Energy · head to head
Helioscope vs OATI webOASIS

OATI webOASIS
Energy
Energy trading and transmission management platform
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Helioscope licences are single user, so each designer needs their own; OATI webOASIS no public pricing published; custom enterprise sales model requires direct contact
- They diverge on capability: Helioscope covers PV system design, OATI webOASIS covers Energy scheduling.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 30 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Helioscope and OATI webOASIS actually diverge.
| Attribute | Helioscope | OATI webOASIS |
|---|---|---|
| Starting price | $159/month | On request |
| Pricing model | subscription | quote |
| Founded | 2012 | 1998 |
Identical on both: free tier (No), platforms (Web, Api), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Energy).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Helioscope
- PV system design
- 3D shade modeling
- Performance simulation
- Single-line diagrams
- BOM generation
- Proposal templates
- Component database
- Financial modeling
Only in OATI webOASIS
- Energy scheduling
- Transmission reservations
- E-tagging
- Market operations
- Balancing authority management
- Congestion management
- Settlement processing
- Real-time dispatch
Both cover
- SSL encryption
- Cloud deployment
- Web support
- Api support
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Helioscope
- Solar project design and modelingnot OATI webOASIS
- Rooftop, carport, and ground-mount solar system planningnot OATI webOASIS
- Financial analysis and sales proposal generation for solar installationsnot OATI webOASIS
OATI webOASIS
- Energy tradingnot Helioscope
- Transmission schedulingnot Helioscope
- Market settlementsnot Helioscope
- Grid balancingnot Helioscope
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Helioscope
- Licences are single user, so each designer needs their own
- Projects are capped at 10 a month on both Basic and Pro
- System size is capped by plan, at 1.25 MW DC on Basic and 5 MW on Pro, so a larger array forces an upgrade regardless of project count
- Trackers, LIDAR modelling and API access sit on the higher tiers
- Enterprise is priced per project with no published figure
OATI webOASIS
- No public pricing published; custom enterprise sales model requires direct contact
Pricing, plan by plan
Helioscope
$159/month- Basic$159/month
- 1 user per license
- 10 projects per month (120 per year)
- 15% discount for annual billing ($1,620/year)
- Pro$259/month
- 1 user per license
- 10 projects per month (120 per year)
- 15% discount for annual billing ($2,640/year)
- Enterprise$null/month
- Unlimited users
- Unlimited projects
- Custom pricing
OATI webOASIS
On requestNo published plan breakdown. See the OATI webOASIS review.
Which should you pick?
Choose Helioscope if
- You need pv system design.
- You work on Web, Api.
- You also want 3d shade modeling.
Choose OATI webOASIS if
- You need energy scheduling.
- You work on Web, Api.
- You also want transmission reservations.
Questions people ask
- Is Helioscope or OATI webOASIS better?
- Neither clearly leads. Helioscope starts at $159/month and OATI webOASIS at On request, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Helioscope or OATI webOASIS?
- Helioscope starts at $159/month and OATI webOASIS at On request.
- Does Helioscope or OATI webOASIS run on more platforms?
- Both run on Web, Api, so platform support will not decide this one for you.
- What is Helioscope best used for?
- Helioscope is most often used for solar project design and modeling, rooftop, carport, and ground-mount solar system planning, financial analysis and sales proposal generation for solar installations. Of those, solar project design and modeling and rooftop, carport, and ground-mount solar system planning are not what OATI webOASIS is typically brought in for.
- What can Helioscope do that OATI webOASIS cannot?
- Helioscope covers PV system design, 3D shade modeling, Performance simulation, Single-line diagrams. OATI webOASIS covers Energy scheduling, Transmission reservations, E-tagging, Market operations. Both handle SSL encryption, Cloud deployment, Web support, Api support.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Helioscope: What is the starting price for HelioScope?
HelioScope Basic plan costs $159 per month per license with annual billing at $1,620/year (15% discount). The Pro plan is $259/month or $2,640/year. Each license covers 1 user. Source: https://helioscope.aurorasolar.com/pricing
SourceOATI webOASIS: How much does OATI WebOasis cost?
OATI does not publish pricing on its website; pricing is customized based on customer needs. Contact sales at 763-201-2000 or [email protected] for pricing information.
SourceHelioscope: How many projects can I design monthly with HelioScope Basic and Pro?
Both Basic and Pro plans include 10 projects per month, equaling 120 projects per year. The project allocation is the same across both tiers; the difference is in design capability (1.25 MW for Basic vs. 5 MW for Pro). Source: https://helioscope.aurorasolar.com/pricing
SourceOATI webOASIS: What is OATI's pricing model?
OATI uses a custom enterprise software sales model where pricing is tailored to individual customer requirements rather than using standard published tiers.
SourceHelioscope: What is the maximum solar design capacity by HelioScope tier?
HelioScope Basic supports designs up to 1.25 MW DC, Pro supports up to 5 MW DC, and Enterprise supports unlimited designs up to 30 MW DC. Accuracy within 1% of PVsyst modeling is maintained across tiers. Source: https://helioscope.aurorasolar.com/pricing
SourceRelated pages
More on OATI webOASIS
Other head to heads
- Helioscope vs Aurora Solar
- Helioscope vs Enphase Enlighten
- Helioscope vs Fronius SOLARWEB
- Helioscope vs ABB Ability
- Helioscope vs SolarWinds
- Helioscope vs Clean Power Research PowerClerk
- Helioscope vs Enerex
- Helioscope vs Stem Athena
- Helioscope vs AutoGrid Flex
- Helioscope vs PowerFactory DIgSILENT
- Helioscope vs GE Digital GridOS
- Helioscope vs SMA Energy
- Helioscope vs Influx Energy Management
- Helioscope vs Johnson Controls Metasys
- Helioscope vs OpenLink Endur
- Helioscope vs Oracle Utilities
- Helioscope vs Petrel E&P Software
- Helioscope vs Siemens EnergyIP
- Helioscope vs Proxibel Grid Suite
- Helioscope vs Quorum CTRM
- Helioscope vs GE Digital Grid Software
- Helioscope vs AVEVA PI System
- Helioscope vs Schneider Electric EcoStruxure
- Helioscope vs Landis+Gyr Gridstream
- Helioscope vs Novity
- Helioscope vs OSIsoft PI System
- Helioscope vs P2 Energy Solutions
- Helioscope vs Pulse Energy Software
- OATI webOASIS vs Aurora Solar
- OATI webOASIS vs Enphase Enlighten
- OATI webOASIS vs Fronius SOLARWEB
- OATI webOASIS vs ABB Ability
- OATI webOASIS vs SolarWinds
- OATI webOASIS vs Clean Power Research PowerClerk
- OATI webOASIS vs Enerex
- OATI webOASIS vs Stem Athena
- OATI webOASIS vs AutoGrid Flex
- OATI webOASIS vs PowerFactory DIgSILENT
- OATI webOASIS vs GE Digital GridOS
- OATI webOASIS vs SMA Energy
- OATI webOASIS vs Influx Energy Management
- OATI webOASIS vs Johnson Controls Metasys
- OATI webOASIS vs OpenLink Endur
- OATI webOASIS vs Oracle Utilities
- OATI webOASIS vs Petrel E&P Software
- OATI webOASIS vs Siemens EnergyIP
- OATI webOASIS vs Proxibel Grid Suite
- OATI webOASIS vs Quorum CTRM
- OATI webOASIS vs GE Digital Grid Software
- OATI webOASIS vs AVEVA PI System
- OATI webOASIS vs Schneider Electric EcoStruxure
- OATI webOASIS vs Landis+Gyr Gridstream
- OATI webOASIS vs Novity
- OATI webOASIS vs OSIsoft PI System
- OATI webOASIS vs P2 Energy Solutions
- OATI webOASIS vs Pulse Energy Software

