Softwr

Machine Learning · head to head

Groq vs Rev

Groq logo

Groq

Machine Learning

Fast inference provider using proprietary LPU hardware for low-latency serving

From
On request
Free plan
No
Rev logo

Rev

AI

Human and AI transcription, captions and subtitles priced per minute

From
Free
Free plan
Yes

The short version

  • Only Rev has a free tier, so it costs nothing to try first.
  • Each has a real cost: Groq pricing is not published and is sold entirely by quote, making cost comparison difficult; Rev human transcription at 1.99 US dollars a minute means roughly 120 dollars an hour of audio, so a long-form interview series costs more in transcription than most teams assume before they run the arithmetic.
  • Prices and features above were last checked on 31 August 2026.

Where they differ

Only the attributes on which Groq and Rev actually diverge.

Attributes where Groq and Rev differ
AttributeGroqRev
Starting priceOn requestFree
Pricing modelquotePer minute for human work, per seat per month for AI
Free tierNoYes
PlatformsAPI, CloudWeb, iOS, Android, API
CategoryMachine LearningAI

Identical on both: user rating (Not yet rated).

What each one covers

Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.

Only in Groq

Nothing recorded that Rev does not also cover.

Only in Rev

  • Human transcription
  • AI transcription
  • Captions and subtitles
  • Legal transcripts
  • File analysis
  • Clio integration
  • Rev API
  • Speaker identification

What people use each for

The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.

Groq

  • Latency-sensitive applications requiring sub-second inference response timesnot Rev
  • High-volume inference workloads where cost per inference matters at scalenot Rev
  • Custom model deployment with performance guaranteesnot Rev
  • Enterprise applications seeking inference-specific infrastructurenot Rev

Rev

  • A law firm that needs a deposition transcript in a court-acceptable page format with a fixed turnaround and a published per-page price it can bill to a matter.not Groq
  • A documentary or podcast producer costing a project in advance, because human transcription at a published per-minute rate makes the transcription line item a known number.not Groq
  • A broadcaster needing compliant human captions rather than machine captions, where accuracy is a regulatory requirement and not a convenience.not Groq
  • A team with high AI volume and occasional high-stakes files, using the subscription for the bulk and paying the discounted human rate only where accuracy matters.not Groq

Where each one falls short

Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.

Groq

  • Pricing is not published and is sold entirely by quote, making cost comparison difficult
  • Limited to open-weight models; no proprietary model access through the platform
  • Not widely integrated into third-party AI platforms compared to OpenAI or Anthropic

Rev

  • Human transcription at 1.99 US dollars a minute means roughly 120 dollars an hour of audio, so a long-form interview series costs more in transcription than most teams assume before they run the arithmetic.
  • AI minutes are allocated per seat per month and do not roll over, so bursty workloads, which is how most media production actually behaves, waste allowance in quiet months and run out in busy ones.
  • The product direction has moved towards legal and investigative use, so a newsroom or media buyer is choosing a tool whose roadmap priority sits elsewhere.
  • Foreign-language subtitles are priced from 6.49 to 15.99 US dollars per minute, an order of magnitude above transcription, which makes multi-language localisation of any volume of video expensive enough to change the plan.
  • Human turnaround is stated in hours rather than guaranteed contractually on the published plans, so a hard broadcast or filing deadline needs an agreement beyond the standard terms.

Pricing, plan by plan

Groq

On request

No published plan breakdown. See the Groq review.

Rev

Free
  • FreeFree
    • 45 AI transcription and caption minutes per month
    • Up to 5 files analysed
    • No human transcription included
  • Essentials$25.49/month
    • 5,000 AI minutes per seat per month
    • Up to 3 seats
    • 10 per cent discount on human transcription, captions and subtitles
  • Pro$47.99/month
    • 10,000 AI minutes per seat per month
    • Up to 5 seats
    • 15 per cent discount on human work
  • Unlimited$undefined/month
    • Unlimited AI minutes
    • Up to 500 files analysed at once
    • Dedicated account specialist

Which should you pick?

Choose Groq if

  • You work on API, Cloud.

Choose Rev if

  • You need human transcription.
  • You want to start without paying.
  • You work on Web, iOS, Android, API.
  • You also want ai transcription.

Questions people ask

Is Groq or Rev better?
Neither clearly leads. Groq starts at On request and Rev at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
Which is cheaper, Groq or Rev?
Rev has a free tier; the other does not. Paid plans start at On request for Groq and Free for Rev.
Does Groq or Rev run on more platforms?
Groq runs on API, Cloud. Rev runs on Web, iOS, Android, API.
Can I use Rev for free?
Yes. Rev has a free tier, so you can try it without paying. Groq starts at On request.
What is Groq best used for?
Groq is most often used for latency-sensitive applications requiring sub-second inference response times, high-volume inference workloads where cost per inference matters at scale, custom model deployment with performance guarantees, enterprise applications seeking inference-specific infrastructure. Of those, latency-sensitive applications requiring sub-second inference response times and high-volume inference workloads where cost per inference matters at scale are not what Rev is typically brought in for.
What can Groq do that Rev cannot?
Rev covers Human transcription, AI transcription, Captions and subtitles, Legal transcripts.

Answered from the vendors’ own pages

Groq: Is Groq free or paid?

Pricing details are not published on the main website. To explore Groq's service and pricing, visit their console at console.groq.com/home.

Source
Rev: How much is human transcription?

1.99 US dollars per minute with a stated accuracy target above 99 per cent, typically returned within 12 hours. Subscribers get 10 to 15 per cent off.

Groq: Does Groq offer a free tier or free credits?

Free tier availability is not documented on the public site. Check the Groq console for current free tier or trial options.

Source
Rev: Is there a free tier?

Yes, 45 AI minutes per month and up to 5 files analysed, with no human transcription included.

Rev: Do unused AI minutes roll over?

No. The allowance is per seat per month and resets, which penalises irregular workloads.

Rev: Can it do subtitles in other languages?

Yes, across seventeen languages, priced from 6.49 to 15.99 US dollars per minute, considerably more than transcription.

Rev: Is Rev still a good choice for newsrooms?

It works, but the subscription tiers are now positioned around legal and investigative workflows, so a newsroom should compare it against a tool built specifically for journalism.

Share

Related pages

Other head to heads