Manufacturing · head to head
Guidewheel vs Samotics

Guidewheel
Manufacturing
Machine monitoring from a clamp on the power cord, so equipment age and protocol stop mattering
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -

Samotics
Manufacturing
Condition monitoring of motor-driven assets using electrical signature analysis from the motor control cabinet
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Guidewheel current draw shows that a machine is consuming power, not that it is producing good parts, so scrap, rework and quality still require operator entry or additional sensors and the OEE quality factor is not measured automatically.; Samotics sAM4 only sees what reaches the motor electrically, so it covers the driven train and misses un-driven equipment, structures, process conditions and anything downstream of a mechanical decoupling.
- They diverge on capability: Guidewheel covers Clamp on current sensing, Samotics covers Electrical signature analysis.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 1 September 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Guidewheel and Samotics actually diverge.
| Attribute | Guidewheel | Samotics |
|---|---|---|
| Platforms | Web, iOS, Android | Web, Cloud |
Identical on both: starting price (On request), pricing model (quote), free tier (No), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Manufacturing).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Guidewheel
- Clamp on current sensing
- Automatic uptime and downtime
- Downtime categorisation
- Real time alerting
- Shift and OEE reporting
- Energy visibility
Only in Samotics
- Electrical signature analysis
- Switchroom installation
- Energy and efficiency measurement
- Submersible and hazardous area coverage
- Fault classification
- Fleet view
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Guidewheel
- A plant running equipment built in the 1980s and 1990s that no controller based monitoring product can readnot Samotics
- A mixed floor of presses, ovens, compressors and fabrication equipment from many manufacturers with no common protocolnot Samotics
- A manufacturer that needs evidence of real capacity before agreeing to buy another machinenot Samotics
- A plant wanting immediate notification when an unattended overnight process stopsnot Samotics
Samotics
- A water utility monitoring submersible and borehole pumps that no vibration sensor can be fitted to without lifting the pumpnot Guidewheel
- A chemical plant with assets in ATEX zones where certifying and maintaining in-field sensors is more expensive than the monitoring itselfnot Guidewheel
- A food plant that wants pump and mixer condition data without opening guarding or taking a hygiene-critical line down to fit sensorsnot Guidewheel
- A site building an energy reduction case, where measured motor efficiency and waste give the business case a payback that reliability alone would notnot Guidewheel
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Guidewheel
- Current draw shows that a machine is consuming power, not that it is producing good parts, so scrap, rework and quality still require operator entry or additional sensors and the OEE quality factor is not measured automatically.
- Cycle counting depends on a distinct load signature for each cycle, so machines with flat continuous draw such as ovens, some extruders and continuous mixers give poor or unusable part counts.
- Installation involves fitting a clamp around a live power conductor inside or near an electrical panel, which in many plants requires a qualified electrician and a scheduled shutdown rather than a plug in setup.
- It is monitoring, not execution, so there is no routing, scheduling, work order or traceability capability and it must sit alongside an ERP or MES rather than replacing either.
- Pricing is per monitored machine, so a plant with two hundred small machines faces a bill proportional to machine count rather than to plant size, and the economics work better on fewer larger assets.
Samotics
- SAM4 only sees what reaches the motor electrically, so it covers the driven train and misses un-driven equipment, structures, process conditions and anything downstream of a mechanical decoupling.
- Each monitored motor needs hardware installed in the motor control centre by a qualified electrician, and in older switchrooms that installation, including any required outage, can cost more than a year of the subscription.
- Per-asset subscription pricing means the cost scales linearly with the number of motors, so a plant with a thousand small motors faces a bill that a fixed-price plant-wide vibration system would not impose.
- Electrical signature analysis on variable-speed drives is harder than on direct-on-line motors, and results vary with drive type, so a heavily VSD estate should insist on a pilot on its own drives before committing.
- Nothing is published on price, contract length or minimum deployment size, and the vendor sells multi-year subscriptions, so early exit terms are a negotiation you have to raise yourself.
Pricing, plan by plan
Guidewheel
On request- Guidewheel$undefined/year
- Per machine monitoring hardware and platform access
- Downtime and OEE reporting
- Alerting and energy visibility
Samotics
On request- SAM4$undefined/year
- Subscription priced per monitored asset
- SAM4 sensor hardware required in each motor control centre
- Electrical installation by a qualified electrician, quoted separately
Which should you pick?
Choose Guidewheel if
- You need clamp on current sensing.
- You work on Web, iOS, Android.
- You also want automatic uptime and downtime.
Choose Samotics if
- You need electrical signature analysis.
- You work on Web, Cloud.
- You also want switchroom installation.
Questions people ask
- Is Guidewheel or Samotics better?
- Neither clearly leads. Guidewheel starts at On request and Samotics at On request, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Guidewheel or Samotics?
- Guidewheel starts at On request and Samotics at On request.
- Does Guidewheel or Samotics run on more platforms?
- Guidewheel runs on Web, iOS, Android. Samotics runs on Web, Cloud.
- What is Guidewheel best used for?
- Guidewheel is most often used for a plant running equipment built in the 1980s and 1990s that no controller based monitoring product can read, a mixed floor of presses, ovens, compressors and fabrication equipment from many manufacturers with no common protocol, a manufacturer that needs evidence of real capacity before agreeing to buy another machine, a plant wanting immediate notification when an unattended overnight process stops. Of those, a plant running equipment built in the 1980s and 1990s that no controller based monitoring product can read and a mixed floor of presses, ovens, compressors and fabrication equipment from many manufacturers with no common protocol are not what Samotics is typically brought in for.
- What can Guidewheel do that Samotics cannot?
- Guidewheel covers Clamp on current sensing, Automatic uptime and downtime, Downtime categorisation, Real time alerting. Samotics covers Electrical signature analysis, Switchroom installation, Energy and efficiency measurement, Submersible and hazardous area coverage.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Guidewheel: Does it work on machines with no controller or network port?
Yes. That is the reason it exists. It measures the power cable, so machine age and protocol are irrelevant.
Samotics: Does Samotics replace vibration monitoring?
For motor-driven assets it often does, and it reaches assets vibration cannot. For un-driven equipment and structures it does not apply at all.
Guidewheel: Will it count parts?
Sometimes. It works where each cycle produces a distinct electrical signature and does not work on continuous draw equipment.
Samotics: Do I have to buy Samotics hardware?
Yes. SAM4 requires the vendor's sensors fitted in the motor control centre; there is no software-only option.
Guidewheel: Do I need IT involvement?
Less than with controller based monitoring, but you do need electrical work to fit the sensors and a path for the gateway to reach the internet.
Samotics: Does it work on variable-speed drives?
It can, but performance depends on the drive and the operating profile. Pilot it on your own VSD assets rather than accepting a reference from a direct-on-line site.
Guidewheel: Is it an MES?
No. It monitors equipment. Work orders, routings and traceability need a separate system.
Samotics: How is it priced?
Subscription per monitored asset, quoted, typically on a multi-year term, with hardware and electrical installation on top.
Related pages
Other head to heads
- Guidewheel vs TrakSYS
- Guidewheel vs Tulip
- Guidewheel vs MachineMetrics
- Guidewheel vs Flow Software
- Guidewheel vs Sight Machine
- Guidewheel vs QAD Redzone
- Guidewheel vs Kepware Server
- Guidewheel vs Prodsmart
- Guidewheel vs Waites Sensor Technologies
- Guidewheel vs Augury
- Guidewheel vs KCF Technologies
- Guidewheel vs Oden Technologies
- Guidewheel vs Hippo CMMS
- Guidewheel vs Rockwell FactoryTalk
- Guidewheel vs 3YOURMIND
- Guidewheel vs AMFG
- Guidewheel vs Aras Innovator
- Guidewheel vs Arena PLM
- Guidewheel vs MOVUS
- Guidewheel vs Poseidon Systems
- Guidewheel vs Nanoprecise Sci Corp
- Guidewheel vs Petasense
- Guidewheel vs SKF Enlight Centre
- Guidewheel vs Sensemore
- Guidewheel vs Erbessd Instruments
- Guidewheel vs eMaint
- Guidewheel vs PROGNOST Systems
- Guidewheel vs Seeq
- Guidewheel vs Siemens WinCC Unified
- Guidewheel vs Simplify3D
- Guidewheel vs TrendMiner
- Samotics vs TrakSYS
- Samotics vs Tulip
- Samotics vs MachineMetrics
- Samotics vs Flow Software
- Samotics vs Sight Machine
- Samotics vs QAD Redzone
- Samotics vs Kepware Server
- Samotics vs Prodsmart
- Samotics vs Waites Sensor Technologies
- Samotics vs Augury
- Samotics vs KCF Technologies
- Samotics vs Oden Technologies
- Samotics vs Hippo CMMS
- Samotics vs Rockwell FactoryTalk
- Samotics vs 3YOURMIND
- Samotics vs AMFG
- Samotics vs Aras Innovator
- Samotics vs Arena PLM
- Samotics vs MOVUS
- Samotics vs Poseidon Systems
- Samotics vs Nanoprecise Sci Corp
- Samotics vs Petasense
- Samotics vs SKF Enlight Centre
- Samotics vs Sensemore
- Samotics vs Erbessd Instruments
- Samotics vs eMaint
- Samotics vs PROGNOST Systems
- Samotics vs Seeq
- Samotics vs Siemens WinCC Unified
- Samotics vs Simplify3D
- Samotics vs TrendMiner
