Softwr

Machine Learning · head to head

Minitab vs Rev

Minitab logo

Minitab

Machine Learning

Statistical software for quality engineering, and the tool Six Sigma training is written around

From
$2394/year
Free plan
No
Rev logo

Rev

AI

Human and AI transcription, captions and subtitles priced per minute

From
Free
Free plan
Yes

The short version

  • Only Rev has a free tier, so it costs nothing to try first.
  • Each has a real cost: Minitab licensing is a per named user subscription, so an organisation where fifty engineers each need it twice a quarter pays fifty full seats for people who open it eight times a year.; Rev human transcription at 1.99 US dollars a minute means roughly 120 dollars an hour of audio, so a long-form interview series costs more in transcription than most teams assume before they run the arithmetic.
  • They diverge on capability: Minitab covers Control charts, Rev covers Human transcription.
  • Prices and features above were last checked on 31 August 2026.

Where they differ

Only the attributes on which Minitab and Rev actually diverge.

Attributes where Minitab and Rev differ
AttributeMinitabRev
Starting price$2394/yearFree
Pricing modelsubscriptionPer minute for human work, per seat per month for AI
Free tierNoYes
PlatformsMac, Windows, WebWeb, iOS, Android, API
CategoryMachine LearningAI
Founded1972Unknown

Identical on both: user rating (Not yet rated).

What each one covers

Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.

Only in Minitab

  • Control charts
  • Process capability analysis
  • Measurement systems analysis
  • Design of experiments
  • Classical statistics
  • Assistant
  • Predictive Analytics module
  • Desktop and browser access

Only in Rev

  • Human transcription
  • AI transcription
  • Captions and subtitles
  • Legal transcripts
  • File analysis
  • Clio integration
  • Rev API
  • Speaker identification

What people use each for

The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.

Minitab

  • Six Sigma and process improvement projects where the training materials and internal procedures already assume Minitabnot Rev
  • Producing capability and gage studies as evidence for a customer audit or a regulatory submissionnot Rev
  • Design of experiments on a production process, run by an engineer who will not be writing codenot Rev
  • Quality departments that need credible statistics without hiring a statistician or a data scientistnot Rev

Rev

  • A law firm that needs a deposition transcript in a court-acceptable page format with a fixed turnaround and a published per-page price it can bill to a matter.not Minitab
  • A documentary or podcast producer costing a project in advance, because human transcription at a published per-minute rate makes the transcription line item a known number.not Minitab
  • A broadcaster needing compliant human captions rather than machine captions, where accuracy is a regulatory requirement and not a convenience.not Minitab
  • A team with high AI volume and occasional high-stakes files, using the subscription for the bulk and paying the discounted human rate only where accuracy matters.not Minitab

Where each one falls short

Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.

Minitab

  • Licensing is a per named user subscription, so an organisation where fifty engineers each need it twice a quarter pays fifty full seats for people who open it eight times a year.
  • Analyses are recorded as a project file and a session log rather than as code, so reviewing what somebody did means reading output instead of reading a script, and reproducing it a year later depends on the same version still being installed.
  • The machine learning capability is a separately licensed module with a fixed set of tree-based methods, so it is neither included in the base price nor competitive with what a Python user has for nothing.
  • There is no deployment path in the statistical product, so putting a model into a running process means buying Minitab Model Ops as another product or reimplementing the model somewhere else entirely.
  • Data handling is worksheet-shaped and held in memory, so anything past a few million rows means preparing the extract in another tool first, and joins and reshaping are clumsy compared with SQL or pandas.

Rev

  • Human transcription at 1.99 US dollars a minute means roughly 120 dollars an hour of audio, so a long-form interview series costs more in transcription than most teams assume before they run the arithmetic.
  • AI minutes are allocated per seat per month and do not roll over, so bursty workloads, which is how most media production actually behaves, waste allowance in quiet months and run out in busy ones.
  • The product direction has moved towards legal and investigative use, so a newsroom or media buyer is choosing a tool whose roadmap priority sits elsewhere.
  • Foreign-language subtitles are priced from 6.49 to 15.99 US dollars per minute, an order of magnitude above transcription, which makes multi-language localisation of any volume of video expensive enough to change the plan.
  • Human turnaround is stated in hours rather than guaranteed contractually on the published plans, so a hard broadcast or filing deadline needs an agreement beyond the standard terms.

Pricing, plan by plan

Minitab

$2394/year
  • Solution Center Core$2394/year
    • Marked as Most Popular
    • Best for quality professionals
    • Minitab Dashboards
  • Solution Center Analytics$2593.5/year
    • Best for analytics professionals
    • Includes predictive analytics capabilities
    • Minitab Dashboards
  • Solution Center Copilot$2793/year
    • All-in-one platform for operational excellence
    • Includes AI-powered insights
    • Minitab Dashboards

Rev

Free
  • FreeFree
    • 45 AI transcription and caption minutes per month
    • Up to 5 files analysed
    • No human transcription included
  • Essentials$25.49/month
    • 5,000 AI minutes per seat per month
    • Up to 3 seats
    • 10 per cent discount on human transcription, captions and subtitles
  • Pro$47.99/month
    • 10,000 AI minutes per seat per month
    • Up to 5 seats
    • 15 per cent discount on human work
  • Unlimited$undefined/month
    • Unlimited AI minutes
    • Up to 500 files analysed at once
    • Dedicated account specialist

Which should you pick?

Choose Minitab if

  • You need control charts.
  • You work on Mac, Windows, Web.
  • You also want process capability analysis.

Choose Rev if

  • You need human transcription.
  • You want to start without paying.
  • You work on Web, iOS, Android, API.
  • You also want ai transcription.

Questions people ask

Is Minitab or Rev better?
Neither clearly leads. Minitab starts at $2394/year and Rev at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
Which is cheaper, Minitab or Rev?
Rev has a free tier; the other does not. Paid plans start at $2394/year for Minitab and Free for Rev.
Does Minitab or Rev run on more platforms?
Minitab runs on Mac, Windows, Web. Rev runs on Web, iOS, Android, API.
Can I use Rev for free?
Yes. Rev has a free tier, so you can try it without paying. Minitab starts at $2394/year.
What is Minitab best used for?
Minitab is most often used for six sigma and process improvement projects where the training materials and internal procedures already assume minitab, producing capability and gage studies as evidence for a customer audit or a regulatory submission, design of experiments on a production process, run by an engineer who will not be writing code, quality departments that need credible statistics without hiring a statistician or a data scientist. Of those, six sigma and process improvement projects where the training materials and internal procedures already assume minitab and producing capability and gage studies as evidence for a customer audit or a regulatory submission are not what Rev is typically brought in for.
What can Minitab do that Rev cannot?
Minitab covers Control charts, Process capability analysis, Measurement systems analysis, Design of experiments. Rev covers Human transcription, AI transcription, Captions and subtitles, Legal transcripts.

Answered from the vendors’ own pages

Minitab: Does Minitab run on macOS?

The installed desktop application is Windows. Mac users work through the browser version, which is included with the subscription but is not identical in every feature.

Rev: How much is human transcription?

1.99 US dollars per minute with a stated accuracy target above 99 per cent, typically returned within 12 hours. Subscribers get 10 to 15 per cent off.

Minitab: Is it machine learning software?

Not primarily. It is a statistics package for quality and process work. Predictive modelling exists in a separate Predictive Analytics module and is limited to tree-based methods.

Rev: Is there a free tier?

Yes, 45 AI minutes per month and up to 5 files analysed, with no human transcription included.

Minitab: Can I buy a perpetual licence?

The current offer is subscription based. Older perpetual licences exist in the field but are not the way the product is sold now.

Rev: Do unused AI minutes roll over?

No. The allowance is per seat per month and resets, which penalises irregular workloads.

Minitab: What is the difference between Minitab and Minitab Workspace or Engage?

Minitab Statistical Software does the analysis. Workspace and Engage are separate products for process mapping, project management and improvement programme governance, and are licensed separately.

Rev: Can it do subtitles in other languages?

Yes, across seventeen languages, priced from 6.49 to 15.99 US dollars per minute, considerably more than transcription.

Minitab: Can I automate it?

Only to a limited degree. There is a command language and integration options, but it is designed to be driven by a person through menus, not scheduled in a pipeline.

Rev: Is Rev still a good choice for newsrooms?

It works, but the subscription tiers are now positioned around legal and investigative workflows, so a newsroom should compare it against a tool built specifically for journalism.

Share

Related pages

Other head to heads