the vendor website.
SourceHelioscope: What is the maximum solar design capacity by HelioScope tier?
HelioScope Basic supports designs up to 1.25 MW DC, Pro supports up to 5 MW DC, and Enterprise supports unlimited designs up to 30 MW DC. Accuracy within 1% of PVsyst modeling is maintained across tiers. Source: https://helioscope.aurorasolar.com/pricing
SourceRelated pages
More on AVEVA PI System
Other head to heads
- AVEVA PI System vs Cognite Data Fusion
- AVEVA PI System vs Fronius SOLARWEB
- AVEVA PI System vs Aurora Solar
- AVEVA PI System vs Enphase Enlighten
- AVEVA PI System vs ABB Ability
- AVEVA PI System vs Novity
- AVEVA PI System vs Bently Nevada System 1
- AVEVA PI System vs Cutsforth InsightCM
- AVEVA PI System vs Emerson Ovation
- AVEVA PI System vs Oracle Utilities
- AVEVA PI System vs Petrel E&P Software
- AVEVA PI System vs Schneider Electric EcoStruxure
- AVEVA PI System vs OATI webOASIS
- AVEVA PI System vs P2 Energy Solutions
- AVEVA PI System vs Proxibel Grid Suite
- AVEVA PI System vs Pulse Energy Software
- AVEVA PI System vs OATI webSmartEnergy
- AVEVA PI System vs SolarWinds
- AVEVA PI System vs Clean Power Research PowerClerk
- AVEVA PI System vs Enerex
- AVEVA PI System vs Stem Athena
- AVEVA PI System vs AutoGrid Flex
- AVEVA PI System vs PowerFactory DIgSILENT
- AVEVA PI System vs GE Digital GridOS
- AVEVA PI System vs SMA Energy
- AVEVA PI System vs Influx Energy Management
- AVEVA PI System vs Johnson Controls Metasys
- AVEVA PI System vs OpenLink Endur
- AVEVA PI System vs Siemens EnergyIP
- Helioscope vs Cognite Data Fusion
- Helioscope vs Fronius SOLARWEB
- Helioscope vs Aurora Solar
- Helioscope vs Enphase Enlighten
- Helioscope vs ABB Ability
- Helioscope vs Novity
- Helioscope vs Bently Nevada System 1
- Helioscope vs Cutsforth InsightCM
- Helioscope vs Emerson Ovation
- Helioscope vs Oracle Utilities
- Helioscope vs Petrel E&P Software
- Helioscope vs Schneider Electric EcoStruxure
- Helioscope vs OATI webOASIS
- Helioscope vs P2 Energy Solutions
- Helioscope vs Proxibel Grid Suite
- Helioscope vs Pulse Energy Software
- Helioscope vs OATI webSmartEnergy
- Helioscope vs SolarWinds
- Helioscope vs Clean Power Research PowerClerk
- Helioscope vs Enerex
- Helioscope vs Stem Athena
- Helioscope vs AutoGrid Flex
- Helioscope vs PowerFactory DIgSILENT
- Helioscope vs GE Digital GridOS
- Helioscope vs SMA Energy
- Helioscope vs Influx Energy Management
- Helioscope vs Johnson Controls Metasys
- Helioscope vs OpenLink Endur
- Helioscope vs Siemens EnergyIP

